全球正義理論是當代政治哲學和道德哲學中的重要理論之一。全球正義理論的很多內容,尤其是該理論所秉承的世界主義理念,引起了不少民族主義者的異議。民族主義者主要從三個方面批判了全球正義理論,即全球正義理論削弱了民族自決、民族責任和民族認同。事實上,民族主義對全球正義理論的批判在不少方面是值得商榷的,全球正義理論能夠容納民族主義的批判,為民族主義提供了一種約束邊界。然而,這并不意味著民族主義缺乏內在價值,同時,民族主義者所強調的特殊義務仍然有著重要的作用。

Global justice is a very important theory in contemporary political philosophy and moral philosophy.Nationalists criticize global justice,and argue that global justice has weakened national self-determination,national responsibility and national identity.In fact,these critiques in many aspects are open to question.Global justice can accommodate the critiques from nationalists,and provide a constraint boundary for nationalism.However,this does not mean that nationalism does not have internal value.Meanwhile,special obligation that nationalists emphasize still plays an important role.