:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣成人受刑人入獄前非法藥物使用之盛行率調查
書刊名:犯罪學期刊
作者:楊士隆 引用關係戴伸峰 引用關係曾淑萍 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Shu-lungTai, Shen-fengTzeng, Shuping
出版日期:2011
卷期:14:2
頁次:頁113-156
主題關鍵詞:高危險族群受刑人非法藥物盛行率High risk groupsInmateIllegal drug usePrevalence rate
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:106
非法藥物問題已經成為台灣社會以及治安上一個重要且立即性的威脅,為了戰勝非法藥物的戰爭,首先最重要的便是瞭解非法藥物在台灣地區的盛行率以及流行狀況。但截至目前為止,台灣對於各項非法藥物濫用現況之盛行率調查資料較為零散且無法針對重點群體進行研究,因此造成對於非法藥物政策之指引與成效評估幫助有限。而官方各項調查顯示,台灣地區一般民眾之非法藥物盛行率約在百分之一上下;而在矯正體系中之成年受刑人部分,卻有極高比例是因為使用非法藥物而入監服刑或是接受相關感化教育,惟受刑人非法藥物盛行率的各種數量化以及質化資料在目前的各項調查中卻付之闕如。 因此,為了正確勾勒出台灣地區非法藥物使用高危險族群(成年受刑人)的非法藥物濫用情形,本研究針對矯正機構中之2,249名受刑人為研究對象,在93%回收率下,描繪此群體之非法藥物使用盛行率。本研究主要發現:監 獄受刑人中,有69.2%表示入監前曾嘗試使用非法藥物;年齡分佈集中在21-40歲,具有集中趨勢。此外,本研究發現第一次施用非法藥物的原因比例最高者為「出於好奇心」,佔80.3%,其次則為「朋友引誘,不好意思拒絕」,為26.9%。第一次提供非法藥物者為「朋友、同事」者比例最高,佔83.8%。第一次取得非法藥物的地方最高比例者為「朋友家」,佔59.3%,其次則為「遊樂場所」,佔19.4%。本研究另外發現曾在娛樂場所與朋友共同吸食非法藥物者佔70.2%。曾在施用非法藥物後發生過危險性行為者佔了65.3%。曾經施用過的非法藥物種類中,以「安非他命」為吸食者最多選擇,佔86.4%,其次則為「海洛因」佔70.1%,而「K他命」則為第三順位,佔43.9%,「搖頭丸」亦佔有33.3%,「大麻」佔有41.8%。 本研究建議應持續加強犯罪人之藥物濫用監測與專業介入、強化個別化處遇與社區處遇、重視女性施用非法藥物問題之越趨嚴重、家庭關係的恢復與重建、工作之輔導與轉介,以減少犯罪人之藥物濫用問題。
Illegal drug use has resulted in a surge of diverse crimes and a series of social problems, and it has been a key issue in government policy. The anti-drug war is indeed an immediate task for the government and it needs a continuous and long-term investment. In order to make the anti-drug task more efficient and effective, the first as well as the most important thing is to figure out the prevalence of illegal drug use in Taiwan. So far, the existing prevalence surveys of illegal drug use seem to be fragmented and are unable to have systematic and thorough investigation on the high-risk group of illegal drug use. Therefore, with carrying out an efficient and accurate prevalence survey of illegal drug use among the high-risk groups and derive the picture of their drug use are the urgent matters of the anti-drug policies in Taiwan. As for the results, the adult inmates who had been put into prison for less than one year were interviewed in this research. Basing on the proportion of adult inmates, ten percent (10%) of the new adult inmates were chosen at random for participating the survey of the prevalence of illegal drug abuse. A total of 2,249 questionnaires had been distributed; the response rate is 93%. The main findings are: (1) Basic Characteristics: 69.2% of the interviewees who confessed using drugs experienced before they serve their term of imprisonment; most of the interviewees are aged 21-40. (2) The first experience of using drugs: 80.3% of them used drugs for the first time out of “curiosities”; 83.8% of the first drugs came from “friends and colleagues”; 59.3% of them used drugs for the first time in “friend’s place”. Besides, among the interviewees who experienced drugs, 70.2% of them used drugs with friends in entertainment places. (3) Drug types Used: Amphetamine is used by most of the interviewees (86.4%); the next is Heroin (70.1%); Ketamine assigns for the third place, accounts for 43.9%, Ecstasy holds 33.3%, Cannabis holds 41.8%. (4)65.3% of interviewees had hazardous sex after using drugs. It is, therefore, suggested that continual attention should be paid to the drug problem, improve the traditional confinement measures, provide multiple treatment, take the increasing female drug abusers seriously, and keep tracing the prevalence of drug use among the high-risk groups with longutudinal and intergral methods. The above suggestions shall be submitted to the related governmental agencies for formulating anti-drug policies towards high-risk groups and establishing a monitoring system of illegal drug use.
期刊論文
1.楊士隆(2007)。建立台灣藥物濫用人口之資料交換與共享資料庫平台之看法。研考雙月刊,31(6),72-83。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fazel, S.、Bains, P.、Doll, H.(2006)。Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: a systematic review。Addiction,101(2),181-191。  new window
3.Rush, B.、Urbanoski, K.、Bassani, D.、Castel, S.、Wild, T. C.、Strike, C.、Somers, J.(2008)。Prevalence of co-occurring substance use and other mental disorders in the Canadian population。The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry,53(12),800-809。  new window
4.Sommers, I.、Baskin, D. R.(1997)。Situational or generalized violence in drug dealing networks。Journal of Drug,27(4),833-849。  new window
5.台灣行政院衛生署管制藥品管理局(2007)。2006年度台灣地區高危險群藥物濫用調查報告。管制藥品簡訊,31。  延伸查詢new window
6.余育斌、許華孚(2005)。藥物濫用少年與期社會網絡之互動要素分析:以明陽中學收容少年爲例。犯罪學期刊,8(1),65-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.監察院(2003)。「非法藥物糾正案」。監察院公報,2431。  延伸查詢new window
8.Singletion, N.、Farrel, M.、Meitzer, H.(2003)。Substance misuse among prisoners in England and Wales。International Review of Psychiatry,15(1/2),150-152。  new window
9.Morgenstern, J.、Langenbucher, J.、Labouvie, E.、Miller, k. J.(1997)。The comorbidity of alcoholism and personality disorders in a clinical population: prevalence rates and relation to alcohol typology variaoles。Journal of Abnormal Psychology,106(1),74-84。  new window
10.Disney, E. R.、Elkins, I. J.、McGue, M.、Iacono, W. G.(1999)。Effects of ADHD, conduct disorder, and gender on substance use and abuse in adolescence。American Journal of Psychiatry,156(10),1515-1521。  new window
11.Levin, F. R.、Evans, S. M.、Kleber, H. D.(1998)。Prevaience of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity1 disorder among cocaine abusers seeking treatment。Drug and Alcohol Dependence,52(1),15-25。  new window
12.Lichtenstein, B.(1997)。Women and Crack-Cocaine Use: A Study of Social Networks and HIV Risk in An Alabama Jail Sample。Addiction Research & Theory,5(4),279-296。  new window
13.Pliszka, S. R.、Sherman, J. O.、Barrow, M. V.、Irick, S.(2000)。Affective disorder in juvenile offenders: A preliminary study。American Journal of Psychiatry,157(1),130-132。  new window
14.Marlowe, D. B.、Kirby, K. C.、Festinger, D. S.、Husband, S. D.、Platt, J. J.(1997)。Impact of comorbid personality disorders and personality disorder symptoms on outcomes of behavioral treatment for cocaine dependence。Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease,185(8),483-490。  new window
15.Tomasson, K.、Vaglum, P.(2000)。Antisocial addicts: the importance of additional axis I disorders for he 28-month outcome。European Psychiatry,15(8),443-449。  new window
16.Vieta, E.、Colom, F.、Martinez-Aran, A.、Benabarre, A.、Reinares, M.、Gasto, C.(2000)。Bipolar II disorder and comorbidity。Comprehensive Psychiatry,41(5),339-343。  new window
17.McCann, B. S.、Roy-Byme, P.(2000)。Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities in adults。Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry,5(3),191-197。  new window
18.Widiger, T. A.、Cadoret, R.、Hare, R.、Robins, L.、Rutherford, M.、Zanarini, M.、Alterman, A.、Apple, M.、Corbitt, E.、Forth, A.、Hart, S.、Kultermarm, J.、Woody, G.、Frances, A.(1996)。DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder field trial。Journal of Abnormal Psychology,105(1),3-16。  new window
19.Winstock, A. R.、Lea, T.、Sheridan, J.(2008)。Prevalence of diversion and injection of methadone and buprenorphine among clients receiving opioid treatment at community pharmacies in New South Wales, Australia。International Journal of Drug Policy,19(6),450-458。  new window
會議論文
1.林瑞欽、黃秀瑄(2003)。海洛因吸食者非理性信念探折。桃園。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.許來發(2006)。由法醫病理解剖中毒死亡案件中監測國內濫用藥物之盛行率及近十年來台灣濫用藥物相關致死案件流行趨勢分析 (計畫編號:DOH95-NNB-1014)。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳爲堅(2005)。全國少年非法藥物使用調査(第二年)。  延伸查詢new window
3.周碧瑟(1999)。台灣地區在校青少年藥物使用流行病學調查研究 (計畫編號:DOH88-TD-1064)。  延伸查詢new window
4.李思賢、晏涵文、陳錄弦、趙運植(2003)。女性非法藥物犯預防愛滋感染介入教材之發展。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳爲堅(2002)。街頭青少年的藥物濫用調査。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳爲堅(2003)。台北地區青少年藥物濫用調査:全台灣調查之先導硏究。  延伸查詢new window
7.朱日僑、盧胤雯(2002)。台灣北部地區青少年藥物使用流行病學調査:針對在校學生之調査。  延伸查詢new window
8.李嘉富、張敏、楊聰財(2001)。台灣北部地區役男新兵非法用藥盛行率與危險因子探討。  延伸查詢new window
9.李思賢、林國甯、楊浩然、傅麗安、劉筱雯、李商琪(2007)。青少年非法藥物戒治者之認知、態度、行爲與因應方式之質性硏究。  延伸查詢new window
10.柯慧貞(2006)。全國大專校院學生藥物使用盛行率與其相關心理社會因素之追蹤研究(第三年)。  延伸查詢new window
11.吳齊殷(2001)。看顧台灣的未来:台灣青少年藥物使用相關信念、態度與行爲的相關硏究。  延伸查詢new window
12.柳家瑞(2008)。台灣地區高危險群藥物濫用調査。  延伸查詢new window
13.林瑞欽(2004)。犯罪少年用藥盛行率與社鲁及心理危險因子之探討。  延伸查詢new window
14.林瑞欽、黃秀瑄(2005)。海洛因濫用者用藥渴求復發危機之分析研究。  延伸查詢new window
15.郭憲文(2004)。台灣地區在學國中、高中生藥物濫用之調査。  延伸查詢new window
16.楊士隆、戴伸峰、曾淑萍(2010)。全國高危險族群藥物濫用盛行率調査。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.楊士隆(2006)。犯罪心理學。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.監察院(2009)。針對2005-2008年之行政院、法務部以及國防部之反毒作戰政策糾正文,http://www.cv.gov.tw/AP_Home/Op_Uüload/eDoc/糾正案/98/098000137980812非法藥物糾政案.pdf, 20100930。  延伸查詢new window
2.台灣行政院衛生署國民健康局,管制藥品管理局,台灣衛生研究(2005)。2005年國民健康訪問暨藥物濫用調査NO2藥物濫用。  延伸查詢new window
3.法務部(2011)。矯正統計,http://www.moj.gov.tw/site/noj/public/MMO/moj/stat/new/newtxt2.pdf, 20111113。  new window
4.法務部(2011)。毒品案件統計,http://www.moi.gov.tw/site/moi/public/MMO/moi/stat/new/newtxt5.pdf, 20111113。  new window
5.李思賢(2006)。藥癮再犯罪成因與心理治療介入的可行性:出監毒癮者之回溯性與前瞻性追蹤硏究。  延伸查詢new window
6.柯慧貞(2003)。南區大專校院學生藥物使用之現況與其成因分析,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.林健陽,陳玉書,呂豐足(2010)。新犯非法藥物施用者施用行爲及非法藥物取得管道之研究,台 北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.White, H. R.(1990)。The drug use-delinquency connection in adolescence。Drugs, Crime and the Criminal Justice System。Anderson Publishing Co.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE