對於在亞洲所發生的二次大戰的人權與人道問題，個人能否以個人名義訴諸於國際機構，並依國際法向違法國家請求對外國人的損害賠償？此問題關係著被害者個人，在國際法上的實體請求權地位，以及被害個人的外國人在國際法上的訴訟主體地位。本文將以對日本展開的一系列戰後補償訴訟，以及國際社會的實例為基礎，探討此一問題，並兼論二二八事件的琉球人受害者的賠償問題。

Under classical international law regime, individual is not a legitimate subject to bring actions based upon causes provided international law. But since the twentieth century the absolute theory was the subject of the regime is constantly challenged. The subject of international law shall not only be the state but also other partial and in complete ones such as non-state actors like individuals. Personal compensation claims against nations which infringed human right during World War II in Asia is also under intensive discussion. This issue is inherently related with individuals as a legitimate claimer under international law regime. This article will discuss the related concerns based upon the practice mainly against post-war Japan. The compensation issues of peoples in Ryukyu during the 228 incident will also be concerned.