參考文獻
一、中文部份
林煥祥(2002)：第一議題：科學教育目標、現況與前瞻-子題一之1：中小學科學教育。第一次全國科學教育會議公聽會提案資料，7-13。
周何主編(2005)：國語活用辭典。台北市：五南圖書。
黃長司、鍾崇燊、黃芳裕(2004)：高中物質科學化學篇。台中市：康熙圖書。
高敬文(1989)：我國國小學童測量概念發展研究。初等教育研究，1， 182-219。
翁秀玉(1997)：國小自然科教師傳達科學本質之行動研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
許良榮(1998)：國小自然科過程技能教學的潛在問題。國教輔導，38(1)，19-22。
許瑛玿、吳慧珍(2002)：網路合作學習與科學過程技能的學習。科學教育月刊，254，16-27。
許榮富(1986)：科學過程技能與科學態度及創造思考力相關性分析研究。論文發表於中華民國七十四年度科學教育學術研討會，231-259。台北市：國立台灣師範大學理學院。
連坤德、毛松霖(1992)：高中生物理科測量及儀器使用技能之評量工具研究。中華民國物理教育學術研討會。台北：國立台灣師範大學。
郭文禎(1999)：國小學生投入實驗活動的方式與其對實驗看法之關係。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
郭重吉、許玫理(1992)：從科學哲學觀點的演變探討科學教育的過去與未來。彰化師範大學學報，3，531-560。
陳文典(1993)：國小學童對測量概念的認識。科學教育學刊，1，111-134。
教育部(1993)：高級中學課程標準。台北市：教育部。
教育部(1999)：國民教育九年一貫課程綱要：「自然科學與生活科技」課程綱要。台北市：教育部。
黃偉蓉、林秋麗、陳文典(1993)：國小學童對長度測量的認識。國立台北師範學院學報，6，43-66。
熊召弟(1996)：臺北公立高中(高一)學生科學過程技能和邏輯思考能力之探討研究。國立台北師範學院學報，9，545-578。
譚寧君(1999)：從兒童的測量迷思概念看教師對兒童測量知識的了解。國立台北師範學院學報，12，407-436。二、英文部份
Allie, S., Buffler, A., Kaunda, L., Campbell, B., & Lubben, F. (1998). First-year physics students’ perceptions of the quality of experimental measurements. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 447-459.
Allie, S., & Buffler, A. (1996). A course in tools and procedures for Physics1. American Journal of Physics, 66(7), 613-624.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
APU (1985). Science at age 15, Report No. 1. London: DES.
APU (1988). Science at age 13, Review report. London: DES.
Buffler, A., Allie, S., Lubben, F., & Campbell, B. (2001). The development of first year physics students’ ideas about measurements in terms of point and set paradigms. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1137-1156.
Cauzinille-Marmeche, E., Meheut, M., S�嫫��, M.-G., & Weil-Barais, A. (1985). The influence of a priori ideas on the esperimental approach. Science Education, 69, 201-211.
Coelho, S. M., & S�嫫��, M-G. (1998). Pupils’ reasoning and practice during hands-on activities in the measurement phase. Research in Science and Technological Education, 16, 79-96.
Davidowitz, B., Lubben, F., & Rollnick, M. (2001). Undergraduate Science and Engineering Students' Understanding of the Reliability of Chemical Data. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(2), 247-252.
Del Carlo, D., & Bodner, G. (2004). Students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty in the chemistry classroom laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 47-64.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Department of Education and Science (1985). Science 5-16: A Statement of Policy. London, HMSO.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Duggan, S., Johnson, P., & Gott, R. (1996). A critical point in investigative work: Defining variables. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 461-477.
Fairbrother, R., & Hackling, M. (1997). Is this the right answer? International Journal of Science Education, 19, 887-894.
Fisher, D., Harrison, A., Henderson, D., & Hofstein, A. (1999). Laboratory learning environments and practical tasks in senior secondary science classes. Research in Science Education, 28, 353-363.
Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 548-553
Germann, P. J., & Aram, R. J. (1996). Student performances on the science processes of recording data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions and providing evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 773-789.
Germann, P. J., Aram, R. J., & Burke, G. (1996). Identifying patterns and relationships among the responses of seventh-grade students to the science process skill of designing experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 79-99.
Giere, R. N. (1991). Understanding Scientific Reasoning, 3rd edition. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative Work in the Science Curriculum. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hackling, M., & Garnett, P. J. (1992). Expert novice differences in science investigation skills. Research In Science Education, 22, 170-177.
Hewson, P. W. (1985). Epistemological commitments in the learning of science: Examples from dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 163-172.
Hodson, D. (1991). Practical work in school science: time for a reappraisal. Studies in Science Education, 19, 175-184.
Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22, 85-142
Hodson, D. (1996). Practical work in school science: exploring some directions for change. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 755-760.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28-54.
Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663-687.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 701-703.
Kanari, Z. & Millar, R. (2004) Reasoning from Data: How Students Collect and Interpret Data in Science Investigations, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 748-769.
Kirschner, P. A. (1988). Epistemology, practical work and academic skill in science education. Science and Education, 1(3), 273-299.
Kirschner, P. A., & Meester, M. A. M. (1988). The laboratory in higher science education: Problems, premises and objectives. Higher Education, 17, 99-119.
Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O’Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. London: Academic Press.
Lubben, F., Buffler, A., Allie, S., & Campbell, B. (2001). Point and set reasoning in practical science measurement by entering university freshmen. Science Education, 85, 311-327.
Lubben, F., & Millar, R. (1996). Children’s ideas about the reliability of experimental data. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 955-968.
Lunetta, V. N. (1996). The school science laboratory: historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 249-262). Dordreche, Nertherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lunetta, V. N., & Tmir, P. (1979) Matching lab activities with teaching goals. The Science Teacher, 46, 22-24.
Mashhadi, A., & Woolnough, B. (1998). Students’ conceptions of the “Reality Status” of electrons. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Singapore educational research association, Singapore.
Masnick, A. M., & Morris, B. J. (2002). Reasoning from data: The effect of sample size and variability on children’s and adults’ conclusions. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 643-648). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Matthews, M. R. (2004). Idealisation and Galileo’s pendulum discoveries: historical, philosophical and pedagogical considerations. Science & Education, 13, 689-715.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Metz, K. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children’s science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65, 93-127.
Millar, R. (1991). A means to an end: the role of processes in science education. In B. E. Woolnough (Eds.), Practical science (pp.43-52). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. Paper prepared for the Committee: High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond process. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33-62.
Millar, R., Gott, R., Lubben, F., & Duggan, S. (1996). Children’s performance of investigative tasks in science: A framework for considering progression. In M. Hughes (Eds.), Progression in Learning (pp 82-108). Clevedon, UK:Multilingual Matters.
Millar, R., Le Marechal. J-F., & Tiberghien, A. (1999). ‘Mapping’ the domain: varieties of practical work. In J. Leach & A. Paulsen (Eds.), Practical Work in Science Education (pp. 33-59). Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
Millar, R., & Lubben, F. (1996). Investigative work in science: The role of prior expectations and evidence in shaping conclusions. Education, 3, 28-34.
Millar, R., Lubben, F., Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (1994). Investigating in the school science laboratory: conceptual and procedural knowledge and their influence on performance. Research Papers in Education, 9(2), 207-248.
Nakhleh, M. B., Polles, J., & Malina, E. (2002). Learning chemistry in a laboratory environment. In J. K. Gilbert et al (eds.), Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice (pp.69-94). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nola, R. (2004). Pendula, models, constructivism and reality. Science & Education, 13, 349-377.
Osborne, J. (1996). Beyond constructivism. Science Education, 80, 53-82
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020.
Padilla, M. J. (1980). Science activities- for thinking. School Science and Mathematics, LXXX, 601-608.
Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education. Kiel: Institute of Science Education at the University of Kiel.
Rollnick, M., Lubben, F., Lotz, S., & Dlamini, B. (2002). What do underprepared students learn about measurement from introductory laboratory work? Research in Science Education, 32, 1-18.
Roth, W. M. (1994). Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 197-223.
Ryder, J., & Leach, J. (2000). Interpreting experimental data: the views of upper secondary school and university science students. International Journal of Science Education, 22(10), 1069-1084.
Samarapungavan, A., & Wiers, R.W. (1997). Children's thoughts on the origin of species. Cognitive Science, 21, 147-177.
Scott, P., & Leach, J. (1998). Learning science concepts in the secondary classroom (third edition), in Ratcliffe, M. (Eds.) ASE secondary science teachers’ handbook. London: Simon and Schuster.
S�嫫��, M-G., Journeaux, R., & Larcher, C. (1993). Learning the statistical analysis of measurement error. International Journal of Science Education, 15(4), 427-438.
So, W. W. (2003). Learning science through investigations: an experience with Hong Kong primary school children. International Journal of Science and mathematics Education, 1, 175-200.
Song, J., & Black, P. J. (1992). The effect of concept requirements and task contexts on pupils' performance in control of variables. International Journal of Science Education, 14 (1), 83-93.
Strike, K. A., Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tamir, P. (1991). Practical work in school science: an analysis of current practice. In B. Woolnough (Eds.), Practical science (pp. 13-30). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Taylor, J. A., & Dana, T. M. (2003). Secondary school physics teachers’ conceptions of scientific evidence: an exploratory case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8, 721-736.
Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403-418.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
Tsai, C. C. (2003). Taiwanese science students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the laboratory learning environments: exploring epistemological gaps. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 847-860.
Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2004). From “Try It and See” to strategic exploration: characterizing young children’s scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 94-118.
Vellom, R. P., & Anderson, C. W. (1999). Reasoning about data in middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 179-199.
Watson, R. (2000). The role of practical work. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 57-71). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Woolnough, B. (1991). Practical science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Woolnough, B., & Allsop, T. (1985). Practical work in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yore, L. D., Hand, B., Goldman, S. R., Hildebrand, G. M., Osborne, J. F., Treagust, D. F., & Wallace, C.S. (2004). New directions in language and science education research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39,347-352.