:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:重大災害資訊治理模式之交易成本分析
書刊名:政治科學論叢
作者:李天申 引用關係周韻采 引用關係
作者(外文):Li, Tien-shenChou, Yuntsai
出版日期:2014
卷期:59
頁次:頁91-117
主題關鍵詞:三邊治理交易成本層級節制雙邊治理Bilateral governanceHierarchical control modelTransaction costsTrilateral governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:22
在2009年莫拉克風災之前,我國是採用層級節制的模式來整合防救災資訊。但根據莫拉克風災的經驗,這套模式難以因應重大災害。當時,臺灣數位文化協會與受災縣市、中央災害應變中心合作,蒐集災民發布至網路的訊息,並透過網路揭露官方的整合性訊息,縮減政府與民間的資訊落差。本文假設,政府於重大災害發生時,要採用層級節制、雙邊治理或三邊治理模式來處理防救災資訊,會受蒐集、登錄、驗證等交易成本的影響。本文採文獻探討、深度訪談、個案研究等研究方法,運用交易成本理論,論證重大災害時,應如何選擇防救災資訊的治理模式。研究結果發現,政府在莫拉克風災時,因救災人力不足,EMIS系統設計不良,加上重大災害本身的不確定性高,大幅提升防救災資訊的交易成本。當災情達一定之規模時,三邊治理模式即比雙邊治理、層級節制模式更有效。最後,本文認為導入三邊治理模式,並將資訊科技妥善運用於防救災資訊的整合,可降低政府因應重大災害的交易成本。
Prior to Typhoon Morakot in 2009, Taiwan applied the hierarchical control model to manage disaster response information. However, the experience of Typhoon Morakot demonstrated this approach to be inadequate for dealing with major disasters. Instead, cooperation between the Association of Digital Culture, local governments in the disaster area, and the Central Emergency Operation Center allowed the collection of messages posted online by disaster victims, which were then collated and posted on official government websites, reducing the information gap between the government and the general public. This article argues that the choice of a hierarchical control model, bilateral governance, or trilateral governance model in the event of a major disaster affects the transaction costs associated with gathering, inputting, and verifying information. The article uses a literature review, in-depth interviews, and case study research, and applies transaction cost theory to the question of which governance model to adopt for dealing with disaster response information in the event of a major disaster. According to the research findings, when Typhoon Morakot hit, a lack of disaster response manpower and poor emergency management information system design, together with the uncertainties associated with a major disaster, substantially increased the transaction costs associated with disaster reduction information. When disasters have reached a certain scale, the trilateral governance model is more effective than the bilateral governance or hierarchical control models. Finally, we argue that the trilateral governance model and the proper use of information technology to integrate disaster information can reduce the transaction costs associated with the response to major disasters.
期刊論文
1.Brown, T. L.、Potoski, M.(2003)。Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,13(4),441-468。  new window
2.Calmon, P.、Pedroso, M. M.(2011)。Incidence of Transaction Costs in Brazilian Health Ministry Programmes: A Case Study of Pluriannual Evaluative Reports。Public Management Review,13(4),515-593。  new window
3.Majone, G.(2010)。Transaction-Cost Efficiency and the Democratic Deficit。Journal of European Public Policy,11(2),150-115。  new window
4.North, D. C.(1984)。Goverrnment and the Cost of Exchanging in History。Journal of Economic History,44(2),255-264。  new window
5.West, K.(2005)。From Bilateral to Trilateral Governance in Local Government Contracting in France。Public Administration,83(2),413-492。  new window
6.Williamson, Oliver E.(2002)。The Theory of the Firm as Governance Structure: From Choice to Contract。Journal of Economic Perspectives,16(3),171-195。  new window
7.Dahlman, Carl J.(1979)。The Problem of Externality。Journal of Law and Economics,22(1),141-162。  new window
8.Williamson, O. E.(2005)。The Economics of Governance。American Economic Review,95(2),1-18。  new window
9.Coase, Ronald H.(1937)。The Nature of the Firm。Economica,4(16),386-405。  new window
研究報告
1.馬士元、林永峻(2008)。強化中央災害應變中心協調聯繫整合功能之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳碩甫、王价巨(2009)。災害防救開口契約之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.張四明(2012)。防災應變體系中資訊網絡整合機制改善之研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Furubotn, Eirik G.、Richter, R.、顏愛靜、郭冠宏、劉籐、黃名義、王本壯、楊國柱、陳柏廷、陳錫鎮、廖仲仁(2009)。制度與經濟理論。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Williamson, Oliver E.(1996)。The Mechanisms of Governance。The Free Press。  new window
3.Williamson, Oliver E.(1975)。Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications。New York, NY:Free Press。  new window
4.Williamson, Oliver E.(1985)。The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms Markets, Relational Contracting。Macmillan, Ltd:Free Press。  new window
5.林鍾沂(2004)。行政學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.交通部中央氣象局(2009)。中央氣象局颱風警報發布概況表,http://rdc28.cwb.gov.tw/data.php?num=2009080804&year= 2009&c_name=%B2%F6%A9%D4%A7J&e_name=M0RAK0T, 2013/04/04。  new window
2.張五常(1985)。中國會走向資本主義的道路嗎,http://ishare.iask.sina.com.cn/download/explain.php7fileidz7205607, 2013/12/15。  延伸查詢new window
3.臺灣數位文化協會(2010)。NGO消防資訊服務體系委外規劃案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Frant, H.(1991)。The New Institutional Economics: Implications for Policy Analysis。Policy Analysis and Economics: Development, Tensions, Prospects。Boston:Kulmer Academic。  new window
2.McGuinness, T.(1994)。Markets and Managerial Hierarchies。Markets, Hierarchies and Networks,。London:Sage。  new window
3.Williamson, O. E.(1997)。Transaction Cost Economics and Public Administration。Public Priority Setting: Rules and Costs。Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE