:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以決策實驗室法修正失效模式與效應分析
作者:屈文華
作者(外文):WEN HUA CHU
校院名稱:中華大學
系所名稱:科技管理博士學位學程
指導教授:李友錚
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2016
主題關鍵詞:失效模式與效應分析風險優先數決策實驗室法Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)Risk Piority Number(RPN)Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
失效模式與效應分析(Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, FMEA)主要在評估失效點發生的機率及後續造成的影響,是一種被廣泛採用的系統化分析技術。其不但可縮短產品製造時間,且對產品設計與製造過程提出保證,藉此提升企業競爭的優勢。而其風險優先數(Risk Priority Number.RPN)儘管為重要的風險評估值,但也存在著未能充分反應各項失效模式的重要性。因而,本研究將提出較佳的RPN運算方法,以期充分反應出失效模式的重要性。
另一方面,若欲解決之問題存在著關聯性,則運用失效模式與效應分析時,將影響問題解決的優先順序。而決策實驗室法(Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory, DEMATEL)對於處理複雜因果關係結構的問題是一種有效的方法,其影響著資源分配和效果,且有助於重新調整問題處理的優先順序。因此,本研究利用決策實驗室法以修正失效模式與效應分析,並與傳統的失效模式與效應分析方法比較。最後,本研究以企業個案實例驗證,藉此說明修正後的失效模式與效應分析法將更能找出問題處理的優先順序。
Failure mode and effect analysis mainly in the assessment of the probability of occurrence of the failure point and the subsequent impact, is a widely used system analysis technology. It can not only shorten the time of product manufacturing, but also guarantee the product design and manufacturing process, thereby enhancing the competitive advantage of the enterprise. And the risk priority number (Priority Number.RPN Risk) is an important risk assessment value, but it also has the importance of failure to fully respond to the failure mode. Therefore, this study will put forward a better RPN algorithm, in order to fully reflect the importance of failure mode.
On the other hand, to solve the problems exist correlation, and the use of failure mode and effects analysis, will affect the priority order to solve the problem.( Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory DEMATEL) is an effective method to deal with the complex causality structure, which affects the distribution and effect of resources. Improved methods can be re adjusted to deal with the priorities of the problem. Therefore, this study uses decision making laboratory analysis to revise the failure mode and effect analysis, and compare with the traditional failure mode and effect analysis method. Finally, this study to business case is verified, thereby indicating modified failure mode and effect analysis method will be better able to find out to deal with the problem of priorities.
郭榮沛(1995)。失效模式與效應分析及其應用案例討論, 機械工業雜誌,第142 期,pp.137。
張清亮、陳文欽、蔡志宏(1999)。CE認證之產品風險分析---以一舨醫醫療器材為例機械工業雜誌,第191期, pp.225-235。
許隆昌、羅應浮、魏秋建(2001)。生產系統預防保養之失效模式與關鍵性分析,真理大學第二屆管理創新與實務研討會,pp1-3。
許隆昌(2001)。生產系統預防保養之失效模式與關鍵性分析,中華大學工業工程與管理研究碩士論文,pp 11-21。
吳貴彬、相如(2003)。失效模式與效應分析之應用,中華民國品質學會第39屆年會暨第9 屆全國品質管理研討會,pp108-122。
李友錚、賀力行(2003)。品質管理:整合性思維,前程企業管理有限公司: p。
陳文欽、劉邦樓、王媛君,曾文美(2006)。研究失效模式與效應分析應用於建築業售後服務之研究,pp 1-12。new window
李友錚、陳日光(2008)。三種失效模式與效應分析之改善考量,中華大學科技管理研究所博士論文,pp 30-40。new window
顧良智、顧向恩(2007)。從FMEA到SMEA。特區品質,1(1),48-38頁。
李友錚、閻鐵民、蔡志弘、胡秀媛(2008)。運用重要度-表現度分析與決策實驗室析法於贏得訂單條件的改善~以臺灣工業電腦製造業為例。博士論文,私立中華大學科技管理研究所,pp5-10。
蘇裕珍(2010)。應用模糊品質機能展開法於貨櫃航商顧客關係管理之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士班,pp7。
關季明(2009)。醫療護照失效模式與效應分析研討,中華民國品質學會,pp10。
陳政全(2009)。以DEMATEL 方法探討建廠專案工程的關鍵成功因素,碩士論文,中華大學科技管理研究所,pp25。
林清池(2011)。失效模式與效應分析應用於營舍防火安全之研究,中華大學營建管理學系碩士論文,pp11。
謝宜芳(2011)。整合修正後 SIPA 與 DEMATEL 於台灣通訊服務業服務品質衡量之研究,中華大學營科技管理博士學位學程博士論文,pp 11-15。new window
盧昆宏、魏振育、歐惠鳳(2010)。 關鍵失效因素決定與問題改善算則之建構全球商業經營管理學報; 2期,pp101。new window
魏乃捷、吳仰、姚舜淵、張又中( 2010) 。應用FMEA與灰色理論建構供應商評選模式,機械技師學刊; 3卷4期,pp 11。
李友錚、賀力行(2011)。品質管理:整合性思維,三版,前程文化,pp30-34。
彭元興、林耀星(2012)。造紙廠程序控制實務,漿紙技術,pp40-41。
陳建舜(2012)。應用Fuzzy DEMATEL與Fuzzy ANP建構太陽能新產品開發模式中華大學, 碩士論文,pp10。
陳文亮、江雅媚、張旭銘(2013)。應用失效模式與效應分析於幼兒學步車產品設計機械技師學刊;6卷4期,pp97。
甘能昊(2013)。用DEMATEL與Fuzzy ANP於新產品開發績效評估-大陸台商TFT-LCD觸控面板產業為例,中華大學, 碩士論文,pp5。
李友錚、作業管理(2014)。創新競爭優勢,五版,前程文化出版,pp181-189。
任恆毅、吳易霖、余佳憓(2014)。改良式FMEA應用於醫療器材設計階段之潛在失效風險評估品質學報,21卷1期,pp17。new window
盧昆宏、張昭雄(2014)。應用六標準差與FMEA提昇鋁壓鑄件之良率,管理資訊計算;3卷特刊,pp327。new window
洪僖黛、廖柏凱、曾全偉(2014)。塑膠模具失效模式之風險分級與排序,危機管理學刊;11卷2期,pp25 - 32。new window
李明賢、葉兆雄、雷方奕、郭修瑋(2015)。運用FMEA與QFD於電晶體封裝製程新產品之開發品質學報; 22卷5期,pp441-445 。
盧昆宏、張昭雄(2015)。六角帶梅花槽雙頭螺栓之成形設計分析工程科技與教育學刊;12卷1期,pp41-57。
廖吳聖、陳雲岫、鍾雲恭(2015)。結合環境因素與成本之FMEA的設計,先進工程學刊;10卷1期,pp19-26。
洪僖黛、梁紹任(2016)。DEA在失效風險評估模式之應用,危機管理學刊;13卷1期, pp1-8。new window
Jordan, W. E. (1972). Failure model effects and criticality analysis. Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, USA, pp30-37.
Gabus, A. and Fontela, E.( 1973). Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility, DEMATEL report No. 1. Geneva, Switzerland: Battelle Geneva Research Cente.
MIL-STD-1629A, (1980).Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects, and criticall yanalysis,” Department of Defense, Washington, DC, USA.
Dhillon, B. S. (1992). Failure modes and effects analysis - bibliography.Microelectronics Reliability, 32(5), p719-731.
Stamatis D.H.( 1995). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution.ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.
AIAG, “Reference manual: potential failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA),” AIAG,USA (1995)
Onodera, K. (1997). Effective techniques of FMEA at each life-cycle stage. ProceedingAnnual Reliability and Maintainability Symp.,(2000). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania(USA), p. 50–56.
Reliey, T.T.(2002). FMEA in preventing medical accidents. ASQ Annual Quality Congress Proceedings Tonge, p657–664.
Moore, S. A. (2007). Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinter-lands: A Western Australian case study. Tourism Management, 28(3), p768-776.
Tse, D. K., & Wilton, P. C. (1988). Models of consumer satisfaction format : An extension.
Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), p204-212.
Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), p1028-1044.
Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using fuzzy
DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), p499-507.
Yang, C. C. (2005). The refined Kano’s model and its application. Total Quality Manage-
ment, 16(10), p1127-1137.
Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. L. (2004). Evolving into new dominant logia for marketing. Journal
Linton, J.D. (2003). Facing the challenges of service automation: An enabler for e-ommerce and productivity gain in traditional services. IEEE Trans. Eng.Manage., 50(4), p478–484.
Reiling, J.G., Knutzen, B.L, Stoecklein, M. (2003). FMEA—the cure for errors medical
.Qual.Progrom., 36(8), p67–71.
Shahin, A. (2005). Integration of FMEA and the Kano model: An exploratory examination Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage, 21(6/7), p731–746.
Vandenbrande, W. (2003). The FMEA method in environment management systems. StandKach., 2, p98–101.
Sawhney, R., Padiyar, A, Li, Y (2004). FMEA based approach for supplier evelopment.IIE Annual Conference and Exhibition, p7–16. J
Hammad Kazemeyni, Abbas Basiri, Nazanin Aghel, and Seyed-Moayed Alavian(2006) The traditional method of prioritizing. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company :p569-573
Lee, C.Y. &Chen, J.K. (2007). Utility priority number evaluation for FMEA. JFail. Anal. And Preven., 7:p321-328.
Lee, Y. C., & Hsieh, Y. F. (2011). Using DEMATEL to implement LibQUAL+TM evaluating library service. Paper presented at the meeting of 2011 International Conference on Engineering Management and Service Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Xia, T., Xi, L., Zhou, X. & Lee, J. (2013). Condition-based maintenance for intelligent monitored series system with independent machine failure modes. International Journal of Production Research, 51(15), p4585-4596.
Tipton, E. (2013). Stratified Sampling Using Cluster Analysis: A Sample Selection Strategy for Improved Generalizations From Experiments. Evaluation Review , 37(2), p109-139.
Li, Y. F., Huang, H. Z., Zhang, H., Xiao, N. C. & Liu, Y. (2013). Fuzzy Sets Method of Reliability Prediction and Its Application to a Turbocharger of Diesel Engines. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 5, Article ID 216192, p1-7.
Yuan, X., Wang, Y. & Gu, Y. (2013). Software Fault Location of CNC System Based on Similar Path Set and Artificial Neural Network. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 5, Article ID 357308.pp1-9..
Hedberg, E. C and Hedges, L. C.( 2014). Reference Values of Within-District Intraclass Correlations of Academic Achievement by District Characteristics: Results From a Meta-Analysis of District-Specific Values. Evaluation Review, 38(6), pp546-582.
Chang, K.U., Chang, Y.C and Lai, P.T. (2014). Applying the concept of exponential approach to enhance the assessment capability of FMEA. J IntellManuf, 25:p1413–1427
Tamura H., Nagata H., &Akazawa K. (2005). Structural DEMATEL for a tructuremodeling of a complex problematique for realizing safe, secure and reliablesociety. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 4, p139-146.
Hajime, Y., I. Kenichi & M. Hajime. (2005). An innovative product development process for resolving fundamental conflicts. J. Jap. Soc. Precision Eng.,71(2): p216-222.
Nanayo, F. and T. Toshiaki. (2002). A new method of paired comparison by improved DEMATEL method: Application to the integrated evaluation of a medical information which has multiple factors. Jap. J. Med. Inform., 22 (2): p211-216.
Lee, Y.C., & Hsieh, Y.F. (2011). Integration of revised simultaneous importance performance analysis and decision making trial and evaluation laboratory – A study of mobile telecommunication industry in Taiwan. African Journal of Business Management, 5(6), p2312-2321.
Tsai, S. B., Lee, Y. C., Wu, C. H. and Guo, J. J. ( 2013). Examining How Manufacturing Corporations Win Orders. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 24(3), p112-124.
Wu, W.W. and Y.T. Lee, (2007). Developing global managers competencies using fuzzy DEMATEL method. Exp. Syst. Appl., 32 (2): p499-507.
Kim, Y.H.,(2006). Study on impact mechanism for beef cattle fanning and importance of evaluating agricultural information in Korea using DEMATEL, PCA and AHP. Agric. Inform. Res., 15 (3): p267-280.
Tsai, S.B., Riga, Saito, Lin, Y.C.,(2015). Discussing measurement criteria and competitive strategies of green suppliers from a green law perspective. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 229(S1), p135–145.
Tsai, S.B., Xue, Y.Z., Huang, P.Y, et al. (2015). Establishing a criteria system for green production. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 229(8), 1395–1406.
Wei Wen Wu.(2012).Segmenting critical factors for successful knowledge manager ntimplementation using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Applied Soft Computing 12 , : p 527–535
Majid Vaziri Sarashk, Sohrab Khanmohammadi & Mahmood. (2014). A new uzzy-dynamic risk and reliability assessment. Decision Science Letters 3 ,: p 431–438
Sachin K. Patil , Ravi Kant. (2014). A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL and FMCDM to predictsuccess of knowledge management adoption in supply chain. Applied Soft Computing, 18, : p 126–235.
Tsai, S. B., Chien, M. F., Xue, Y, (2015). Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL to determine Environmental Performance: A Case of Printed Circuit Board Industry in Taiwan. PLoS ONE, 10(6): e0129153. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129153.
Guo, J. J. and Tsai, S. B. (2015). Discussing and Evaluating Green Supply Chain Suppliers: A Case Study of the Printed Circuit Board Industry in China. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 26(2), 5: p 6-67.
Wei-Feng Guo, Jian Zhou, Chih-Lang Yu, Sang-Bing, Tsai, (2015). Evaluating the Green Corporate Social Responsibility of Manufacturing Corporations from a Green Industry law Perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 11(3), : p 96-115.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top