臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：多對一電視政治新聞專訪之對話分析研究
書刊名：新聞學研究
作者：江靜之 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chiang, Chin-chih
出版日期：2013
卷期：117
頁次：頁89-134
主題關鍵詞：中立；問題；電視政治訪談；對立；對話分析；Adversarialism；Conversation analysis；Neutralism；Questions；Television political news interviews
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:41
本研究採對話分析，探究多對一政治訪問者如何協力提問及形塑立場。本研究分析2010年【新聞面對面】五都市長候選人專訪，發現主持人透過維持問答互動來形塑訪問者中立性，並以重述及協力追問而在對立訪問中維持中立，主持人也透過日常對話機制塑造輕鬆氣氛，甚至為受訪者創造友善環境。此外，主持人對立性低於其他訪問者，因前者多藉他人之名提問且使用較多開放式問題，後者則直接表達個人觀點、使用結構複雜的問題，較多追問。
Focusing on many-to-one political news interviews, this study adopted a conversation analysis to explore how interviewers construct questions collaboratively and establish their positions. By conducting a case study on Face News, this study discovered that the host on this program typically remains neutral by returning the discussion to a normal question-and-answer system. In addition, by reformulating other interviewers’ questions and issuing follow-up questions, this host manages to conduct confrontational interviews while still maintaining his/her neutral stance. Furthermore, by mixing casual conversations into the discussion, the host creates a friendly environment for guests and enables a political interview to be casual in nature. Finally, this study demonstrated that the host is less adversarial than other interviewers because the host tends to ask questions attributed to third parties and employ questions that are more open-ended. By contrast, the other interviewers do not hesitate to express opinions directly, ask multiple questions in succession, and ask more follow-up questions than the host does.
期刊論文
1.Atkinson, P.、Silverman, D.(1997)。Kundera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self。Qualitative Inquiry，3(3)，304-325。  new window
2.Ben-Porath, E. N.(2010)。Interview effects: Theory and evidence for the impact of televised political on viewer attitudes。Communication Theory，20，323-347。  new window
3.Clayman, S. E.(1988)。Displaying neutrality in television news interviews。Social Problems，35(4)，474-492。  new window
4.Clayman, S. E.(1989)。The production of punctuality: Social interaction, temporal organization, and social structure。The American Journal of Sociology，95(3)，659-691。  new window
5.Clayman, S. E.(2002)。Disagreements and third parties: Dilemmas of neutralism in panel news interviews。Journal of Pragmatics，34，1385-1401。  new window
6.Emmertsen, S.(2007)。Interviewers’ challenging questions in British debate interviews。Journal of Pragmatics，39，570-591。  new window
7.Heritage, J.、Roth, A.(1995)。Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview。Research on Language and Social Interaction，28(1)，1-60。  new window
8.Huls, E.、Varwijk, J.(2011)。Political bias in TV interviews。Discourse & Society，22(1)，48-65。  new window
9.Hutchby, I.(2011)。Non-neutrality and argument in the hybrid political interview。Discourse Studies，13(3)，349-365。  new window
10.Koshik, Irene(2003)。Wh-questions used as challenges。Discourse Studies，5(1)，51-77。  new window
11.Lauerbach, G.(2010)。Manoeuvring between the political, the personal and the private: Talk, image, and rhythm in TV dialogue。Discourse & Communication，4(2)，125-159。  new window
12.Rendle-Short, J.(2007)。Neutralism and adversarial challenges in the political news interview。Discourse & Communication，1(4)，387-406。  new window
13.Thornborrow, J.、Montgomery, M.(2010)。Special issue on personalization in the broadcast news interview。Discourse & Communication，4(2)，99-104。  new window
14.Wadensjö, C.(2008)。The shaping of Gorbachev: On framing in an interpreter-mediated talk-show interview。Text & Talk，28(1)，119-146。  new window
15.Ekström, M.(2002)。Epistemologies of TV journalism: A theoretical framework。Journalism，3(3)，259-282。  new window
16.Clayman, S. E.、Heritage, J.(2002)。Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S. presidents Eisenhower and Reagan。Journal of Communication，52，749-775。  new window
學位論文
1.李昱慧(2010)。台灣電視節目訪談中漢語是否問句的研究(碩士論文)。清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.江靜之(2005)。尋找理想的廣電新聞訪問者：論述角度之探析(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hutchby, I.、Wooffitt, R.(1999)。Conversation Analysis: Principles, practices, and applications。Malden, MA：Polity Press。  new window
2.江靜之(2007)。新聞訪問個案(四)：廣播新聞訪問之問句句型。新聞訪問：理論與個案。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Clayman, S. E.、Heritage, J.(2002)。The news interviews: Journalists and public figures on the air。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.徐業平、丁小燕(2005)。新聞採訪。北京：新華出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bell, P.、van Leeuwen, T.(1994)。The media interview: Confession, contest, conversation。Kensington, NSW：University of New South Wales Press。  new window
6.Garrison, B.(1992)。Professional news reporting。Hillsdale, New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
7.Hutchby, Ian(1996)。Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
8.Fairclough, N.(1995)。Critical discourse analysis: Papers in the critical study of language。London, England：NY：Longman。  new window
9.Titscher, Stefan、Meyer, Michael、Wodak, Ruth、Vetter, Eva(2000)。Methods of text and discourse analysis。Sage。  new window
10.Fairclough, Norman(1992)。Discourse and Social Change。Polity Press。  new window
11.Heritage, John C.(1984)。Garfinkel and ethnomethodology。Polity Press。  new window
12.Fairclough, Norman(1989)。Language and power。Longman。  new window
13.江靜之(2009)。從論述角度探析廣電新聞訪問者的現實與理想。台北：秀威。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Antaki, C.、Widdicombe, S.(1998)。Identity as an achievement and as a tool。Identities in talk。London：Sage。  new window
2.Corner, J.(2003)。Mediated persona and political culture。Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity and cynicism。Sage。  new window
3.Greatbatch, D.(1998)。Conversation analysis: Neutralism in British news interviews。Approaches to media discourse。Oxford：Blackwell Publisher。  new window
4.Heritage, John(1985)。Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience。Handbook of Discourse Analysis。London：Academic Press。  new window
5.Heritage, J.、Greatbatch, D.(1993)。On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews。Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis。Oxford：Polity Press。  new window
6.Schegoloff, E. A.(1993)。Reflections on talk and social structure。Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis。Oxford：Polity Press。  new window
7.Wilson, T. P.(1993)。Social structure and the sequential organization of interaction。Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis。Polity Press。  new window
8.Zimmerman, D. H.、Boden, D.(1993)。Structure-in-action: An introduction。Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis。Oxford：Polity Press。  new window
9.Fairclough, N.(1998)。Political discourse in the media: An analytical framework。Approaches to media discourse。Oxford：Blackwell Publishers。  new window
10.Woodilla, J.(1998)。Workplace conversations: The text of organizing。Discourse and Organization。London：Sage。  new window
11.Drew, Paul、Heritage, John(1992)。Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction。Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：917（臺灣：905，外國：12） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1385896 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67179860
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上