:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:1924~1925年英國政府處理廣東海盜問題的策略運用:粵英軍事合作剿盜行動
書刊名:國史館館刊
作者:應俊豪 引用關係
作者(外文):Ying, Chun-hao
出版日期:2013
卷期:37
頁次:頁1-3+5-48
主題關鍵詞:廣東海盜粵英合作英國海軍香港Kwangtung piratesCanton-Britain cooperationBritish NavyHong Kong
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:49
1920年代廣東海盜問題,已成為英國政府眼中日益棘手的課題。受到民國以來廣東政治局勢動盪不安的影響,廣東南部沿海及珠江流域各村落的海盜活動也隨之活躍。回比鄰廣東的香港,自然首當其衝;加以廣東海盜的劫掠範圍不僅限在廣東沿海與內陸水路,而是廣及整個東亞水域,使得香港往來廣東、北至上海、南至新加坡的輪船航線均淪為廣東海盜可能下手劫掠的目標。職是之故,英國政府無不竭盡心力,試圖謀求廣東海盜問題的有效解決方法。而尋求廣州當局的協助,亦即透過粵、英雙方軍事合作模式,直接進剿海盜巢穴,以謀澈底解決廣東海盜問題,則是英國政府的首要策略運用。1924-1925年間,由於粵、英關係的和緩,英國海軍與粵軍部隊開始一系列的軍事進剿行動,以剷除廣東各地的海盜集團。然而,粵英軍事合作剿盜的成效,卻備受質疑。根據英國海軍事後的檢討報告,粵英合作剿盜雖然有其一定的效果,但是不確定因素仍多,必須隨時面對廣州當局內部質疑聲浪、軍事派系傾軋與包庇,尤其是廣東政局波動及中、英關係演變等負面作用的掣肘與拖累。在英國駐華公使館的評估中,也坦承粵方合作將領明顯對英國懷有戒心,不願讓英國海軍在軍事行動中介入過深,因此「英國軍艦絕大部分的時候只是擔任護航的工作」。 尤有要者,粵英軍事合作還可能帶來英國外交部十分擔心的政治風險,因為英國海軍的諸多行動, 其實已有介入中國內政之嫌,除可能引起中國內部不滿的勢力, 產生反英風潮外,也可能造成其他列強的猜忌。
Kwangtung pirates were a very serious issue for the British government in the 1920s. Due to the impacts of political disturbances and social disorders in the republican China, piratical activities near the southern parts of Kwangtung increased. Hong Kong, Britain's settlement near Kwangtung, suffered greatly from piracy. Besides, Kwangtung pirates' activities were not confined only on the coastal areas of Kwangtung but also extended to areas ranging from Shanghai to Singapore. In others words, almost the entire steamer shipping line in the East China Seas became a prey to Kwangtung pirates. That was exactly the reason why the British government resorted every available means in an attempt to wipe out these pirates. By means of cooperation with the Canton government and forming a Canton-Britain military expedition to destroy pirates' lairs in Kwangtung was the first priority for the British government.As the relationships between Canton and Britain eased, the British Navy and the Cantonese troops launched a series of military expeditions to wipe out notorious gangs of pirates in Kwangtung. However, the validity of the Canton-Britain military cooperation was questionable. According to the Britain Navy's evaluation reports, this cooperation did reduce the piracy problems in Kwangtung, but other uncertainties must be taken into consideration, such as the strong antagonism from the Canton government, clique struggle, political confrontation, etc. The British Legation at Peking also admitted that some Cantonese generals felt vigilant about the cooperation and did not want the British naval force to intervene the expeditions too much. Thus, the British gunboats were often refrained from working actively, except for some escorted missions. Furthermore, this military cooperation might bring the British government a political risk, as the cooperation of the British naval action could be blamed for interfering with the Chinese internal affairs that might trigger the anti-Britain campaign in China but also cause other powers' criticism.
期刊論文
1.張俊義(2000)。英國政府與1924年廣州商團叛亂。廣東社會科學,2000(3),100-108。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.應俊豪(2012)。1920年代英國人眼中的廣東海盜問題。2012海洋文化國際學術研討會,慶門大學中文系、廈門大學國學院、國立臺灣海洋大學海洋文化研究所主辦 (會議日期: 2012年11月20-21日)。慶門。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.龍康琪(2001)。Britain and the Suppression of Piracy on the Coast of China with Special Reference to the Vicinity of Hong Kong 1842-1870(碩士論文)。Hong Kong University。  new window
圖書
1.郭廷以(1986)。近代中國史綱。香港:香港中文大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.石源華(1996)。中華民國外交史辭典。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.賈楨(1979)。籌辦夷務始末(咸豐朝)。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.村上衛(2013)。海の近代中国:福建人の活動とイギリス.清朝。名古屋:名古屋大学出版会。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃月波、于能模、鮑釐人(1935)。中外條約彙編。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.徐友春(1991)。民國人物大辭典。河北人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1929)。南華早報,香港。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2009)。南方都市報,廣州。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1926)。世界日報,香港。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1927)。工商日報,香港。  延伸查詢new window
5.日本外務省記錄,東京。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1927)。香港華字日報,香港。  延伸查詢new window
7.(1925)。香港華字日報,香港。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1924)。香港華字日報,香港。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1926)。The China Mail,香港。  new window
10.Foreign Office (Great Britain)(1905)。Central Correspondence, Political, China, 1905-1940(FO 371)。,London:Public Record Office。  new window
11.(1927)。The China Mail,香港。  new window
12.(1927)。廣州民國日報,廣州。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.莫紀彭、李業宏(1996)。李福林自述。廣州文史。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top