顧頡剛1926年任廈門大學史學研究教授,承擔"經學專書研究"課程。這是他首次承擔的課程,而且是他之后連續撰寫的《尚書》講義的開端。本文除了利用《顧頡剛全集》所收的有關廈門大學講義的史料以外,還利用顧頡剛的原稿和在大學發布的油印本,試圖全面梳理此次廈門大學講義的內容。顧頡剛此次的講義,基本上只講到《偽古文尚書》的造偽和辨偽,他主要根據丁晏的說法指出《偽古文尚書》是王肅偽造的。這"王肅偽造說",顧頡剛開課時已有強烈反駁,現在看來已不成立。本文最后討論顧頡剛的"王肅偽造說"的背景和意義,以期作為對學術思想史研究的一種方法上的反思。

Gu Jiegang became a professor of history at Xiamen University in 1926 where he taught a course on the "Study of Confucian Classical Books". It was his first course at the university,and it’s also the beginning of his continuous writing of lecture notes on SHANGSHU. This article not only uses historical materials embodied in the GUJIEGANGWENJI( Complete Works of Gu Jiegang),but also uses Gu Jiegang’s original manuscripts and mimeographed handouts,in an attempt to grasp the context of the course at Xiamen University comprehensively. In this course, he only mentioned the forgery and distinguishing forgery of the GUWENSHANGSHU( Old Text of the Book of Documents),mainly,according to Ding Yan’s statement,he pointed out that Wang Su forged it. In fact,when he undertook teaching the course,this argument was strongly argued by some scholars and it seems the argument on "Wang Su Forged the GUWENSHANGSHU"is not correct. This article finally discusses the contexts and meanings of Gu Jiegang’s argument on "Wang Su Forged the GUWENSHANGSHU",with a methodological reflection on the study of the history of academic thoughts.