:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以野生動物保護區保育價值檢驗條件評估法之次序效果
書刊名:農業經濟叢刊
作者:鄭蕙燕 引用關係羅炳和
作者(外文):Jeng, Joann Huei-yannLo, Bing-ho
出版日期:1999
卷期:5:1
頁次:頁89-119
主題關鍵詞:條件評估法次序效果保育價值野生動物保護區Contingent valuation methodQuestion-ordering effectConservation valuesWildlife sanctuaries
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:36
     本文主要評估胛生動物保護區之保育效益及其影響因素,並驗證以條件評估法評估 臺灣野生動物保護區是否存有次序效果。本研究以內大肚溪口、蘭陽溪口、無尾港水鳥保護 區等三個野生動物保護區為驗證對象,受訪樹本來自全省各縣市居民與各保護區之遊客。本 研究檢驗次序效果時將受訪者分為野生動物保護區之遊客與非遊客、居民與非居民兩大分 類。驗證結果發現保護區在問卷上之排列順序會影響部分民眾對保育效益之評價。另外,有 實際探訪野保區經驗的民眾對野生動物保護區保育價值之願付價格大於未曾去過者,居民對 其鄰近保護區的保育價值評價大於非居民。
     The purpose of this paper is to test for question-ordering effect with the contingent valuation method We use data from a survey focusing on the conservation values of three waterfowl's wildlife sanctuaries in Taiwan Respondents are separated into groups of wildlife sanctuary closely related and less related Empirical evidence shows that, for less-related group or non-resident/non-participants, willingness to pay is sensitive to the sequencing of Lan-Yang waterfowl area Similar result is found for the closely-related group when differences between the two groups, however, suggest that respondents' experience and residential district may affect their valuations toward wildlife sanctuaries Dissemination of the importance of wildlife sanctuaries is therefore suggested as an essential instrument to promote conservation policy in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Arrow, K. J.(1982)。Risk Perception in Psychology and Economics。Economic Inquiry,20,1-9。  new window
2.Tversky, A.、Sattath, S.、Slovic, P.(1988)。Contingent Weighting in judgment and choice。Psychological Review,95(3),371-384。  new window
3.林曜松(19970500)。臺灣野生動物的保育。環境教育季刊,34,16-39。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳永華(1992)。鳥語尋蹤--宜蘭區。中華飛羽,45,14-15。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bateman, I. J.、Langford, I. H.(1997)。Budget-constraint, Temporal and Question-ordering Effect in Contingent Valuation Studies。Environment and Planning A,28,1215-1228。  new window
6.Boyle, K. J.、Reiling, S. D.、Philips, M. L.(1990)。Species Substitution and Question Sequencing in Contingent-Valuation Surveys Evaluating the Hunting of Several of Wildlife。Leisure Science,12,103-118。  new window
7.Boyle, K. J.、Welsh, M. P.、Bishop, R. C.(1993)。The Role of Question Order and Respondent Experience in Contingent-Valuation Studies。Journal of Environment Economics and Management,25,S80-S99。  new window
8.Carson, R. T.、Flores, N. E.、Hanemann, W. M.(1998)。Sequencing and Valuing Public Goods。Journal of Environment Economics and Management,36,314-323。  new window
9.Halvorsen, B.(1996)。Ordering Effect in Contingent Valuation Surveys: Willingness to Pay for Reduced Health Damage from Air Pollution。Environmental and resource Economic,8,485-499。  new window
10.Hanley, N.、Spash, C. L.、Walker, L.(1995)。Problem in Valuing the Benefits of Biodiversity Protection。Environmental and Resource Economics,5(3),249-272。  new window
11.吳珮瑛(19961200)。Embedding in Multiple-Referendum Contingent Valuation Experiment。農業經濟半年刊,60,229-260。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭蕙燕、林政德(19981200)。條件評估法之嵌入效果:臺灣野生動物保護區之驗證。農業經濟半年刊,64,125-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Kahneman, Daniel、Tversky, Amos(1984)。Choices, values, and frames。American Psychologist,39(4),341-350。  new window
14.Bennett, J. W.(1984)。Using Direct Questioning to Value the Existence Benefits of Preserved Natural Areas。Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics,28(2/3),136-152。  new window
15.Jordan, J. L.、Elnagheeb, A. H.(1993)。Willingness to Pay for Improvements in Drinking Water Quality。Water Resources Research,29(2),237-245。  new window
研究報告
1.鄭蕙燕(1996)。平衡生態資源保育與產業發展之政策評估研究 (計畫編號:85科技-1.18-企-17)。國立中興大學農業經濟系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳恭鋑(1994)。關渡沼澤區的保護效益評估--假設性市場評價法之應用(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院經濟建設委員會(1997)。中華民國永續發展策略綱領。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Jakobsson, K. M.、Dragun, A. K.(1996)。Contingent valuation and endangered species: Methodological issues and applications。Edward Elgar。  new window
3.Sheaffer, R. L.、Mendenhall, W.、Ott, L.(1996)。Elementary Survey Sampling。Belmont, CA:Duxbury Press。  new window
4.Schuman, H.、Presser, S.(1981)。Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
5.農業委員會(1997)。台灣地區的野生動物保護區。台北:行政院農業委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.農業委員會(2000)。台灣地區的野生動物保護區。台北:行政院農業委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cummings, R. G.、Brookshire, D. S.、Schulze, W. D.(1986)。Valuing Environmental Good: An Assessment of the Contingent-valuation Method。Savage, MD:Rowman and Littlefield。  new window
8.顏月珠(1998)。商用統計學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.Freeman, A. Myrick III(1993)。The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods。Resources for the Future Press。  new window
10.Mitchell, R. C.、Carson, R. T.(1989)。Using survey to value public goods: The contingent valuation method。Washington, DC:Resources for the Future。  new window
圖書論文
1.Samples, K. C.、Hollyer, J. R.(1990)。Contingent Valuation of Wildlife Resources in the Presence of Substitutes and Complements。Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Issues, Theory and Applications。Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE