李怡穎、楊仁壽，2006，資訊型態與互動方式對團隊共識與績效的影響，中山管理評論，第十四卷，第二期，頁493-521。
汪明生、方之光與黃瓅輝，1996，“事前機率與個別證據對主觀機率判斷的影響：以受過統計訓練的學生為樣本”，管理學報，第十三卷，第二期。
楊仁壽、方祥明，2003, “動態系統知識的學習-團隊學習與個人學習之比較實驗”，管理學報，第二十卷，第三期，頁429-456。Ajzen, I., 1977, “Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction”, Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 353, 10, pp.303-314.
Anderson and Maletta, 1994, “Auditor attendance to negative and positive information: the effect of experience related differences” Behavioral Research in Accounting, Volume 6, pp.1-20.
Anderson, N. H., 1981, Foundation of Information Integration Theory, San Diego: Academic Press.
Anderson, N. H., 1986, A Cognitive theory of judgment and decision, In Brehmer, B., H. Jungermann, P. Loruens, and G. Sevon’（Eds.）, New Direction in Research on Decision Making, Elserier Science Publishers B. V.（North-Holland）
Anderson, N. H. and C. C. Graesser, 1976, “An information integration analysis of attitude change in group discussion”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 2, pp.210-222.
Argote, L., Devadas R. and N. Melone, 1990, “The base rate fallacy: Contrasting processes and outcomes of group and individual judgment”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, pp.296-310.
Argote, L., Gruenfeld, D. and C. Naquin, 2000, Group Learning in Organization, In M. E. Turner, (ed.), Group at work：Advance in Theory and Research. Erlbaum, New York.
Argote, L., Seabright M. A., and L. Dyer, 1986, “Individual versus group use of base rate and individuating information”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, pp.65-75.
Argyris, C., 1982 Reasoning, learning and Action: individual and organization, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Argyris, C., 1990, Overcoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational learning. Boston MA:Allynand Bacon.
Argyris, C. and D. A. Schon, 1996, Organizational learning II －Theory, Method and Practice. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Argyris, C., Putman, R. and D. M. Smith, 1985, Action Science, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Augustinova, M. Oberle’, D. and G. L. Stasser, 2005, “Differential Access to information and anticipated group interaction: impact on individual reasoning”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 4, pp.619-631.
Bar-Hillel, 1983, The base rate fallacy controversy, In Roland W. Scholz Idm（Eds.） Decision making under uncertainty: Cognitive decision research, social interaction, development and Epistemology, pp.39-61. Elservier Science publishers B. V.: Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bar-Hillel, M., 1980, “The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments”, Acta Psychological, 44, pp.211-233.
Bar-Hillel, M., 1980a, “The base rate fallacy in probability judgments”, Acta Psychological, 44, pp.211-233.
Bar-Hillel, M. and B. Fischhoff, 1981, “When do base rates affect predictions?” Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 41, 10, pp.671-680.
Bazerman, M. H.（1990）, Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, Wiley: New York.
Benbasat, L. and J. Lim, 2000, “Information technology support for debiasing group judgments: an empirical evaluation”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 83, 1, pp.167-183.
Birnbaum, M. H., 1983, “Base rates in Bayesian inference: Signal detection analysis of the cab problem”, American Journal of Psychology, 96, pp.85-94
Birnbaum, M. H., 2001, “Introduction to Behavioral Research on the Internet”, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Blrnbaum, M. H. and B. A. Mellers, 1983, “Bayesian in-ference: Combining base rates with opinions of sources who vary in credibility”, Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 45, pp.792-803.
Borgida, E. and R. E. Nisbett, 1977, “The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 3, pp.258-271.
Burnstein, E. and A. Vinokur, 1977, “Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, pp.315-322.
Buyukkurt, B. K. and M. D. Buyullurt, 1991, “an experimental study of the effectiveness of three debiasing techniques”, Decision Science, 22, 1, pp.60-73.
Chalos, P., 1989, “The base rate fallacy: Evidence from loan committees”, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, pp.150-159.
Chanin, M., Wulwick, V. and H. A. Shapiro, 1984, A study of comparative effectiveness of problem solving technologies, In D. Currie and J. Gentry（Eds.）, Developments in Business Simulation and Experimental Exercises. Normal, IL: Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, pp.29-34.
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. and J. B. Bushyhead, 1981, “Physicians'' use of probabilistic information in a real clinical setting”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, pp.928-935
Cole, W. G., 1988, “Three graphic representations to aid Bayesian inference”, Methods of Information in Medicine, 27, pp.125-132.
Cosier, R. A., 1978, “The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracy”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, pp.295-306.
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. and R. E. White, 1999, “An Organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution”, Academy of Management Review, 24, 3, pp.522-537.
Davis, D. D. and D. W. Harless, 1996, “Group vs. Individual Performance In A Price-Searching Experiment”, Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 2, pp.215-227.
Davis, J. H., 1973, “Group Decision and Social Interaction: A Theory of Social Decision Schemes”, Psychological Review, 80, pp.97-125.
Davis, J. H., 1992, “Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: selected examples, 1950-1990”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, pp.3-38.
Davis, J. H., 1996, Group decision making and quantitative judgments: A consensus model. In E. H. Witte and J. H. Davis（Eds）, Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups, （Vol. 1, pp.35-59. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.）
DeSanctis, G. and R. B. Gallupe, 1987, “A foundation for the study of group decision support systems”, Management Science, 33, pp.589-609.
Deutsch, M. and H. B. Gerard, 1955, “A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
Devine, D. J., 1999, “Effects of cognitive ability, task knowledge, information sharing and conflict on group decision making effectiveness”, Small Group Research, 30, 5, pp.608-634.
Diehl, M. and W. Stoebe, 1987, “Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward solution of a riddle”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, pp.497-509.
Eddy, D. M., 1982, Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine : Problems and opportunities, In D. Kahne-man, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (Eds.) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (PP. 249-267) Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edmondson, A. C., 2002, “The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: a group –level perspective”, Organization Science, 13, 2, pp.128-146.
Edwards, W., 1954, “The theory of decision making”, Psychological Bullitin, 51, pp.380-417.
Edwards, W. 1968, Conservatism in human information processing, In B. Kleinmuntz (eds) Formal representation of human judgment (pp.17-52) New York: Wiley.
Epley, N. and T. Gilovich, 2001, “ Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors”, Psychological Science, 12, 5, 391-396.
Evans, J. St. B. T. and H. Bradshaw, 1986, “Estimating sample size requirements in research design: a study of intuitive statistical judgment”, Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 5, pp.10-19.
Fischhoff B., 1982, Debiasing, In Kahneman, D., P. Slovic and A. Tversky（Eds.）, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, pp.422-444, Cambridge University Press.
Fischhoff B. and M. Bar-Hillel., 1984, “Diagnosticity and the base-rate effect”, Memory and Cognition, 12, 402-410
Fischhoff, B. and M. Bar-Hillel 1984, “Focusing techniques: a shortcut to improve probability judgments”, Organizational Behavior and Human performance, 34, pp.175-194.
Fischhoff, B., slovic, P. and S. Lichtenstein, 1979, “Subjective sensitivity analysis”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, pp.339-359
Fishbein, M. and I. Ajen, 1975, “Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research”, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fiske and Susan, 1980, “Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 38, pp.889-906.
Friedman, S., 2004, “ Learning to make more effective decisions: changing beliefs as a prelude to action”, The Learning Organization, 11, 2/3, 110-128.
Funder, D. C., 1994, “Judgmental Process and Content”, Psychology, 5, #17, Base Rate（12）
Gersick, C. J. and J. R. Hackman, 1990, “Habitual routines in task- performing teams”, Organization Behavior and Human Decision Process, Vol.47, No.1, pp.65-97.
Gigone, D. and R. Hastie, 1993, “The common knowledge effect: information sharing and group judgment”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, pp.959-974.
Gigone, D. and R., Hastie, 1996, The impact of information on group judgment: A model and computer simulation, In E. H. Witte and J. H. Davis（Eds.）, Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups, （Vol. 1, pp. 221-251）. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ginosar, Z. and Y. Trope, 1980, “The effects of base rates and individuating information on judgments about another person”, Experimental and Social Psychology, 16, pp.228-242.
Goodie, A. S. and E. Fantino, 1999, “Base rates versus sample accuracy: competition for control in human matching to sample”, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, pp.155-169.
Goodie, A. S. and E. Fantino, 1995, “An experientially derived base-rate error in humans”, Psychological Science, 6, pp.101-106.
Goodie, A. S. and E. Fantino, 1999, “What does and does not alleviate base rate neglect under direct experience”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, pp.307-335.
Gouran, D. S., 1986, Inferential errors, interaction and group decision making, In R. Y. Hirokawa and M. S. Poole（Eds）, Communication and group decision making（pp.93-111）, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
Green, P. C., Alter, P. and A. F. Carr, 1993, “Development of standard anchors for scoring generic past-behavior question in structured interviews”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1, pp.203-212.
Greenberg, J., and R. A. Baron, 2000, Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Griffith, T. L. and M. A. Neale, 2001, “Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: from nascent knowledge to transactive memory”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, pp.379-421.
Guzzo and Dickson 1996, “Team in organizations: recent research on performance & effectiveness”, Annual Review of Psychology, 47, pp.307-338.
Hackman, J. R., 1990, Groups that work (and those that don’t): creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hart, P., 1991, “risk-taking and recklessness: Quality of process and outcome in policy decision making”, Politics and the Individual, 1, 1, pp.67-90.
Hedlund, J., Ilgen, D. R. and J. R. Hollenbeck, 1998, “Decision Accuracy in Computer-Mediated Versus Face-to-Face Decision-Making Teams”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 1, pp.30-47.
Herbert T. T. and R. W. Estes, 1977, “Improving executive decisions by formalizing dissent-the corporate devil’s advocate”, Academy of Management, 2, 4, pp.662.
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S. and D. A. Vollrath, 1997, “The Emerging Conceptualization of Groups as Information Processors”, Psychological Bulletin, 121, 1, pp.43-64.
Hinsz, V. G. and D. J. Davidson, 1993, “Contextual influences of within subjects designs on base rate type problems” Paper presented at the meeting of the Judgment and Decision Making Society（Washington, D. C.）.
Hogarth, R. M. 1980, “Judgment and choice: The psychology of decision”, London: John Wiley and Sons, pp.204-233.
Hogarth, R. M. and Einhorn, H. J., 1992, “Order Effects in Belief Updating: the Belief-adjustment Model”, Cognitive Psychology, 24, pp.1-55.
Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., LePine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A. and J., Hedlund, 1998, “Extending the Multilevel Theory of Team Decision Making: Effects of Feedback and Experience in Hierarchical Teams”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.41, No.3, pp. 269-282.
Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., and J. Phillips, 1995, “Multilevel Theory of Team Decision Making: Decision Performance in Teams Incorporating Distributed Expertise”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.80, No.2, pp.292-316.
Huber, V. L., Neale, M. A. and G. B. Northcraft, 1987, “Decision bias and personnel selection strategies”, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 40, pp.136-147.
Issaccs, W. N., 1999, Dialogue and the art of thinking together: A pioneering approach to communicating in business and in life, New York: Doubleday.
Janis, I. L., 1972, Victims of group think: psychological studies of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Janis, I. L., 1982, Victims of groupthink（2nd ed.）, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Johnson, W. B., 1983, “Representativeness in judge mental predictions of corporate bankruptcy”, The Accounting Review, LVIII, 1, pp.78-97.
Jonassen, D. H. and H. II Kwon, 2001, “Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face to face group problem solving”, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49,1, pp.35-51.
Joyce, E. and G. Biddle, 1981, “Are auditor’s judgments sufficiently regressive”, Journal of Accounting Research, 19, pp.323-349.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1972, “Subjective probability: a judgment of re-presentativeness”, Cognitive Psychology, 3, pp.430-454.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1972a, “Subjective probability: A judgment of re-presentativeness”, Cognitive Psychology, 3, pp.430-454
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1972b, “On prediction and judgment”, ORI Research Monograph, 12, 4, #10.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1973, “On the psychology of prediction”, Psychological Review, 80, pp.237-251.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1979, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”, Econometrical, Vol. 47, pp.263-91, March.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and A. Tversky, 1982, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Cambridge University press: Cambridge.
Kanouse, David E. and L. Hanson Jr. Reid, 1972, “Negativity in Evaluations”, Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, Morristown, NJ: General Leaming Press, pp.47-62.
Kanouse, David E., 1984, “Explaining Negativity Biases in Evaluation and Choice Behavior: Theory and Research”, Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 703-308.
Karau, S. J. and J. R. Kelly, 1992, “The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 6, pp.542-571.
Kasl, E., Marsick, V. J. and Dechant, K., 1997, “Teams as Learners：A Research-Based Model of Team Learning”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30, 2, pp.227-246.
Kataoka, H. C., Latham, G. P. and G. Whyte, 1997, “The relative resistance of the situational , patterned behavior and conventional structured interviews to anchoring effects”, Human Performance, 10, 1, pp.47-63.
Kelly, J. R., Jackson, J. W. and S. L. Huston-Comeaux, 1997, “The effects of time pressure and task differences on influence modes and accuracy in decision making group”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, pp.10-22.
Kerr, N. L. and R. S. Tindale, 2004, “Group performance and decision making”, Annual Review of Psychology, 55, pp.623-655.
Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R. J., Kramer, and P. Geoffrey, 1996, “Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups”, Psychological Review, 103, 4, pp.687-719.
Kerr, N. L., Niedermeire, K. E. and M. F. Kaplan, 1999, “Bias in jurors vs bias in juries: new evidence from the SDS perspective”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 80, 1, pp.70-86.
Klein, A.G., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R. and C. E. Zsambok, 1992, Decision making in action: models and methods, New Jersey: Ablex.
Koehler, J. J., 1993, “The base rate fallacy myth”, Psycologuy, 4, pp.49.
Koehler, J. J., 1996, “The base-rate fallacy reconsidered: descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, pp.1-53
Kohlas, J., 1989, “Modelling uncertainty with belief functions in numerical models”, European Journal of Operations Research, 40, pp.377-388.
Lant T. K. and S. J. Mezias, 1992, “An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation”, Organization Science, Vol.3, No.1, pp.47-71.
Larson, J.R. Jr., Foster Fishman, P. G. and T. M. Franz, 1998, “Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision making groups”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24,5, pp.482-495.
Leon, M. and N. H. Anderson, 1974, “A ratio rule from integration theory applied to inference judgments”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 1, pp.27-36.
Lim, L. H. and I. Benbasat, 1997, “The debiasing role of group support systems: an experimental investigation of the representativeness bias”, International Journal of Computer Studies, 47, pp.453-471.
Lim, Lai-Huat and I. Benbasat, 1996, “A framework for addressing group judgment biases with group technology”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 3, pp.7-24.
Locke, E., 1986, Generalizing from laboratory to field settings, MA: Lexington Books.
Lyon, D. and P. Slovic, 1976, “Dominance of accuracy information and neglect of base rates in probability estimation”, Acta Psychological, 40, pp.287-298
Macchi, L., 1994, “On the communication and comprehension of probabilistic information”, Psycoloquy, 5, #11, Base Rate（11）
Manis, M., Dovalina, I., Avis, N. E. and S. Cardoze, 1980, “Base rates can affect individual predictions”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, pp.231-248
March, J. C., 1991, “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization Science, Vol.2, No.2, pp.71-87.
Mason, R. O., 1969, “a dialectical approach to strategic planning”, Management Science, 15, pp.403-414.
Maznevski, M. L., 1994, “Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members”, Human Relations, 47, 5, pp.531-552.
McGrath, J. E and D. A. Kravitz, 1982, “Group research”, Annual Review of Psychology, 33, pp.195-230.
McGrath, J. E., 1984, Groups: Interaction and Performance, Prentic Hill, NJ.
Mckenna, S., 1995, “Moving a business forward through team learning”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.10, No.1, pp.28-36.
Meehl, P. E. and A. Rosen, 1955, “Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores”, Psychological Bulletin, 52, pp.194-216.
Meyerowitz, B. E. and S. Chaiken, 1987, “The effects of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions and behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 3, pp.500-510.
Moorhead, G., Neck, C. P. and M. S. West, 1998, “The tendency toward defective decision making within self-managing teams: The relevance of groupthink for the 21st century”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 2, pp.327-351.
Mullen, B., Johnson, C. and E. Salas, 1991, “Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration”, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 1, pp.3-23.
Myers, D. G. and H. Lamm, 1976, “The group polarization phenomenon”, Psychological Bulletin, 83, pp.602-627.
Murphy, K. R., Balzer, W. K., Lockhart, M. C. and E. J. Eisenman, 1985, “ Effects of previous performance on evaluations of present performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 72-84.
Nagao, D. H., Tindale, R. S., Hinsz, V. B. and J. H. Davis, 1985, “Individual and group baiases in information processing”, Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
Naumes, M. J. 1998, Individual differences in learning style and group performance, in R. R.Hoffman and M. F. Sherrick（ed.） Viewing Psychology as a Whole: The Integrative science of William N. Dember, Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological association.
Nemiroff, P. M., Pasmore, W. A., and D. L. Ford, 1976, “The effects of two normative structural interventions on established and ad hoc groups, Implications for improving decision making effectiveness”, Decision Science, 7, pp.841-855.
Nisbett, R. E. and E. Borgida, 1975, “Attribution and the psychology of prediction”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, pp.932-943
Norman H. A., 1981, Foundations of Information Integration Theory (New York : Academic Press,), 144; quoted in Robin M. Hogarth and Hillel J. Einhorn, Order Effects in Belief Updating: the Belief-adjustment Model, Cognitive Psychology 24:1 (January 1992) : 2.
Norman, D. A. and D. G. Bobrow, 1975, “On data limited and resource-limited processes”, Cognitive Psychology, 7, pp.44-64.
Novemsky, N. and S. Kronzon, 1999,” How are base rate used, when they are used: a comparison of additive and Bayesian models of base rate use”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, pp.55-69.
Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R. and J. F. George, 1991, “Electronic meeting systems to support group work”, Communication of the ACM, 34, pp.40-61.
Pollard, P. and J. St. B. T. Evans, 1983, The role of representativeness in statistical inference: a critical appraisal, In J. St. B. T. Evans. Routledge and Kegan Paul（Eds）, In Thinking and reasoning: Psychological approaches, pp.107-134.
Press, S. J., 1989, Bayesian Statistics: Principles, Models, and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Priem, R.L., Harrison, D.A., and N.K. Muir, 1995, “Structured Conflict and Consensus Outcomes in Group Decision Making”, Journal of Management, 21, 4, pp.691-710.
Propp, K. M., 1997, “Information utilization in small group decision making: A study of the evaluation interaction model”, Small Group Research, 28, 3, 424-453.
Roberts, E., 1997, “Team training: when is enough…enough?” The Journal of Quality and Participation, Vol.20, No.3, pp.16-20.
Roy, M. C. and F. J. Lerch, 1996, “Overcoming ineffective mental representations in base rate problems”, Information System Research, 7, 2, pp.233-247.
Roy, M. C., 1991, Ineffective internal representations and the impact of information presentation in base rate problems, Unpublished Ph D. dissertation, Carnegic Mellon University.
Russo, J. E. and P. J. H. Schoemaker, 1990, Decision Traps. New York: Doubleday & Company.
Schmitt, N., 1976, “Social and situational determinants of interview,” Personnel Psychology, 29, 79-101.
chmitt, N. and W.C. Borman, 1993, Personnel selection in organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Scholz, R. W., 1983, Introduction to decision making under uncertainty: biases, fallacies and the development of decision making. In R. W. Scholz, Decision making under uncertainty, pp.3-18.
Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Hilton, D., and G. Naderer, 1991, “Base rates, representativeness, and the logic of conversation: The contextual relevance of ''irrelevant'' information”, Social Cognition, 9, pp.67-83
Schweiger, D. M, Sandberg, W. R. and Houston, 1986, “Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: a comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy and consensus”, Academy of Management Journal, 29, pp.51-71.
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., and J. W. Ragan, 1986, “Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus,” Academy of Management Review, 29, 1, pp.51-71.
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., and P. L. Rechner, 1989, “Experimental Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil''s Advocacy, and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making Academy of Management Journal, 32, pp.745-772.
Schwenk, C. and J. S. Valacich, 1994, “Effects of Devil''s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry on Individuals versus Groups”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 2, pp.210-222.
Schwenk, C. R. and R. A. Cosier, 1980, “Effects of the expert, devils advocate and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performance”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, pp.409-424.
Schwenk, C. R., 1982, “Effects of inquiry method and ambiguity tolerance on prediction performance”, Decision Scuences, 13, pp.207-221.
Schwenk, C. R., 1984, “Devil’s advocacy in managerial decision making”, Journal of Management Studies, 21, pp.153-168.
Schwenk, C., 1990, “Effects of Devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis”, Organizational Behavior and human Decision Processes, 47, pp.161-176.
Senge, P. M.1990, “The Fifth Discipline”, The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday.
Short, J., Williams, E. and B. Christie, 1976, “The Social Psychology of Telecommunication”, CHI Conference Companion, pp.99-100.
Sia, C. L., Tan, B. C.Y. and K. K. Wei, 2002, “Group polarization and computer mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity”, Information System Research, 13, 1, pp.70-113.
Simon, H. A., 1955, “A behavioral model of rational choice”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, pp.99-112.
Skowronski, J.J., and D.E. Carlston, 1987, "Social Judgment and Social Memory: The Role of Cue Diagnosticity in Negativity, Postivity, and Extremity Biases”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 4, 689-699.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and S. Lichtenstein, 1977, “Behavioral Decision Theory”, Annual Review of Psychology, 28, pp.1-39.
Stasser G., L. A. Taylor and C. Hanna, 1989 “Information Sampling in Structured and Unstructured Discussion of Three- and Six-person Group”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.57, pp.67-78,.
Stasser, G. and D. Stewart, 1992, “Discovery of Hidden Profiles by Decision-Making Group: Solving a Problem versus Making a Judgment”, Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 57, pp.67-78.
Stasser, G. and W. Titus, 1985, “Polling of Unique Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion”, Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 48, pp.1467-1478.
Stasser, G., Tayolr L. A. and C. Hanna, 1989, “Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six- person groups”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.48, pp.67-89.
Stasson, M. F., Ono, K., Zimmerman, S. K. and J. H. Davis, 1988, “Group consensus processes on cognitive bias tasks: a social decision scheme approach”, Japanese Psychological Research, 30, 2, pp.68-77.
Stone, D. N., Sivitanides, M. P. and A. P. Magro, 1994, “Formalized Dissent and Cognitive Complexity in Group Processes and Performance”, Decision Science, 25, 2, pp.243-261.
Streufert S, and S. C. Streufert, 1978, Behavior in the Complex Environment, New York: John Wiley.
Taylor, S. E., 1991, “Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization hypothesis”, Psychological Bulletin, 110, 1, pp.67-85.
Troutman, C. M. and J. Shanteau, 1977, “Inferences based on nondiagnostic information”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, pp.43-55.
Tung, L. L. and A. R., Heminger, 1993, “The Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil''s Advocacy, and Consensus Inquiry Methods in a GSS Environment”, Information & Management, 25, 1, pp.33-41.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman., 1971, “The belief in the law of small numbers”, Psychological Bulletin, 76, pp.105-110.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, 1974, “Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases,” Science, 185, pp.1124-1131
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, 1980, Causal schemas in judgment under under-tainty, In: M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in Social Psychology. Hillsdale, N. J. : Erlbaum
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman, 1982, Evidential impact of base rates. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (PP. 153-160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, 1982a, Evidential impact of base rates, In: D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuris-tics and Biases. New York : Cambridge university Press
Valacich, D., Dennis, Hinsz, V. and J. Davis, 1994, “Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story”, Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, pp.448-467.
Valacich, J. S. and C. Schwenk, 1995, “Structuring conflict in individual, face to face, and computer-mediated group decision making: carping versus objective devil’s advocacy”, Decision Science, 26, 3, pp.369-393.
Vinokur, A. and E. Burnstein, 1974, “Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, pp.305-315.
Wallsten , T., 1972, “Conjoint-measurement framework for the study of probabilistic information processing”, Psychological Review, 79, pp.245-260
Wallsten, T. S., 1983, The theoretical status of judgmental heuristics, In Roland W. Scholz Idm（Eds.） Decision making under uncertainty: Cognitive decision research, social interaction, development and Epistemology, pp.21-37. Elservier Science publishers B. V.: Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Walther, J. B., 1992, “Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated communication: A relation perspective”, Communication Research, 19, 1, pp52-90.
Walther, J. B., 1992, “Interpersonal effects in computer mediated interactions: a relational perspective”, Communication Research, 19, 1, pp.187-203.
Wells, G. L. and J. H. Harvey, 1977, “Do people use consensus information in making causal attributions?” Personality and Social Psychology , 35, pp.279-293
Whyte, G., 1993, “Escalating commitment in individual and group decision making: a prospect theory approach”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 54, pp.430-455.
Whyte, G. and C. Sue-Chan, 2002, “The neglect of base rate data by human resources managers in employee selection”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 19, 1, pp.1-11.
Wickham, P. A., 2003, “The representativeness heuristic in judgements involving entrepreneurial success and failure”, Management Science, 41, 1/2, pp.156-167.
Wittenbaum, G. M., 2000, “The Bias Toward Discussing Shared Information”, Communication Research, 27, 3, pp.379-402.
Wright, E. F., Luus, C. A. E. and S. D. Christie, 1990, “Does group discussion facilitate the use of consensus information in making causal attributions”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 2, pp.261-269.
Zigurs, I., and B.K. Buckland, 1998, “A Theory of Task-Technology Fit and Group Support SystemsEffectiveness”, MIS Quarterly, 22, 3, pp.313-334.
Ziller, R. C., 1957, “Four techniques of group decision making under uncertainty”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, pp.384-388.