:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:都市建設界線可有效控制都市成長嗎?財產權與展望理論觀點
作者:汪禮國
作者(外文):Li-Guo Wang
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:不動產與城鄉環境學系
指導教授:賴世剛
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:都市建設界線財產權展望理論都市蔓延公共領域UCBsProperty rightsProspect theoryUrban sprawlPublic domain
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:45
都市成長邊界(Urban Growth Boundaries, UGBs)對於規範都市發展的效果並無定論。為避免與UGBs混淆,本研究將都市發展用地與非都市發展用地之界線定義為都市建設界線(Urban Construction Boundaries, UCBs),並從財產權觀點解釋了理論上與概念上為什麼UCBs會導致而非抑制都市蔓延,並提出研究假說:UCBs可能會造成部分開發者向UCBs外尋找土地發展,而非制止它。首先依據展望理論(Prospect Theory),透過問卷實驗驗證,發現UCBs實施之後,產生部分開發者會有往界外開發之情形發生,原因包括,財產權追求(property right capturing)、界內損失厭惡(loss aversion inside the UCBs)及界外風險追求(risk seeking outside the UCBs),使得開發者態度產生改變。本研究再進一步提出四個假說及三個量化指標來評估UCBs的效果,並就不同規劃時期以臺北市信義區作為實證案例。雖然不同於本研究所預測的,信義區在兩次規劃時期(1956-1991)中都市成長,並沒有充分證據顯示發生在UCBs之外,但是隱性資料顯示有向UCBs外蔓延的傾向。另依照Wang 等(2014)針對北京與臺北進行比較,發現北京分析的結果,在1983至2005年的兩次規劃階段中的都市成長幾乎都發生在UCBs 之外,符合本研究的假說。本研究的發現有助於提高後續擬訂相關成長管理計畫、政策或法規時,將開發者態度納入的重視。
UGB is probably the best known among these urban containment boundaries. In fact, UGBs were not implemented in Taiwan, but the boundaries between urbanized land area and non-urbanized land area in Taiwan are quite close to the concept of UGBs. In this paper, we use the term “urban construction boundaries”, or UCBs, in Taiwan as the land control mechanism.
In this paper, from a property rights perspective, we first explain, theoretically and conceptually, why UCBs in general could cause urban sprawl, rather than stop it. In addition, we conducted an experiment on developers’ attitudes toward land development inside and outside UCBs through prospect theory. Our findings showed that the setting of UCBs made a proportion of developers search for land outside the UCBs for development in order to capture property rights left in the public domain, and prompt the forces of pulling development inside the UCBs because of loss aversion as well as those of pushing development outside the UCBs because of risk seeking. Secondly, we propose four assumptions and three quantitative indices to evaluate the effectiveness of UCBs policy by using Xinyi district of Taipei city as an empirical case study. Different from our prediction, there is insufficient evidence displaying that the urban sprawl of Xinyi district during two planning periods (1956-1991) occurred outside UCBs. But the indirect data indicate that Xinyi District has a tendency to sprawl. As predicted by our analysis, the urban sprawl in Beijing during the two planning periods from 1983 to 2005 took place mostly outside the UCBs (Wang et al., 2014). We argue that a successful land control measure, such as UCBs, should take into account the developers’ behavioral reaction to plans and regulations in order to stop effectively urban sprawl.
中文部分
方世榮(2002)。基礎統計學,二版。臺北:華泰文化事業公司。
王保進(2012)。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究,初版。臺北:心理出版社。
臺北市政府(2009)。臺北市年鑑。臺北:臺北市政府。
臺北市政府都市發展局(1973)。擬定台北市挹翠山莊細部計劃案。臺北:臺北市政府都市發展局。
臺北市政府都市發展局(1979)。變更台北市都市計畫保護區計畫(通盤檢討)案。臺北:臺北市政府都市發展局。
臺北市政府都市發展局(2012)。臺北市都市發展年報。臺北:臺北市政府都市發展局。
臺北市都市計畫委員會(2008)。臺北市都市計畫委員會第581次會紀錄。臺北:臺北市都市計畫委員會。
臺北市都市設計及土地開發許可審議委員會(2012)。臺北市都市設計及土地開發許可審議委員會第349次會議紀錄。臺北:臺北市政府都市發展局。
汪禮國、賴世剛(2008)。複雜科學與都市發展理論:回顧與展望。台灣公共工程學刊,4,3,1-11。
吳統雄(1985)。態度與行為研究的信度與效度:理論、應用、反省。民意學術專刊,29-53。
金家禾(1997)。都市成長界線對地價與公共服務成本之影響。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版。
洪 蘭譯,康納曼著(2013)。快思慢想,初版。臺北:天下遠見。
楊重信(1996)。農地釋出之我見。農地釋出方案對我國自然及人文資源之衝擊因應策略研討會,台大全球變遷中心。
蔡佩璇(2009)。土地使用分區管制對都市土地使用變遷之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南。
賴世剛、陳志閣(2006)。分區管制對臺北都會區土地使用變遷的影響:一電腦模擬。台灣土地研究,9,1,1-31。new window
賴世剛譯,路易斯霍普金斯著(2005)。都市發展-制定計畫的邏輯,初版。臺北:五南圖書出版公司北。
謝明瑞(2007)。行為經濟學理論的探討。空大商學學報,15,253-298。new window

外文部分
Alexander, E. R. and Faludi, A. (1989). Planning and Plan Implementation: Notes on Evaluation Criteria. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 16(2), 127-140.
Bae, C. H. C. (2001). Cross-border impacts of growth management programs: Portland, Oregon, and Clark County, Washington. Paper presented at 17th Pacific Regional Science Conference, Portland, OR.
Baer, W. C. (1997). General Plan Evaluation Criteria: An Approach to Making Better Plans. Journal of American Planning Association, 63(3), 329-344.
Baerwald, T. (1981). The site selection process of suburban residential builders. Urban Geography, 2(4), 339-57.
Barnett, J. (2007). Smart Growth in a Changing World. American Planning Association, Chicago, IL: Planners Press.
Barzel, Y. (1991). Economic Analysis of Property Right. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bengston, D. N. and Youn, Y. C. (2006). Urban containment policies and the protection of natural areas: the case of Seoul’s greenbelt. Ecology and Society, 11(1), Article No. 3.
Bengston, D. N., Fletcher, J. O. and Nelson, K. C. (2004). Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2-3), 271-286.
Berke, P. R., Godschalk, D. R. and Kaiser, E. J. (2006). Urban land use planning. 5th ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Bhatta, B. (2010). Causes and Consequences of Urban Growth and Sprawl. In Analysis of Urban Growth and Sprawl from Remote Sensing Data (pp. 17-36). Berlin Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag.
Cho, S. H., Wu, J. J. and Boggess, W. G. (2003). Measuring Interactions among Urban Development, Land Use Regulations, and Public Finance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, 988-999.
Cho, S. H., Chen, Z. and Yen, S. T. (2008). Urban Growth Boundary and Housing Prices: The Case of Knox County, Tennessee. The Review of Regional Studies, 38(1), 29-44.
Connerly, C. E. and Muller, N. A. (1993). Evaluating Housing Elements in Growth Management Comprehensive Plans, In Growth Management: The Planning Challenge of the 1990s. edited by J. Stein, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Couch, C. and Karecha, J. (2006). Controlling urban sprawl: some experiences from Liverpool. Cities, 23(5), 353-363.
Cox, W. ( 2001). American dream boundaries: urban containment and its consequences. Published by the Georgia Public Policy Foundation.
DeGrove, J. M. and Miness, D. A. (1992). The New Frontier for Land Policy: Planning and Growth Management in the States. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
Ding, C., Knaap, G. J. and Hopkins, L. D. (1999). Managing urban growth with urban growth boundaries: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, 46, 53-68.
Downs, A. ( 2002). Have Housing Prices Risen Faster in Portland Than Elsewhere? Housing Policy Debate, 13, 7–31.
Edward L. G. and Gyourko, J.( 2002). The Impact of Zoning on Housing Affordability. NBER Working Paper No. 8835, NBER Program(s).
Frew, J. R., Jud, G. D. and Wingler, T. R. (1990).The Effects of Zoning on Population and Employment Density. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1990, 3,155–63.
Friend, J. and Hickling, A. (1987). Planning under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. New York: Pergamon Press.
Gennaio, M. P., Hersperger, A. M. and Burgi, M. (2009). Containing urban sprawl-Evaluating effectiveness of urban growth boundaries set by the Swiss Land Use Plan. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 224-232.
Gore, T. and Nicholson, D. (1991). Models of the land-development process: a critical review. Environment and Planning A, 23, 705-730.
Grieson, R. E. and White, J. R. (1981). The Effects of Zoning on Structure and Land Markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 10, 271–85.
Han, H., Lai, S.-K., Dang, A., Tan, Z., and Wu, C. (2009). Effectiveness of urban construction boundaries in Beijing: an assessment. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A, 10(9), 1285-1295.
Hathout, S. (2002). The use of GIS for monitoring and predicting urban growth in East and West St Paul, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Journal of Environment Management, 66(3), 229-238.
Helling, A. (1998). Collaborative Visioning: Proceed with Caution. Journal of American Planning Association, 64(3), 335-349.
Herlod, M., Goldstein, N. C. and Clarke, K. C. (2003). The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86(3), 286-302.
Hopkins, L. D. (1981). The decision to plan: planning activities as public goods, Urban Infrastructure, Location, and Housing. Eds. W. R. Lierop, P. Nijkamp, Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.
Hopkins, L. D. (2001). Urban development: the logic of making plans. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Huang, S. L., Wang, S. H. and Budd, W.W. (2009). Sprawl in Taipei’s peri-urban zone: Responses to Spatial planning and implications for adapting global environment change. Landscape and Urban planning, 90(1-2), 20-32.
Isakson, H. (2004). Analysis of the Effects of Large Lot Zoning. Journal of Real Estate Research, 26(4), 397-415.
Jud, G. D. (1980). The Effects of Zoning on Single-family Residential Property Values: Charlotte, North Carolina. Land Economics, 56, 142–54.
Jun, M. J. (2004). The effects of Portland’s Urban Growth Boundary on Urban Development Patterns and Commuting. Urban studies, 41(7), 1333-1348.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. and Thaler, R. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status-quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193-206.
Kline, J. and Alig, R. (1999). Does land use planning slow the conversion of forest and farm lands. Growth and Change, 30, 3-22.
Knaap, G. J. (1985). The Price Effects of Urban Growth Boundaries in Metropolitan Portland, Oregon. Land Economics, 61, 26–35.
Knaap, G. J., Hopkins, L. D. and Donaghy, K. P. (1998). Do plans matter? A game-theoretic model for examining the logic and effects of land use planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18, 25-34.
Lai, S. K. (2002). Information structures exploration as planning for a unitary organization. Planning and Markets, 5, 32-41.
Lai, S. K. (2012). Effects of urban construction boundaries on urban development in China: assessment and rectification. final paper submitted to Peking University-Lincoln Institute Center for Urban Development and Land Policy as partial fulfillment of the contract numbered F33-20101201-LSK.
Leung, L. (1987). Developer behavior and development control. Land Development Studies, 4, 17-34.
Lucy, W. H. and Phillips, D. L. (2000). Confronting suburban decline: Strategic planning for metropolitan renewal. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Mark, J. H. and Goldberg, M. A. (1986). A Study of the Impacts of Zoning on Housing Values Over Time. Journal of Urban Economics, 20, 257–73.
Masek, J. G., Lindsy, F. E. and Goward, S. N. (2000). Dynamics of urban growth in the Washington DC metropolitan area, 1973-1996, from Landsat observations. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(18), 3473-3486.
Maser, S. M., Riker, W. and Rosett, R. N. (1977). Effects of Zoning and Externalities on the Price of Land: An Empirical Analysis in Monroe County, New York. Journal of Law and Economics, 20, 111–32.
Metropolitan Planning Commission (MPC) (2001). Tennessee Public Chapter 1101: Growth Plan for Knoxville, Knox County, and Farragut, Tennessee. Available at: http://www.knoxmpc.org, June.
Millward, H. (2006). Urban containment strategies: a case-study appraisal of plans and policies in Japanese, British, and Canadian cities. Land Use Policy, 23(4), 473-485.
Mohamed, R. (2006). The psychology of residential developers: lessons from behavioral economics and additional explanations for satisficing. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 28-37.
Nelson, A. C. and Duncan, J. B. (1995). Growth Management Principles and Practices. Planners Press, Chicago, IL.
Nelson, A. C. and Moore, T. (1993). Assessing urban growth management: the case of Portland, Oregon, the USA’s largest urban growth boundary. Land Use Policy, 10, 293-302.
O’Sullivan ( 2007). Urban Economics. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Press.
Patterson, J. (1999). Urban growth boundary impacts on sprawl and redevelopment in Portland, Oregon. Working Paper, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater.
Pendall, R., Martin, J. and Fulton, W. (2002). Holding the Line: Urban Containment in the United States. The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, D. C.
Peterson, G. E. (1974). The Influence of Zoning Regulations on Land and Housing Prices. Working Paper 1207–24, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Phillips, J. and Goodstein, E. (2000). Growth Management and Housing Prices: The Case of Portland, Oregon. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18, 334-344.
Porter, D. R. (1986). Growth Management Keeping on Target? Urban Land Institute and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Washington, D. C.
Porter, D. R., Dunphy, R. T. and Salvesen, D. (2002). Making Smart Growth Work. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D C.
Richardson, H. W. and Gordon, P. (2001). Portland and Los Angeles: beauty and the beast. Paper presented at the 17th Pacific Regional Science Conference, Portland, OR.
Samuelson, W. and Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
Schaeffer, P. V. and Hopkins, L. D. (1987). Behavior of land developers: planning and the economics of information. Environment and Planning A, 19, 1221-1232.
Schmutz , G. L. (1931). Economic Effects of Zoning in the United States. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 155(2), 172-177.
Shlay, A. B. and Rossi, P. H. (1981). Keeping Up the Neighborhood: Estimating Net Effects of Zoning. American Sociological Review, 46, 703–719.
Simon, H. A. (1955). On a Class of Skew Distribution Functions, Biometrika, 52, 425-440.
Staley, S. R., Edgens,J. D. and Mildner, G. C. S. (1999). A line in the land: urban- growth boundaries, smart growth, and housing affordability. Policy Study No. 263, Reason Public Policy Institute.
Stein, J. M. (1993). Growth Management: The Planning Challenge of the 1990s. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Szold, T. S. and Carbonell, A. (2002). Smart Growth: Form and Consequences. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
Talen, E. (1996). Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 10(3), 248-259.
Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 453-458.
Urban Land Institute (1998). Smart Growth Economy, Community, Environment. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D. C.
von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Behavioral Research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, L. G., Lai, S. K. and Han, H. (2013). Effects of Plans on Urban Development in Taipei: Do They Contain Growth? paper presented at The Third Asian Seminar in Regional Science, Taiwan, Chinese Regional Science Association, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Korean Regional Science Association, Regional Science Association of China.
Wang, L. G., Han, H. and Lai, S. K. (2014). Do plans contain urban sprawl? A comparison of Beijing and Taipei. Habitat International, 42, 121-130.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top