:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從納斯邦、丹尼爾斯之健康照護需求觀點論長期照護之實踐與挑戰
書刊名:應用倫理評論
作者:蕭玉霜
作者(外文):Hsiao, Yu-shuang
出版日期:2014
卷期:57
頁次:頁55-81
主題關鍵詞:納斯邦丹尼爾斯健康照護需求長期照護NussbaumDanielsHealth care of needLong-term care
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:38
老化是生命過程的實然面貌,您、我都會老;不過,活得老,卻不一定活得好。我們還有選擇的機會嗎?這是攸關生存公義的重要問題,是我們應當思惟的課題。首先,老化伴隨著失能,我們必須關切他們的健康照護需求是什麼?然後,才知道如何滿足他們的照顧;其次,誰應該滿足這些需求?如何來滿足他們的需求,是家庭或者是政府應該承擔的責任。再來,我們應當追尋老人照顧與期待是否存在落差,如果有落差那麼因素是什麼,應該如何解決。本文企圖檢討這些問題,並前往日本實地考察,探討究竟失能的老人是否仍享有生命的尊嚴與幸福人生的機會,以提出建置長期照護服務之具體建議。
Ageing is an unavoidable process in human life. Everybody including you and me is getting older. However, to live longer does not mean to live well. Do we still have opportunities to choose the way we would like to live? This is a significant issue related to existence integrity and what we should think about. First, ageing sometimes accompanies disabilities. We have to be concerned about what the health care needs of the elderly are, and then know how to meet their demand. Second, who should offer the demand? How could their demand be satisfied? Whose responsibility is it, family's or government’s? Next, we should explore the discrepancies between the actual care and anticipative care of the elderly with disabilities and reasons of these discrepancies, and find the way to solve the problems. This study is to discuss above-mentioned issues, for which we had some observations in Japan in order to explore whether the elderly with disabilities can have opportunities to have the dignity and welfare of life and to provide practical suggestions in establishing long-term care services.
期刊論文
1.Espinoza, S.、Walston, J. D.(2005)。Frailty in older adults: insights and interventions。Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine,72(12),1105-1112。  new window
2.Gill, T. M.、Gahbauer, E. A.、Allore, H. G.(2006)。Transitions between frailty states among community-living older persons。Arch Intern Med,166,418-423。  new window
3.李瑞全(20120400)。醫藥之良好狀態(Wllbeing)之分析:生活品質、生活質量與生命質素。應用倫理評論,52,141-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭美雲、蕭玉霜、張秀如(20121200)。獨居老人因肝硬化引發個人因應能力失調之護理經驗。秀傳醫學雜誌,11(3/4),129-136。  延伸查詢new window
5.邱文達(20110400)。衛生福利的融合綜效--長期照護的前瞻。研考雙月刊,35(2)=282,123-130。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.蕭玉霜(2007)。從狄爾泰詮釋學之人文科學基礎建構護理倫理實踐進路。第四屆中央大學哲學研究所校際研究生論文發表會。中壢:中央大學文學院哲學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.World Health Organization(1984)。The Uses of Epidemiology in the Study of the Elderly。Geneva:World Health Organization。  new window
2.內政部統計處(2011)。100年第11週內政統計通報98年老人狀況調查結果。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李世代(2003)。老年醫學老年照護與老化之一般原則。臺北:臺灣老年醫學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dilthey, Wilhelm、Makkreel, Rudolf A.、Rodi, Frithjof(1988)。Introduction to the human sciences。New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
3.Nussbaum, Martha C.(2000)。Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership。Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Daniels, Norman(2008)。Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Rawls, John(2001)。Justice as Fairness: A Restatement。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.中廣新聞(2011)。釘妻案判9年,王敬熙喊為什麼不是死刑,臺灣性別人權協會。,http://gsrat.net/news/newsclipDetail.php?ncdata_id=6940, 2014/02/23。  延伸查詢new window
2.世界衛生組織。世界衛生組織法,http://apps.who.int/gb/bd/PDF/bd47/CH/constitution-ch.pdf?ua=1, 2014/02/23。  new window
3.世界衛生組織。維也納人權宣言,http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/chinese/CHl1viedec_BIG5.html, 2013/03/23。  延伸查詢new window
4.板橋照護中心照片,http://ameblo.jp/fujikenikukai/imagelist.html, 2014/09/21。  new window
5.Daniels, Norman(2002)。Justice and Long-Term Care: Need We Abandon Social Contract Theory?,http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/ethical_choices.pdf, 2011/05/23。  new window
6.Nussbaum, Martha C.(2002)。Justice and Long-Term Care: Need We Abandon Social Contract Theory?,http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/ethical_choices.pdf, 2011/05/23。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE