:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:徐志摩〈再別康橋〉節奏分析
書刊名:臺灣詩學學刊
作者:陳啟佑
作者(外文):Chen, Chi-you
出版日期:2013
卷期:21
頁次:頁107-124
主題關鍵詞:徐志摩再別康橋節奏押韻同音堆集句子長度Chih-Mo HsuSaying Goodbye to CambridgeRhythmHeaped homonymsPauseSentence length
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:41
徐志摩〈再別康橋〉發表以來的數十年間,諸多學者、專家紛紛評騭此詩,其中不乏論此詩之節奏者,或從押韻、行中韻、雙聲、疊韻、頓等角度論述,或從類疊、頂真、錯綜、句子長度等理論分析。見解精闢者有之,觀點啟人疑竇者亦有之,或某些論述有不足之處。本文從押韻、同音堆集、頓、句子長度四個角度切入,冀能收匡謬誤、補不足之功。此外本文尚強調此詩各節之奇數行(第一、三行)亦押韻,且奇數行自成一系統,奇數行相互對應,此為前人所未言者。
For several decades, many scholars and experts have continually criticized ”Saying Goodbye to Cambridge” since Hsu Chih-Mo delivered the poem. Among the criticisms, many of them are about the rhythm of the poem, and others, rhyme, internal rhyme, duel-tone, running rhyme, pause, or, repetition, anadiplosis, complexity, sentence length, and so on. Some of them show us inclusive insights, but some of them are inadequate and doubtful. This paper aims to analyze ”Saying Goodbye to Cambridge” from the following four perspectives: rhyme, homophone stacking, pause and sentence length, with an expectation for correcting the mistakes and making up the deficiencies. Besides, this paper also emphasizes the rhymes of the odd lines in each stanza in the poem and the odd lines form a unique system in the way of corresponding to each others. So far, this viewpoint hasn't been mentioned by any critics yet.
圖書
1.(1980)。辭海。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.丁旭輝(2001)。徐志摩的詩情與詩藝。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳奚真(1996)。牛津高級英英/英漢雙解辭典。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.許霆、魯德俊(1991)。新詩格律的研究。銀川:寧夏人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.(2000)。高中國文教師手冊(一)。臺北:龍騰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉大樾(1998)。論文偶記。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.向宏業、唐仲揚、成偉鈞(1991)。修辭通鑑。中國青年出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳本益(19940800)。漢語詩歌的節奏。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.丁旭輝(2006)。徐志摩「再別康橋」的永恆魅力。淺出深入話新詩。臺北:爾雅出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱光潛(1982)。從研究歌謠後我對於詩的形式問題意見的變遷。詩論新編。臺北:洪範書店。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE