:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Are Problems of Underrecognition and Devaluation of Care Work Being Resolved?: Japanese Policy Experience and Prospects for Securing the Long-term Care Workforce
書刊名:臺灣社會福利學刊
作者:Morikawa, Mie
出版日期:2014
卷期:12:1
頁次:頁35-64
主題關鍵詞:Long-term careLong-term care insurance systemWorkforceCare workPolicyJapan長期照護長期照護保險系統日本
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:65
The purpose of this article is to analyze whether Japan’s long-term care (LTC) policy measures for securing the LTC workforce have contributed in the past, and are likely to contribute in the future, to resolution of the problems of underrecognition and devaluation of care work. Almost all aging or aged societies, including Japan, have many unresolved problems with regard to recruiting and retaining a good-quality LTC workforce. Since the launch of the Long-Term Care Insurance System (LTCIS) in 2000, securing human resources and improving the working conditions of care workers has become a crucial policy issue. In presenting the Japanese LTC policy experience and discussing prospects for securing the LTC workforce, the author first examines the following questions: What has been the main approach of the LTCIS in securing a quality LTC workforce? What kind of problems/issues have policymakers faced? What prospects does the newly introduced scheme have? Second, the author describes the ongoing reforms in the LTCIS aimed at establishing the Community-Based Integrated Care System, while paying attention to how reform affects the recognition and valuation of care work. Finally, the author critically analyzes the implications for Japan’s policy development for resolving or not resolving the problems of underrecognition and devaluation of care work.
期刊論文
1.Atkinson, Carol、Lucas, Rosemary(201303)。Policy and gender in adult social carc work。Public Adminislration,91(1),159-173。  new window
2.Findlay, Patricia、Findlay, Jeanette、Stewart, Robert(2009)。The consequences of caring: skills, regulation and reward among early years workers。Work, employment and society,23(3),422-441。  new window
3.Himmelweil, Susan(1999)。Caring Labor。Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,561(1),27-38。  new window
4.井口克郎(2013)。介護の質の把握と改善のための基本視角:介護サービスと労働や介護保障制度の関係性に着目して。日本医療経済学会会報,30(1),1-27。  延伸查詢new window
5.森川美絵(2012)。『介護労働の低評価』再考:日本の介護保険制度における介護労働評価の枠組み。社会政策,3(3),78-89。  延伸查詢new window
6.森川美絵(2014)。社会政策におけるケアの労働としての可視化。社会政策,5(3),25-37。  延伸查詢new window
7.Morikaw, Mie(2014)。Problematic Issues Concerning social investment Strategy in Elderly Care: Implications from the Case of Japan’s Long-Terin Care Policy。Social Policy and Labor Studies,5(3),113-125。  new window
8.Morikawa, Mie(201401)。Toward community-based integrated care: trends and issues in Japan’s long-term care policy。International Journal of Integrated Care,14。  new window
9.向井通郎(2013)。熟練ケアワーカーの臨床能力の評価:語りからみたケアワーク実践の分析を通して。老年社会科学,34(4),471-481。  延伸查詢new window
10.Steinberg, Ronnie L.(1999)。Emotional Labor in Job Evaluation: Redesigning Compensation Practices。Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,561(1),143-157。  new window
11.鈴木聖子(2010)。介護ケアの質の評価に関する研究:介護ケアの質を構成する評価指標の開発。介護福祉,80,25-38。  延伸查詢new window
12.Ungerson, Clare(1997)。Social Politics and the Commodification oi Care。Social Politics,3(4),362-381。  new window
會議論文
1.社会保障制度審議会介護保険部会(20130606)。社会保障制度審議会介護保険部会第45回。Tokyo:MHLW。  延伸查詢new window
2.社会保障制度審議会介護保険部会(20130122)。社会保障制度審議会介護保険部会第42回。Tokyo:MHLW。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.OECD(1998)。The Future of Female-Dominated Occupations。Paris:OECD。  new window
2.OECD(2011)。Help wanted?。Paris:OECD。  new window
3.OECD(2013)。Good life in Old Age。Paris:OECD。  new window
其他
1.內閣府(2012)。平成24年度から介護プロフェッショナルのキャリア段位制度--国家戦略・プロフェッショナル検定~が始まります,Tokyo:Cabinet Office。,http://www5.cao.go.jp/keizail/jissen-cu/jissen-cu.html, 2013/11/08。  延伸查詢new window
2.介護労働安定センター(2012)。介護労働の現状について平成23年度介護労働実態調査。  延伸查詢new window
3.介護労働安定センター(2013)。介護労働の現状について平成24年度介護労働実態調査,Tokyo:Carc worker Support Center Foundation。,http://www.kaigo-center.orjp/report/pdf/li24_roudou_ genjyou.pdf, 2014/04/26。  延伸查詢new window
4.介護労働安定センター(2013)。介護労働者調査の統計表,Tokyo:Carc worker Support Center Foundation。,http://www.kaigo-ceiiter.orjp/report/pdf/h24_chousa_roiidousha_ toukeihyou.pdf, 2014/04/26。  延伸查詢new window
5.地域包括ケア研究会(2009)。平成20年度地域包括ケア研究会:今後の検討のための論点整理,Tokyo:三菱UFJリサーチ&コンサルテイング株式会社。,http://www.mhlw.go.jp/houdoii/2009/05/h0522-1.html, 2012/08/31。  延伸查詢new window
6.地域括ケア研究会(2010)。平成21年度地域包括ケア研究会報告書,Tokyo:三菱UF Jリサーチ&コンサルティング株式会社。,http://www.kantei.gojp/jp/smgi/kmkyukoyou/sinsmteam/TF/kaigo_dail/siryou8.pdf, 2012/08/31。  延伸查詢new window
7.厚生労働省老健局(2012)。介護職員をめぐる現状と人材の確保等の対策について,Tokyo:MHLW。,http://www.mhlw.gojp/stf/sliingi/2r9852000002ae5j-att/2r9852000002aej7.pdf, 2014/04/26。  延伸查詢new window
8.日本ホームへルパー協会(20130808)。介護保険改定、介護報酬改定に関する要望書。  延伸查詢new window
9.厚生労働省(20140425)。予防給付の見直しと生活支援サービスの充実,Tokyo:MHLW。,http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/2014/01/dl/tp0120-09~03d.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
10.社会保障制度審議会介護給付费分科会(20140327)。社会保障審議会介護給付費分科会第99回,Tokyo:MHLW。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Moss, Peter、Boddy, Janet、Cameron, Claire(2006)。Care Work, Present and Future: Introduction。Care Work。Oxford:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE