:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:五口通商時期廈門英籍華民管轄權交涉(1843-1860)
書刊名:政大史粹
作者:彭思齊
作者(外文):Peng, Sih-chi
出版日期:2009
卷期:16
頁次:頁31-71
主題關鍵詞:外交史英籍華民管轄權條約口岸廈門Diplomatic historyAnglo-ChineseJurisdictionTreaty portAmoy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:41
1842年〈南京條約〉簽訂前,昔日清廷視為「天朝棄民」的海外華人,因英國建立海峽殖民地(Straits Settlements),而成為英國直接統治下的「英國臣民」(British Subjects)。1843年,當廈門開放為條約口岸,大部分原鄉為閩南的英籍華民(Anglo-Chinese),遂選擇以新身分脫離清廷管轄,合法返回廈門。然而由於這些華民語言、服飾和生活習慣與內地民人無異,便造成中英地方官管理上的問題,衍生一連串之外交交涉。當中國尚未能理解近代國籍法之屬民觀,英國也未理解清廷傳統海禁政策之意義,交涉過程充分凸顯相異法律秩序之衝突與矛盾。1851年廈門小刀會陳慶真事件將問題癥結推向高峰,但最後爭議仍無法徹底解決,埋下日後衝突之根源。
As soon as China was forced to open the trading ports after the Opium War, lots of overseas Chinese who had been migrated to abroad for a long time, took the opportunity to go back to their native lands under the protection from western countries, especially the Great Britain. Most of these Anglo-Chinese were from the Strait Settlements, and they registered at the consulate to enter the opening ports. In the early returning period, the Chinese and the British government insisted on their jurisdiction over these people respectively. In the case of China, the confirmed thought of banning on maritime trade affected the administrator to deem those people as their subject. On the contrary, British consul thought that the jurisdiction over the returning Anglo-Chinese should belong to them. Thus the contradictory between two counties caused a lot of diplomatic negotiations in coastal province of China. Yet the negotiations could not solve these disputes thoroughly at this period, it lays down the origins which will cause conflict in the future.
期刊論文
1.黃嘉謨(19780600)。英人廈門小刀會事件。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,7,309-354。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.藍瀛芳(1979)。國籍立法與國籍的法律關係。法學叢刊,24(3),39。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林德榮(2006)。西洋航路移民:明清閩粵移民荷屬東印度與海峽殖民地的研究。江西。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.蔣廷黻(1977)。近代中國外交史資料輯要。臺北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.顏清湟(1990)。出國華工與清朝官員。北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.李長傳(1990)。中國殖民史。上海。  延伸查詢new window
4.Purcell, Victor、郭湘章(1974)。東南亞之華僑。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
5.Song, Ong-Siang(1984)。One Hundred Years' History of the Chinese in Singapore。Singapore。  new window
6.莊國土(2001)。華僑華人與中國的關係。廣州:廣東高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王宏斌(2002)。清代前期海防:思想與制度。社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.費成康(1991)。中國租界史。上海:上海社會科學院出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.茅海建(2005)。天朝的崩潰:鴉片戰爭再研究。北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
10.中央研究院近代史研究所、郭廷以(1966)。道光咸豐兩朝籌辦夷務始末補遺 (1842-1861)。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。  延伸查詢new window
11.馬士、楊志信、馬伯皇、伍丹戈、張匯文(2000)。中華帝國對外關係史。上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
12.MacNair, Harley Farnsworth(1971)。The Chinese Abroad, Their Position and Protection。The Chinese Abroad, Their Position and Protection。Taipei。  new window
13.村上衛(2007)。十九世紀廈門的歸國華僑。日本東方學(1)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳鴻瑜(2005)。關於華僑史的幾個問題。中華民國海外華人研究學會演講系列(2)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.Purcell, Victor(1975)。The Chinese in Malaya。The Chinese in Malaya。Kuala Lumpur。  new window
16.許同莘、汪毅、張承棨(1974)。康熙、雍正、乾隆道光條約。康熙、雍正、乾隆道光條約。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.顏清湟(1995)。Ch'ing Changing Images of the Overseas Chinese (1644-1911)。Studies in Modern Overseas Chinese History。Singapore。  new window
18.洪卜仁(1992)。廈門租界概述。列強在中國的租界。北京。  延伸查詢new window
19.(1964)。條約草案。鴉片戰爭之研究(資料篇)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
20.陳再成(1986)。漳州簡史(初稿)。漳州簡史(初稿)。漳州。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)鄂爾泰(1964)。大清世宗憲皇帝實錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)文慶(1963)。籌辦夷務始末,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1845)。Chinese letters, Inward and Outward。  new window
4.Chinese Records for 1848。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE