:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:漢魏之際儒道關係與士人心態
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:王曉毅
作者(外文):Wang, Xiaoyi
出版日期:1997
卷期:15:1=29
頁次:頁45-71+443-444
主題關鍵詞:黃老儒教玄學士人漢魏之際Huanglao taoist schoolConfucianismNeo-taoismScholarsHan and wei dynasties, the turning point
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(6) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:44
     在漢末儒教危機的歷史條件下,黃老道家得以復興,以形名學與養生學活躍於社會 批判思潮和早期道教中,並在建安時期戰亂的特殊環境中一度成為曹魏意識形態的主流。 但是儒家學說已在中國社會扎根,黃老道家無法取而代之,故儒、道兩家的思想差異引起 了思想界關注;如何使之融為一體,成為當時最重要的時代課題。經過曹魏前期幾代思想 家的努力,到正始時期誕生了以儒道融合為特徵的早期玄學,其中黃老形名學與養生學分別 與儒家倫理結合,形成了貴無論和元氣自然論兩大玄學流派。這一學術思潮變化的底蘊,是 魏漢之際士人文化性格中儒家社會倫理與道家個性自由雙重化過程,經歷了漢末名士、建安 名士和正始名士具有明顯繼承關係的三代士人才基本完成。
     The Huanglao Taoist school 黃老道家revived when Confucianism faced a crisis at the end of the Han dynasty. This school developed from Huanglao's logic and the theory of conserving vital power. It played a key role in criticism by society and even once became the mainstream ideology of the Cao-Wei 曹魏 era during the chaotic wars of the Jian-an 建安 reign. Nevertheless, because Confucianism was so deeply rooted in Chinese society, Huanglao Taoism was unable to fully replace it. The intellectuals were greatly concerned about the differences between Confucianism and Taoism and the most important academic dilemma was how to combine the two school of thoughts.After much effort the thinkers of the Cao-Wei period developed the early form of Neo-Taoist玄學 thought which combined Taoism and Confucianism. Huanglao's logic and the theory of conserving vital power was intermingled with Confucian ethics to respectively form the characteristics of the two Neo-Taoist schools of thought:nihilism and natural vitality. The essence of this thought transformation stemmed from the inclusion of the Confucian social ethics and the Taoist stress on individual freedom into the cultural disposition of the intellectuals of that time. This was basically completed by the last three generations (the end of the Han dynasty as well as the Jian-an and Zhengshi 正始 periods) of intellectuals as they inherited and developed the former generation's thought.
期刊論文
1.安徽省亳縣博物館、李燦(1978)。亳縣曹操宗族墓葬。文物,1978(8),34-47。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李志鈞(1978)。阮籍集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王曉毅(1994)。中國古代人才鑒識術─《人物志》譯注與研究。吉林。  延伸查詢new window
3.釋道宣(1991)。續高僧傳。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.盧弼(1982)。三國志集解。藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊伯峻。列子集釋。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉勰、黃叔琳(1978)。文心雕龍注。台北:台灣開明書店。  延伸查詢new window
7.逯欽立(1995)。先秦漢魏晉南北朝詩。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.歐陽詢、汪紹楹、李劍雄(1982)。藝文類聚。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.湯用彤(1983)。湯用彤學術論文集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.范曄、王先謙(1984)。後漢書集解。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.王明(1979)。太平經合校。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉義慶、劉孝標、余嘉錫、周祖謨(1993)。世說新語箋疏。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.馬國翰(1990)。玉函山房輯佚書。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳壽、裴松之、陳乃乾(1982)。三國志。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.老子、嚴遵、王德有(1994)。老子指歸。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.皮錫瑞、周予同(1959)。經學歷史。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.周予同、朱維錚(1983)。周予同經學史論著選集。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.王國維(1959)。觀堂集林。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.張魯、饒宗頤(1991)。老子想爾注校證。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.王弼、樓宇烈(1980)。王弼集校釋。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.應劭、王利器(1981)。風俗通義校注。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
22.房玄齡(1974)。晉書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
23.葛洪(1936)。抱朴子。上海:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
24.吳九龍(1990)。孫子校釋。孫子校釋。北京。  延伸查詢new window
25.魯迅(1973)。而巳集。而巳集。北京。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)汪繼培(1979)。潛夫論箋,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)嚴可均(1985)。全上古三代秦漢三國六朝文,北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.(東漢)班固(1965)。前漢書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(東漢)王充(1936)。論衡,上海。  延伸查詢new window
5.馬王堆漢墓帛書整理小組(1976)。經法,北京。  延伸查詢new window
6.(漢)徐幹(1995)。中論,上海。  延伸查詢new window
7.(晉)張華(1980)。博物志,北京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top