資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.142.164.174)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
國中一年級學生的科學認知偏好
書刊名:
科學教育學刊
作者:
鄭湧涇
/
黃秋純
/
蔡在壽
/
廖碧珠
作者(外文):
Cheng, Yeong-jing
/
Huang, Chiou-chwen
/
Tsai, Tzay-show
/
Liaw, Bih-ju
出版日期:
1993
卷期:
1:1
頁次:
頁51-76
主題關鍵詞:
科學認知偏好
;
認知偏好風格
;
課程評鑑
;
Science cognitive preferences
;
Cognitive preference style
;
Curriculum evaluation
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:17
本研究發展「科學認知偏好測驗」(TSCP),以探索臺北地區國中一年級學生之「科學認知偏好」,並研究其與學生背景特性和學校大小等變項之間的關係。結果顯示,TSCP的信度和效度考驗均稱滿意。R、P、Q、A四項認知偏好的型式分數之內部均質性信度分別為0.63、0.60、0.84和0.64。TSCP分數的因素分析抽取出三個因素,因素分析與四項認知偏好型式的相關分析結果均證實了Q-R兩極軸的存在。全體樣本的科學認知偏好取向,依喜好的程度順序排列為P(原理原則)>Q(批判質疑)>A(應用)>R(記憶)。亦即學生於學習自然科學知識時,偏好鑑識科學知識之原理原則而不喜記憶科學知識,更進一步的分析顯示,在生物、物質科學和地球科學三個分測驗中,學生表現之科學認知偏好的「取向」,不盡相同。 男女生科學認知偏好的分數並無顯著不同;惟不同類型學校(大小)的學生,科學認知偏好取向顯著不同,大型學校學生偏好P、Q,中型學校學生偏好P,而小型學校學生則偏好A。研究的結果亦顯示,家長職業不同的學生,科學認知偏好的分數並無顯著差異存在。
以文找文
In this study, the Test of Science Cognitive Preference (TSCP) was developed and used to investigate the science cognitive preference styles of 7th grade students in Taipei area. In addition, the relationship between cognitive preference and students' background characteristics and certain school variables were explored. The results indicated that the reliability and validity of the TSCP was satisfactory. The internal consistency reliabilities of the R, P, Q and A modes were 0.62, 0.60, 0.84, and 0.84, and 0.64 respectively. Results of factor analysis revealed 3 factors. The intercorrelation among the scores of the four cognitive preference modes and factor loadings confirmed the Q-R bipolar axis proposed in the previous study. The subjects exhibited a strong preference for the P and a weak preference for the R mode. The order of preference from the highest to the lowest was P>Q>A>R. This indicated that 7th graders in Taipei area preferred learning general principles of the science information presented to them, to memorizing scientific facts. Further data analysis revealed that distinct differences in cognitive preference style were found among biology, physical science and earth science subtests. No difference in the scores of the four cognitive preference modes was found between male and female subjects. However, significant differences in science cognitive preferences were found among the three types of schools categorized by size. Students of large schools showed a higher preference for the P and Q modes, while students of medium and small schools showed a higher preference for the P and Q modes, while students of medium and small schools showed a higher preference for the P and A modes respectively. Meanwhile, the results of the study revealed that no differences in science cognitive preferences were found among the students grouped by parents' occupation.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Tamir, P.(1988)。The relationship between cognitive preferences, student background and achievement in science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,25(3),201-216。
2.
Cronbach, L. J.(1951)。Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test。Psychometrika,16(3),297-334。
3.
Tamir, P.(1985)。Meta-analysis of cognitive preference and learning。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,22(1),1-17。
4.
Atwood, R. K.(1968)。A cognitive preference examination using chemistry content。JRST,5(1),34-35。
5.
Atwood, R. K.(1971)。Development of a cognitive preference examination utilizing general science and social science content。JRST,8,273-275。
6.
Barnett, H. C.(1974)。An investigation of relationships among biology achievement, perception of teacher style, and cognitive preferences。JRST,11(2),141-147。
7.
Brown, S. A.(1975)。Cognitive preferences in science: Their nature and analysis。Studies in Science Education,2,43-65。
8.
Fazio, F.、Zambotti, G.(1977)。Some cognitive style variables and their relationships to chemistry achievement。Journal of College Science Teaching,6(3),154-155。
9.
Heath, R. W.(1964)。Curriculum, cognition and educational measurement。Educational & Psychological Measurement,24(2),239-253。
10.
Jungwirth, E.(1980)。Alternative interpretations of findings in cognitive preference research in science education。Science Education,64(1),85-94。
11.
Kempa, R. F.、Dube, G. E.(1973)。Cognitive preference orientations in students of chemistry。British J. of Educational Psychology,43,279-288。
12.
Mackay, L. D.(1972)。Changes in cognitive preferences during two years of study in Victorian schools。Australian Science Teacher J.,18,63-66。
13.
Tamir, P.(1975)。The relationship among cognitive preference, school environment, teachers' curricular bias, curriculum, and subject matter。AERJ,12(3),235-264。
14.
Tamir, P.(1976)。The relationship between achievement in biology and cognitive preference style in high school students。British J. Educational Psycholology,46,57-67。
15.
Tamir, P.(1977)。A note on cognitive preferences in science。Studies in Science Education,4,111-121。
16.
Tamir, P.(1977)。The relationship between cognitive preferences of students and their teachers。Journal of Curriculum Studies,9(1),67-74。
17.
Tamir, P.(1981)。Validation of cognitive preferences。British Educational Research Journal,7(1),37-49。
18.
Tamir, P.、Kempa, R. F.(1978)。Cognitive preferences styles across three science disciplines。Science Education,62(2),143-152。
19.
Tamir, P.、Lunetta, V. N.(1977)。A comparison of ipsative and normative procedures in the study of cognitive preferences。The Journal of Educational Research,71(2),86-92。
20.
Tamir, P.、Lunetta, V. N.(1978)。Cognitive preference in biology of a group of talented high school students。JRST,75(1),59-64。
21.
Tamir, P.、Jungwrith, E.(1984)。Test scores and associations as measures of cognitive preferences。Studies in Educational Evaluation,10,149-158。
22.
Tamir, P.、Penick, J. E.、Lunetta, V. N.(1982)。Cognitive preferences and creativity: An exploratory study。JRST,19,123-132。
23.
van den Berg, E.、Lunetta, V. N.、Tamir, P.(1982)。The convergent validity of the cognitive preference construct。JRST,19(5),417-424。
24.
Hicks, L. E.(1970)。Some properties of Ipsative, Normative, and Forced-choice Normative measures。Psychological Bulletin,74(3),167-184。
25.
鄭湧涇(19910100)。Biology Cognitive Preferences of Preservice Biology Teachers。Proceedings of the National Science Council. Part D, Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education,1(1),32-40。
26.
Rost, J.(1983)。Cognitive preferences as components of student interest。Studies in Educational Evaluation,9,285-302。
27.
Tamir, P.、Kempa, R. F.(1977)。College students' cognitive preferences in science。The Journal of Educational Research,70,210-218。
28.
Van den Berg, E.、Lunetta, V. N.、Tamir, R.(1978)。Cognitive preferences: A validation study。Studies in Educational Evaluation,4(2),107-120。
29.
Witkin, Herman A.、Moore, C. A.、Goodenough, D. R.、Cox, P. W.(1977)。Field-Dependent and Field-Independent: Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications。Review of Educational Research,47(1),1-64。
會議論文
1.
Wu, Ta-You(1983)。Science Education Program in the Republic of China。First Asian-Pacific Conference on Science Education。Taipei。
學位論文
1.
van den Berg, E.(1978)。Cognitive preferences: A Validation Study(博士論文)。The University of Iowa,Iowa City, Iowa。
2.
Boehlke, P. R.(1984)。Cognitive Preference and Science Teaching Behavior(博士論文)。The University of Iowa,Iowa City, Iowa。
圖書
1.
Guilford, J. P.、Fruchter, B.(1978)。Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。
2.
國立台灣師範大學科學教育中心(1986)。教育部中小學科學教育環境調查研究:課程教材評鑑計畫。
延伸查詢
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
生物認知偏好與學業成就的關係
2.
國中學生生物認知偏好之研究
1.
臺灣不同地區、不同性別的國小學童科學探究之比較
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code