:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:數位化時代的裁判外紛爭處理制度--從ADR到ODR的程序保障
書刊名:政大法學評論
作者:沈冠伶 引用關係
作者(外文):Shen, Kuan-ling
出版日期:2021
卷期:166
頁次:頁227-312
主題關鍵詞:裁判外紛爭處理線上紛爭處理調解律師和解律師協同程序消費紛爭小額請求程序保障程序選擇權Online dispute resolutionODRAlternative dispute resolutionADRMediationAttorney's settlementCollaborative law processSmall claimsConsumer disputeProcedural justiceRight of procedural choice
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:56
  • 點閱點閱:3
期刊論文
1.楊崇森(20101000)。美國民事訴訟制度之特色與對我國之啟示。軍法專刊,56(5),5-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Pappas, Brian A.(2015)。Med-Arb And The Legalization Of Alternative Dispute Resolution。Harv. Negot. L. Rev.,20(1),157-203。  new window
3.Weisman, Martin C.(2013)。Med-Arb: The Best Of Both Worlds。Disp. Resol. Mag.,19(3),40-41。  new window
4.Fiss, Owen M.(1984)。Against Settlement。Yale L. J.,93(6),1073-1090。  new window
5.王明禮(20050000)。科技於法律程序上之應用--以線上糾紛解決途徑為例。世新法學,2,1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.姜世明(20151100)。調解(調處)制度之研究--兼談調解人之法律風險。月旦法學,246,84-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Trenczek, Thomas(2008)。Stand und Zukunft der Mediation - Konfliktvermittlung in Australien und Deutschland。SchiedsVZ,6(3),135-141。  new window
8.王泰升(20180300)。再訪臺灣的調解制度:對傳統的現代化轉譯。臺灣史研究,25(1),101-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.林俊宏(20150400)。初探電子商務糾紛與線上仲裁制度--以美國經驗為例。仲裁,101,98-120。  延伸查詢new window
10.向明恩、王怡蘋(20160500)。兩岸消費訴外紛爭解決機制之開展--從臺灣法出發並借鏡歐盟之規範。月旦法學,252,25-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.山田文(20190128)。透過ADR所成立之和解及其執行力。臺灣法學雜誌,360,3-22。  延伸查詢new window
12.Morek, Rafal(2006)。The Regulatory Framework for Online Dispute Resolution: A Critical View。University of Toledo law review,38(1),163-192。  new window
13.Sanders, Anne(2021)。Video-Hearings in Europe Before, During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic。International Journal for Court Administration,12(2)。  new window
14.Menashe, Doron(2018)。A Critical Analysis of the Online Court。University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law,39(4),921-953。  new window
15.Meller-Hannich, Caroline、Nöhre, Monika(2019)。Ein zeitgemäßer Rahmen für Zivilrechtsstreitigkeiten。NJW,72(35),2522-2526。  new window
16.山田文、邱璿如(20190228)。日本訴訟外紛爭解決機制研習會(3)--ADR與裁判。臺灣法學雜誌,362,26-41。  延伸查詢new window
17.李淑如(20190900)。消費者線上紛爭解決(ODR)機制--以歐盟與德國之ODR法制為啟示。高大法學論叢,15(1),115-119+121+123-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.沈冠伶(20201200)。商業事件之裁判外紛爭處理--以商業法院之調解及移付仲裁為中心。月旦法學教室,218,32-58。  延伸查詢new window
19.沈冠伶(20210900)。民事訴訟之線上起訴與遠距審理--民事法院數位轉型及現代化之展望。月旦法學,316,106-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.林俊廷(20171215)。訴訟外紛爭解決機制(ADR)與司法改革。司法周刊,1880,2-3。  延伸查詢new window
21.山田文(2013)。ADR法改正の課題。法律時報,85(4),11-16。  延伸查詢new window
22.Cameiro, Davide、Novaisa, Paulo、Andradeb, Francisco、Zeleznikowc, John、Neves, José(2014)。Online Dispute Resolution: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective。A. I. Rev.,41(2),211-240。  new window
23.Dasteel, Jeffrey H.(2017)。Consumer Click Arbitration: A Review of Online Consumer Arbitration Agreements。Arb. L. Rev.,9。  new window
24.Del Duca, Louis F.、Rule, Colin、Rimpfel, Kathryn(2014)。eBay's De Facto Low Value High Volume Resolution Process: Lessons and Best Practices for ODR Systems Designers。Y. B. Arb. & Mediation,6,204-219。  new window
25.Ebner, Noam、Greenberg, Elayne E.(2020)。Strengthening Online Dispute Resolution Justice。WASH. U. J. L. & POL'Y,63,65-117。  new window
26.Exon, Susan Nauss(2017)。Ethics and Online Dispute Resolution: From Evolution to Revolution。OHIO ST. J. ON DlSP. RESOL.,32(4),609-664。  new window
27.Henssler, Martin(1997)。Anwaltliches Berufsrecht und Mediation。AnwBl,3,129-138。  new window
28.Leutner, Gerd、Hacker, Maximilian(2012)。Zu Unrecht verschmäht: Der vollstreckbare Anwaltsvergleich。NJW,65(19),1318-1323。  new window
29.Main, Thomas O.(2019)。Mediation: An Unlikely Villain。OHIO St. J. ON DlSP. RESOL.,34(3),537-574。  new window
30.Münch, Christof(1993)。Der vollstreckbare Anwaltsvergleich als Räumungsvergleich。NJW,46(18),1181-1182。  new window
31.Prütting, Hanns(2018)。Rückgang der Klageeingangszahlen bei den staatlichen Gerichten。DRiZ。  new window
32.Scott, Marilyn A. K.(2008)。Collaborative Law: Dispute Resolution Competencies for the 'New Advocacy'。Queensl. U. Tech. L. & Just. J.,8(1),213-237。  new window
33.Sela, Ayelet(2018)。Can Computers Be Fair? How Automated and Human-Powered Online Dispute Resolution Affect Procedural Justice in Mediation and Arbitration。Ohio St. J. on Dis. Resol.,33(1),91-148。  new window
34.Ward, Ettie(2007)。Mandatory Court-Annexed Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States Federal Courts: Panacea or Pandemic?。St. JOHN'S L. REV.,81(1),77-98。  new window
35.Webb, Stu(2000)。Collaborative Law: An Alternative for Attorneys Suffering 'Family Law Burnout'。Matrim. Strategist,13。  new window
36.Weinstein, Jack B.(1996)。Some Benefits and Risks of Privatization of Justice Through ADR。Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol.,11(2),241-295。  new window
37.Wolf, Christian(2015)。Zivilprozess versus außergerichtliche Konfliktlösung - Wandel der Streitkultur in Zahlen。NJW,68(23),1656-1661。  new window
研究報告
1.中華民國青年創業協會總會(2012)。電子商務交易紛爭解決機制之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華民國總統府(2017)。總統府司法改革國是會議成果報告。  延伸查詢new window
3.財團法人資訊工業策進會(2018)。我國參與「APEC發展微中小型企業線上爭端解決架構」倡議之先期研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.財團法人金融消費評議中心(2019)。2018年年報。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳品蓁(2018)。跨境線上紛爭解決機制--以電子商務平台內部紛爭解決機制為中心(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Katsh, Ethan、Rifkin, Janet(2001)。Online Dispute Resolution--Resolving Conflicts In Cyberspace。Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Klowait, Jürgen、Gläßer, Ullar(2014)。Mediationsgesetz。  new window
3.山本和彥、山田文(2015)。ADR仲裁法。日本評論社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Cortés, Pablo(2017)。The Law of Consumer Redress in an Evolving Digital Market。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Katsh, M. Ethan、Rabinovich-Einy, Orna(2017)。Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes。Oxford University Press。  new window
6.中經院(2019)。數位貿易線上紛爭解決(ODR) 機制研究。  延伸查詢new window
7.Althammer, Christoph、Meller-Hannich, Caroline(2017)。VSBG Verbraucherstreitbeilegungsgesetz。  new window
8.Civil Justice Council Advisory Group(2015)。Online Dispute Resolution for Low Value Civil Claims。Civil Justice Council。  new window
9.Engel, Martin(2010)。Collaborative Law。Mohr Siebeck。  new window
10.Garner, Michael、Voithof, Caroline(2019)。Rechtstatsachenforschung。  new window
11.Greger, Reinhard、Unberath, Hannes(2012)。MediationsG: Recht der alternativen Konfliktlösung。  new window
12.Kovach, Kimberleek(2004)。Mediation, Principles & Practice。West Academic Publishing。  new window
13.Menkel-Meadow, Carrie、Porter-Love, Lela、Kupfer-Schneider, Andrea(2006)。Mediation: Practice, Policy, and Ethics。Wolters Kluwer Law & Business。  new window
14.Stein, Friedrich、Jonas, Martin、Schlosser, Peter(1994)。Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung。  new window
15.Susskind, Richard(2019)。Online Courts and the Future of Justice。Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Vesser, Kristin(1995)。Der Vollstreckbare Anwaltsvergleich。  new window
其他
1.邱璿如,黃柄縉,黃書苑,丁素娟(2017)。日本行政型及民間型ADR制度考察報告。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.沈冠伶(2012)。台灣之裁判外紛爭處理制度(ADR)現況與發展--以法院之調解制度為中心。跨世紀兩岸民事程序法學之新視野。元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.Menkel-Meadow, C.(2013)。Regulation of Dispute Resolution in the United States of America: From the Formal to the Informal to the 'Semi-Formal'。Regulating Dispute Resolution: ADR and Access to Justice at the Crossroads。Hart。  new window
3.Menkel-Meadow, Carrie(2014)。Alternative and Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Context Formal, Informal, and Semiformal Legal Processes。The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice。Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.沈冠伶(2019)。勞動調解程序之重構:紛爭處理制度多元化與程序之轉換。民事訴訟法之研討。元照。  延伸查詢new window
5.沈冠伶(2012)。「律師之和解」作為裁判外紛爭處理制度。訴訟權保障與裁判外紛爭處理。  延伸查詢new window
6.邱聯恭(2018)。程序保障之機能--基於民事事件類型審理必要論及程序法理交錯適用肯定論之觀點。程序制度機能論。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Hess, Burkard(2019)。Privatizing Dispute Resolution and Its Limit。Privatizing Dispute Resolution: Trends and Limits。Nomos。  new window
8.Krans, Bart、Nylund, Anna。Civil Courts Coping with Covid-19: Exceptional Times, Normal Times, New Times?。Civil Courts Coping with COVID-19。Eleven International Publishing。  new window
9.Rabinovich-Einy, Oma、Katsh, Ethan(2012)。Lessons from Online Dispute Resolution for Dispute System Design。Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice。Eleven International Publishing。  new window
10.Zwickel, Martin(2018)。Die digitale Strukturierung und inhaltliche Erschließung zivilprozessualer Schriftsätze im Spannungsfeld zwischen Parteiherrschaft und Richtermacht。Digitalisierung der gerichtlichen Verfahren und das Prozessrecht。  new window
11.邱聯恭(20000000)。程序選擇權之法理--著重於闡述其理論基礎並準以展望新世紀之民事程序法學。程序選擇權論。臺北:三民。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE