:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:市場強勢典範與傳媒的倫理道德--香港個案之研究
書刊名:新聞學研究
作者:俞旭黃煜
作者(外文):Yu, XuHuang, Yu
出版日期:1997
卷期:55
頁次:頁224-243
主題關鍵詞:市場強勢典範小報文化資訊娛樂化Accented market paradigmTabloid cultureInfotainmentHong Kong
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:64
     1990年代以來,香港大眾傳播在量的方面蓬勃發展,增長迅速。然而,這並不代表它在質的方面有所改善,也並不意味著它在提高公眾知情權、捍衛新聞自由等方面有著令人讚譽的成就。恰恰相反,資本主義商業利益的激烈競爭力上1997大氣候的政治壓力,使香港傳媒在雙重的擠壓下發生畸變,其經營方式與操作生態,正在經歷著市場強勢導向的典範轉移,由此產生了一系列新聞職業道德的問題和危機。   本文將香港傳媒的倫理道德問題置於典範轉移的大背景下考量,提出「市場強勢典範」這一概念化 (Conceptualization) 的命題,並以此作為研究近年香港傳媒倫理道德的基本框架。本文分析最近發生的有關典型事件與案例,考查香港傳媒產生道德危機的政經原因,剖析97效應和正在形成中的市場強勢媒體典範對香港新聞界及社會造成的衝擊。
     With accented market paradigm as the conceptual framework, this paper investigates ethical problems of the Hong Kong news media and explores the upsurge of the infotainment model. It cites cases since 1993 involving overdose of sensationalism, computer manipulation of photos, invasion of privacy, verdict pronouncement by media, and use of media to give vent to personal spite, and analyzes their ethical implications. The paper explains the ethical deterioration in terms of the “1997 mentality”, an upsurge of infotainment, intense media competition, publishers' interference and legal loopholes. It is argued that in the unique context of Hong Kong, the market-driven approach adopted by the news media has evolved into a paradigm accentuating market at the sacrifice of the conventional social roles media are supposed to play.
期刊論文
1.Cronin, M.、Mcpherson, J.(1995)。Pronouncements and denunciations: An analysis of state press association ethics codes from the 1920s。Jouranlism & Mass Communication Quarterly,890-901。  new window
2.李怡(1996)。言論自由的喉管被割掉了--香港報業的減價戰。九十年代,312,30-33。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.梁偉賢(1996)。香港新聞道德專業化的面貌。邁向21世紀兩岸三地傳播媒介研討會。香港。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇鑰機(1996)。完全市場導向新聞學:《蘋果日報》個案研究。傳播與經濟發展研討會。香港。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅文輝、張黎文(1996)。臺灣新聞人員的專業倫理:1994年的調查分析。傳播與經濟發展研討會。香港。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mott, F.(1962)。American Journalism。Macmillan Press。  new window
2.Chan, J. M.、Lee, P. S. N.、Lee, C. C.(1996)。Hong Kong journalists in transition。Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press。  new window
3.Altschull, J.(1984)。Agents of power。New York:London:Longman。  new window
4.Barker, L.(1990)。Communication。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
5.Chung, T. Y.(1995)。Surveys on media performance and freedom of speech: Summary report。Hong Kong:Social Sciences Research Center of the University of Hong Kong:Radio Television Hong Kong:Hong Kong Journalism Association。  new window
6.Goodwin, H.(1987)。Grouping for ethics in journalism。Ames, Iowa:Iowa State University Press。  new window
7.Hausman, C.、胡幼偉(1995)。良心危機--新聞理論學的多元觀點。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Lyotard, J.、Bennington, G.、Massumi, B.(1984)。The postmordern condition: A report on knowledge。Minneapolis。  new window
9.Merrill, J.(1989)。The dialect in journalism。Baton Rouge, LA:Louisiana State University Press。  new window
10.Pippert, W.(1988)。An ethics of news。Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press。  new window
11.Schiller, H.(1989)。Culture, Inc.: The corporate takeover of public expression。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Underwood, D.(1993)。When MBAs rule the newsroom。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
13.Wesley-Smith, P.(1993)。An introduction to the Hong Kong legal system。Hong Kong:Oxford University Press。  new window
14.馬傑偉(1996)。解讀普及媒介。香港次文化有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.香港政府出版處(1987)。香港年報。香港:香港政府出版處。  延伸查詢new window
16.(1996)。華聲月報。北京。  延伸查詢new window
17.Habermas, J.(1991)。The Structural Transformation of Public Sphere。MIT Press。  new window
18.Report of the Broadcasting Authority: September 1994, August-1995。Hong Kong。  new window
19.McManus, John H.(1994)。Market-driven Journalism: Let the citizen beware?。Sage。  new window
20.Bagdikian, Ben(1992)。The Media Monopoly。Boston:Beacon。  new window
其他
1.李金銓,蘇鑰機,馮應謙(19960205)。新聞工作者如何看報紙可信度。  延伸查詢new window
2.(19950206)。經濟日報,香港。  延伸查詢new window
3.(19970128)。快報,香港。  延伸查詢new window
4.(19960422)。明報,香港。  延伸查詢new window
5.(19960122)。新報,香港。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Wacks, R.(1992)。The right to privacy in civil liberties in Hong Kong。Civil liberties in Hong Kong。Hong Kong:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE