:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:治安策略暨民間化治安體系之發展趨勢:以新竹市警察局之「三區共構」為例
書刊名:文官制度
作者:陳明傳李金田
作者(外文):Chen, Mark Ming-chwangLee, Jin-tian
出版日期:2010
卷期:2:3
頁次:頁73-106
主題關鍵詞:警政民間化民間化治安體系警政策略Privatization of policingPrivatization of social protectionStrategy of policing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:54
全球甚多民主國家,例如英、美、日、加拿大等刑事司法體系
中已存在著很多的民間化機構。其中英、美、加、愛爾蘭、盧森
堡、波蘭等國之私人警衛甚至超出警察的總人數。除此之外,一些
非營利性之民間組織、志願團體、義工等亦如私人警衛一般大量的
存在於民主社會,來協助警察或刑事司法機關,共同維護社會安
寧。
作者引述警政策略發展之各類新趨勢,以及民間化治安策略各
國實例,暨保全業與私人警衛之發展現狀,論述民間化治安體系之
發展確實在治安維護效率與效果方面,有其一定之時代需求與優
勢。最後,以新竹市警察局在此方面之革新實驗為例,說明我國警
政在此方面發展進程以及未來賡續研發之方向。
Privatization is a global trend in the criminal justice institution and its
managerial practices. Nowadays, the number of people working in the private
security has exceeded that in the public security, i.e. the police force, as
can be seen in U.K., Canada, Ireland, Luxemburg and Poland. In addition,
the Non-Governmental Organization (NGO), volunteer and neighborhood
watch of various private sectors are booming with the rapid development of
the private security. And these new social protection institutions have greatly
boosted the police and Criminal Justice agencies in their efforts to safeguard
society.
The authors describe the new development of this trend and cite various
nations’ privatization practices to explain this trend, showing that privatization
of social protection really works in terms of maintaining community
safety and stability. Further, this paper uses Hsinchu City Police Bureau as
an example of successful experimentation of this new strategy.
期刊論文
1.Galloway, Robert、Fitzgerald, Laurie A.(1992)。Service Quality in policing。FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin,61(11),1-7。  new window
2.李宗勳(2010)。跨部門協力如何落實在「公共治理」--以「第三造警力」(Third Party Policing)為例。國際非政府組織學刊,創刊號,49-74。  延伸查詢new window
3.Reno, J.(1993)。Americorps-A Call to Service。National Institute of Justice Journal,227,2-3。  new window
會議論文
1.Sarre, R.、van Steden , R.(2005)。Challenges for Policing in the 21st Century: The Growth of Private Security。Prague, the Czech Republic。  new window
2.Manning, P. K.(1991)。Toward a Theory of Police Organization: Polarities and Change。Taipei。  new window
研究報告
1.Worcester Regional Research Bureau(2003)。Compstat and Citistat: Should Worcester Adopt These Management Techniques?。  new window
學位論文
1.謝文忠(2001)。社區巡守隊犯罪預防成效之研究(碩士論文)。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李宗勳(1992)。市場機能與政府管制--我國警政工作民營化之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝玫妃(2004)。組織信任與社區安全之探討--以台北市信義區雙和社區為例。中央警察大學,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mayhew, P.、Elliot, D.、Dowds, L.(1989)。The 1988 British Crime Survey。London:HMSO。  new window
2.Thibault, E. A.、Lynch, L. M.、McBridge, R. B.(1985)。Proactive Police Management。Englewood Cliffe, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
3.新竹市警察局(2010)。行政院第二屆「政府服務品質獎」參獎申請書。新竹市:新竹市警察局。  延伸查詢new window
4.新竹市警察局(2010)。推動「三區共構警政策略」精進會議紀錄。新竹市:新竹市警察局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Goldstein, H.(1990)。Problem oriented Policing。New York:McGraw Hill。  new window
6.陳明傳(1992)。論社區警察之發展。中央警察大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Oliver, Willard M.(2007)。Homeland Security for Policing。Pearson Education, Inc.。  new window
8.Trojanowicz, R.、Bucqueroux, B.、Kappelwr, V. E.、Gaines, L. K.(1990)。Community Policing--A Contemporary Perspective。Ohio:Anderson Publishing Co.。  new window
9.Skolnick, Jerome H.、Bayley, David H.(1986)。The New Blue Line: Police Innovation in Six American Cities。New York, NY:Free Press。  new window
10.李誠、高希均、劉克智、董安琪、曾志朗、許士軍(2001)。知識經濟的迷思與省思。天下遠見。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳明傳、Munro, Jim L.、廖福村(2001)。警政基礎理念--警政哲學與倫理的幾個議題。中央警察大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Williams, Alan(1979)。The Police of Paris: 1718-1789。Baton Rouge:London:Louisiana State University Press。  new window
13.中華民國社區營造學會(2005)。行政院六星計劃會議--社區治安策略工作坊之策略會議資料。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.內政部警政署刑事警察局(2007)。保全業統計。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
15.新竹市警察局婦幼隊(2010)。99年重點工作推動與展望簡報。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
16.新竹市警察局第一分局(2010)。湳雅派出所落成啟用紀念手札。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
17.內政部警政署(2007)。內政部警政署人事室警察人力統計。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
18.Cunningham, W. C.、Stratton, J. R.、Van Mefer , C.(1991)。Private Security: Patterns and Trends。Washington, DC。  new window
19.Home Office(1989)。Tackling Crime。London。  new window
20.National Police Agency(1989)。The Police of Japan 1989。Tokyo:National Police Agency。  new window
21.National Police Agency of Japan(1992)。The Koban--Police Box and Residential Police Box。Tokyo:National Police Agency of Japan。  new window
22.The Republic of Singapore Police(1990)。Police Life Annual Report 1990。Singapore。  new window
23.Trojanowicz, R. C.、Harden, H. A.(1985)。The Status of Contemporary Community Policing Program。East Lansing, MI。  new window
24.Matthews, R.(1989)。Privatization in Perspective。Privatizing Criminal Justice。London。  new window
其他
1.內政部警政署(2007)。警政白皮書,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.李宗勳(2010)。社區營造與安全治理--從單一管理到共同經營,http://www.cspa.org.tw/%AA%C0%B0%CF%C0%E7%B3y%BBP%A6w%A5%FE%AAv%B2z(%A7%F5%A9v%BE%B1).doc, 20100701。  new window
3.National Police Agency(2006)。Japanese Community Police and Police Box System,www.npa.go.jp/english/seisaku1/JapaneseCommunityPolice.pdf/2006, 20080915。  new window
4.National Police Agency(2006)。Guidelines on Relief Measures for Crime Victims,www.npa.go.jp/english/kokusai/pdf/19.pdf/2006, 20080915。  new window
5.The Metropolitan Police Service(2006)。Neighbourhood Watch Information,www.officer.com/UK, 20060810。  new window
圖書論文
1.South, Nigel(1989)。Reconstructing Policing: Differentiation and Contradiction in Post-War Private and Public Policing。Privatizing Criminal Justice。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE