Sport and exercise science programs should be promoted both in quality and quantity through the influence of knowledge integration and professional elaboration. This study was purposed to compare the differences between Taiwan and other advanced countries in terms of the structure and principles of the undergraduate curriculum in sport and exercise sciences, and to suggest possible perspectives. Related curriculum data were collected from the authorized university websites. Six universities with department/school, which aims to develop sport/exercise programs, were selected from Unites States of America, United Kingdom, Australia and Taiwan. The collected data were designated to sub-disciplines such as, physiology, biomechanics, psychology, research and general. Weighted scores were adopted to run statistical analysis. We found the results as follows: 1. Every country specified its preferred courses in each division, 2. The investigated weighted scores of physiology sub-discipline were significantly higher than other sub-disciplines in all countries. However, the weighted scores of research sub-discipline were significantly lower than other sub-disciplines in Taiwan, and 3. The total average weighted scores were not significantly different among countries. This study concludes that the departments of physical education, sport/exercise, leisure and health in Taiwan should consider the following, 1. increase sport/exercise science curriculum, 2. revise the structure of sport/exercise science curriculum in accordance with the suggestions of American professional associations, 3. recruit more faculty members specialized in sport/exercise science, 4. emphasize both theoretical and practical teaching materials to correspond with the requirements of the professional certificate examination and market demand, and 5. encourage diversified and integrated development of sport/exercise science.