臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：財富分配ˎ社會階層結構和經濟績效--一個政治經濟學模型
書刊名：經濟論文叢刊
作者：李太龍／潘士遠
作者(外文)：Li, Tailong／Pan, Shiyuan
出版日期：2014
卷期：42:3
頁次：頁405-451
主題關鍵詞：財富分配；政治投資；階層結構；經濟績效；Wealth distribution；Political investment；Social structure；Economic performance
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:21
本文採用政治經濟學視角討論為什麼財富分配不均導致經濟績效不良。如果初始財富分配很不均或政治投資成本很高或信貸市場很不完善，那麼可以進行政治投資的個體就少，政治市場的競爭就微弱。這樣，在位的政治精英就能制定經濟政策剝削其他階級（中產階級），這不僅加劇財富分配不均而且導致經濟扭曲嚴重，損害經濟發展。模型表明，（在一定條件下）財富分配格局、社會階層結構和經濟績效長期演進到穩態，該穩態取決於初始財富分配、政治投資成本和信貸市場完善程度。
Why will an unequal wealth distribution lead to poor economic performance? This paper develops a simple model to answer this question from the perspective of political economics. It is shown that, under some conditions, the distribution of wealth, social structure and economic performance emerge as long-run steady equilibrium outcomes depending on the initial wealth distribution, the political investment cost and the credit market’s imperfection. The more unequal the initial wealth distribution or the higher the political investment cost or the greater the degree of imperfection in the credit market, the less the individuals are able to invest in political capital. Therefore, the political market is less competitive and the incumbent political elite can levy a high tax on the middle class. This not only worsens wealth inequality but also undermines economic development.
期刊論文
1.Persson, Thorsten、Tabellini, Guido(1994)。Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?。American Economic Review，84(3)，600-621。  new window
2.Li, H. B.、Meng, L. S.、Zhang, J. S.(2006)。Why Do Entrepreneurs Enter Politics Evidence from China。Economic Inquiry，44(3)，559-578。  new window
3.Perotti, R.(1996)。Growth, Income Distribution and Democracy: What the Data Say。Journal of Economic Growth，1，149-187。  new window
4.Banerjee, A. V.、Newman, A. F.(1993)。Occupational Choice and the Process of Development。Journal of Political Economy，101(2)，274-298。  new window
5.丁偉祥(2002)。政治獻金案困擾德國朝野政黨。德國研究，17，31-37。  延伸查詢new window
6.王夏剛(2006)。清代檔案中譚嗣同資料釋讀。史學月刊，7，118-120。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃冕堂(2002)。中國歷代糧食價格問題通考。文史哲，2002(2)，33-48。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉海峰(2000)。科舉制的起源與進士科的起始。歷史研究，2000(6)，3-16+190。  延伸查詢new window
9.謝俊美(2001)。晚清賣官鬻爵新探--兼論捐納制度與清朝滅亡。華東師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版)，33，50-61。  延伸查詢new window
10.顧善慕(2006)。清代乾隆年間的捐納制度。黑龍江社會科學，5，158-159。  延伸查詢new window
11.Daron Acemoglu(2006)。A Simple Model of Inefficient Institutions, Scan- dinavian。Journal of Economics，108，515-546。  new window
12.Aghion, Philippe、Eve Caroli、Cecilia García-Peñalosa(1999)。Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories。Journal of Economic Literature，37，1615-1660。  new window
13.Ansolabehere, Stephen、de Figueiredo John M.、Snyder James M. Jr.(2003)。Why Is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics。Journal of Economic Perspectives，17，105-130。  new window
14.Banerjee, Abhijit V.、Duflo, Esther(2003)。Inequality and Growth: What can the Data Say?。Journal of Economic Growth，8，267-299。  new window
15.Benhabib, Jess、Aldo Rustichini(1996)。Social Conflict and Growth。Journal of Economic Growth，1，125-142。  new window
16.Bennedsen, Morten、Feldmann Sven E.(2006)。Informational Lobbying and Political Contributions。Journal of Public Economics，90，631-656。  new window
17.Connolly, William J.(1996)。How Low Can You Go? State Campaign Contribution Limits and the First Amendment。Boston University Law Review，76，483-536。  new window
18.Li, Hongyi、Zou, Heng-fu(1998)。Income Inequality is not Harmful for Growth: Theory and Evidence。Review of Development Economics，2(3)，318-334。  new window
19.Pedersen, Karl R.(1995)。Rent-seeking, Political Influence and Inequality: A Simple Analytical Example。Public Choice，82，281-305。  new window
20.Deininger, K.、Squire, L.(1998)。New ways of looking at old issues: Inequality and growth。Journal of Development Economics，57(2)，259-287。  new window
21.Forbes, K. J.(2000)。A Reassessment of the Relationship between Inequality and Growth。The American Economic Review，90(4)，869-887。  new window
22.Faccio, Mara(2006)。Politically-Connected Firms: Can They Squeeze the State?。American Economic Review，96(1)，369-386。  new window
23.Alesina, Alberto、Perotti, Roberto(1996)。Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment。European Economic Review，40(6)，1203-1228。  new window
24.Galor, Oded、Zeira, Joseph(1993)。Income Distribution and Macroeconomics。Review of Economic Studies，60(1)，35-52。  new window
25.Khwaja, Asim Ijaz、Mian, Atif(2005)。Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market。The Quarterly Journal of Economics，120(4)，1371-1411。  new window
26.Barro, Robert J.(2000)。Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries。Journal of Economic Growth，5(1)，5-32。  new window
27.Grossman, Gene M.、Helpman, Elhanan(1994)。Protection for Sale。American Economic Review，84(4)，833-850。  new window
28.Snyder, James M. Jr.(1990)。Campaign Contributions as Investments: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1980-1986。Journal of Political Economy，98(6)，1195-1227。  new window
29.Alesina, Albert、Rodrik, Dani(1994)。Distributive Politics and Economic Growth。The Quarterly Journal of Economics，109(2)，465-490。  new window
學位論文
1.唐焱(2008)。法律視野下的徽州鹽商--從萬曆至道光(碩士論文)。華東政法大學，上海。  延伸查詢new window
2.夏衛東(2006)。清代科舉制度的若干問題研究(博士論文)。浙江大學，杭州。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.白壽彞(1999)。中國通史第九卷(中古時代．明時期)。上海：上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.寺田隆信、張正明(1986)。山西商人研究。山西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chen, Zhao、Lu Ming、He Junzhi(2008)。Political Participation of Entrepreneurs: Evidence from Liu-zhou, Guangxi, Chian。Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy。  new window
其他
1.晶報(20130616)。從科員到省部級--中國官員升遷圖。  延伸查詢new window
2.雷宇，王磊(20100108)。行賄當上的人大代表風光依舊。  延伸查詢new window
3.雷宇，王磊(20100131)。商人進政協不能只看賺錢多少。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Be´nabou, Roland J.(2005)。Inequality, Technology, and the Social Contract。Handbook of Economic Growth。Amsterdam：North-Holland Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：664（臺灣：650，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67662719
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上