政府社會給付之標定績效：以經濟弱勢者為例__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	政府社會給付之標定績效：以經濟弱勢者為例
書刊名：	社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者：	呂朝賢
作者(外文)：	Leu, Chao-hsien
出版日期：	2010
卷期：	14:2
頁次：	頁49-90
主題關鍵詞：	標定績效；標定效應；標定效率；標定效能；廣泛標定；Targeting performance；Targeting impact；Targeting efficiency；Targeting effectiveness；Broad targeting
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:0 點閱:93

本文以2008年行政院主計處家庭收支調查爲資料，運用IRIS、Beckerman與Shorrocks等給付績效指數，剖析當前政府社會給付對經濟弱勢者的標定績效。分析結果顯示：標定機制愈多元的給付，標定效率與標定效應愈佳；其中又以資產調查式給付之績效最佳。就標定效能來說，社會保險給付大於其餘社會給付項目，且呈現預算規模愈大者，效能愈高的情況。另外，我們亦發現：標定效能、標定效率與標定效應三者間，存在取捨關係，愈偏廣泛標定的給付雖標定效能較高，但在標定效率及標定效應上則較差。

以文找文

Based on the 2008 Survey of Family Income and Expenditure, conducted by Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, my research applies the indicators that IRTS, Beckerman and Shorrocks et al has developed and constructed to analyze the targeting performance of current governmental social benefits for the economically disadvantaged. The data analysis concludes that the more plural the targeting mechanism, the better the targeting efficiency and targeting impact both perform, and that among all benefits, the means-tested benefits are the best performer. As to the targeting effectiveness, it is suggested that the social insurance benefits perform greater than others, and that the bigger the budget size, the greater the target effectiveness becomes. Finally, my research also find a trade-off relationship among the targeting performance, the targeting efficiency and the targeting impact: though it has better targeting performance, the broad targeting benefits also imply the worse targeting efficiency and targeting impact.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Buhmann, Brigitte、Rainwater, Lee、Schmaus, Guenther、Smeeding, Timothy M.(1988)。Equivalence Scales, Well-Being, Inequality, and Poverty: Sensitivity Es-timates Across Ten Countries Using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Data-base。Review of Income & Wealth，34(2)，115-142。
2.	Korpi, W.、Palme, J.(1998)。The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries。American Sociological Review，63(5)，661-687。
3.	Keen, M.(1992)。Needs and targeting。The Economic Journal，102(410)，67-79。
4.	傅立葉(2002)。〈積極性社會福利政策的內涵─思索臺灣福利政策下階段的發展方向〉。《臺灣智庫通訊》，第4 期，5-7。延伸查詢
5.	監察院(2009)。〈糾正「工作所得補助方案」〉。《監察院公報》，2646，12-17。延伸查詢
6.	Beckerman, W.(1979)。‘The Impact of Income Maintenance Payments on Poverty in Britain, 1975’。The Economic Journal，89 (354):，261-279。
7.	Bolderson, H. and D. Mabbett(1996)。Cost Containment in Complex Social Security Systems: The Limitations of Targeting’。International Social Security Review，49 (1):，3-17。
8.	Coady, D. P., M. E. Grosh and J. Hoddinott(2004)。Targeting Outcomes Redux’。World Bank Research Observer，19 (1):，61-85。
9.	Cornia, G. A. and F. Stewart(1993)。‘Two Errors of Targeting’。Journal of International Development，5 (5)，459-496。
10.	Creedy, J.(1996)。Comparing Tax and Transfer Systems: Poverty, Inequality and Target Efficiency’。Economica，63 (250)，S163-S174.。
11.	DeFina, R. H. and K. Thanawala(2004)。‘International Evidence on the Impact of Transfers and Taxes on Alternative Poverty Indexes’。Social Science Research，33(2)，322-338。
12.	Foltin, C.(1999)。‘State and Local Government Performance: It’s Time to Measure Up!。The Government Accountants Journal，48 (1):，40-46。
13.	Förster M. F. and K. Vleminckx(2004)。‘International Comparisons of Income Inequality and Poverty: Findings from the Luxembourg Income Survey’。Socio-Economic Review，2 (2):，191-212。
14.	Foster, J., J. Greer and E. Thorbecke(1984)。‘A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures’。Econometrica，52 (3):，761-766。
15.	Hagenaars, A. J. M.(1987)。‘A Class of Poverty Indices’。International Economic Review，28 (3):，583-607。
16.	Mahler, V. A. and D. K. Jesuit(2006)。Fiscal Redistribution in the Developed Countries: New Insights from the Luxembourg Income Study’。Socio-Economic Review，4 (3):，483-511。
17.	Makdissi, P. and Q. Wodon(2004)。‘Measuring Poverty Reduction and Targeting Performance under Multiple Government Programs’。Review of Development Economics，8 (4)，573-582。
18.	Moullin, M.(2003)。‘Defining Performance Measurement’,。Perspectiveson Performance，2 (2):，3。
19.	Neely, A.(1999)。‘The Performance Measurement Revolution: Why Nowand What Next?。International Journal of Operations & Production Management，19 (2):，205-228。
20.	Notten, G. and F. Gassmann(2008)。Size Matters: Targeting Efficiency and Poverty Reduction Effects of Means-Tested and Universal Child Benefits in Russia’。Journal of European Social Policy，18 (3):，260-274。
21.	Pereirinha, J. A.(1996)。Welfare State and Anti-Poverty Regimes: The Case of Portugal’。South European Society and Politics，1 (3):，198-218。
22.	Sainsbury, D. and A. Morissens。Poverty in Europe in the Mid-1990s: The Effectiveness of Means-Tested Benefits’。Journal of European Social Policy，12 (4):，307-327.。
23.	Sefton, T.(2002)。‘Targeting Fuel Poverty in England: Is the Government Getting Warm?’。Fiscal Studies，23 (3):，369-399。
24.	Spicker, P.(2005)。Targeting, Residual Welfare and Related Concepts: Modes of Operation in Public Policy’。Public Administration,，83 (2)，345-365。
25.	Wodon, Q. T.(1997)。‘Targeting the Poor using ROC Curves’。World Development，25 (12):，2083-2092。
26.	Zheng, B.(1997)。‘Aggregate Poverty Measures’。Journal of Economic Surveys，11(2)，123-162。

研究報告
1.	Bibi, S. and J. Y. Duclos(2009)。A Comparison of the Poverty Impact of Transfers, Taxes and Market Income Across Five OECD Countries.。
2.	Coady, D. P., M. E. Grosh and J. Hoddinott(2004)。Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries: Review of Lessons and Experience。Washington, D.C.:。
3.	Domelen, J. V.(2007)。Reaching the Poor and Vulnerable: Targeting Strategies for Social Funds and other Community- Driven Programs。Washington, D.C.:。
4.	Dutrey, A. P.(2007)。Successful Targeting? Reporting Efficiency and Costs in Targeted Poverty Alleviation Programmes。Geneva:。
5.	FAO.(2001)。Targeting for Nutrition Improvement: Resources for Advancing Nutritional Well-Being.。Rome:。
6.	Grosh, M., C. del Ninno, E. Tesliuc and A. Ouerghi(2008)。For Protection and Promotion: The For Protection and Promotion: The Design and Implementation of Effective Safety Nets.。Washington, D.C.:。
7.	Hagenaars, A. K.、Zaidi, M. A.(1994)。Poverty Statistics in the Late 1980s: Research based on Micro-Data。Luxembourg：Office for Official Publications of the European Communities。
8.	Hoddinott, J.(1999)。Targeting: Principles and Practice。Washington, D.C.:。
9.	IRIS(2005)。Note on Assessment and Improvement of Tool Accuracy。University of Maryland。
10.	Jackson, R. and S. Wickrema(1988)。Targeting to Reach the Food-Insecure。
11.	Mitchell, D.(1990)。Is There a Trade-off Between the Efficiency and Effectiveness Goals of Income Transfer Programs?。Luxembourg。
12.	Mkandawire, T.(2005)。Targeting and Universalism in Poverty Reduction。Geneva:。
13.	Shapley, L. S.(1953)。A Value for N-person Games’。N.J.:。
14.	Sharp, K.(1997)。Targeting Food Aid in Ethiopia。Addis Ababa。
15.	Sharp, K.(1998)。Between Relief and Development: Targeting Food Aid for Disaster Prevention in Ethiopia。London:。
16.	Slater, R. and J. Farrington(2009)。Targeting of Social Transfers: A Review for DFID。London:。
17.	World Food Programme(2006)。Targeting in Emergencies。
18.	World Food Programme(2009)。Comprehensive Food Security & Vulnerability Analysis Guidelines。Rome, Italy:。

圖書
1.	Mitchell, D.(1991)。Income Transfers in Ten Welfare States。Aldershot:：Gower Publishing Company。
2.	Atkinson, Anthony Barnes、Smeeding, Timothy M.、Rainwater, Lee(1995)。Income Distribution in OECD Countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study。Paris：Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Publications。
3.	Citro, Constance F.、Michael, Robert T.(1995)。Measuring Poverty: A New Approach。Washington, D.C.：National Academies Press。
4.	Gilbert, Neil、Terrell, Paul(2002)。Dimensions of Social Welfare Policy。Allyan and Bacon。
5.	內政部(2008)。《工作所得補助方案核定本》。延伸查詢
6.	Gilbert, N.(2001)。‘Renegotiating Social Allocations: Choices and Issues’。Targeting Social Benefits: International Perspectives & Trends。New Brunswick, New Jersey。
7.	Lebas, M. and K. Euske(2007)。‘A Conceptual and Operational Delineation of Performance’。Business Performance Measurement: Unifying Theories and Integrating Practice。Cambridge。
8.	Mackay, R.(2001)。The New Zealand Model: Targeting in an Income-Tested System’。Targeting Social Benefits:International Perspectives & Trends。New Brunswick, New Jersey。
9.	Procurement Executives' Association(1999)。Guide to a Balanced Scorecard Performance Management Methodology: Moving from Performance Measurement to Performance Management。Washington, D.C：Procurement Executives' Association。
10.	Smeeding, T. M., L. Rainwater and G. Burtless(2001)。U.S. Poverty in a Cross-National Context’。Understanding Poverty。New York。
11.	Weisbrod, B. A.(2001)。Collective Action and the Distribution of Income: A Conceptual Approach’。Economic Theory and the Welfare State。Northampton, MA。

單篇論文
1.	Shorrocks, A. F.(1999)。Decomposition Procedures for Distributional Analysis: A Unified Framework Based on Shapley Value，University of Essex, Department of Economics。，http://www.komkon.org/~tacik/science/shapley.pdf。

其他
1.	行政院主計處(2009)。《2008 年社會指標統計年報》，台北。延伸查詢

圖書論文
1.	Barrett, C. B.(2002)。Food Security and Food Assistance Programs’。Handbook of Agricultural Economics。Netherlands：Elsevier B. V.。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	臺灣多面向貧窮測量與分析
2.	貧窮門檻的成分及其問題
3.	兒童經濟安全保障政策之探討

1.	臺灣多面向貧窮測量與分析

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	主管工作壓力的族群差異：個人背景、工作與職業因素
2.	民間消費與政府消費--臺灣的實證研究
3.	青少年新電視使用與其家庭人際關係之研究
4.	抽樣調查中樣本代表性的問題
5.	臺灣儲蓄函數的再探討
6.	臺北市家庭消費結構之預測
7.	民國七十二年臺灣省家庭收支調查提要分析
8.	臺灣樣本家庭結構環境及經濟活動現況探討
9.	臺灣地區人口因素對儲蓄之影響
10.	臺灣經濟發展過程中所得分配變動之分析
11.	雙底冊電話抽樣調查之事後校正：聯立方程式法之理論與實務
12.	影響臺灣人減災整備行為因子之探討
13.	急性健身運動與執行功能之前導研究：家庭收入之調節角色
14.	跨界治理策略、機遇與挑戰：粵港澳大灣區發展案例
15.	中低收入老人家庭的決策行為--國民年金與戶內資源分配

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫