:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:時間、相對所得與邊際效用遞減法則關係之探討
書刊名:中科大學報
作者:曹淑琳 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsao, Shuling
出版日期:2019
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁13-33
主題關鍵詞:時間相對所得實際所得邊際效用遞減法則TimeActual incomeRelative incomeLaw of diminishing marginal utility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:2
依據林忠正(2015,2016,2017)序列論文的研究,可以了解常用的「邊際效用遞減法則」不能在效用數值只能排序的序數總效用概念中取得一個容身之處。如何解決此效用理論的基本問題,一直沒有重要的進展。此項經濟理論上的重大缺陷,直到林忠正(2015,2016,2017)提出「序數邊際效用分析法」(ordinal marginal utility approach)才為「序數的邊際效用遞減法則」取得一個合理的理論定位。本文依據林忠正的「序數邊際效用分析法」,提出並討論一個關於「邊際效用遞減法則」的有趣問題。簡單地說,本文強調人們所得的邊際效用為「相對所得」的函數,「相對所得」取決於「實際所得」與「參考所得」的相對大小,此時,可以以「實際所得」與「參考所得」的「比例」方式來呈現「相對所得」的概念,而且在「邊際效用遞減法則」成立的情況下,「相對所得」愈高,消費者的邊際效用愈低,換句話說,效用取決於「相對所得」,也就是一人的幸福程度或效用取決於「實際所得」(實際狀態)與「參考所得」(參考點)的互相比較的概念。本文也要探討「參考所得為時間的函數,並會隨著時間的延伸而變化的概念」之觀點,也就是,當「實際所得」大於「參考所得」時,隨著時間的延伸,「參考所得」會向上調整而逐漸接近「實際所得」;當「實際所得」小於「參考所得」時,隨著時間的延伸,「參考所得」會向下調整而逐漸接近「實際所得」。藉由以上的論述,我們可以解釋以下的現象:隨著時間的經過,高估自己所得之人,會逐漸認清現實,其對於幸福的評價(亦即邊際效用)會因此隨著時間而逐漸增加,但各個年歲的幸福程度(亦即各時點總效用)卻會隨時間逐漸下降,而幸福評價與幸福程度都會隨著時間漸漸回復成與平常的狀態相差不遠,甚至是無差異的;反之,低估自己所得之人,其幸福變化,會隨著時間的經過,逐漸認清現實,其對於幸福的評價(亦即邊際效用)會因此隨著時間而逐漸下降,但各個年歲的幸福程度(亦即各時點總效用)卻會隨時間逐漸上升,而幸福評價與幸福程度都會隨著時間漸漸回復成與平常的狀態相差不遠,甚至是無差異的。因此,本文欲討論現代經濟理論中,未曾提出討論的「時間」、「相對所得」與「邊際效用遞減法則」之間微妙的關係。
According to Lin (2015, 2016, 2017) series of dissertations, we can understand that the commonly used "Law of diminishing marginal utility" cannot obtain a place in the concept of total utility number ordinal that utility value can only sort. There is no significant progress in how to solve the basic problem of this utility theory. This major theoretical imperfection in economic theory, until Lin (2015, 2016, 2017) proposed that the "ordinal marginal utility approach" was to obtain a reasonable theoretical position for the "ordinal marginal utility reduction law." Based on the "Ordinal Marginal Utility Analysis Method" put forward by Lin, this paper proposes and discusses an interesting question about "the law of diminishing marginal utility". To put it simply, this article emphasizes that people's marginal utility is a function of "relative income." The relative income depends on the relative size of "actual income" and "reference income." In this case, "actual income" and "reference income" can be used. The "proportional" approach is to present the concept of "relative income," and in the case of the establishment of the "law of diminishing marginal utility", the higher the "relative income", the lower the marginal utility of consumers. This article also discusses new ideas of "reflecting the concept that income is a function of time and will change over time." That is, when "actual income" is greater than "reference income, " as time goes by, "reference income" will adjust upward and gradually approach "real income"; when "actual income" is less than "reference income," The extension of time "reference income" will adjust downwards and gradually approach "real income". Through the above discussion, we can explain the following phenomenon: As time goes by, people who overestimate their own income will gradually recognize the reality, and their evaluation of happiness (marginal utility) will gradually increase, but the happiness of each age (the total utility at the time) will gradually decline, and the happiness evaluation and happiness will gradually return to the same state as the normal state, even if there is no difference; on the contrary, underestimate the income of the person, the happiness change, as time goes by, the reality is gradually recognized, and the evaluation of happiness (the marginal utility) will gradually decline over time, but the happiness of each age (the total utility at each time) will follow the time gradually rises, and the happiness evaluation and happiness level will gradually return to the same state as usual, even if there is no difference. Therefore, this article discusses the subtle relationship between "time", "relative income" and" law of diminishing marginal utility" that have not been discussed in modern economic theory.
期刊論文
1.Blanchflower, David G.、Oswald, Andrew J.(2004)。Well-being over time in Britain and the USA。Journal of Public Economics,88(7/8),1359-1386。  new window
2.陳嘉鳳、周才忠(20120400)。臺灣民眾主觀快樂幸福感之樣貌與未來之發展方向。應用倫理評論,52,83-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Tsou, Meng-wen、Liu, Jin-tan(2001)。Happiness and domain satisfaction in Taiwan。Journal of Happiness Studies,2,269-288。  new window
4.Samuelson, P. A.(1938)。A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour。Economica (New Series),5(17),61-71。  new window
5.Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada(2005)。Income and Well-being: An Empirical Analysis of the Comparison Income Effect。Journal of Public Economics,89(5),997-1019。  new window
6.Hagerty, M. R.、Veenhoven, R.(2003)。Wealth and Happiness Revisited: Growing National Income Does Go with Greater Happiness。Social indicators research,64(1),1-27。  new window
7.Easterlin, Richard A.(2001)。Income and Happiness: towards a Unified Theory。The Economic Journal,111(473),465-484。  new window
8.Oswald, A. J.(1997)。Happiness and Economic Performance。Economic Journal,107,1815-1831。  new window
9.Bernardelli, H.(1934)。Notes on the Determinateness of the Utility Function。Review of Economic Studies,2,69-75。  new window
10.Bernardelli, H.(1938)。The End of the Marginal Utility Theory?。Economica,5(18),192-212。  new window
11.Bernardelli, H.(1952)。A Rehabilitation of the Classical Theory of Marginal Utility。Economica,19(75),254-268。  new window
12.Alesina, Alberto、Di Telia, Rafael、MacCulloch, Robert(2004)。Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Different?。Journal of Public Economics,88(9/10),2009-2042。  new window
13.Easterlin, Richard A.(1995)。Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?。Journal of economic behavior & organization,27(1),35-47。  new window
14.林忠正(2017)。經濟學典範的挑戰:為何「極大化總效用」分析架構是「國王新衣」?--論Bernardelli在1950年代的感嘆。系統思考與管理,1(2),57-81。  延伸查詢new window
15.Hudík, M.(2014)。Reference-Dependence and Marginal Utility: Alt, Samuelson, and Bernardelli。History of Political Economy,46(4),677-693。  new window
16.Lancaster, K.(1953)。A Refutation of Mr. Bernardelli。Economica,19,259-262。  new window
17.Lange, O.(1934)。The Determinateness of the Utility Function。Review of Economic Studies,1,218-225。  new window
18.Lelkes, O.(2006)。Tasting Freedom: Happiness, Religion and Economic Transition。Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,59,173-194。  new window
19.Lin, C. C.、Peng, S. S.(2019)。The Role of Diminishing Marginal Utility in the Ordinal and Cardinal Utility Theories。Australian Economic Papers,58(3),233-246。  new window
20.Solnick, S. J.、Hemenway, D.(1998)。Is more always better?: A survey on positional concerns。Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,37(3),373-383。  new window
會議論文
1.林忠正(2015)。序數與基數效用理論簡史I:為何陷入兩難困境的效用理論必須重建?跨界得與失的序數邊際效用分析法。中央研究院經濟所學術研討會,中央研究院經濟所 。  延伸查詢new window
2.林忠正(2015)。序數與基數效用理論簡史II:為何陷入兩難困境的效用理論必須重建?跨界得與失的序數邊際效用分析法。中央研究院經濟所學術研討會,中央研究院經濟所 。  延伸查詢new window
3.林忠正(2015)。邊際效用遞減法則在序數與基數效用理論中的角色:難覓合適棲身之地的邊際效用遞減法則,跨界得與失的序數邊際效用分析法。中央研究院經濟所學術研討會,中央研究院經濟所 。  延伸查詢new window
4.林忠正(2015)。為何Marshall需求理論必須被擺進經濟學歷史博物館?(I)跨界的得與失的序數邊際效用分析法。中央研究院經濟所學術研討會,中央研究院經濟所 。  延伸查詢new window
5.崔曉倩、陳美伶(2008)。所得與快樂:台灣社會變遷基本調查的跨期分析。台灣的社會變遷1985-2005台灣社會變遷調查計畫第十一次研討會(第一階段),中央研究院社會學研究所 。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.行政院主計處(2012)。家庭收支:平均每人每年可支配所得。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Schor, Juliet B.(1991)。The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure。New York:Basic Books。  new window
2.Layard, Richard(2005)。Happiness: Lessons from a new science。Penguin。  new window
3.Varian, H. R.(1996)。Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach。W. W. Norton。  new window
單篇論文
1.林忠正(2016)。連劣等品都不能妥善解釋的現代個體理論不要也罷:你不可以說「所得提高我對某一商品的邊際效用提高了」,台灣經濟學會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Diener, E.、Oishi, S.(2000)。Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations。Culture and subjective well-being。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
2.Easterlin, Richard A.(1974)。Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence。Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz。Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top