臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：網絡社會運動時代的來臨？太陽花運動參與者的人際連帶與社群媒體因素初探
書刊名：人文及社會科學集刊
作者：陳婉琪 引用關係／張恒豪 引用關係／黃樹仁
作者(外文)：Chen, Wan-chi／Chang, Heng-hao／Huang, Su-jen
出版日期：2016
卷期：28:4
頁次：頁467-501
主題關鍵詞：太陽花運動；社會運動；人際連帶；社群媒體；公民參與；Sunflower Movement；Social movement；Social media；Social ties
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:91
  • 點閱點閱:120
近年社群媒體興起，學者提出「網絡社會運動」、「連結行動的邏輯」等概念來理解集體行動新模式。2014 年春天，震盪臺灣社會的太陽花運動，其行動邏輯能否驗證這些新理論？本文利用〈太陽花運動參與者調查〉資料，輔以〈台灣社會變遷調查〉，分析這場社運中影響參與者高度投入之因素，研究發現，因「現實生活人際關係」而前來的現場靜坐者較不可能成為長期駐守者，投入時數最低；弱連帶（陌生網友）所帶來的投入程度反而遠高於強連帶。此外，在給定相同年齡、就業狀態的情況下，社群媒體使用者的參與程度確實比非使用者來得高。本文研究結論具有公民社會強化的重大意涵。
The Sunflower Movement, which occurred in the spring of 2014 in Taiwan, has shaken the political kaleidoscope of Taiwan. Based on a survey of sit-in demonstrators around the Legislative Yuan during the protest, this study explores to what extent the logic of the collective (as well as perhaps connective) action reflects the current social movement discourses. Contrary to conventional wisdom, strong ties are not more effective in inducing higher levels of protest action. Among the sit-in participants, those who came on the basis of real life personal ties stayed much fewer hours than those who came spontaneously or in answer to the call of ＂netizens＂. However, the strong ties brought more participants, whereas the weak ties (netizens) contributed to a much smaller percentage of participants. Additionally, we found that social media users spent significantly longer hours at the protest site than traditional media users.
期刊論文
1.陳平軒(20111200)。從網路到街頭：反國光石化的動員經驗、成效與反省。臺灣社會研究，85，437-450。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭國威(20111200)。臺灣社會媒體與網路動員（2009-2011）。臺灣社會研究，85，451-482。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Gladwell, Malcolm(20101004)。Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted。The New Yorker，86(29)，42-49。  new window
4.Bennett, W. Lance、Segerberg, Alexandra(2012)。The Logic of Connective Action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics。Information, Communication & Society，15(5)，739-768。  new window
5.Opp, Karl-Dieter、Gern, Christiane(1993)。Dissident Groups, Personal Networks, and Spontaneous Cooperation: The East Germany Revolution of 1989。American Sociological Review，58(5)，659-680。  new window
6.Snow, David A.、Zurcher, Louis A. Jr.、Ekland-Olson, Sheldon(1980)。Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment。American Sociological Review，45(5)，787-801。  new window
7.鄭陸霖、林鶴玲(20011200)。社運在網際網路上的展現：臺灣社會運動網站的聯網分析。臺灣社會學，2，55-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.王維菁、馬綺韓、陳釗偉(20130700)。網際網路時代的社會運動：以臺灣環境運動組織為例。資訊社會研究，25，1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Nepstad, Sharon Erickson、Smith, Christian(1999)。Rethinking Recruitment to High-Risk/Cost Activism: The Case of Nicaragua Exchange。Mobilization: An International Quarterly，4(1)，25-40。  new window
10.Walgrave, Stefaan、Verhulst, Joris(2011)。Selection and Response Bias in Protest Surveys。Mobilization: An International Journal，16(2)，203-222。  new window
11.van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien、Walgrave, Stefaan、Klandermans, Bert、Verhulst, Joris(2012)。Contextualizing Contestation: Framework, Design, and Data。Mobilization: An International Journal，17(3)，249-262。  new window
12.Valenzuela, Sebastian、Arriagada, Arturo、Scherman, Andres(2014)。Facebook, Twitter, and Youth Engagement: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Social Media Use and Protest Behavior Using Propensity Score Matching。International Journal of Communication，8，2046-2070。  new window
13.Mercea, Dan(2013)。Probing the Implications of Facebook Use of the Organizational Form of Social Movement Organizations。Information, Communication and Society，16(8)，1306-1327。  new window
14.Brym, Robert、Godbout, Melissa、Hoffbauer, Andreas、Menard, Gabe、Zhang, Tony Huiquan(2014)。Social Media in the 2011 Egyptian Uprising。The British Journal of Sociology，65(2)，266-292。  new window
15.McAdam, Doug(1986)。Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer。American Journal of Sociology，92(1)，64-90。  new window
16.林鶴玲、鄭陸霖(20010600)。臺灣社會運動網路經驗：一個探索性的分析。臺灣社會學刊，25，111-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Shirky, Clay(2011)。The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the public Sphere, and Political Change。Foreign Affairs，90(1)，28-41。  new window
18.Brady, Henry E.、Schlozman, Kay Lehman、Verba, Sidney(1999)。Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists。American Political Science Review，93(1)，153-168。  new window
19.Lee, F. L. F.(2014)。The impact of online user-generated satire on young people's political attitudes: Testing the moderating role of knowledge and discussion。Telematics & Informatics，31(3)，397-409。  new window
20.張恒豪(20150600)。障礙者的公民運動：權利論述和社會模式的在地實踐。思與言，53(2)，89-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.陳婉琪、黃樹仁(20151200)。立法院外的春吶：太陽花運動靜坐者之人口及參與圖象。臺灣社會學，30，141-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Deacon, David、Stanyer, James(2014)。Mediatization: Key Concept or Conceptual Bandwagon?。Media, Culture & Society，36(7)，1032-1044。  new window
23.Earl, Jennifer(2015)。The Future of Social Movement Organizations: The Waning Dominance of SMOs Online。American Behavioral Scientist，59(1)，35-52。  new window
24.Passy, Florence、Giugni, Marco(2001)。Social Networks and Individual Perceptions: Explaining Differential Participation in Social Movements。Sociological Forum，16(1)，123-153。  new window
25.Reuter, Ora John、Szakonyi, David(2015)。Online Social Media and Political Awareness in Authoritarian Regimes。British Journal of Political Science，45(1)，29-51。  new window
26.Skoric, Marko M.、Poor, Nathaniel(2013)。Youth Engagement in Singapore: The Interplay of Social and Traditional Media。Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media，57(2)，187-204。  new window
27.Van Dijck, José、Poell, Thomas(2013)。Understanding Social Media Logic。Media and Communication，1(1)，2-14。  new window
28.Walgrave, Stefaan、Bennett, W. Lance、Van Laer, Jeroen、Breunig, Christian(2011)。Multiple Engagements and Network Bridging in Contentious Politics: Digital Media Use of Protest Participants。Mobilization，16(3)，325-349。  new window
29.Xie, Wenjing(2014)。Social Network Site Use, Mobile Personal Talk and Social Capital among Teenagers。Computers in Human Behavior，41，228-235。  new window
30.李明穎(20120700)。網路潛水者的公民參與實踐之探索：以「野草莓運動」為例。新聞學研究，112，77-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Tufekci, Zeynep、Wilson, Christopher(2012)。Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square。Journal of Communication，62(2)，363-379。  new window
32.蕭遠(20110900)。網際網路如何影響社會運動中的動員結構與組織型態？--以臺北野草莓學運為個案研究。臺灣民主季刊，8(3)，45-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Coase, Ronald H.(1960)。The Problem of Social Cost。Journal of Law and Economics，3(2)，1-44。  new window
34.林宗弘(20121200)。非關上網？臺灣的數位落差與網路使用的社會後果。臺灣社會學，24，55-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Snow, D. A.、Zurcher, L. A. Jr.、Ekland-Olson, S.(1983)。Further Thoughts on Social Networks and Movement Recruitment。Sociology，17(1)，112-120。  new window
研究報告
1.傅仰止、章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊(2015)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫：第六期第五次調查計畫執行報告 (計畫編號：NSC 102-2420-H-001-007-SS2)。臺北：中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Katz, James E.、Rice, Ronald E.(2002)。Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction。Boston, MA。  new window
2.Bennett, W. Lance、Segerberg, Alexandra(2013)。The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.May, Christopher(2002)。The Information Society: A Sceptical View。Polity Press。  new window
4.Morozov, Evgeny(2011)。The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom。New York：Public Affairs Books。  new window
5.McAdam, Douglas(1988)。Freedom Summer。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Earl, Jennifer、Kimport, Katrina(2011)。Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
7.Shirky, Clay(2008)。Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations。Penguin。  new window
8.Altheide, David L.、Snow, Robert P.(1979)。Media logic。Sage Publications。  new window
9.Benkler, Yochai(2006)。The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom。Yale University Press。  new window
10.Olsen, Mancur(1965)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press：Harvard Economic Studies。  new window
11.何明修(2005)。社會運動概論。臺北：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.Tarrow, Sidney G.(1994)。Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Castells, Manuel(2012)。Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age。Polity Press。  new window
其他
1.陳韜文，李立峯(2014)。佔領運動新組織形態初探，http://www.pentoy.hk/%E6%99%82%E4%BA%8B/mpforum2013/2014/11/11/%E9%99%B3%E9%9F%9C%E6%96%87%E3%80%81%E6%9D%8E%E7%AB%8B%E5%B3%AF%EF%BC%9A%E4%BD%94%E9%A0%98%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E6%96%B0%E7%B5%84%E7%B9%94%E5%BD%A2%E6%85%8B%E5%88%9D%E6%8E%A2/， 。  new window
2.(2015)。萬人響應，一人到場，http://zh_pttpedia.wikia.com/wiki/%E8%90%AC%E4%BA%BA%E9%9F%BF%E6%87%89%EF%BC%8C%E4%B8%80%E4%BA%BA%E5%88%B0%E5%A0%B4。  new window
3.陳婉琪，黃樹仁(2015)。太陽花運動參與者調查，臺北。(D00118)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Nye, David E.(2004)。Technological Prediction: A Promethean Problem。Technological Visions: The Hopes and Fears That Shape New Technologies。Philadelphia：Temple University Press。  new window
2.McCarthy, John D.、Zald, Mayer N.(1987)。Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory。Social Movements in an Organizational Society。New Brunswick, NJ：Transaction Books。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：987（臺灣：975，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67303269
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上