本文透過尊於法律解釋理論的討論，以及尊於「概念觀」的討論，指出尊於法律的解釋，無法脫離尊於各該體制概念觀的理解。法規範必然連結在特定的法制度（法體制）之內，而釐清、討論、詮釋這些法體制觀念概念之概念觀，是我們能合理進行該法規範解釋適用的必要條件。而大多數的法律倫理規範屬於法規範，因此尊於法律倫理的解釋、適用，也需要尊於法律倫理的概念觀有所瞭解。本文透過實例及相關規定的檢討，指出法律倫理（尤其是律師倫理）涉及眾多的利益衝突以及規範衝突，因此並上適合以道德或人格訴求，作為立論的基礎，反而應該在相關的教學、研究中，強調倫理學的基本知識及道德論證的基本知識。本文並建議，在此基礎上，應考慮在法學教育體制中，更強化基礎法學的教學與研究。

Legal interpretation cannot be separated from appropriate understanding of the conceptions of legal institutions, and legal norms are embedded and interconnected in legal institutions. Therefore, the clarification, understanding and interpretation of conceptions of legal institutions are prerequisite for interpretation and application of legal norms. Through the examination of related cases and legal rules, the article points out that legal ethics is concerned with conflict of interests and collisions of legal norms. Personal morality, therefore, is not an appropriate foundation of legal ethics. As the conclusion, the article argues that the basic knowledge of ethical theories and moral reasoning should be emphasized in the research and teaching of legal ethics. The courses of fundamental legal studies should be strengthened in legal education as well.