:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:獨立倡導人投入長照服務因素與其問題解決方式之研究
書刊名:臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊
作者:楊秋燕黃松林 引用關係郭俊巖 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Chiu-yenHuang, Song-linKuo, Chun-yen
出版日期:2017
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁33-67
主題關鍵詞:社會工作獨立倡導倡導人長期照顧服務法Social workIndependent advocacyAdvocatesLong-term care service act
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:17
近年來臺灣社會工作專業日益重視老人獨立倡導服務,只是礙於剛起步,民眾知之有限,遑論投身倡導工作。即令如此,不過仍有愈來愈多人願意參與倡導服務。由是,本文主要目的在於探討獨立倡導人參與倡導服務的因素以及倡導工作的困境與因應之道,為了達此目的,本文採用質性方法針對11位老人獨立倡導人執行倡導活動的心得表述進行資料的蒐集與分析。研究發現,倡導人投入倡導服務之因素,包括:推廣老人權益意識、為自身老老期做準備、敦促政府重視倡導工作、為學習新知和幫助長者以及投入倡導工作與本職學能相關。繼而老人獨立倡導服務遇到的問題及解方,包括:初次建立關係、結案時機、情感需求、身障失能、生活習慣及飲食適應等問題,不過倡導人皆能依機構長者不同問題型態尋求倡導伙伴、督導、機構社工及相關人員的支援而獲致適當處置。而獨立倡導對老人權益保障有三項功能和意義,包括:獨立倡導可提供照顧資源與資訊管道、倡導工作可促進社區資源連結及倡導服務可協助長者爭取權益和獲得尊重。最後,本文依研究結果提出相關建議。
The social work professional has recently been emphasizing on the independent advocacy service for the elderly in Taiwan. The kind of service is so new that the public and the service-providers in the elder care know less about it. Even so, it can be found that more and more people, called as "independent advocates", are willing to participate in this project. Thus, this paper aims to research the reasons why advocates wanted to be involved in the independent advocacy service; additionally, their difficulties and coping methods when involving in the independent advocacy are explored. For the purposes, the research analyzed qualitative data, which were implementation experiences, collected from 11 independent advocates. It was found that the factors of involving in the independent advocacy service for the elderly included: Promoting the awareness of the elder rights and interests, preparing for the self when getting old, urging the government's attention to the advocacy, learning new knowledge, helping the elderly, and meeting what had learned in social work. In terms of the difficulties that the independent advocates would face, the ways of establishing relationship with the elderly, the timing of closing cases, as well as the elderly's emotional needs, disabilities, and diet adaptation were mentioned. However, the independent advocates could cope with these difficulties by seeking supports from the peers, supervisors, social workers and other staff in the long-term care institutions. The research also found that the independent advocacy could give meaning to the protection of the rights and interests of the elderly in three dimensions: 1) the caring resources and information could be provided; 2) the resource linkage in the community were promoted; and 3) fighting for rights and getting respected for the elderly were urged. Finally, this research concluded by proposing some recommendations for further enhancing the independent advocacy service for the elderly.
期刊論文
1.徐東明(2006)。RCA/CA:根源分析和糾正措施。科教文匯(下半月),2006(04)。  延伸查詢new window
2.Featherstone, B.、Fraser, C.(2012)。I'm Just a Mother. I'm Nothing Special, they're all Professionals: Parental Advocacy as an Aid to Parental Engagement。Child and Family Social Work,17(2),244-253。  new window
3.Henderson, R.(2006)。Defining Non-instructed Advocacy。Planet Advocacy,18,5-7。  new window
4.Palmer, D.、Nixon, J.、Reynolds, S.、Panayiotou, A.、Palmer, A.、Meyerowitz, R.(2012)。Getting to know you: reflections on a specialist independent mental health advocacy service for Bexley and Bromley residents in forensic settings。Mental Health Review Journal,17(1),5-13。  new window
5.Newbigging, K.、McKeown, M.、French, B.(2011)。Mental health advocacy and African and Caribbean men: good practice principles and organizational models for delivery。Health Expectations,16(1),80-104。  new window
6.MacIntyre, G.、Stewart, A.(2011)。For the record: the lived experience of parents with a learning disability: a pilot study examining the Scottish perspective。British Journal of Learning Disabilities,40(1),5-14。  new window
7.黃松林、吳玉琴、楊秋燕、郭佳寧(20160500)。獨立倡導服務與長期照顧品質。社區發展季刊,153,143-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黃松林(20060600)。獨立倡導--在老人社會照顧之應用。社區發展季刊,114,270-280。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃松林(2016)。獨立倡導--中區(臺中市、彰化縣與南投縣)機構內老人權益倡導實驗方案計畫成果報告書。臺中:臺灣社會發展研究學會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dalrymple, J.、Burke, B.(2001)。Anti-oppressive Practice: Social Care and the Law。Buckingham:Open University Press。  new window
2.Solomon, Barbara Bryant(1976)。Black empowerment: Social work in oppressed communities。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
3.Newbigging, K.、McKeown, M.、Hunkins-Hutchinson, E.、French, B.(2007)。Developing Mental Health Advocacy with African and Caribbean Men。London:SCIE。  new window
4.Stewart, A.、MacIntyre, G.(2013)。Advocacy: Models and Effectiveness。Edinburgh:School of Applied Sciences, University of Strathclyde。  new window
5.Townsley, R.、Marriott, A.、Ward, L.(2009)。Access to Independent Advocacy: An Evidence Review。Bristle:Office for Disability Issues。  new window
6.Trotter, R.(2012)。Over-looked Communities, Over-due Change: How Services can Better Support BME Disabled People。London:Scope。  new window
7.謝秀芬(2003)。社會個案工作:理論與技巧。臺北:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
8.Advocacy 2000(2000)。Principles and Standards in Independent Advocacy Organisations and Groups。Edinburgh:Advocacy 2000。  new window
9.Frankl, V. E.、司群英、郭本禹(2015)。追求意義的意志。北京:中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Scottish Independent Advocacy Alliance(2008)。Principles and Standards for Independent Advocacy。Edinburgh:Scottish Independent Advocacy Alliance。  new window
11.Chisholm, M.(2001)。Independent Advocacy: A Guide for Commissioners。Scottish Health Boards。  new window
其他
1.吳玉琴(2013)。權能激發及獨立倡導應用於老人社會工作實務,http://203.72.96.2/lkk2/userfiles/權能激發及獨立倡導應用於老人社會工作實務-吳玉琴秘書長.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
2.衛生福利部(2016)。衛生福利部106年度施政計畫,http://www.mohw.gov.tw/MOHW_Upload/doc/10%e8%a1%9b%e7%94%9f%e7%a6%8f%e5%88%a9%e9%83%a8106%e5%b9%b4%e5%ba%a6%e6%96%bd%e6%94%bf%e8%a8%88%e7%95%ab_0056387002.pdf。  new window
3.衛生福利部(2016)。長期照顧十年計畫2.0(106-115年),衛生福利部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Burke, B.、Harrison, P.(2002)。Anti-oppressive practice。Social work: themes, issues and critical debates。New York:Palgrave。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE