臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：台灣智慧財產權交易市場及創新中介服務之研究 - 以工研院為例
作者：張彬彬
作者(外文)：Chang, Pin-Pin
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：管理科學系所
指導教授：黃仁宏
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2010
主題關鍵詞：智慧財產；專利中介；專利交易；專利拍賣；工研院；台灣；intellectual property；patent intermediary；patent transaction；patent auction；ITRI；Taiwan
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:45
智慧財產權對於全球成長型的企業，特別是台灣的高科技產業而言，是極重要的資產。近年來，台灣智慧財產權交易市場快速成長。專利賣家讓售閒置未用的專利來獲取利益，是切合實際及符合潮流的作法。再者，愈來愈多的台灣公司正主動積極地購買有價值的專利，以期對抗專利侵權訴訟的威脅及取得進入新產品市場的保護。因此，對專利需求不斷增長的台灣市場，正是國外專利賣家將閒置專利讓售到台灣的好機會。
專利交易是一個高度專業知識及經驗的複雜過程，常需要借助專業的中介服務，才能順利促成交易。工業技術研究院是台灣最大的產業技術研發機構，長期以來，也一直是台灣企業的密切合作夥伴。自2003年以來，工業技術研究院已累積許多成功的專利交易及中介的經驗。所以，本研究是以工業技術研究院多年的實務經驗為個案研究的基礎。
本研究探討工業技術研究院創新的專利交易模式，台灣專利交易的市場現況，研究台灣專利買家的需求並進而提出對國外的專利賣家的建議。對有興趣賣專利到台灣的國外賣家，本研究的主要建議有四項：找對市場上高需求技術的專利，提供有價值的專利分析資訊，提供正確的授權資訊，以及運用專業的專利中介業者。此外，專利中介業者已是市場上重要的角色。本研究也運用專家意見法來探討專利中介業者重要的資源及能力。本研究發現，和買方業者的聯結關係，有效撮合及促成交易的能力，及提供專利交易相關的諮詢是專利中介業者的關鍵成功因素。
Intellectual Property (IP) is of great importance to growing companies around the world, and particularly in the high-tech sectors in which many Taiwanese enterprises operate. The IP transaction market in Taiwan has been growing rapidly in recent years. For holders of unused patents, selling them to companies around the world is a sensible way to create value from the patents. At the same time, more and more companies in Taiwan are actively seeking to acquire IP assets in order to combat the threat of patent litigation and enter new product markets with protection. This situation creates opportunities for foreign patent sellers looking to generate revenue from their idle IP assets.
Patent transaction is a complicated process involving a high degree of specialization and knowledge. It often requires assistance from professional service providers like intermediaries. Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), the largest government-supported research institute in Taiwan, has long been a close partner of local industry. ITRI has accumulated successful experience in both IP transaction and brokerage since 2003. This research uses ITRI’s practical experience as a basis of case study in this research.
This research presents ITRI’s innovative patent transaction model, current status of Taiwan patent market, and offers insights into buyers’ needs for foreign patent sellers interested in selling patents to Taiwan. Key suggestions include: selling patents in the right technical areas, providing supporting material to highlight patent value, providing accurate encumbrance information, and using a local broker to overcome the obstacles of understanding and navigating the Taiwan market. In addition, IP intermediary has become an important player in the market. This research uses the expert opinion method to investigate what types of resources and capabilities are important to IP intermediaries. Our findings suggest that networking with local industries, efficient seller-buyer match and transaction consultancy are considered as key success factors (KSFs) contributing to success of IP intermediaries.
1. Aaker, D. A., “Managing assets and skills: the key to a sustainable competitive advantage”, California Management Review, 31 (2), pp. 91-106, 1989.
2. Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. H., “Strategic assets and organizational rent”, Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), pp. 33-46, 1993.
3. Barney, J. B., “Organizational culture: can it be a source of competitive advantage?”, Academy of Management Review, 11 (3), pp. 656-665, 1986.
4. Barney, J. B., “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, 17 (1), pp. 99-120, 1991.
5. Benassi, M. and Di Minin, A., “Playing in between: patent brokers in markets for technology”, R & D Management, 39 (1), pp. 68-86, 2009.
6. Central Bank of the Republic of China (Taiwan), “Standard Presentation Report by Year 1984-2006”. Retrieved April, 2010 from http://www.cbc.gov.tw/content.asp?CuItem=2072
7. Chesbrough, H., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2003.
8. Chesbrough, H., Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2006.
9. Collis, D. J., “Montgomery CA. Competing on resources: strategy in the 1990s”, Harvard Business Review, 73 (4), pp. 118-128, 1995.
10. Daniel, D. R., “Management information crisis”, Harvard Business Review, 39 (5), pp. 111-121, 1961.
11. Eisenhardt, K. and Martin, J., “Dynamic capabilities: what are they?”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 1105-1121, 2000.
12. Evans, D. S. and Schmalensee, R. Catalyst Code: The Strategies Behind the World's Most Dynamic Companies, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2007.
13. Ghosh, B.C., et al. “The key success factors, distinctive capabilities, and strategic thrusts of top SMEs in Singapore”, Journal of Business Research, 51 (3), pp. 209-221, 2001.
14. Grant, R. M., “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation”, California Management Review, 33 (3), pp. 114-135, 1991.
15. Grant, R. M., “Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge Integration”, Organization Science, 7 (4), pp. 375-387, 1996.
16. Grant, R. M., Analyzing Resources and Capabilities. In: Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications, 6th ed., Blackwell Publishing, UK, 2008.
17. Grunert, K. G. and Ellegaard, C., The Concept of Key Success Factors: Theory and Method. In: M. J. Baker (editor), Perspectives on Marketing Management, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 3, 1993.
18. Hall, R. “The Strategic analysis of intangible resources”, Strategic Management Journal, 13 (2), pp. 135-144, 1992.
19. Hall, R. “A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 607-618, 1993.
20. Hanel, P. “Intellectual property rights business management practices: a survey of the literature”, Technovation, 26, pp. 895-931, 2006.
21. Hill, C. W. L., and Jones, G. R., Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability. In: Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach, 7th ed., Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 2007.
22. Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., and Walker, G., “Guest editors' introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity”, Strategic Management Journal, 24, pp. 889-902, 2003.
23. Hunt, S.D., and Morgan, R. M., “The comparative advantage theory of competition”, Journal of Marketing, 59 (2), pp. 1-15, 1995.
24. Innography. Retrieved June 30, 2009 from http://www.innography.com/
25. ITRI website. Retrieved August 2009 from http://www.itri.org.tw/eng/about/article.asp?RootNodeId=010&NodeId=0101
26. ITRI, ITRI 30, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2005 (in Chinese).
27. ITRI, 2005-2006 Annual Report, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ITRI, 2007.
28. Kay, J. Innovation. In: Foundations of Corporate Success: How Business Strategies Add Value, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
29. Kogut, B. and Zander, U., “Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology”. Organization Science, 3 (3), pp. 383-397, 1992.
30. Lee, K-R. and Rhee, W., “Identifying Leading Korean Industries and Firms Based on Patent and Export Statistics”, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 16 (2), pp. 167-185, 2008.
31. Lee, Y-J., “Characteristic Features of Valuable Patents: The Difference between Private Firms and Public Research Institutes in Korea”, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 16 (1), pp. 187-210, 2008.
32. Leidecker, J. K. and Bruno, A. V., “Identifying and using critical success factors”, Long Range Planning, 17 (1), pp. 23-32, 1984.
33. Markides, C. C. and Williamson, P. J., “Related diversification, core competencies and corporate performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp. 149-165, 1994.
34. Mascarenhas, B., Baveja, A. and Jamil, M., “Dynamics of core competencies in leading multinational companies”, California Management Review, 40 (4), pp. 117-132, 1998.
35. Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA), Taiwan, R.O.C., White Paper on Taiwan Industrial Technology, 2003 (Chinese version). Retrieved April, 2010 from http://white.tier.org.tw/2003/index.htm
36. Nelson, R. R., “Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?”, Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp. 61-74, 1991.
37. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), The Knowledge-based Economy, OECD, Paris, 1996.
38. Peteraf, M. A., “The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view”, Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 179-191, 1993.
39. Porter, M., Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985.
40. Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G., “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, 90 (3), pp. 79-91, 1990.
41. Rabino, S. and Enayatei, E., “Intellectual property: the double-edged sword”, Long Range Planning, 28 (5), pp. 22-31, 1995.
42. Reed, R. and DeFillippi, R. J., “Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 15 (1), pp. 88-102, 1990.
43. Rivette, K.G. and Kline, D., The New CEO Challenge. In: Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1999.
44. Rivette, K. G. and Kline, D., “Discovering new value in intellectual property”, Harvard Business Review, 78 (1), pp. 54-66, 2000.
45. Rockart, J. F., “Chief executives define their own data needs”, Harvard Business Review, 57 (2), pp. 81-93, 1979.
46. Shieh, C-C., A Comparison of Technological Competitiveness between Industries of Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea, CEPD (Council for Economic Planning and Development) Report, 2002 (Chinese version), Retrieved August, 2010 from http://www.cepd.gov.tw/dn.aspx?uid=1151
47. Shih, C.T., et al. Industrial Technology and the Industrial Technology Research Institute: Visible Brain, ITRI, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2003.
48. Stalk, G., Evans, P. and Shulman, L. E. “Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy”, Harvard Business Review, 70 (3), pp. 57-69, 1992.
49. Taiwan Technology Marketplace (TWTM) website. Retrieved November, 2010 from http://www.twtm.com.tw/energy/certify.aspx?subnav=3
50. TechPowerUp, “LG.Philips LCD Enters Into a Settlement Agreement with CPT”, News, November 28, 2007. Retrieved August, 2010 from http://www.techpowerup.com/45620/LG.Philips_LCD_Enters_Into_a_Settlement_Agreement_with_CPT.html
51. Teece, D. J., “Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”, Research Policy, 15 (6), pp. 285-305, 1986.
52. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), pp. 509-533, 1997.
53. Thurston, Richard L. “Taiwan Under Siege-the Intellectual Property Wars of the 21st Century”, National Cheng Kung University R & D Forum, Tainan, Taiwan, May, 2008. Retrieved August, 2009 from http://research.ncku.edu.tw/re/activities/c/20080425/activities.html
54. TMCnet, “MediaTek to pay Zoran $85m to settle patent suit”, News, January 26, 2006. Retrieved August, 2010 from http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2006/01/26/1318671.htm
55. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), “Patents By Country, State, and Year - All Patent Types”, Products and Services, December, 2009. Retrieved May, 2010 from http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cst_all.htm
56. Wernerfelt, B. “A resource-based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 5, pp. 171-180, 1984.
57. Williams, J. J. and Ramaprasad, A., “The utilization of critical success factors: A Profile”, Decision Sciences Institute Proceedings, 2, pp. 858-860, 1998.
58. Winter, S. G., “The satisficing principle in capability learning”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 981-996, 2000.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：721（臺灣：717，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2017497 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67810774
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上