:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:制度要素與流動人口的住房保障
書刊名:人口研究
作者:楊菊華
出版日期:2018
卷期:2018(1)
頁次:60-75
主題關鍵詞:流動人口農民工住房住房保障居住居住融合MigrantHousingHousing securityResidential segregationResidential integration
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
文章分析近十年流動人口住房來源的變動趨勢、基本特點及其影響因素,重點關注更能體現"安居"的住房擁有和保障性住房情況。分析結果表明,約七成流動人口租住私房,擁有住房的比例很低,租住公屋的比例極低;盡管流動人口群體內存在明顯分層,但作為"外來人",住房方面的共性大于差異性;流入地經濟越發達、流動跨越的行政區域越大,擁有住房或租住公屋的概率越低。可見,將流動人口全面納入住房保障體系之路依舊舉步維艱、任重道遠。在"住有所居"、"共享"發展等理念的引領下,未來需要真正從制度上消減流動人口安居之路上的障礙,擴大公租房對流動人口的覆蓋率,減弱流動人口的"過客"感受,讓流入地成為他們的心安之家。
The Chinese government,central and local alike,has issued a number of documents,aiming to include migrants in the housing security system at the place of destination since 2010.Have these policies improved migrants’ living condition? Focusing on housing source,this paper describes its changing trend in the past 10 years,and explores its associates in 2014.Analytic results show that over70% of migrants stay in rented house; the proportion of migrants who own house/apartment is very low and those who have access to public housing is extremely low.While urban and rural hukou( household registration) type makes a difference in owning/access to public housing and renting housing,both rural-urban migrants and urban-urban migrants share more similarities than difference in housing source,especially when they are compared to local residents.Such findings suggest that it still has a long way to go to include migrants in the local housing security framework.In the context of"Shared Development"norms,more efforts should be devoted to alleviate barriers migrants encounter in access to public housing and improve the ability of migrants to own their own houses/apartments.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE