資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.118.193.7)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
內外夾擊--歐洲人權法院與國家人權機構之互動
書刊名:
臺灣國際研究季刊
作者:
廖福特
作者(外文):
Liao, Fu-te
出版日期:
2018
卷期:
14:1
頁次:
頁121-155
主題關鍵詞:
國家人權機構
;
歐洲人權法院
;
北愛爾蘭人權委員會
;
蘇格蘭人權委員會
;
平等及人權委員會
;
National human rights institution
;
European Court of Human Rights
;
Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission
;
Scottish Human Rights Commission
;
Commission for Equality and Human Rights
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:
6
點閱:3
『歐洲人權公約』現有47個會員國,幾乎涵蓋所有歐洲國家,歐洲人權法院之管轄權及於所有有關解釋及適用公約之事項。聯合國認為國家人權機構是實踐國際人權條約的重要機制,聯合國各機關認為國家人權機構至少可以扮演保護者、促進者及橋樑三種重要角色。歐洲共有49個國家人權機構,包括人權諮詢委員會、單一職權委員會、混和機制、人權監察使、獨立人權委員會等五種類型。各歐洲國家之國家人權機構透過參與歐洲人權法院之訴訟程序扮演法庭之友之角色,因此兩者也形成裡應外合之情狀,合作監督歐洲各國實踐公約所保障之權利。英國有三個國家人權機構,其中有北愛爾蘭人權委員會及平等及人權委員會曾參加歐洲人權法院之訴訟程序。北愛爾蘭人權委員會都與英國政府有不同見解,但是得到歐洲人權法院之認同。而平等及人權委員會參與歐洲人權法院訴訟時,絕大部分表達與英國政府不同意見,充分顯現其獨立性,而且大部分意見為歐洲人權法院所接受。
以文找文
European Convention on Human Rights (Convention) has 47 member states which include almost every European state. Jurisdiction of European Court of Human Rights (Court) covers all issues related to interpretations and applications of the Convention. The United Nations (UN) considers that National Human Rights Institutions (NHRI) are important mechanisms for implementation of international human rights instruments. The UN also believes that NHRIs can play roles as protector, promotor and bridge. There are 49 European NHRIs including five models: human rights advisory commission, single function commission, hybrid mechanism, human rights ombudsman and independent human rights commission. Each European NHRI participates as an amicus curiae at the Court so to cooperate to monitor European states with compliance with the Convention. The United Kingdom has three NHRIs. Opinions of the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission were different from those of the UK government, but endorsed by the Court. The Equality and Human Rights also acted independently and most of its views were agreed by the Court.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
O'Cinneide, Colm(2007)。The Commission for Equality and Human Rights: A New Institution for New and Uncertain Times。Industrial Law Journal,36(2),141-162。
2.
Klug, Francesca、O'Brien, Claire(2004)。'Fairness for All'? An Analysis of Human Rights Power in the White Paper on the Proposed Commission for Equality and Human Rights。Public Law,2004(Winter),712-724。
3.
廖福特(20000400)。北愛爾蘭人權委員會及愛爾蘭國家人權委員會。新世紀智庫論壇,9,74-78。
延伸查詢
4.
廖福特(20060800)。生命權與廢除死刑--歐洲理事會觀點之分析。政大法學評論,92,49-119。
延伸查詢
5.
Drzemczewski, Andrew、Meyer-Ladewig, Jens(1994)。Principal Characteristics of the New ECHR Control Mechanism, as Established by Protocol No. 11, Signed on 11 May 1994。Human Rights Law Journal,15(3),81-86。
6.
Cameron, Iain(1995)。Protocol 11 to the European Convention on Human Rights: The European Court of Human Rights as a Constitutional Court?。Yearbook of European Law,15,219-260。
7.
Bernhardt, Rudolf(1995)。Reform of the Control Machinery under the European Convention on Human Rights: Protocol No. 11。American Journal of International Law,89(1),145-154。
8.
Bratza, Nicolas、O'Boyle, Michael(1997)。Opinion: The Legacy of the Commission to the New Court under the Eleventh Protocol。European Human Rights Law Review,3,211-228。
9.
de Beco, Gautheir(2007)。National Human Rights Institutions in Europe。Human Rights Law Review,7,331-340。
10.
Lester, Lord of Herne Hill、Beattie, Kate(2006)。The New Commission for Equality and Human Rights。Public Law,2006(Summer),197-208。
11.
Mowbray, Alastair R.(1993)。Reform of the Control System of the European Convention on Human Rights。Public Law,1993(Autumn),419-427。
12.
Schermer, Henry G.(1993)。The European Court of Human Rights after the Merger。European Law Review,18(6),493-505。
13.
Schermer, Henry G.(1994)。The Eleventh Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights。European Law Review,19(8),367-384。
14.
Schermer, Henry G.(1995)。Adaptation of the 11th Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights。European Law Review,20(6),559-579。
15.
Suk, Julie Chi-Hye(2006)。Antidiscrimination Law in the Administrative State。University of Illinois Law Review,2,405-474。
會議論文
1.
Ximenes, Sebastiao Dias(2005)。The Background, Structure, Functions and Perspective of the NHRC of Timor-Leste。Conference on NHRIs in the Asia-Pacific, Taiwan Foundation for Democracy and Taiwanese Society of International Law,(會議日期: October 22-23, 2005)。Taipei。
2.
盧瓦特(1994)。西歐監察制度之沿革與發展235-236。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Baker, Christopher(1998)。Human Rights Act 1998: A Practitioner's Guide。Sweet & Maxwell。
2.
Scottish Executive Justice Department(2002)。The Scottish Human Rights Commission Consultation Paper。Scottish Executive Justice Department。
3.
Department of Trade and Industry(2007)。Equality Impact Assessment on Proposals for Location of the Commission for Equality and Human Rights。Department of Trade and Industry。
4.
Leckie, David、Pickersgill, David(1999)。The 1998 Human Rights Act Explained。The Stationery Office。
5.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights(2012)。Handbook on the establishment and accreditation of National Human Rights Institutions in the European Union。European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights。
6.
Canadian Human Rights Foundation, and Philippine Commission on Human Rights(2000)。National Human Rights Institutions at Work Regional Workshop in Economic, Social and Cultural Rights。Canadian Human Rights Foundation, and Philippine Commission on Human Rights。
7.
Commonwealth Secretariat(2001)。National Human Rights Institutions: Best Practice。London:Commonwealth Secretariat。
8.
Kjaerum, Morten(2003)。National Human Rights Institutions: Implementing Human Rights。Copenhagen:Danish Institute for Human Rights。
單篇論文
1.
Parliamentary Assembly(1994)。Recommendation 1247 on the Enlargement of the Council of Europe。
其他
1.
German Institute for Human Rights(2002)。Jahresbericht 2002 (Annual Report 2002),http://www.institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de/fileadmin/_migrated/tx_commerce/jahresbericht_2002.pdf。
2.
House of Lords, and House of Commons(2003)。Joint Committee on Human Rights, Sixth Report, Session 2002-03,https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200203/jtselect/jtrights/67/6702.htm。
3.
Scottish Human Rights Commission(2009)。Annual Report 2008-2009,http://www.scottishhumanrights.com/media/1148/crannualreport2008-2009pdf.pdf。
4.
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, and Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs(2004)。Fairness for All: A New Commission for Equality and Human Rights,http://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/Fairness%20for%20all.pdf。
圖書論文
1.
Dickson, Brice(2005)。The Protection Role of the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission。The Protection Role of National Human Rights Institutions。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。
2.
Boothman, Christopher(2000)。The Commission of Racial Equality。Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices National Experience Throughout the World。Kluwer Law International。
3.
McCrudden, Christopher(1987)。The Commission for Racial Equality: Formal Investigations in the Shadow of Judicial Review。Regulation and Public Law。Weidenfeld and Nicolson。
4.
Hadden, Tom(2000)。The Role of a National Commission in the Protection of Human Rights。Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices National Experience Throughout the World。Kluwer Law International。
5.
Bernhardt, Rudolf(1994)。Human Rights and Judicial Review: the European Court of Human Rights。Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective。Kluwer Academic Publishers。
6.
Elizondo, Gonzalo、Aguilar, Irene(2000)。The Ombudsman Institution in Latin America: Minimum Standards for its Existence。National Human Rights Institutions Articles and Working Papers。Danish Centre for Human Rights。
7.
Livingstone, Stephen、Murray, Rachel(2004)。The Effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions。Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context。Hart Publishing。
8.
Castells, Juan Vintŏ(2000)。The Ombudsman and Parliamentary Committees on Human Rights in Spain。Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices National Experience Throughout the World。The Hague:Kluwer Law International。
9.
Drzemczewski, Andrew(1997)。A Major Overhaul of the European Human Rights Convention Control Mechanism: Protocol No. 11。Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law。The Hague:Kluwer Law International。
10.
Neff, Stephen C.、Avebury, Eric(2000)。Human Rights Mechanisms in the United Kingdom。Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices National Experience throughout the World。The Hague:Kluwer Law International。
11.
Ramcharan, Bertrand G.(2005)。[The Protection Role of National Human Rights Institutions] Introduction。The Protection Role of National Human Rights Institutions。The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
臺灣和國際人權轉型的故事之一:模擬亞洲人權法院
2.
2009至2016年隨機殺人事件對臺灣死刑存廢的反省
3.
論死刑之裁量與界限:以兩公約與比較法為出發
4.
歐洲人權公約第3條與嚴重系統性歧視:私人關係中的非人道或侮辱待遇
5.
從公民與政治權利國際公約論死刑裁判之人權基準--最高法院近年相關裁判之綜合評析
6.
「公民與政治權利國際公約」國內法化之影響:最高法院死刑相關判決之檢視
7.
英國「平等及人權委員會」之探究
8.
生命權與廢除死刑--歐洲理事會觀點之分析
1.
死刑制裁之政策分析
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code