:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:STEM相關學科課程整合模式國際比較研究
書刊名:比較教育研究
作者:李春密趙蕓赫
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(5)
頁次:11-18
主題關鍵詞:STEM教育課程標準橫向整合縱向整合STEM educationCurriculum standardsHorizontal integrationVertical integration
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
本文通過對美國、芬蘭、韓國、新加坡、英國、法國、中國以及加拿大安大略省、澳大利亞維多利亞州等基礎教育階段STEM相關學科課程文件進行內容分析,剖析了各國在整合課程方面的特色和趨勢,并從橫向整合和縱向整合兩個維度進行了比較研究。橫向整合主要表現為三種模式,分別是以建構大概念為核心的跨學科概念體系的模式、以主題或課題形式來實現跨學科實踐的模式以及通過表現期望的形式來實現橫向整合的模式;縱向整合主要表現為兩種模式,分別是通過核心概念和表現期望相結合來進行縱向整合的模式以及通過學科核心概念和內容要求相結合的形式來進行縱向整合的模式。進而,根據所梳理出的各國整合模式的特色和趨勢,提出我國STEM相關課程的設計建議,即將跨學科概念融入課程、以表現期望的形式呈現知識內容的具體要求以及注重各學段之間知識及能力要求的銜接。
This paper analyzes the contents of STEM-related curriculum standard documents of the United States, Ontario of Canada, Finland, South Korea, Singapore, United Kingdom, Victoria of Australia, France, and China. Through in depth understanding of the characteristics and trends of these countries in the integration of curriculum, horizontal integration and vertical integration are compared. The horizontal integration model of these countries mainly includes three types, which are the construction of the interdisciplinary conceptual system with the core concept, the interdisciplinary practice through project, and the expectation of students’ performance. The vertical integration model is either a model of vertical integration through core concepts and performance expectations, or a model of vertical integration through disciplinary core concepts and content requirements. Based on the analysis of the characteristics and trends of the national integration model, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the design of STEM related courses, in order to provide relevant curriculum design for our country’s strategy and reference.
期刊論文
1.余勝泉、胡翔(2015)。STEM教育理念與跨學科整合模式開放。教育研究,2015(4),13-22。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊亞平、陳晨(2016)。美國中小學整合性STEM教學實踐的研究。外國中小學教育,2016(5),58-64。  延伸查詢new window
3.王旭卿(2015)。面向STEM教育的創客教育模式研究。中國電化教育,2015(8),36-41。  延伸查詢new window
4.唐小為、王唯真(2014)。整合STEM發展我國基礎科學教育的有效路徑分析。教育研究,2014(9),61-68。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭玉英(2013)。整合與發展--科學課程中概念體系的建構及其學習進階。課程.教材.教法,2013(2),44-49。  延伸查詢new window
6.Geum, Y.、Bae, S.(2012)。The Recognition and Needs of Elementary School Teachers about STEAM education。대한공업교육학회지,37(2),57-75。  new window
學位論文
1.馬紅芹(2015)。美國K-12階段"科學、技術、工程和數學"(STEM)教育研究(碩士論文)。南京師範大學,南京。  延伸查詢new window
2.穆鑫楠(2015)。21世紀以來美國高中STEM課程發展研究(碩士論文)。天津師範大學,天津。  延伸查詢new window
3.李揚(2014)。STEM教育視野下的科學課程構建(碩士論文)。浙江師範大學,金華。  延伸查詢new window
4.王玲玲(2015)。基於STEM的小學科學課程設計研究(碩士論文)。華東師範大學,上海。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.National Research Council(2011)。A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas。Washington, DC:National Academies Press。  new window
2.Cho, J.、Ok, H.、Lee, S.、Lim, H.、Cha, S.、Kim, D.、Lim, J.(2012)。Educational policies for improvement based on international student assessment results。Seoul:Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation。  new window
3.NGSS Lead States(2016)。Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states。Washington, D.C.:The National Academies Press。  new window
其他
1.Finnish National Board of Education(2011)。National Core Curriculum for Basic Education,http://www.oph.fi/english/education/basic education/curriculum。  new window
2.(2012)。Science and technology system in Singapore,http://portal.unesco.org/pv_obj_id_FEF9DC982079B3D65A213313DF13C4FCFB7D0200/filename/Singapore.pdf。  new window
3.AQA(2016)。National Core Curriculum for Upper Secondary School,http://www.aqa.org.uk/subjects/science。  new window
4.Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority(2008)。Victorian Certificate of Education Study Design,http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies.html。  new window
5.NGA & CCSSO(2016)。Common Core State Standards for Mathematics,http://www.corestandards.org/thestandards/mathematics。  new window
6.Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority(2016)。Victoria Essential Learning Standards,http://vels.vacc.vic.edu.au/。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE