:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:提升基隆港競爭力之策略
書刊名:國立臺灣海洋大學海運學報
作者:張國中張志清 引用關係林財生
出版日期:2010
卷期:19:1
頁次:頁91-123
主題關鍵詞:基隆港港埠經營港埠競爭策略定期航運Keelung PortPort operationPort competition strategyLiner shipping
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:62
摘要 基隆港為過去臺灣經濟成長扮演重要的角色,然而,近年來也面對鄰近港口的強 烈競爭與中國大陸經濟成長的快速崛起所帶來的挑戰,包括臺北港、高雄港以及 中國大陸的港口,例如:廈門、福州。尤其是臺北港貨櫃中心已從2009 年3 月 開始正式營運,將逐漸影響基隆港的貨櫃吞吐量和收益。基隆港必須思考各項挑 戰與及可以克服困難的發展策略。又因兩岸間海運直航禁令解除,亦有必要探討 能為基隆港能否因此而有新發展、新契機,以及基隆港未來的經營策略。本研究 以港埠經營者的立場,透過專家訪談、尋找發展港埠的重要依據,研擬符合客製 化需求之港埠競爭策略,再審視航線組合,以近洋航線為主搭配少數之洲際航 線,強化硬體設施,增加遠洋航線之彎靠機會。提高碼頭裝卸效率,並配合近洋 航線滯港時間較短之特性,降低航商成本,減少北櫃南運之內陸拖運成本,機動 調整轉口櫃費率等,以增加基隆港的競爭力。
ABSTRACT Keelung Port has been acted as an important role in Taiwan’s economic development in past decades. However, Keelung Port faces keen competition among neighboring ports and challenges arising from rapid economic growth of mainland China, including Taipei and Kaohsiung port, as well as mainland China’s port, such as Xiamen and Fuchow Ports. Especially, Taipei port’s container terminals start operation since March of 2009. It might cause decrease of container throughput and revenues of Keelung Port. Keelung Port needs to consider its challenges and the future strategies which can be adopted for overcome the above difficulties. In consideration that the ban of direct shipping links across Taiwan Strait has eventually lifted, it is necessary, for Keelung Port, to take this chance for future development. Keelung Port needs to figure out some strategies in coping with the challenges in the future. Based on the viewpoints of terminal operators, this study explores important issues relating to how to adopt port competition strategies in order to meet customerized demand in shipping markets. It also examines the formation of shipping lines connected with Keelung Port, and provides suggestions as to how to adopt marketing measures, including how to focus on short-sea shipping lines, and to be supported by some intercontinental shipping lines. This study suggests to enhance infrastructure of Keelng Port for inducing more intercontinental shipping lines calling at Keelung Port. It also also suggests certain measures to upgrade operational efficency in container whaves in order to meet the requirements of short-sea shipping lines, of which the vessels is required to stay in port shorter than other vessels, and reduce their operational costs, and save the costs in inland haulage. Keelung Port is also suggested to adopt flexible tariff rates in order to improve its competitiveness.
期刊論文
1.連淑君、曾世隆、桑國忠(20081200)。臺灣地區貨櫃集散站利益區隔之研究。航運季刊,17(4),55-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.魯炳炎(20070900)。政策倡導聯盟架構之研究:以我國自由貿易港區政策為例。航運季刊,16(3),75-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳基國、謝明輝(20051200)。基隆港裝卸作業民營化對裝卸效率影響之實證研究。運輸學刊,17(4),359-391。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.葉俊榮(20020900)。行政院組織改造的目標、原則及推動機制。國家政策季刊,1,1-22。  延伸查詢new window
5.Slack, B.(1985)。Containerization, Inter-port Competition and Port Selection。Maritime Policy and Management,12(4),293-303。  new window
6.Murphy, P. R.、Daley, J. M.(1994)。A Comparative Analysis of Port Selection Factors。Transportation Journal,34(1),15-21。  new window
7.蕭丁訓、張志清、林光、陳基國(20071200)。臺灣港埠發展加值型服務港埠之啟思。航運季刊,16(4),61-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Murpby, Paul R.、Daley, James M.、Dalenberg, Douglas R.(1992)。Port Selection Criteria: An Application of a Transportation Research Framework。The Logistics and Transportation Review,28(3),237-255。  new window
9.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development(1999)。Technical Note: Fourth-generation Port。UNCTAD Ports Newsletter,19,9-12。  new window
10.Song, D. W.(2001)。Port Co-opetition As a New Strategic Option。Seaview,56,2-8。  new window
會議論文
1.行政院大陸委員會(2008)。「海峽兩岸海運協議」相關說明。「海峽兩岸海運協議」相關說明。  延伸查詢new window
2.倪安順、孫允儀(2007)。亞太地區港埠競争力與臺灣地區港埠經營策略之研究。2007年兩岸三地航運與物流研討會。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳春益、張雅富(2007)。臺海兩岸航運方式之演變。兩岸三地航運與物流研討會。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭丁訓、盧展猷、曹至宏(2006)。從港埠客戶結構論碼頭經營者的競爭策略--以基隆港貨櫃儲運場為例。航港政策高階論壇。  延伸查詢new window
5.UNCTAD(1992)。Port Marketing and The Challenge of the Third Generation Ports。United Nations Conference on Trade and Development。New York:Trade and Development Board。  new window
研究報告
1.余坤東、梁金樹、張志清(2001)。基隆港務局轉投資與多角化經營。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊素勤(2004)。基隆港自由貿易港區現況及未來發展。  延伸查詢new window
3.基隆港務局(2007)。從兩岸港口發展探討基隆港競爭策略。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳建豪(2008)。促進台灣四大國際商港郵輪觀光之策略研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李宗勳(2009)。現階段基隆港的營運策略(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.李嘉華(2005)。港埠建設BOT專案計畫合理風險承擔機制之研究(碩士論文)。長榮大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林美利(2008)。港區貨櫃場儲區作業模式評選之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學,基隆市。  延伸查詢new window
5.張貞德(2009)。應用資料包絡分析法評估兩岸三地國際貨櫃港經營績效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.張琮恩(2008)。國際港埠物流中心關鍵能力評估之研究─以A港為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.郭維達(2009)。基隆港貨櫃碼頭經營策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃獻治(2009)。港埠貨櫃裝卸作業效率分析與探討--以西岸貨櫃場為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.葉家宏(2009)。基隆港組織變革與未來發展之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.蕭丁訓(2007)。創新管理下基隆港之核心競爭策略(博士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.蘇育玲(2004)。從策略與制度面探討基隆港提升競争力之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.翁博志(2009)。我國自由貿易港區之發展問題分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學,基隆市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.交通部運輸研究所(2006)。臺灣地區商港整體發展規劃(96-100年)。臺北:交通部運輸研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.林光、張志清(2007)。兩岸三地航運與物流的新發展與研究。中華航運學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.長榮大學國際運輸研究中心(2008)。臺中港貨櫃營運競争力與未來經營策略之研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.Glueck, W. F.(1984)。Business Policy and Strategy Management。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
5.Jose L. T.(2006)。Privatization: The Port of Singapore Experience。  new window
6.The Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries(MOMAF)(2003)。Trend and analysis of large container vessels。KOREA。  new window
7.United Nations(2009)。United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Review of Maritime Transport 2009。  new window
8.Thomas(1997)。Structural Changes in Maritime Transport。Port Policy Seminar。  new window
圖書論文
1.包嘉源、張志清、林光(2007)。影響兩岸海運通航之關鍵因素。兩岸三地航運與物流的新發展與研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾志煌、王慶福、林美霞(2006)。貨櫃裝卸量減少原因探討與未來港埠發展對策建議。基隆港建港120週年論文。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊文賢(2007)。國際港埠物流中心創新管理的競爭優勢--以臺灣港埠為例。兩岸三地航運與物流的新發展與研究。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top