:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:一部結合古籍與秘檔的佳作--雍正《硃批諭旨》論析
書刊名:輔仁歷史學報
作者:陳冠至 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Kuan-chih
出版日期:2014
卷期:32
頁次:頁89-121
主題關鍵詞:明清檔案硃批諭旨雍正皇帝年羹堯年案Archives of Ming and QingVermilion-Rescript EdictsYongzheng EmperorNian Gengyao
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:72
武英殿本雍正《硃批諭旨》,為現存諸板中之珍品。原書所錄上奏官員的層級涵蓋甚廣,多數為外任官員,少數為京官與派遣至各處執行特殊任務的欽差人等。這些人從不同角度來反映當時的政治、經濟、軍事、文化、外交、民族、宗教、自然災異…等情況,描繪出一幅幅雍正朝生動活潑且囊括各種面向之政治與社會生活的真實樣貌。檔案對於印證歷史事件的重要性絕對是毋庸置疑,往往提供許多史籍闕載的珍貴材料。《硃批諭旨》便是以檔案為主體的古籍刊本,它具備國家檔案與天子御批兩大特點,歷史佐證作用仍具備一定之權威性。本文除利用文獻的角度對雍正《硃批諭旨》進行賞析外,同時選擇清初年羹堯(1679-1726)案為例,試圖旁證目前學界對本案始末的瞭解,及因而引出全書內容之特性,進一步地突顯出《硃批諭旨》在文獻學和歷史學上的雙重價值。同時,也探討檔案與古籍間的關聯性,特別是兩者結合產生的作用。
The Yongzheng "Vermilion-Rescript Edicts", which was printed by Imperial Printing Office, and is the most precious edition today. Officials recorded by this book covers in a wide range of levels, the majority were local officials, a small number of officials were in the capital and some persons with special mission that were sent over the imperial. These people from different angles to reflect the prevailing political, economic, military, cultural, diplomatic, nationality, religion, natural Calamity ... etc., draw many lively and real appearances include variety of political and social lifestyle during Yongzheng Period. The importance of Archive in proof of historical event is absolutely no doubt, often provide valuable first-hand material. The "Vermilion-Rescript Edicts" is a good example, it has two major characteristics either the national archives or the emperor orders by himself, so the authenticity and credibility is relatively higher, and the effect of evidence is authoritative. In addition to use the vision of edition to appreciate Yongzheng "Vermilion-Rescript Edicts", through the content of Vermilion-Rescript, and selecting the death penalty case of Nian Gengyao (1679-1726), trying to understand the whole story and the characteristics of this book more deeply, in order to underline the double value in philology and history of "Vermilion-Rescript Edicts". In the same time, the writer also look forward to carry off the comments or guiding by the scholarships have the same habit in researching archives of Ming and Qing or philology.
期刊論文
1.陳捷先(19780600)。雍正初年清世宗與年羹堯之君臣關係。國立臺灣大學歷史學系學報,5,105-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.莊吉發(19880300)。雍正硃批諭旨。歷史月刊,2,24-27。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱先華(1985)。硃批奏摺之由來及其他。故宮博物院院刊,1985(1),18-22。  延伸查詢new window
4.眭達明(2003)。奏摺制度的確立及其影響。秘書,2003(4),42-44。  延伸查詢new window
5.趙彥昌、姚迪(2009)。奏摺功能考。山東檔案,2009(1),63-66。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡智強(1999)。雍正及其奏摺制度。辦公室業務,1999(2),46。  延伸查詢new window
7.秦國經(2009)。清代皇帝的硃批諭旨選錄(上)--康熙、雍正帝的硃批諭旨。辦公室業務,2009(5),58-60。  延伸查詢new window
8.韋慶遠(2000)。論雍正其人。史學集刊,2000(3),29-37。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳吉遠(1997)。雍正帝與年羹堯的郎舅情結。紫禁城,1997(4),20。  延伸查詢new window
10.田露汶(1997)。略論雍正帝與年羹堯關係的演變。歴史檔案,1997(4),98-102。  延伸查詢new window
11.史松(1991)。論年羹堯之死。清史研究,1991(3),26-32。  延伸查詢new window
12.(1983)。談談怎樣在歴史研究中利用歷史檔案的問題(續)。檔案時空,1983(4),14-17。  延伸查詢new window
13.趙雲田(1984)。略論雍正《硃批諭旨》。遼寧師範大學學報(社會科學版),1984(3),59-62。  延伸查詢new window
14.宮崎市定(1957)。雍正硃批諭旨解題--その史料的價值。東洋史研究,15(4),1-32。  延伸查詢new window
15.喬衍琯(19710300)。我國套色印刷簡說。國立中央圖書館館刊,4(1),17-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳捷先(19710600)。雍正批硃諭旨--控制巨僚的一種工具。國立中央圖書館館刊,4(2),1-9。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王劍(2005)。明代密疏研究。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.世宗。硃批諭旨。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳捷先(1977)。清史雜筆。臺北:學海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.故宮博物院文獻館(1930)。雍正硃批諭旨不錄奏摺總目。北平:故宮博物院。  延伸查詢new window
5.國立故宮博物院故宮文獻編輯委員會(1971)。年羹堯奏摺專輯。臺北:國立故宮博物院。  延伸查詢new window
6.永瑢、紀昀(1986)。欽定四庫全書總目。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊啟樵(1983)。雍正帝及其密摺制度研究。源流文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.國立故宮博物院(1977)。宮中檔雍正朝奏摺。臺北:國立故宮博物院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.牛淑貞(200106)。論雍正朝的奏摺政治。陰山學刊。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE