:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中小組織創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究
作者:黃麗美
作者(外文):Huang Li-Mei
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:工業科技教育研究所
指導教授:蔡錫濤
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2004
主題關鍵詞:創新氣氛學校效能創新創造力innovation climateschool effectivenessinnovationcreativity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
本研究以學校創新氣氛與學校效能為主題,問卷調查法深入研究,以全省(含澎湖地區)共計3348所公立國民中、小學教師為母群體,依學校所在地區及規模分層隨機抽樣179所國民中、小學計2235位教師為樣本進行問卷調查,探討國民中、小學創新氣氛與學校效能之現況、剖析教師人口變項及學校變項對創新氣氛與學校效能知覺之差異,以及創新氣氛對學校效能各構面之影響情形。研究獲得下列結論:
一、 國民中、小學創新氣氛與學校效能現況大致良好,但也普遍感受到工作壓力沉重。
二、 國小教師在正向創新氣氛知覺均顯著高於國中教師,在負向創新氣氛知覺均顯著低於國中教師,且國中、小在創新氣氛與學校效能知覺各構面均達顯著差異。
三、 創新氣氛、學校效能受人口變項與學校環境系絡所影響
(一) 小型學校對正向創新氣氛與學校能知覺較中、大型學校高,負向創新氣氛均低於中、大型學校。
(二) 創校年為35年以上學校均顯著高於創校年35年以下學校。
(三) 在工作挑戰性構面上,南部學校顯著高於中部學校;在資源充分性構面上,北部學校顯著高於中部學校。在過度工作壓力構面上,北部學校也顯著高於南部學校。
(四) 男性、年長、資深、兼任行政主管(校長、主任)、教育程度在研究所以上教師所知覺正向創新氣氛與學校效能較高,且其抗壓性也較高。
四、 創新氣氛與學校效能有顯著關聯性
(一) 正向組織創新氣氛構面與學校效能構面呈正相關,而過度工作壓力構面則與學校效能構面呈負相關。
(二) 教師教學品質與工作團隊支持呈正相關,且工作挑戰性與學生成就表現有較高相關。
(三) 資源充分性與家長及社區支持呈負相關。
(四) 組織激勵、主管激勵、工作團隊支持、工作自主性、工作挑戰性對學校效能的影響較大。
五、 組織創新氣氛對學校效能具有預測力
組織創新氣氛對於學校效能不同構面有不同的預測力,主管激勵對行政服務表現具預測力;工作團隊支持對教師教學品質構面最具預測力;在學生成就表現構面及家長社區支持構面皆以組織激勵最具預測力。
依據以上結論,本研究針對學校創新經營、教育行政創新管理,以及未來相關研究提出建議,做為增進國民中小學營造創新氣氛與提升學校效能之參考。
The research centered on school innovative climate and school effectiveness through analysis of literature review and questionnaire survey. 3,348 public elementary and junior high schools (Peng-hu included) were drawn as population. Through stratified random sampling according to school size and region, 2,235 teachers from 179 schools were sampled, to explore: first, the current conditions of school innovative climate and school effectiveness; second, the influence of variables such as teacher background difference, and school characteristics on perception of innovative climate and school effectiveness; and third, the influence of school innovative climate on school effectiveness.
The conclusions of the research are as follows:
I. The elementary and junior high schools under research show that the innovative climate and school effectiveness are normally good, yet it is common of the teachers to feel stressed from the heavy workload.
II. Elementary school teachers indicate higher positive perception of innovative climate than junior high school teachers, and the former shows conformity on the negative perception of school innovative climate by scoring significantly lower than junior high school teachers. Significant differences exist in all conceptions between elementary and junior high schools teachers.
III. Innovative climate and school effectiveness are affected by teacher background difference and school characteristics.
1. Tintype schools show higher positive innovative climate perception than medium and large type schools, and they also show an identical lower negative perception of innovative climate.
2. Schools built more than 35 years score higher on every perception than those less than 35 years.
3. On the perception of work challenge, schools in Southern Taiwan generally score higher than those in Central Taiwan; on the perception of school resources, schools in Northern Taiwan also show a significant higher tendency than that of schools in Central Taiwan. As to the conception of overstress workload, schools in Northern Taiwan show a significantly higher tendency than that of schools in Southern Taiwan as well.
4. Male, elder, senior, taking up administrational positions, and graduate school educational background have a higher positive school innovative climate perception, and often possess higher compressive resistance.
IV. Correlation existed between innovative climate and school effectiveness.
1. Positive organization innovative climate is in positive correlation with school effectiveness, while overstress workload in negative correlation with school effectiveness.
2. Teaching quality is positively correlated with teamwork.
3. Support from Parents and communities is negatively correlated with resources.
4. Perception as Organizational encouragement, supervisory encouragement, support from teamwork, autonomy, and challenging have greater influence on school effectiveness.
V. Innovative climate has predictability to school effectiveness.
Supervisory encouragement is predictive of managerial service performance; teamwork is predictive of teaching quality; organizational encouragement serves as the best predictor of students’ achievement and support from parents and communities.
According to the conclusions of this study, the researcher presents suggestions on school innovative management, educational governance innovation, and future research respectively so as to enhance school innovative climate and effectiveness at the elementary and junior high education level.
參考文獻
一、中文參考書目
方德隆(1986)。國民中學組織結構與組織效能之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
毛連塭 (1998)。激發組織創造力,提昇國家競爭力。創造思考教育,1-5。
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。台北:心理。
王如哲(2003)。英美學校效能研究的回顧與啟示。台灣教育,619,14-29。
王瓊淑譯(1999)。Hope, J., & Hope, T.著。笑傲第三波。台北:經典傳訊。428。
朱志宏(1991)。公共政策,34。台北:三民。
江志正(1999)。國民小學團體動力、組織學習、學校效能發展策略與學校效能關係之研究。未出版博士學位論文。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。
江岷欽、林鍾沂(1995)。公共組織理論。台北市國立空中大學。183-184。
呂祝義(1994)。國民中學學校環境、社區環境與學校效能關係之研究。未出版碩士學位論文。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。
牟中原(2000)。導讀-未來需要具創造力的公民。全是贏家的學校。台北:天下文化。
余瑞陽(1997)。國民小學校長管理能力與學校效能關係之研究。未出版碩士學位論文。台北市立師範學院,台北。
李子建、趙志成(1998)。邁向優質學校教育:香港《躍進學校計畫》的特色。上海高教研究第一期。45-48。
李金泉(民81):SPSS/PC+實務與應用統計分析。台北:松崗電腦。
李詠吟、張新仁、潘慧玲、許殷宏(1998)。國民小學學校效能縱貫研究。教育研究資訊。6(3),1-25。
李皓光(1995)。國民小學學校效能評量指標之研究。未出版碩士論文。國立台中師範學院,台中。
沈翠蓮(1994)。國民小學教師專業成長、教學承諾與學校效能關係之研究。未出版碩士學位論文,國立高雄師範大學,高雄。
周文欽、歐滄和、許擇基、盧欽銘、金樹人和范德鑫(1999)。心理與 教育測驗。台北:心理。
邱皓政(1999)。組織環境與創意行為:組織創新量表的發展與創新指標的建立(從科技產業到政府機構)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。(計畫編號:NSC88-2519-S-128-001-C),未出版。
邱皓政(2002)。學校組織創新氣氛的內涵與教師創造力的實踐:另一件國王的新衣?。應用心理學學報。15。191-2240。
吳定、張潤書、陳德禹(1989)。行政學(下)。台北:國立空中大學,456。
吳定、張潤書、陳德禹、賴維堯(1994)。行政學(一)。台北:國立空中大學,164-165。
吳宗立(1998)。國民中學組織衝突、外在壓力、行政決策與學校效能關係之研究。未出版博士學位論文。國立政治大學,台北。
吳清山(1989)。國民小學管理模式與學校效能關係之研究。未出版博士學位論文。國立政治大學,台北。
吳清山(1998)。學校效能研究,7-9。台北:五南。
吳清山(2003/2)。學校效能研究:理論與應用。台灣教育。619。2-13。
吳清山、林天祐(2001)。學校效能。教育研究月刊,83,138-139。
吳清基(1990)。精緻教育的理念。台北:師大書苑。
吳璧如(1990)。國民小學組織文化與組織效能關係之研究。未出版碩士學位論文,國立高雄師範大學,高雄。
林月盛(1995)。國民小學公共關係、教師參與程度與學校效能關係之研究。未出版碩士學位論文,國立高雄師範大學,高雄。
林水波 (1995)。組織創造力:迎接挑戰的裝備。銓敘與公保月刊,4(10),3-14。
林泊佑(1994)。國民小學公共關係與組織效能之相觀研究。未出版碩士論文。國立政治大學,台北。
林佳慧(1999)。組織內部創新氣氛與知識管理機制關係之探討。未出版碩士學位論文。國立中央大學,中壢。
林清山(1994)。心理與教育統計學。台灣東華:台北。
季安譯,盧有澄著(2000)。Intel 創新之祕。124。台北:天下文化。
胡夢鯨(1995)。臺灣地區城鄉國民小學教育資源分配之比較。國立中正大學學報社會科學分冊,6(1),1-35。
范熾文(2001)。國小校長領導行為,教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究。未出版博士學位論文。國立台灣師範大學,台北。
侯世昌(2002)。國民小學家長教育期望、參與學校教育與學校效能之研究。未出版博士學位論文。國立台灣師範大學,台北。
秦夢群(2000)。教育行政。台北:五南。84。
郭添財(1991)。台灣省南部地區國民小學最適經營規模之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
郭誌光(2001)。個人創造力、組織創新氣候、及組織創新績效之關係—台北市廣告公司的實證研究。未出版碩士學位論文。國立中正大學,嘉義。
陳賢舜(2000)。南投縣小型國民小學合併之研究。未出版碩士學位論文。國立暨南國際大學,南投。
教育部(2001)。創造力教育白皮書。取自:http://www.creativity.edu.tw/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=1
黃秀君(2001)。知識經濟對學校教育之影響與因應策略。現代教育論壇「知識經濟與教育」專輯。69-79。
黃政傑、李隆盛(1996)。技職教育概論。台北:師大書苑。
黃曙曜譯(1994)。Jun, J. S.著。公共行政:設計與問題解決。台北:五南。
張玉山、張靜琪(2004)。創意學子團隊學習歷程—以中山大學創意學子計畫為例。第二屆「創新與創造力」研討會。499。
張正霖(1997)。國民小學全面品質管理、學校組織氣氛與學校效能之研究。未出版碩士學位論文。台北市立師範學院,台北。
張紹勳、林秀娟(民83):SPSS For Window 統計分析—初等統計與高等統計。台北:松岡。
張德銳(1995)。教育行政研究。台北:五南。
張慈娟(1997)。國民小學校長教學領導與教學效能之研究。未出版碩士學位論文。國立新竹師範學院,新竹。
張慶勳(2002)。學校組織行為。台北:五南。231-233。
游進年(1991)。國民中學學校氣氛與學校效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,33,227-245。
廖勝能(2001)。學校組織創新氣氛與知識管理關係之研究。未出版碩士學位論文。國立台南師範學院,台南。
鄭友超、黃祈銘(2001)。我國高中職工業類科學校教師教育專業承諾與學校效能關係之研究。教育研究資訊,9(2),15-43。
鄭燕祥(2001)。學校效能及校本管理發展的機制。台北:心理。
潘松彬(2002)。中小企業在知識分享中創意表現之研究。未出版碩士學位論文。國立台灣師範大學,台北。
潘慧玲(1999)。學校效能研究領域的發展。教育研究集刊,43,80-90。
潘慧玲(1999)。學校效能相關概念的釐析。教育研究資訊,7(5),138-153。
劉春榮(1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。未出版博士學位論文。國立政治大學,台北。
蔡啟通、黃國隆、高泉豐(2001)。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。管理學報,18(4),527-566。
蔡進雄(2001)。轉型領導與學校效能。台北:師大書苑。
簡文娟(1998)。「組織創新氣候」評鑑量表之建立-以高科技產業為實證研究對象。未出版碩士學位論文。國立中央大學,中壢。
謝金青(1997)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構。未出版博士論文,國立政治大學,台北。
謝金青(1996)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構。新竹師院學報,11 ,449-486。
蘇水柳(1993)。臺北市立國民小學學校事務行政管理與學校組織效能相關之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學,台北。
饒見維(1999)。九年一貫課程與教學革新,載於中華民國教材研究發展學會主編,邁向課程改革的新紀元─九年一貫課程與教學革新。347-367。
二、英文參考書目
Abbey, C. & Dickson, J. W. (1983). R & D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 362-368.
Albrecht, K.(1987).The creative corporation, Illinois:Dow Jones- Irwin。
Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 221-233.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 14-23.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organization. In B.M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings(Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167. Aldine Publishing Company.
Amabile, T. M. Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory; Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950-967
Amabile, T. M., Conti , R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., &Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5), 1154-1184.
Amabile, T. M. (1998). A model of creativity and innavation in organization. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 123-167.
Amabile, T. M. & Gryskiewicz , S. S. (1989). The creative environment scales: work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231-253.
Amoroso, D. L. & Eriksson I. V. (2000). Use of content analysis for studying the creativity construct in the context of technology-rich applications. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International conference on system science.
Ancess, J. (1995). An inquiry high school learner-centered accountability at the urban academy.(REIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 385 648 )
Anderson, V. (1991). Alternative economic indicators. London: Routledge.
Angus, L. (1993). The sociology of school effectiveness. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14, 333-345.
Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban education reform. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: the magic synthesis. New York: Basic Books.
Baer, M. & Frese, M. (2003/Feb). Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45-68.
Bardach, E. (1998). Managerial Craftsmanship: Getting Agencies to Work Togethe. Brookings, Washington, DC.
Barley, S. R. (1983). Semiotics and the study of occupational and organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 393-413.
Barron, F. C. & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.
Bernacki, E. (2002). Create a freewheelin’ creative climate. New Zealand Management, 98, 45(10), 36.
Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1987). Creative product analysis: testing a model by developing a judging instrument In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.). Frontiers of Creativity research: Beyond the basics, 341-379. Buffalo, New York: Bearly Limited.
Biondi, A. M. & Parnes, S. J. (1976). Assessing Creative Growth. Buffalo, N. Y.: Creative Education Foundation.
Blua, J. R. & Mckinley, W. (1979). Ideas, complexity and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 200-219.
Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging innovation in the public sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 310-319.
Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and innovation in the public sector. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467-476.
Bozeman, B. and Straussman, J. D. (1990). Public management strategies: Guidelines for managerial effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
Brown, M. (1998).The tyranny of the international horse race. In R. Slee & G. Weiner with S. Tomlinson (Eds.), School Effectiveness for Whom? Challenges to the school effectiveness and the school improvement movements (33-47 ). London: Falmer Press.
Brown, B. R. & Cooper, G. R.. (2000). School-based management: how effective is it? NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 77-85.
Bruffee, K. (1999). Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Burgess, G. H. (1989). Industrial organization. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Burningham, C., & West, M. A. (1995). Individual, climate, and group interaction processes as predictors of work team innovation. Small Group Reseach, 26, 106-117.
Burtless, G. (ed.) (1996). Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Cameron, K. (1978). Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administration Science Quarterly, 23, 604-632.
Center for Creative Leadership (2000). KEYS:Assessing the Climate for Creativity. Retrieved from http://www.actis.ca/english/innovation/keys.htm
Chapman, J. (1993). Leadership, management and the effectiveness of schooling: a response to Mr. Gradgrind. Journal of Education Administration, 31(4), 4-18.
Cheong, C. Y. (1999). The pursuit of school effectiveness and educational quality in Hong Kong. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10 (1), 10-30.
Cheong, C. Y. (2000). Cultural Factors in Educational Effectiveness: a framework for comparative research. School Leadership and Management, 20 (2), 207-225.
Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, Markets, and American Schools. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
Claudet, J. G., & Ellett, C. D. (1999). Conceptualization and measurement of supervision as a school organizational climate construct. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14(4), 318-350.
Clegg, B. (1999). Creativity and Innovation for Managers. Oxford: Institute of Management Butterworth Heinemann.
Codianni, A. V., & Wilbur, G. (1983). More effective schooling from research to practice. New York: Clearing House and Urban Education.
Coe, R. & Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1998). School effectiveness research: criticisms and recommendations. Oxford Review of Education, 24 , (4). 421-438.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E., Hobson, E., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., & York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Couger, D. Higgins, L., & McIntyre, S. (1994). Measuring Creativity in products and services. Management Information Systems Quarterly.
Craft, A. (1997). Identity and creativity: education for post-modernism? Teacher Development, An International Journal of Teacher’s Professional Development, 1(1), 83-96.
Craft, A.(2003). The limits to creativity in education: dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113-127.
Creemers, B. P. M. (1996). The school effectiveness knowledge base. In D. Reynolds, R. Bollen, D. Hopkins, L. Stoll, & N. Lagerweij (Eds.), Making good schools-linking school effectiveness and school improvement, 36-58. London: Routledge.
Creemers, B. P. M. (1996). The goals of school effectiveness and school improvement. In D. Reynolds, R. Bollen, B Creemers, D. Hopkins, L. Stoll, & N. Lagerweij (Eds.), Making good schools-linking school effectiveness and school improvement, 21-35. New York: Routledge.
Creemers, B. P. M., & Reezigt, G.. J. (1997). School effectiveness and school improvement: Sustaining links. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 396-429.
Creemers, B. P. M. & Van der Werf, G. (2000). Economic viewpoints in educational effectiveness: cost-effectiveness analysis of an educational improvement project, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(3), 361-384.
Creemers, B. P. M. (2002). Form school effectiveness and school improvement to effective school improvement: background, theoretical analysis, and outline of the empirical study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(4), 343-362.
Cropley, A. J. (1999). Creativity and cognition: producing effective novelty. Roeper Review, 21, 253-261.
Csikszentmihaly, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.)Handook of Creativity (New York.Cambridge University Press).
Cuban, L. (1984). Transforming the frog into a prince: effective schools research, policy and practice at the district level, Harvard Educational Review, 54, 2, 129-151.
Daft, R. L. (2001). Organization theory and design, By South-Western College Publishing, seventh edition.
Dahlberg, K., & Drew, N. (1997). A lifeworld paradigm for nursing research. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 15(3), 303-317.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
Davis, G. A. (1975). In frumious pursuit of the creative person. Journal of Creative Behavior, 9, 75-87.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. (1980). Group inventory for finding interests. Watertown. WI:Educational Assessment Service.
Davis, G. A. & Thomas, M. A. (1989). Effective schools and effective teacher, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Pell, S. W. J. (2002/ Jun.). Support for innovation in site-based-managed school: developing a climate for change. Educational Research Quarterly, 25 (4), 36-49.
Delaney, J., Jarley, P., & Fiorito, J. (1996). Planning for change:Determinants of innovation in US national unions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 49, 597-614.
Dilthey, W. (1990): Einfuhrung in die Geisteswissenschaften. In ders: Gesammelte Schriften Band 1. Stuttgart: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Dimock, M. E. (1936). “The meaning and scope of public administration”. The Frontiers of Public Administration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1-12.
Dunn, R. J., & Harris, L. G. (1998). Organizational dimensions of climate and the impact on school achievement. Journal of Instructional Psycholog, 25(2), 100-114.
Dunphy. S., Herbig, P. & Palumbo, F. A. (1997). Structure and innovation: in D. E. Hussey (Ed.). The Innovation Challenge, 195-218. Chichesten John Wiley.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 99-111.
Ekvall, G. (1983). Climate, structure and innovativeness of organizations: A theoretical framework and an experiment. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Council for management and organizational Behavior.
Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Work and Organizational Psychology, 5 105-123.
Elliott, J. (1996). School effectiveness research and its critics: Alternative visions of schooling. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(2), 199-244.
Fatt, J. P. T. (2000/ Summer). Fostering creative in education, 120(4), 744-757.
Francis, L. J. (1992). Primary school size and pupil attitudes: Small is happy? Educational Management and Administration, 20(2), 100-104.
Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action and conscientication. Harvard Educational Review, 40(3), 42-477.
Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal,39, 37-63.
Gadamer, H. G. (1994). Truth and method. (J. Weinsheimer& D. Marshall, Trans) (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum.
Garmston, R., & Wellman, B. (1998). Teacher talk that makes a difference. Educational Leadership, 55(7), 30-34.
Genck, F. H. (1983). Improve school performance, New York: Praeger Publishers, 64-67.
Getzels, J. W. (1960). Changing values challenge the schools. School Review, 65, 92-102.
Glick, W . H (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organisational and psychological climate : Pitfalls in multilevel research, Academy of Management review, 10, 601-616.
Glick, W. H. (1988). Response: organizations are not central tendencies. Shadowboxing in the dark, round 2. Academy of Management Review, 13, 133-137.
Godwin, L. G., & Moran, J. D. (1986). Reliability of an instrument for measuring creativity in preschool children. Unpublished manuscript.
Gough, H. G., & Heilbum, A. B. (1980). The adjective check list manual (2nd ed.), Palo Alto. CA:Consulting Psychologists.
Gorard, S. (2001). International comparisons of school effectiveness: the second component of the‘crisis account’in England? Comparative Education, 37(3), 279-296.
Grandmont, R. (1997). Parent involvement can be fun. Principal, 76, 43-44.
Gray, L., Hopkins, D., Reynold, D., Wilcox, B., Farrell, S., & Jesson, D. (1999). Improving schools: performance and potential. Bucking ham, UK:Open University Press.
Greenberg, P. (1995). Promoting excellence in early childhood education. Principal, 74, 11-14.
Griffin, A. & Pager, A. L. (1993). A report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10, 291-308.
Griswold, J. (1989). A study of the differences between parent perceptions of effective elementary schools and research indicators of effective elementary schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50-07A: 1867. (University Microfilms No. AA18924422)
Gryskiewicz, S. (1999). Positive turbulence: developing climates for creativuty, innovation, and renewal. Jossey-Bass.
Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Translated by Thomas J. M. Boston: Beacon: Beacon Press.
Haller, E. J. (1992). High school size and student indiscipline: Another aspect of the school consolidation issue? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(2), 145-156.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94, 328-355.
Halsey, V. (1996). Creating a school where people want to be. Thrust for Education LeaderShip, 26, 25.
Hambermas, J. (1987). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 1. Frankfurt/ M.: Suhrkamp.
Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141-164.
Harber, C. & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). School effectiveness and school improvement in context: the case of South Africa. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, (4), 421-434.
Hargreaves, A. (1995). Changing teachers, changing times. New York: Teachers College Press.
Herrear, S. (1996). Multicultural education: Meeting the needs of ethnic minority students. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 63, 20-25.
Hoy, W. K. & Ferguson, J. (1989). A theoretical framework and exploration of organizational effectiveness of schools. In J. L. Burdin (ED.), School Leadership, 259-274. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
Hoy, W. K., Smith, P.A., Sweetland, S.R. (2003/Jan). The development of the organizational climate index for high schools: Its Measure and Relationship to Faculty Trust. The High School Journal, 86(2), 38-49.
Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (1996). Educational administration: theory, research, and practice, (5th ed.), New York: Random House, Inc.
Hughs, A. D., & Drew, J. S. (1984). A state creative? Papers in Social Sciences, 4, 1-15.
Insel, P. M. & Moos, R. H. (1975). Work Environment Scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Isaksen, S. G. & Kaufmann, G. (1990), Isaksen, S. G. & Kaufmann, G. (1993 / March). Adaptors and climate for creativity. Studia Psychologica, 32, 129-141.
Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K.J., Ekvall, G. & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of the Best and Worst Climates for Creativity: Preliminary Validation Evidence for the Situational Outlook Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171-184.
Isaksen, S. G. & Parnes, S. J. (1985). Curriculum planning for creative thinking and problem solving. Journal of creative Behavior, 19(1).
Isaksen, S. G. (1987). Education Implications of Creativity Research: An Updated Rationale for Creative Learning. Frontiers of Creativity Research. New York: Bearly Limited.
Isaksen, S. G. (1988). Educational implications of creativity research: an updated rationale for creative learning. Creative learning, Creative Research,167-203. New York: Bearly Limited.
Isaksen, S. G. (1995). Some recent developments on assessing the climate for creativity and change. Paper presented at the International Conference on Climate for Creativity and Change, Buffalo, Centre for Studies in Creativity.
Isaksen, S. G., & Kaufmann, G. (1993). Adaptors and innovators: Different perceptions of the psychological climate for creatirity. In Rickards, T. P. Colemont, P. Groholt, M. Parker & H. Smeekes(Eds.), Creativity and innovation: Learning from practice, 47-54. Delft, The Netherlands: Innovation conswting Group TNO.
James, L. R., & Sells, S. B. (1981). Psychological climate: theoretical perspective and empirical research, in Magnusson, D. (Ed.), Toward a Psychology of situations. An International perspective, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ., 275-295.
James, L. R., Joyce, W. F., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (1988). Comment: organizations do not cognize. Academy of Management Journal,13, 129-132.
Johannessen, J. A., & Dolva, J. O. (1994). Competence and innovation, palo alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists press.
Johnson, J. (1996). What factors determine a good school? Are views from the school board, parents, and teachers, congruent? Unpublished manuscript, Valdosta State University, GA.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research (Interaction Book Company, Edit, MN).
Jones, A. P., & James, L. R. (1979). Psychological climate: Dimensions of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 201-250.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics, Academy of Management Review. 20(2), 404-437
Kaltsounis, B., & Honeywell, L. (1980). Additional instruments useful in studying creative behavior and creative talent: Part IV. non-commercially available instruments. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 56-67.
Kangis, P., & Williams, D. G. S. (2000). Organizational climate and corporate performance: an empirical investigation. Management Decision, 38, 531-540.
Kanter, R. M. (1984). The change masters-innovation for productivity in the American Corporation, Simon & Schuster. New York.
Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
Kao, J. J. (1991). Managing Creativity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kashdan, S. (1997). Given the circumstances: Teachers talk about public education today. Education Leadership, 54, 47.
Kast, F. E. & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1985). Organization and management: a systems and contingency. Approach, New York: MgGraw-Hill book company, 286.
Kauffman, G. (1997). Top teachers sound off. The American School Board Journal, 184, 8.
Kazama, S., Foster, J. & Hebl, M. (2002/August). Impacting climate for innovation: can CEOs make a difference? Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada.
Kellaghan, T. & Madaus, G. F. (1979) Within school variance in achievement: school effect or error? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 5, 101-107.
Khatena, J. (1982). Myth: Creativity is too difficult to measure. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(1), 21-3.
Kickul, J. & Liao-Troth. M. A. (2003/Fall). The meaning behind the message: Climate perceptions and the psychological contract. Mid-American Journal of business Muncie, 18(2), 23.
Kilmann, R. H. (1985). Gaining control of the corporate culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629.
Kirton, M. J., Treffinger, D. ,Ekvall, G., & Kaufmann, G. (1998). The Relationship Between Cognitive Style and Individual Psychological Climate: Reflections on a Previous Study. Creative Problem Solving Group-Buffalo.
Krichevskii, V. (1998/July). Four levels of school innovation. Russian Education and Society, 40(7), 29-36.
Kirschenbaum, R. J. (1998/ March). The creativity classification system: an assessment theory. Roeper Review, 21(1), 20-26.
Kumar, V. K., Kemmler. D. & Hloman, F. R. (1997). The creativity styles questionnaire revised. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 51-58.
Kuo,Y. Y. (1996). Taoistic psychology of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(3), 197-212.
Lampikoski, K. & Emden, J. B. (1996). Igniting Innovation: Inspiring Organisations by Managing Creativity. New York: Wiley.
Lauer, K. J. (1994). The assessment of creative climate: An investigation of Ekvall’s Creative Climate Questionnaire. Unpublished master’s thesis, State University College, Buffalo, New York.
Levine, D. U. & Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Unusually effective school : a review and analysis of research and practice. Madison, WI: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
Liu, I. M. & Hsu, M. (1974). Measuring Creative Thinking in Taiwan by the Torrance Test. Testing and Guidance, 2, 108-109.
Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures, in R. J. Sternberg (ed.). Handbook of Creativity, 339-350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lumsdaine, E., & Lumsdaine, M. (1995). Creative Problem Solving. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Luyten, H. (1998). School effectiveness and student achievement, consistent across subjects? Evidence from Dutch elementary and secondary education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4, 281-308.
MacKay, T. (1999). Education and the disadvantaged: is there any justice? The Psychologist, 12(7), 344-349.
Madaus, G. F., Airasian, P. W., & Kellaghan, T. (1980). School effectiveness a reassessment of the evidence. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Manis, J. G. & Meltzer, B. N. (1972). Symbolic Interaction, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 9.
Mang, P. Y. (2000/August). Strategic innovation: constantinos markides on strategy and management. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 43-45.
Mathur, S. G. (1982). Cross-cultural implications of creativity. Indian Psychological Review, 22(1), 12-19.
McCormack-Larkin, M.& Kritek, W. (1983). Milwaukee’s project rise. Educational Leadership, 40, 16-21.
McFadzean, E. (1998). Enhancing creative thinking within organizations. Henley Management College, Greenland,Henley-on-Thames, Oxon, UK., 309-315.
McMurray, A. J. (2003/Sep). The relationship between organizational climate and organizational culture. Journal of American Academy of Business, 3,1/2, 1-8.
Moran, E. T. & Volkwein, J. F. (1992). The cultural approach to the formation of the organisational climate. Human Relations, 45 (1), 19-46.
Moran, S. (1995). A good school: The school board speaks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
Morrison, E. W. & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: extra-role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403-419.
Morley, L., & Rassool, N. (1999). School effectiveness: Fracturing the discourse. London: Falmer Press.
Mortimore, P. (1987). School examination results in ILEA, London: Inner London Education Authority.
Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Somerset: Open Books.
Mortimore, P. (1998). The end of the story. In P. Mortimore (Ed.), The road to improvement: Reflections on school effectiveness, 329-345. Swets and Zeitlinger: Lisse.
Moynihan, D. (1969). Maximum feasible participation: community action in the way on Poverty, New York: The Free Press.
Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., & Mesa, R. R. (1985). School effectiveness:checking process and developing a role for state and fedral government. Teachers College Record, 86(4), 616-641.
National Advisory Committee on Creative and Culture Education (NACCCE) (1999) All Our Futures: Creativity Culture and Education (London, Department for Education and Employment).
Nevelle, C. (1994). Factors of the school environment that have a positive impact on student learning and behavior. (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International 55, 12A: 3704.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
Pan, H. L. & Yu, C. (1999). Educational reforms with their impacts on school effectiveness and school improvement in Taiwan, R. O. C. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(1), 72-85.
Paschal, B. J., Kuo, Y. Y. & Schurr, K. T. (1981-2, Dec./ Jan). ‘Creative Thinking in Indiana and Taiwan College Students’, paper presented at the 5th Conference of the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Bhubaneshwar, India.
Pauly, E. (1991). The Classroom Crucible. New York: Basic Books.
Pavitt, K. (1999). Technology, management and systems of innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, U.K.
Payne, R. L. & Pugh, D. D. (1976). Organizational structure and climate. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1125-1172. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Peterson, R. E. (2002, December/January). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 7-10.
Phillips, R. A. (1997). A Stakeholder Theory and A principle of Fairness, Business Ethics Journal, 7(1), 51-66.
Plsek, P. (1997). Creativity, Innovation, and Quality. New York: ASQ Quality Press.
Pollack, T. (1995 July). Creative climate. Electric Light & Power, 731(7), 30.
Poole, M. S. (1985). Communication and organisational climates: Review, critique and a new perspective, In R. D. McPhee & P. A. Tomkins (eds.). Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions, 79-108, Beverly Hills, Sage.
Powell, W. W. (1996). Trust-Based Forms of Governance, in T. R. Tyler, and R. M. Kramer(eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers pf Theory and Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 51-67.
Pritchett, L., & Filmer, D. (1997). What educational production functions really show. A positive theory of education. Policy Research Working Paper of the Development Research Group Poverty and Human Resources. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: a review. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 427-452.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hour: Secondary school and their effects on children. London: Open Books.
Quinn, J. B. (1992). The intelligent enterprise a new paradigm. Academy of Management Executive, 6(4), 48-63.
Ralph, J. H. & Fennessey, J. (1983). Science or reform:some questions about the effective schools model. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 689-694.
Raudsepp, E. (1987/April ). Establishing a creative climate. Training and Development Journal, 50-53.
Rafferty, T. J. (2003/Spring). School climate and teacher attitudes toward upward communication in secondary schools, American Secondary Education, 31(2 ), 49-70.
Reichers, A. E., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: an evolution of constructs. In Schneider, B. (ED.). Organizational Climate and Culture, 5-39. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rentsch, J. R. (1990). Climate and culture: Interactions and qualitative differences in organizational meanings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 668-681.
Reynolds, D. (1992 ). School effectiveness and school improvement: an updated review of the British literature. In Reynolds, D., & P. Cuttance(Eds.), School effectiveness: Research, policy and practice. London: Cassell.
Reynolds, D., & Teddlie., C. (2000). The future agenda for school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), International handbook of school effectiveness research 322-343. London and New York: Falmer Press.
Reynolds, D., & Teddlie., C. (2001). Reflections on the Critics, and Beyond Them. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(1), 99-113.
Rhodes, M. (1961/April). An Analysis of Creativity. Phi delta Kappan, 305-310.
Ring, P. S. & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Formal and informal dimensions of Transactions; in A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle and M. S. Poole (Eds.) Research on the Mangement of Innovation (Harper and Row Publishers, New York), 171-192.
Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies and applications. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Prentice-Hall.
Roffe, I. (1999). Innovation and creativity in organisations : a review of the implications for training and development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(4/5), 224.
Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7-31, London.
Ruppel, C. P. & Harrington, S. J. (2000). The relationship of communication, ethical work climate, and trust to commitment and innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 313-328.
Safran, L. (2001). Creativity as mindful learning: a case from learner-led home-based education. In A. Craft, B. Jeffery and M. Leibling (2001) (Eds). Creativity in Education, London: Continuum.
Schaefer, C. E. (1975). The importance of measuring metaphorical thinking in children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 140-148.
Schafer, W. D., & Yen, S. R. (2000). School effect indices: stability of one and two-level formulations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(3), 239-250.
Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of process indicators of school functioning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1 (1), 73.
Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: Research, Theory and Practice. (London, Cassell.)
Scheerens, J. & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundation of educational effectiveness, New York: Pergamon.
Scheerens, J. (2000a). Improving school effectveness. Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning. (Fundamentals of Educational Planning. (Fundamentals of Educational Planning series no. 68)
Scheerens, J. (2000b). School effectiveness in developed and developing countries: a review of the reseach evidence. World Bank WEB-page,
http://www.worldbank.org/education.schools.
Scheerens, J. (2001). Monitoring School Effectiveness in Developing Countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, (4), 359-384.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organisational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
Schneider, B. & Snyder, R. A. (1975). Some relationships between job satisfaction and organizational climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 318-328.
Scieszka, G. (1996). Key indicators of effective rural elementary school as perceived by parents and teachers (Doctoral dissertation, Boston College, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 09A:3820.
Scott, S. G. & Burce, R. A. (1994), Determinates of innovative behavior : A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Joumal, 37 (3), 580-607.
Sharman, D. & Johnson, A. (1997). Innovation in all things! Developing creativity in the workplace. Industrial and Commercial Training, 29(3), 85-87.
Shin J. (1996). The effects of executive leadership on organizational innovation in nonprofit. Human service organizations(HSOs), University of Pittsburgh.
Sisk, H. L. (1969). The principles of management. South-Western Publish Co. Cincinnati, Ohio, 282-284, 359-363, 501-506.
Spender, J., & Kessler, E. (1995). Managing the uncertainties of innovation: Extending Thompson. Human Relations, 48, 35-56.
Sta. Maria, R. F. (2000). Perception of learning culture, concerns about the innovation, and their influence on use of an on-going innovation in the Malaysian public sector (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia University, 2000).
Stein, M. I. (1974). Stimulating creativity (1). New York: Academic Press.
Sternberg, R. J. & O’Hara, L. (1999). Creativity and Intelligence in R. J. Sternberg (ed.) Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). What is the common thread of creativity? Its dialectical relation to intelligence and wisdom. American Psychologist, 56, 360-362.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1998). The cruising school: The unidentified ineffective school. In L. Stoll & K. Myers (Eds.), No quick fixes: Perspectives on schools in difficulty 189-206. London and Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
Stoll, L., Wikeley, F., & Reezigt, G. (2002) Developing a Common Model ? Comparing Effective School Improvement Across European Countries. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(4), 455-475.
Tardif, T. Z. & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). What do you know about creativity? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity, 429-440. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, B. O. (2002). The effective schools process: alive and well. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(5), 375-378.
Taylor, F. W. (1923). Scientific management. New York: Harper & Row.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London:Falmer.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). School make a difference :Lessons learned from a ten year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
Teddlie,C., Stringfield, S., Wimpleberg, R., & Kirby, P. (1989). Contextual differences models for effective schooling in the USA. In B. Creemers, T. Peters, & D. Reynolds (Eds.), School effectiveness and school improvement, 117-130. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Terziovski, M. (2002). Achieving performance excellence through an integrated strategy of radical innovation and continuous improvement. Measuring Business Excellence, 6(2), 5-19.
Thomas, H. & Martin, J. (1996). Managing resources for school improvement: creating a cost-effective school, London: Routledge.
Thomas, S. (2001). Dimensions of secondary school effectiveness: Comparative analysis across regions. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(3), 285-322.
Thrupp, M. (2001). Sociological and political concerns about school effectiveness research: time for a new research agenda. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, (1), 7-40.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance test of creative thinking norms and technical manual. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press/ Ginn Xerox.
Torrance, E. P., Khatena, J., & Cunnington, B. F. (1973). Thinking creatively with sounds and words: directions manual and scoring guide. Bensenville IL: Scholastic Testing.
Townsend, T. (1993). School effectiveness:identifying the complexities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED359612).
Tucker, R. B. (2001/Jan/Feb). Innovation: the new core competency. Strategy & Leadership. 29(1), 11-16.
Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing for Innovation. Callfornla Management Review, 28(3),74-92.
U.S. Department of Education(1999/ May). Educational Excellence for All Children Act of 1999. Washington, D.C.
Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590-607.
Van Der Burg, K. (1987). Effective school characteristics: A comparison of administrator and parent perspectives (Doctoral dissertation. the University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48. 08A:1957.
VanGundy, A. (1984). Managing group creativity: A modular approach to problem solving. New York: American Management Association.
Vogt, W. P.(1999). Dictionary Of Statistics & Methodology: A
Nontechnical Guide For The Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications.
Walberg, H. J. (1989). District size and student learning. Educational and urban Society, 21(2), 145-163.
Ward, T. B., Finke, R. A., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Creativity and the mind: Discovering the genius within. New York: Plenum.
Weick, K. (1987). Theorizing about organizational communication. In F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts & L. Porter(eds.), Handbook of organizational communication, 97-122. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: genius and other myths. New York: Freeman.
Welsh, J. F., Petrosko, J. M., & Metcalf, J. (2003). Institutional effectiveness activities: faculty and administrator support at two-year institutions. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 75-94.
West, M. & Dawson, J. (2002/Augest). Impacting climate for innovation: can CEOs make a difference? Presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the society for Industrial and Orangizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada.
Westwood, R. & Low, D. R. (2003/Aug). The multi-cultural muse: culture, creativity and innovation. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. CCM, 3(2), ABI/ INFORM GLOBAL.
Whitty, G. (1997). Social theory and education policy: The legacy of Karl Mannheim. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18, 149-163.
Wiles, J. W. (1995). Middle level education in rural America.(ERIC Document Reproduction Services No .ED 385426)
Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity assessment packet (CAP). Buffalo, N. Y.: D. O. K. Publishers.
Willmott, R. (1999). School effectiveness research: An ideological commitment ? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 33, 253-268.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.
Wikeley, F., Stoll, L. & Lodag, C. (2002). Effective School Improvement: English Case Studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(4), 363-385.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity.Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.
Wycoff, J. (2002). Defining innovation. National Driller, 23(2), 52.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE