:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:住宅區公共空間配置型態與住宅侵入竊盜犯罪機率分析--英國及臺灣之案例研究
書刊名:建築學報
作者:蘇智鋒黃乃弘王子熙
作者(外文):Shu, Simon Chih-fengHuang, Jason N. H.Wang, Tzu-hsi
出版日期:2008
卷期:66
頁次:頁35-60
主題關鍵詞:住宅竊盜空間型構數位分析切入點互視程度道路便捷度Residential burglarySpace syntaxPoint of accessInter-visibilityRoad accessibility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:82
摘 要 有關環境設計與住宅侵入竊盜防範之議題,西方各國近年已有諸多研究討論。本文擬以空間型 構數位分析檢視住宅區公共空間配置型態與被侵入竊盜機率之關連,並就英國三案例與台灣二案例 作比較。主要空間因子包括道路類型、道路便捷度、住宅互視程度等。雖然不同地域環境之空間組 構型態不一;然而,研究成果一致顯示,以呈前門對前門充分互視,且位於較便捷之連通道路上之 住宅,因受來往人車與鄰居之自然守望保護,成為較安全之空間型態。相反地,位於人車稀少偏僻 區位,當又缺乏前門對前門互視關係時,因缺乏前述之自然防禦機制,常成為竊盜高危險之區域。
ABSTRACT In the western context, “crime prevention through environmental design” is one major issue in urban development and much research has offered useful strategies for crime prevention. This paper employs Space Syntax to study correlations between spatial configuration and burglary distribution patterns and compares research findings from three towns in Britain with two successive case studies in Taiwan. Three major spatial elements are considered: road types, road accessibility, and inter-visibility between dwellings. Though there are differences in street layout configuration between UK and Taiwan’s cities, our consistent findings show that segregated streets become extremely vulnerable when combined with low inter-visibility in areas whereas integrated streets with higher accessibility can be very safe when associated with good inter-visibility due to informal surveillance generated in these areas.
期刊論文
1.蘇智鋒(1999)。空間型態之內在組構邏輯SPACE SYNTAX之介紹。建築向度:設計與理論,創刊號,43-53。  延伸查詢new window
2.Shu, Simon C. F.(2000)。Housing Layout and Crime Vulnerability。Urban Design International,5(3/4),177-188。  new window
3.Hillier, B.(1983)。Space Syntax: A Different Urban Perspective。The Architects' Journal,178(48),47-63。  new window
4.Hillier, B.、Shu, Simon(1999)。Designing for Secure Spaces。Planning in London,29,36-38。  new window
會議論文
1.Shu, Simon C. F.(2003)。From Garden City Utopia to Genuine Intelligible New Town - A Proposal for the Future Development of the Chung-Hsing New Village。Tainan。  new window
學位論文
1.王子熙(2005)。都市住宅區空間組構型態與竊盜犯罪傾向之研究--以臺灣某城市為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.唐國淵(1997)。臺中市北東南三區住宅「侵入竊盜」之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃乃弘(2002)。空間型構與住宅竊盜之關聯性研究--以臺灣某都市為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.龍宗彥(2004)。以型構與行為分析觀點探討都市公共開放空間系統之設計議題—以台北市信義計畫區為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Brantingham, Paul J.、Brantingham, Patricia L.(1981)。Environmental Criminology。Sage。  new window
2.Jacobs, J.(1962)。The Death and Life of Great American Cities。London:Jonathan Cape。  new window
3.楊士隆、何明洲(2004)。竊盜犯罪防治:理論與實務。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Newman, O.(1972)。Defensible Space : Crime Prevention Through Urban Design。New York:Collier Books。  new window
5.楊士隆(1996)。犯罪心理學。臺北:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hillier, Bill、Hanson, Julienne(1984)。The Social Logic of Space。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Hillier, B.(1996)。Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.黃富源、范國勇、張平吾(2002)。犯罪學概論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄧煌發(1995)。犯罪預防。桃園:中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.Clarke, Ronald V.(1997)。Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies。Harrow and Heston。  new window
11.Poyner, Barry、Webb, Barry(1991)。Crime Free Housing。Oxford:Butterworth Architecture。  new window
12.蘇智鋒(2005)。跨地域性文化居住空間組構型態與社會認知議題比較研究-以型構數位分析為工具。多元文化與後殖民空間:空間再詮釋。臺南。  延伸查詢new window
13.Hillier, B.(1988)。Against Enclosure。Rehumanizing Housing。London, UK。  new window
14.Newman, O.(1980)。Community of Interest。Garden City, NY:Doubleday。  new window
15.Budd, T.(1999)。Burglary of Domestic Dwellings. Findings from the British Crime Survey, Home Office Research。Burglary of Domestic Dwellings. Findings from the British Crime Survey, Home Office Research。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.Pascoe, T.(1993)。Domestic Burglaries: The Burglar's View, BRE Information Paper,London, UK。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE