:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:東突議題國際化研究
書刊名:東亞研究
作者:康四維
作者(外文):Kang, Seu-wei
出版日期:2012
卷期:43:2
頁次:頁101-143
主題關鍵詞:東突上海合作組織戲劇理論全球治理East TurkistanShanghai Cooperation OrganizationConstructivismDramaturgical approach
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:142
新疆東突問題,原係英國與蘇聯等外國勢力所策動,對中國西北邊疆進行侵略的派生產物。中共建政之後,隨著與中蘇共關係的變化,使得東突議題亦持續若隱若現。蘇聯解體與冷戰結束,地區權力與意識形態的真空,使得新疆地區少數民族問題與國際恐怖主義以及極端宗教思潮逐漸合為「三股勢力」,東突議題乘勢再起,引發中共當局警惕。2001年九一一事件之後,中共趕搭國際反恐列車,爭取將「東突厥斯坦伊斯蘭運動」(ETIM)列為國際恐怖組織名單,除積極參與美國主導之國際反恐活動外,復透過上海合作組織以軍事演習、司法合作等方式打 擊東突勢力。與此同時,東突組織在國際間亦展開整併或轉型,從原本的獨立建國訴求,改以維吾爾人權組織面貌出現,透過人權的普世價值,爭取國際間的發言地位與生存空間。本文嘗試從建構概念對東突國際化議題進行研究,在「言語-行為」的建構概念下,通過社會學「戲劇理論」對東突組織與中共政權之間的論述、批判與控訴進行分析,並以北京奧運與七五事件作為觀察個案,以印證相關理論對本研究課題的適用性。研究認為,由於中共積極將東突納入國際恐怖組織名單,而東突組織又藉由人權辯護轉型,相互激盪的結果,導致東突議題國際化趨勢呈現不可逆轉之發展。
The Xinjiang East Turkistan issues were rooted on the foreign countries’ strategy to invade the northwest territory of China during the 1930s to 1940s. Soviet Union continually used the same issues to disturb China after PRC established. Following the Soviet Union collapse and the independence of Central Asia countries, the Xinjiang minority ethic problems combine with international terrorism and extreme religious theory to make the East Turkistan issues booming again. PRC takes the advantage of September 11th attacks, joining the global anti-terrorism campaign leads by U.S. By the way, PRC persuaded U.S. to admit the East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) is the international terrorism group. On the other hand, PRC takes the joint military exercises and justice cooperation of Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) to eliminate the East Turkistan influence. Meanwhile, the global Turkistan groups transited the original appeals of independence to the human rights in order to get more active spaces in the international society. This paper tries to analyze East Turkistan issues toward internationalization by following approach. Taking the “speech act” of constructivism theory and dramaturgical approach compares the strategies between East Turkistan groups and PRC. By discussing the differences of viewpoints about human rights in global and anti-terrorism in domestic governance, explains why the East Turkistan issue internationalization will lead dilemma to PRC. In the end, using the 2008 “Beijing Olympic” and 2009 “Events of July 5” as the studying cases testify the analytic approaches. For the reasons of PRC vigorous taking the East Turkistan groups on the UN terrorist’s list and those groups debating themselves by the viewpoints of human rights, this paper indicates East Turkistan issues toward internationalization is an irreversible tendency.
期刊論文
1.龐中英(200110)。中國的亞洲戰略:靈活的多邊主義。世界經濟與政治,2001(10),30-35。  延伸查詢new window
2.Huntington, Samuel P.(1993)。The Clash of Civilization?。Foreign Affairs,72(3),22-49。  new window
3.朱寧(2003)。安全化與非安全化--哥本哈根學派安全研究。世界政治與經濟,10,24。  延伸查詢new window
4.余學會(2010)。『東突』上了聯合國『恐』字名單。世界知識,19,22-28。  延伸查詢new window
5.李玉玲(2010)。創制《上海合作組織引渡公約》,懲治跨國三股勢力犯罪。法治與社會,249-250。  延伸查詢new window
6.李春月、郝慶威(2006)。可能危及北京奧運安全的因素及對策研究。瀋陽體育學院學報,25(3),26-28。  延伸查詢new window
7.阿碧(2008)。保障平安奧運的秘密武器。檢察風雲,15,24-26。  延伸查詢new window
8.徐杰舜(2003)。新疆民族分裂主義產生的國際背景考察報告。廣西民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版),25(1),28-29。  延伸查詢new window
9.高永久、劉雅妮(2006)。東突恐怖分裂勢力製造國際影響研究。大連民族學院學報,4=33,65。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.徐飛彪。恐怖主義與北京奧運安保。桃園。4。  延伸查詢new window
2.Announcement: 4th WUC General Assembly and 6th Leadership Training Seminar to be Held in Tokyo, Japan。  new window
3.Introducing the World Uyghur Congress。  new window
圖書
1.Turner, Jonathan H.(1988)。A Theory of Social Interaction。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
2.中國現代國際關係研究所(2001)。國際恐怖主義與反恐怖鬥爭。北京:時事出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.潘志平、王鳴野、石嵐(2008)。「東突」的歷史與現狀。北京:民族出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Aust, Anthony(2010)。Handbook of International law。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Wang, James C. F.(2002)。Contemporary Chinese Politics: An Introduction。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall:Upper Saddle River。  new window
6.Buzan, Barry Gordon、Wæver, Ole、De Wilde, Jaap(1998)。Security: a New Framework for Analysis。Lynne Rienner Publishers。  new window
7.Buzan, Barry、Wæver, Ole(2003)。Regions and Powers: the Structure of International Security。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.王國杰(1997)。東干族形成發展史。西安。  延伸查詢new window
9.苗普生、馬品彥、厲聲(2006)。歷史上的新疆。烏魯木齊。  延伸查詢new window
10.胡聯合(2001)。當代社會恐怖主義與對策。北京。  延伸查詢new window
11.Goffman, Erving(1959)。Presentation of Self in Everyday Life。New York。  new window
12.Lampton, David M.、Ewing, Richard Daniel(2003)。The U.S-China Relations Facing International Security Crises: Three Case Studies in Post-9/11 Bilateral Relations。Washington D.C.。  new window
其他
1.(2002)。中華人民共和國和哈薩克斯坦共和國關於打擊恐怖主義、分裂主義和極端主義的合作協定。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1996)。中華人民共和國與哈薩克斯坦共和國引渡條約。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2006)。打擊恐怖主義、分裂主義和極端主義上海公約全文。  延伸查詢new window
4.(2011)。伊犁將軍金順。  延伸查詢new window
5.(2002)。東突列入聯合國黑名單。  延伸查詢new window
6.潘光(2007)。和平使命--2007。  延伸查詢new window
7.顧爾德(2009)。什麼是台灣的國家利益--從熱比婭事件談起。  延伸查詢new window
8.(2005)。China: Rebiya Kadeer Release Welcome but Tactically Timed。  new window
9.(2004)。Declaration of the Formation of the Government-in-Exile of the Republic of East Turkistan。  new window
10.Chen, Yu-Wen(2011)。A Network Approach to the Study of the World Uyghur Congress' Global Outrerach: A Methodological Note。  new window
11.Reese, Shawn(2007)。National Special Security Events。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top