:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:立法院外的春吶:太陽花運動靜坐者之人口及參與圖象
書刊名:臺灣社會學
作者:陳婉琪 引用關係黃樹仁 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Wan-chiHuang, Su-jen
出版日期:2015
卷期:30
頁次:頁141-179
主題關鍵詞:太陽花運動抗議調查社會運動參與者Sunflower MovementProtest survey methodSocial movement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:116
2014年 3月 25至 29日,台北大學社會學系志願師生於太陽花學運期間發動了一項臨時調查計畫 —「太陽花運動參與者調查」,在立法院周遭靜坐區分時段以系統抽樣方式,針對靜坐者進行一對一面訪問卷調查。共得有效樣本 989份,完訪率 98.4%。本文乃這次調查資料的分析報告。內容涵蓋三個部分:一是運動參與者的基本人口圖象,包括:學生比例、年齡、性別、教育程度、居住地區及職業狀態。二是學生樣本的校系分布及社團參與狀況;並對照全台灣大專院校的統計資料,以約略瞭解不同學校類型與科系領域參與程度之差異。三為靜坐者的參與狀況,包括參與時數、天數、過夜次數、到場交通時間,人際邀約或網路動員是否為主要參與原因,以及不同年齡層的主要訊息管道。資料顯示,這群支持抗議行動的靜坐者,多元異質,職業、校系的分布非常廣泛。然而儘管異質性大,在參與原因上,這群參與者,不分年齡,多數都強調個人的自主決定;儘管網路為獲取運動訊息的最重要管道,但視「網友動員」為參與原因的人相當地少。我們推論凸顯個人自主性的一般心理機制並不足以完整解釋這個發現,社群網路世代所展現的新型「網絡社會運動」及其相關特質很可能更為關鍵。最後,對照近年西方文獻針對「抗議調查」方法論上的準則建立,本調查不僅符合重要原則,資料品質亦優於既有同類型調查,證明了即使是面臨突發性質的抗議靜坐行動,也有可能同時達成高完訪率與近千份的有效樣本數,不需訴諸既有方法論文獻所採用的妥協策略。本調查的成功經驗之於方法論的進展具有相當的意義。
The Sunflower student movement, which occurred in the spring of 2014 in Taiwan, has shaken the political kaleidoscope of Taiwan as well as the whole of society. During the second week of the Sunflower Movement, volunteer faculty and students from National Taipei University, Department of Sociology executed a survey among the sit-in demonstrators outside the Legislature, relying on a systematic sampling procedure and short face-toface interviews by trained interviewers. Whereas public opinion split along the political divide, many believed that most protesters were students who were either ideologically radical or driven by a political party. This study, however, provides a more complete portrait of the protesters, which contradicts popular belief. Our study reached the following conclusions. First, except for the fact the most participants are rather young (3 out of 4 are less than 30), their fields of study (among students) and occupations (among non-students) are very diverse. Second, although it is widely believed that the Internet plays an important role in this collective action, very few participants reported that they were recruited by virtual rallies. Nearly half of the protesters reported that they joined the sit-in spontaneously. Third, for these protesters, social media was the most important information source during the protest. 9 out of 10 listed Facebook (or other types of social media) as being among their top three information sources.
期刊論文
1.Nepstad, Sharon Erickson、Smith, Christian(1999)。Rethinking Recruitment to High-Risk/Cost Activism: The Case of Nicaragua Exchange。Mobilization: An International Quarterly,4(1),25-40。  new window
2.辜炳珍、蘇婉芬(20070900)。中華民國教育程度及學科標準分類修正情形。主計月刊,621,71-73。  延伸查詢new window
3.Walgrave, Stefaan、Verhulst, Joris(2011)。Selection and Response Bias in Protest Surveys。Mobilization: An International Journal,16(2),203-222。  new window
4.van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien、Walgrave, Stefaan、Klandermans, Bert、Verhulst, Joris(2012)。Contextualizing Contestation: Framework, Design, and Data。Mobilization: An International Journal,17(3),249-262。  new window
5.van Aelst, Peter、Walgrave, Stefaan(2001)。Who Is That (Wo)man in the Street? From the Normalization of Protest to the Normalization of the Protester。European Journal of Political Research,39(4),461-486。  new window
6.Valenzuela, Sebastian、Arriagada, Arturo、Scherman, Andres(2014)。Facebook, Twitter, and Youth Engagement: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Social Media Use and Protest Behavior Using Propensity Score Matching。International Journal of Communication,8,2046-2070。  new window
7.Mercea, Dan(2013)。Probing the Implications of Facebook Use of the Organizational Form of Social Movement Organizations。Information, Communication and Society,16(8),1306-1327。  new window
8.Heaney, Michael T.、Rojas, Fabio(2007)。Partisans, Nonpartisans, and the Antiwar Movement in the United States。American Politics Research,35(4),431-464。  new window
9.Brym, Robert、Godbout, Melissa、Hoffbauer, Andreas、Menard, Gabe、Zhang, Tony Huiquan(2014)。Social Media in the 2011 Egyptian Uprising。The British Journal of Sociology,65(2),266-292。  new window
10.瞿欣怡(20140320)。不要害怕,外面的人會守護我們--318學生占領議場側記。天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
11.郭瓊俐、楊宗興、呂苡榕(20140330)。太陽花學運石破天驚。新新聞,1412。  延伸查詢new window
12.McAdam, Doug(1986)。Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer。American Journal of Sociology,92(1),64-90。  new window
會議論文
1.陳婉琪、張恒豪、黃樹仁(2015)。網路社會運動世代的來臨?太陽花參與者人際連帶群媒體因素初探。學生運動與社會正義中央研究院社會學研究所20週年所慶學術研討會,(會議日期: 2015年5月29日至30日)。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部統計處(2013)。大專校院各校科系別學生數。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Earl, Jennifer、Kimport, Katrina(2011)。Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
2.Shirky, Clay(2008)。Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations。Penguin。  new window
3.Benkler, Yochai(2006)。The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom。Yale University Press。  new window
4.Castells, Manuel(2012)。Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age。Polity Press。  new window
其他
1.Chen, Agnes(20140414)。太陽花與大腸花:台灣民主遍地開花的歷史轉折點,http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1022268, 2014/10/13。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘋果日報(20140416)。「戰神」黃國昌首度回顧學運歷程全紀錄,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140416/380428/, 2014/10/13。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳培煌,蘇聖怡(20140328)。林飛帆:我們低估台灣民眾的憤怒,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140328/368490/, 2014/10/13。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳韜文,李立峯(2014)。佔領運動新組織形態初探,http://www.pentoy.hk/%E6%99%82%E4%BA%8B/mpforum2013/2014/11/11/%E9%99%B3%E9%9F%9C%E6%96%87%E3%80%81%E6%9D%8E%E7%AB%8B%E5%B3%AF%EF%BC%9A%E4%BD%94%E9%A0%98%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E6%96%B0%E7%B5%84%E7%B9%94%E5%BD%A2%E6%85%8B%E5%88%9D%E6%8E%A2/, 。  new window
5.張鐵志(20140402)。從小確幸到憤怒的一代,http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/7/article/1201, 2014/10/13。  延伸查詢new window
6.袁孝維(20140609)。師法自然看到不足與包容而非自滿與自我:別當憤青走入山林找正能量。  延伸查詢new window
7.施致如(201404713)。「太陽花學運幕後推手系列報導13」NGO 挺學運嚴婉玲當學生後盾,http://iservice.ltn.com.tw/2013/specials/stp/news.php? rno=8&no=770329&type=a, 2014/10/28。  延伸查詢new window
8.科技部人文及社會科學研究發展司(2012)。台灣社會變遷調查六期三次(社會階層組及性別組),http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/sc/cht/scDownload3.php, 2014/09/23。  延伸查詢new window
9.何明修(20140521)。如何理解太陽花學生運動,http://x-strait.blogspot.tw/2014/05/blog-post_21.html, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
10.行政院主計處(2013)。人力運用調查報告,http://ebook.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/4527113848J204GCI5.pdf, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
11.林靜梅,陳立峰(20140410)。太陽花學運NGO組織背後傾力支持,http://news.pts.org.tw/detail.php? NEENO=266481, 2014/10/28。  延伸查詢new window
12.自由時報(20140325)。不要臉的髒東西! 段宜康怒斥抹綠謠言,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/975501/print, 2014/10/28。  延伸查詢new window
13.三立新聞網(20140321)。服貿/金溥聰:少數人的高音量,不一定代表沉默大多數,http://www.setnews.net/News.aspx?PageGroupID=1&NewsID=17476&PageType=2, 2015/07/01。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Klandermans, Bert、Smith, Jackie(2002)。Survey Research: A Case for Comparative Designs。Methods of Social Movement Research。Minneapolis:University of innesota Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE