臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：析論我國情報通訊監察法制--以美國法制為比較
書刊名：軍法專刊
作者：李榮耕 引用關係
出版日期：2010
卷期：56:5
頁次：頁105-134
主題關鍵詞：通訊監察；情報通訊監察；情報監察；國家安全；通訊穩私；Communication surveillance；Intelligence communication surveillance；National security communication privacy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:65
為維護國家安全，情報機關常以通訊監察之方式來蒐集資訊，但是，通訊監察 的執行，對於監察對象及無辜第三人之通訊隱私常常造成相當大之影響。是故，在 執行情報通訊監察時，於程序上應如何衡平國家安全及人民基本權利兩方面之需 要，應值深入研究。在此一議題上，美國實務發展已久，也已有極為完整之規定， 本文介紹了其中之重要法制，併在討論後指出我國國家情報工作法及通訊保障及監 察法中應該修正之處，冀希其得為將來立（修）法及學說研究之參考材料。
For the purpose of national security, intelligence agency usually conducts communication surveillance to gather necessary information. However, from time to time, communication surveillance invades the privacy rights of targets and innocent third parties. Thus, it becomes critical to balance national security and the protected fundamental rights while conducting intelligence communication surveillance. This article introduces and analyzes the legal framework of foreign intelligence surveillance of the United States. In addition, we point out the defects of the National Intelligence Services Law and Communication Surveillance and Protection Law.
期刊論文
1.李榮耕(20080300)。I am Listening to You--釋字第六三一號解釋、令狀原則及修正後通訊保障及監察法。臺灣本土法學雜誌，104，47-60。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖元豪(20060400)。多少罪惡假「國家安全」之名而行？--簡介美國反恐措施對人權之侵蝕。月旦法學，131，37-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡榮耕(20080400)。I am Listening to You--釋字第六三一號解釋、令狀原則及修正後通訊保障及監察法。臺灣本土法學雜誌，105，43-56。  延伸查詢new window
4.王兆鵬(20010900)。路檢及國界檢查。臺灣本土法學雜誌，26，15-30。  延伸查詢new window
5.Burton, Adam(2006)。Fixing FISA for Long War: Regulating Warrantless Surveillance in the Age of Terrorism。PIERCE L. REV.，4，381。  new window
6.Howell, Beryl A.、Lesemann, Dana J.(2007)。FISA's Fruit in Criminal Cases: An Opportunity for Improved Accountability。UCLA J. INT'L L. & FOREIGN AFF.，12，145。  new window
7.Fishman, Clifford S.(1987)。Interception of Communication in Exigent Circumstances: The Fourth Amendment, Feberal Legislation, and the United States Department of Justice。GA. L. REV.，22，1。  new window
8.Bradley, Curtis A.(2006)。Feburary 2, 2006 Letter from Scholars and Former Government Officials to Congressional Leadership in Response to Justice Department Whitepaper of January 19, 2006。IND. L.J.，81，1415。  new window
9.Schwartz, Helene E.(1981)。Oversight of Minimizat ion Compliance under the foreign Intelligence Surveilance Act: How the Watchdogs are Doing Their Jobs。RUTGERS L. J.，12，405。  new window
10.Brownell, Herbert(1954)。The Public Security and Wire Tapping。CORNELL L.Q.，39，195。  new window
11.Valdivieso, Juan P.(2008)。Recent Developments: Protect America Act of 2007。HARV. J. ON LEGIS.，45，581。  new window
12.Bloom, Robert、William J. Dunn(2006)。The Constitutional Infirmity of Warrantless NSA Surveillance: The Abuse of Presidential Power and the Injury of the Fourth Amendment。WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J.，15，147。  new window
13.Blum, Sephanie Cooper(2009)。What Really is at Stake with the FISA Amendment Act of 2008 and Ideas for Future Surveillance Reform。B.U. PUB. INT. L. J.，18，269。  new window
14.Banks, William C.(2007)。The Death of FISA。M INN. L. REV.，91，1209。  new window
圖書
1.COLE, DAVID(2008)。JUSTICE AT WAR。  new window
其他
1.ACLU v. NSA, 438 F. Supp. 2d 754 (E.D. Mich. 2006)。  new window
2.ACLU v. NSA, 493 F.3d 644 (6th Cir. 2007)。  new window
3.Brown v. United States, 484 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1973)。  new window
4.In re Sealed Case, 310 F.3d 717 (For. Intel. Surv. Rev. 2002)。  new window
5.Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 358 n.23 (1967)。  new window
6.United States v. Brown, 908 F.2d 968 (4th Cir. 1990)。  new window
7.United States v. Buck, 548 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1977)。  new window
8.United States v. Hammoud, 381 F.3d 316, 322 (4th Cir. 2004)。  new window
9.United States v. Isa, 923 F.2d 1300 (8th Cir. 1991)。  new window
10.United States v. Ning Wen, 477 F.3d 896 (7th Cir. 2007)。  new window
11.United States v. Ott, 827 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1987)。  new window
12.United States v. Pelton, 835 F.2d 1067 (4th Cir. 1987)。  new window
13.United States v. Sarkissian, 841 F.2d 959 (9th Cir. 1988)。  new window
14.United States v. Squillancote, 221 F.3d 542 (4th Cir. 2000)。  new window
15.United States v. United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972)。  new window
16.United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990)。  new window
17.Eggen, Dan(2005)。Bush Authorized Domestic Spying。  new window
18.Risen, James，Lichtblau, Eric(2005)。Bush Lets U.S. Spy on Callers Without Courts。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：897（臺灣：887，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67674336
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上