:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:股權群眾募資之新里程--兼論證券商經營股權性質群眾募資平臺業務之法制發展及課題
書刊名:華岡法粹
作者:王志誠 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Chih-cheng
出版日期:2016
卷期:61
頁次:頁1-58
主題關鍵詞:群眾募資創意集資資訊揭露專區團體訴訟創櫃板CrowdfundingGofunding ZoneClass ActionGo incubation board for startup and acceleration firmsGISA
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:69
近年來,由於網際網路的普及與互聯網技術之應用,諸如雲端計算、搜尋引擎、社交網絡、大數據、數據挖掘以及行動支付等,掀起了一股網路經濟的浪潮,連帶地衝擊到了傳統金融固有領域,這股浪潮為傳統金融結構帶來的改革創新的壓力,並且加劇了跨領域的競爭與合作關係。群眾募資以迥異於傳統資金借貸方式,藉由網路社群力量,透過募資平臺募得資金,已成為當前全球最熱門的集資管道。本文先從群眾募資之基本概念及運作類型出發,並分析新興金融模式與現行法制規範之牴觸與解套辦法。其次,則介紹美國現行對於群眾募資之法制規範,並簡述我國目前群眾募資發展現況。最後,再分析及探討證券商辦理群眾募資平臺業務之相關規範,期能引導我國群眾募資能邁向正面健全的發展。
In recent years, due to the advancement of technology and the popularization of the internet, the wholly new finance model, which is different from direct finance and indirect finance, has reshaped the traditional finance market. Generally speaking, there are six operation models of internet finance: third-party payment, P2P lending, crowdfunding, the finance of big data, the portal of internet finance and virtual currency. Internet finance is a combination of technology and finance, which has opened a wave of network economy. Obviously, the network economy has not only put pressure on the traditional finance structure to reform and innovate in a more speedy fashion, it also deepens both competition and cooperation between different fields. Crowdfunding is quite different from the traditional way of lending, but by the power of internet community, funds raised through fund-raising platforms have become the world's most popular fund-raising channel. This paper will introduce the basic concept and operation models of crowdfunding and analyze the conflict and possible solution between the emerging financial models and existing legal norms. Secondly, this paper will explore the current US legal norms for crowdfunding and outline the current development of crowdfunding regulations in Taiwan. Finally, with the hope to help crowdfunding in Taiwan to develop positively and soundly, this paper will analyze and discuss the regulation of equity crowdfunding platforms business operated by the security firms.
期刊論文
1.Gilson, Ronald J.、Kraakman, Reinier H.(1984)。The mechanisms of market efficiency。Virginia Law Review,70(4),549-644。  new window
2.王文宇(20150300)。網路金融的發展與法制。月旦法學,238,5-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王建雄(2014)。美國眾籌融資法律的新發展及對中國的啟示。國際經濟法學刊,21(2),127-151。  延伸查詢new window
4.王志誠(2016)。建立專責法規讓群募「有法可循」。臺灣銀行家,79。  延伸查詢new window
5.俞力華(20070700)。論證券投資人及期貨交易人保護法第28條團體訴訟之既判力主觀範圍--新創特定給付訴訟之判決不完全對世效,或擴張爭點效使及於原告方當事人不同之後訴。律師雜誌,334,84-91。  延伸查詢new window
6.李雪靜(2013)。眾籌融資模式的發展探析。上海金融學院學報,2013(6)。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳佩珊、黃若瑜(2016)。新創事業蓬勃加速亞洲群募興起。臺灣銀行家,73。  延伸查詢new window
8.長江證券股份有限公司(2014)。證券行業開展股權眾籌業務的立法與相關實踐問題研究。中國證券,2014(10)。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃茂榮(20151000)。微型企業的納稅輔導。植根雜誌,31(10),379-400。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊智翔(20151100)。股權群眾募資之制度與管理。會計研究月刊,360,68-75。  延伸查詢new window
11.郭大維(20090315)。我國證券投資人保護機制之省思。臺灣法學雜誌,124,1-11。  延伸查詢new window
12.胡湘湘(2016)。全球最夯集資管道--群募平臺7年多11.5倍。臺灣銀行家,73。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳佑寰(20151100)。我們也可以當天使:股權群募之投資風險與保護機制。會計研究月刊,360,76-82。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉志堅、吳珂(2014)。眾籌融資起源、發展與前瞻。經營管理,2014(6)。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉紹樑(2015)。Fin + Tech或Fin v. Tech。臺灣銀行家,71,14。  延伸查詢new window
16.賴威仁(2016)。政府與民間共推扶植創業創意好點子。臺灣銀行家,73。  延伸查詢new window
17.羅明雄、丁玲(2013)。互聯網金融六大模式深度解析。中國科技財富,2013(9)。  延伸查詢new window
18.Bradford, C. Steven(2012)。Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Laws。Columbia Business Law Review,2012(1),1-150。  new window
19.Hughes, Laura Michael(2014)。Crowdfunding: Putting A Cap on the Risks for Unsophisticated Investors。CHARLESTON L. REV.,8。  new window
20.Pope, Nikki D.(2011)。Crowdfunding Microstartups: It's Time for the Securities and Exchange Commission to Approve a Small Offering Exemption。U. PA. J. BUS. L.,13。  new window
21.Sher, Noam(2006)。Underwriter Civil Liability for IPO's: An Economic Analysis。U. PA. J. INT'L ECON. L.,27。  new window
22.Weinstein, Ross S.(2013)。Crowdfunding in the U.S. and Abroad: What to Expect When You're Expecting。CORNELL INT'L L. J.,46。  new window
23.Morsy, Sherief(2014)。The JOBS Act and Crowdfunding: How Narrowing the Secondary Market Handicaps Fraud Plaintiffs。BROOKLYN L. REV.,79。  new window
24.Carni, Uriel S.(2014)。Protecting the Crowd through Escrow: Three Ways That the Sec Can Protect Crowdfunding Investors。FORDHAM J. CORP & FIN. L.,19。  new window
25.劉連煜、林俊宏(2004)。投資人團體訴訟新時代的來臨。月旦法學,111,80-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.王志誠(20150300)。創櫃板與公眾籌資法制之建構。月旦法學教室,149,36-42。  延伸查詢new window
27.林郁馨(20140600)。投資人的諾亞方舟--投資人保護中心與證券團體訴訟之實證研究。月旦法學,229,75-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.王志誠(20151200)。股權群眾募資之管制及法律責任--兼評最高法院一O四年度臺上字第二七四四號刑事判決及臺灣高等法院一O一年度金上重更(一)字第十九號刑事判決。月旦裁判時報,42,34-55。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉彥廷(2003)。論證券投資人及期貨交易人保護法之團體訴訟(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭瓊茹(2010)。投資人保護法團體訴訟制度之研究--以保護機構之任務與定位為中心(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李耀東、李鈞(2014)。互聯網金融框架與實踐。電子工業。  延伸查詢new window
2.王志誠(2013)。現代金融法。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
3.零壹財經、零壹數據(2014)。眾籌服務行業白皮書(2014)。中國經濟。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉連煜(2015)。現代公司法。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳勇(2015)。中國互聯網金融研究報告(2015)。中國經濟。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE