:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣對《南海仲裁案》的回應與其國際法意涵:新的南海政策?
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:姜皇池
作者(外文):Jiang, Huang-chi
出版日期:2016
卷期:13:3
頁次:頁7-34
主題關鍵詞:臺灣南海仲裁案國際法南海政策黃岩島民主礁TaiwanThe South China Sea Arbitration CaseInternational lawSouth China sea policyScarborough Shoal
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:93
  • 點閱點閱:82
期刊論文
1.譚偉恩(20160700)。南中國海仲裁案裁決評析。戰略安全研析,135,15-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.賈宇(2005)。南海斷續線之法律地位。中國邊疆史地研究,15(2)。  延伸查詢new window
3.Jia, Bing Bing(2014)。The Principle of the Domination of the Land over the Seas: A Historical Perspective on the Adaptability of the Law of the Sea to New Challenges。GERMAN Y.B. INT'LL.,57,63-94。  new window
4.Kwiatkowska, Barbara、Soons, Alfred(1990)。Entitlement to Maritime Areas of Rocks Which Cannot Sustain Human Habitation or Economic Life of Its Own。NETH. Y.B. INT'L L.,21,139-181。  new window
5.王勇智、宋軍、韓雪雙、薛桂芳(2008)。關於南海斷續線的綜合研討。中國海洋大學學報,2008(3)。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hayton, Bill(2017)。When Good Lawyers Write Bad History: Unreliable Evidence and the South China Sea Territorial Dispute。OCEAN DEV. & INT'L L.,48,17-34。  new window
7.Shen, Jiangming(1997)。International Law Rules and Historical Evidences Supporting China's Title to the South China Sea Islands。HASTINGS INT'L & COMP. L.,21(1),1。  new window
8.Franckx, Erik、Benatar, Marco(2012)。Dots and Lines in the South China Sea: Insights from the Law of Map Evidence。ASIAN J. INT'L L.,2(1),89。  new window
9.Kingdon, Emma(2015)。A Case for Arbitration: The Philippines' Solution for the South China Sea Dispute。Boston College International and Comparative Law Review,38(1),129-132。  new window
10.Zou, Keyuan(2012)。China's U-Shaped Line in the South China Sea Revisited。OCEAN DEV. & INT'L L.,43(1),18-19。  new window
11.Charney, Jonathan(1999)。Rocks that Cannot Sustain Human Habitation。AM. J. INT'L L.,93,863-877。  new window
12.Chang, Teh-Kuang(1991)。China's Claim of Sovereignty over Spratly and Paracel Islands: A Historical and Legal Perspective。CASE W. RES. J. INT'L L.,23(3),399-403。  new window
13.Beckman, Robert(2013)。The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea。AM. J. INT'L L.,107(1),142-143。  new window
圖書
1.丘宏達、陳純一(2012)。現代國際法。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.姜皇池(2013)。國際公法導論。新學林出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Crawford, James(2006)。The Creation of States in International Law。  new window
4.內政部(2015)。中華民國南疆史料選輯。臺北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭文路、黃碩琳(2007)。南海爭端與南海漁業資區域合作管理研究。北京:海洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.內政部(2015)。方域映彩:東海及南海重要島礁圖像集。台北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
7.黎蝸藤(2016)。被扭曲的南海史:二十世紀前的南中國海。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
8.高之國、賈兵兵(2014)。論南海九段線的歷史、地位和作用。北京:海洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.RIDDELL, ANNA、PLANT, BRENDAN(2009)。EVIDENCE BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE。  new window
10.SYMMONS, CLIVE R.(2008)。HISTORIC WATERS IN THE LAW OF THE SEA: A MODERN RE-APPRAISAL。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
11.ANDERSON, DAVID(2008)。MODERN LAW OF THE SEA: SELECTED ESSAYS。  new window
12.DAMROSCH, LORI FISHLER(2009)。INTERNATIONAL LAW: CASES AND MATERIALS。  new window
13.SOHN, LOUIS B.(2010)。LAW THE SEA IN A NUTSHELL。  new window
14.CHURCHILL, R. R.、LOWE, A. V.(1999)。THE LAW OF THE SEA。  new window
15.TANAKA, YOSHIFUMI(2015)。THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE SEA。  new window
16.外交部(2016)。和平南海.國韁永固:中華民國南海政策說帖。台北:外交部。  延伸查詢new window
17.Shaw, Malcolm N.(2014)。International Law。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.宋承恩(20160201)。南海仲裁案:臺灣不願面對的真相,http://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/955024。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋承恩(20160714)。南海仲裁案果真是一場騙局,http://newtalk.tw/news/view/2016-07-14/75193。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡季廷(2016)。蔡季廷評台灣南海政策:「固有疆域」被剝離,http://hk.cmtt.com/doc/1043/4/6/5/104346574.html?coIuid=93&kindid=15470&docid=104346574&mdate=0811002643。  延伸查詢new window
4.Embassy of the Philippines。Notification and Statement of Claim of the Republic of the Philippines of 22 January 2013,http://www.philippineembassy-usa.org/uploads/pdfs/embassy/2013/2013-0122-Notification%20and%20Statement%20of%20Claim%20on%20West%20Philippine%20Sea.pdf。  new window
5.外交部(1999)。中華民國政府抗議近來馬來西亞政府侵佔我南沙群島之榆亞暗沙及簸箕礁,及菲律賓政府將具有主權爭議之黃岩島納入其版圖,並重申我南海主權立場,http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News—Content_M—2.aspx?n=5028B03CED127255&sms=5ED24855AD8E6C58&s=90AD3AE9BFCF7390。  延伸查詢new window
6.Ministry of Foreign Affairs (PRC)。Historical Evidence To Support China's Sovereignty over Nansha Islands,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/topics_665678/3754_666060/tl9231.shtml。  new window
7.Ku, Julian。Dear Taiwan: The PCA Ruling Does Not Threaten Your Control Over Taiping Island,http://opiniojuris.org/2016/07/14/dear-taiwan-pca-ruling-not-threaten-controltaiping-island/。  new window
8.EPIC(1953)。INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC ORGANIZATION, LIMITS OF OCEANS AND SEAS,https://epic.awi.de/29772/l/IH01953a.pdf。  new window
9.PCA Case Repository(20140330)。THE MEMORIAL OF THE PHILIPPINES,http://www.pcacases.com/pcadocs/Memorial%20of%20the%20Philippines%20VoIume%20I.pdf。  new window
10.外交部(2016)。中華民國外交部對南海仲裁案的立場,http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content_M_2.aspx?n=5028B03CED127255&sras=5ED24855AD8E6C58&s=2FE266654F43DD5C。  延伸查詢new window
11.外交部(2016)。中華民國外交部對南海仲裁案的立場,http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content_M_2.aspx?n=5028B03CED127255&sms=5ED24855AD8E6C58&s=2FE266654F43DD5C。  延伸查詢new window
12.外交部(2012)。外交部嚴正聲明我對太平島立場,http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content_M_2.aspx?n=5028B03CED127255&sms=5ED24855AD8E6C58&s=837020B05AD4C8C6。  延伸查詢new window
13.外交部。中華民國政府重申擁有南海主權,概不承認其他各方片面作為,http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News—Content_M_2.aspx?n=5028B03CED127255&sms=5ED24855AD8E6C58&s=20D0A5DF254AC8B8。  延伸查詢new window
14.總統府。總統赴我國南沙太平島發表談話,http://www.president.gov.tw/Default.aspx?tabid=131&nnid=514&itemid=36615, 。  延伸查詢new window
15.外交部(2016)。中華民國南海政策說帖,http://multilingual.mofa.gov.tw/web/web_UTF-8/South/%E4%B8%AD%E8%8F%AF%E6%B0%91%E5%9C%8B%E5%8D%97%E6%B5%B7%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E8%AA%AA%E5%B8%96.pdf。  new window
16.外交部(2015)。中華民國政府對南海問題之立場聲明,http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=8742DCE7A2A28761&s=02A142E7057EF2C2。  延伸查詢new window
17.外交部(2013)。中華民國外交部關切菲律賓邇來在南沙群島侵犯我權益之非法作為並重申立場,http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content_M_2.aspx?n=5028B03CED127255&sms=5ED24855AD8E6C58&s=ED0AF8910E7874AF。  延伸查詢new window
18.外交部(2013)。中華民國外交部對越南「海洋法」內文擅將我國西沙及南沙群島納入越南主權及管轄範圍表達嚴正關切與抗議,http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content_M_2.aspx?n=5028B03CED127255&sms=5ED24855AD8E6C58&s=926BEE6C41792C8E。  延伸查詢new window
19.外交部公眾外交協調會(1997)。中華民國政府針對菲律賓政府在其所謂「卡拉揚群島」(Kalayaan Islands)舉行村長選舉事發表嚴正聲明,http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content_M_2.aspx?n=5028B03CED127255&sms=5ED24855AD8E6C58&s=3159337CB1BE800。  延伸查詢new window
20.外交部公眾外交協調會(2009)。外交部針對菲律賓通過法案將屬於我國之部分南沙群島及中沙群島之黃岩島劃入菲國領土事鄭重聲明,http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News—Content—M_2.aspx?n=5028B03CED127255&sms=5ED24855AD8E6C58&s=E9E4B914F66266EF。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.姜皇池(2000)。論「歷史性水域」:由國際海洋法檢視我國《領海及鄰接區法草案》第六條。國際法與臺灣:歷史考察與法律評估。台北:學林文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
2.Mawdsley, A. Aguilar(1993)。Evidence Before the International Court of Justice。ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF WANG TIEYA。  new window
3.Vukas, Budislav(2004)。Closed and Semi-closed Seas。THE LAW OF THE SEA: SELECTED WRITINGS。  new window
4.Anderson, David(2012)。Islands and Rocks in the Modern Law of the Sea。THE LAW OF THE SEA CONVENTION: US ACCESSION AND GLOBALIZATION。  new window
5.Coito, Joel C.(2015)。Boundary Conflict: The China-Philippines Confrontation over the Scarborough Reef and the Viability of UNCLOS Dispute Settlement Procedures。SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND NEW CHALLENGES TO OCEAN LAW。  new window
6.Zou, Keyuan(2005)。Dispute over the Scarborough Shoal。LAW OF THE SEA IN THE EAST ASIA: ISSUES AND PROSPECTS。  new window
7.Jayakumar, S.(2014)。[THE SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTES AND THE LAW OF THE SEA] Introduction。THE SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTES AND THE LAW OF THE SEA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE