:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:類型基因譜:關於民居類型演化的方法性試探
書刊名:建築學報
作者:王韡儒 引用關係王明蘅 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Wei-juWang, Ming-hung
出版日期:2008
卷期:66
頁次:頁79-96
主題關鍵詞:類型演化因譜鍵類型民居Typological evolutionGenetic codeKey typeHan house type
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:50
摘 要 本研究旨在發展一個可以辨識屬類關係並能顯示類型間演化軌跡的類型方法論。有別於第一代 屬類分析方法論的生產規則,第二代方法論運用了一組類比於基因的抽象圖式進行類型的基因編 碼。在類型基因的五項層級中,最上層的「基礎圖式」以及「操作圖式」構成基型的結構,其餘層 級則為顯型的呈現。研究中發現6 項「基礎圖式」以及10 項「操作圖式」,足以解釋研究中普遍存 在於臺灣及中國東南漢民居的關鍵類型與變異類型,這顯示此方法論傳遞類型演化中動態訊息的能 力。本研究的價值在於透過建立基因譜,揭示類型學中複雜的屬類關係而非單純的分類,因而能更 接近對類型演化知識真實的理解。
ABSTRACT The research is aimed to launch a new methodology for typological study with the capacity of not only discerning taxonomical traits of house types, which can also reveal traces of evolutions among types. As opposed to the rule-based method, also known as the first generation methodology, the new approach employs a set of abstract schemas fashioned in the way not unlike the performance of genetic codes in life science. The analytical technique developed as such is therefore called Genetic Coding, which constitutes the hard core of the second-generation methodology. Among the five layers of coding system, “Basic Schema” and “Operative Schema”, the top two layers, are responsible for the formation of genotype structure and the rest layers are for phenotype presentation. 6 Basic schema and 10 Operative Schema are found valid so far that can sufficiently account for all examined cases of Han house type particularly in Taiwan and the southeast China region. Various forms of key type share quite similar if not the same genetic codes, which manifests capability of delivering dynamic evolution traces. It is remarkable as result that through the establishment of genetic pedigree, typology is shown to be complicated taxonomical relations instead of absolute classification, which is much closer to the true understanding of epistemic phenomena known as typological evolution.
期刊論文
1.Vidler, Anthony(1977)。The Idea of Type: The Transformation of the Academic Ideal: 1750-1830。Oppositions,8,93-115。  new window
2.王韡儒(2006)。民居類型之屬類分析-以臺閩三合院為例。建築學報,55,51-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Harbraken, N. J.(1988)。Type as a Social Agreement。Biennial Asian Congress of Architecture。Cambridge:MIT。  new window
研究報告
1.王明蘅、王韡儒(2005)。漢民居屬類分析方法論。0。  延伸查詢new window
2.王明蘅、王韡儒(2001)。閩臺民居類型形式演化理論試探。0。  延伸查詢new window
3.王明蘅、黃衍明、王韡儒(2002)。類型之演化方法論與關連假說。0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉致平、王其明、李乾朗(2001)。中國居住建築簡史:城市、住宅、園林。臺北:藝術家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Rapoport, Amos(1969)。House, Form and Culture。Prentice-Hall。  new window
3.Hillier, Bill、Hanson, Julienne(1984)。The Social Logic of Space。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.龍炳頤(1991)。中國傳統民居建築。中國傳統民居建築。香港。  延伸查詢new window
5.李乾朗(2004)。臺灣十大民居。臺灣十大民居。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃崇岳、楊耀林(2006)。客家围屋。客家围屋。廣州。  延伸查詢new window
7.戴志堅(2003)。闽台民居建筑的渊源与形态。闽台民居建筑的渊源与形态。福州。  延伸查詢new window
8.Quatremère de Quincy, Antoine Chrysostome(1825)。Type。Encyclopédie Méthodique Architecture, Vol. 3, Pt. II。Paris, France。  new window
其他
1.Wang, W. J.,Wang, M. H.(2008)。Embedded Schema: Towards a New Research Program of Traditional Chinese House Types,0。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE