資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.145.56.28)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
DEA在失效風險評估模式之應用
書刊名:
危機管理學刊
作者:
洪僖黛
/
梁紹任
作者(外文):
Hung, H. T.
/
Liang, S. R.
出版日期:
2016
卷期:
13:1
頁次:
頁1-8
主題關鍵詞:
失效模式與效應分析
;
資料包絡分析法
;
多準則決策分析
;
妥協規劃
;
共同權重
;
Failure mode and effects analysis
;
FMEA
;
Data envelopment analysis
;
DEA
;
Multiple criteria decision making
;
MCDM
;
Compromise programming
;
Common weights
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:102
失效模式與效應分析(failure mode and effects analysis, FMEA)是一種預防性的風險管理技術,主要應用於分析與辨認產品設計系統的潛在失效模式,並根據風險優先指數(risk priority number, RPN)決定失效模式的改善順序,藉由適當的改善措施來降低失效率與提高可靠度。由於傳統RPN 是以嚴重性、發生率、以及難檢度等三個風險因子的乘積來衡量,雖然具有計算簡單與容易比較的優點,但也使FMEA 引發眾多爭議。為了改進RPN 的缺失而使失效模式的評比結果具有代表性,本研究基於資料包絡分析法(data envelopment analysis, DEA)適用於決定多準則決策分析問題(multiple criteria decision making, MCDM)評估屬性權重之特性,將失效模式的嚴重性、發生率、以及難檢度等風險因子視為評估屬性,在DEA 的概念下,考量失效模式風險評估屬性之理想值(ideal) 與反理想值(anti-ideal),建立以距離函數為基礎的妥協規劃共同權重模式來決定嚴重性、發生率、以及難檢度等風險因子的共同權重。採用共同權重來計算失效模式的RPN,不僅使得全部失效模式能在相同的基準下確認改善的先後順序,並且讓全部失效模式不論以理想值或反理想值為評估基準均有一致的排序結果。
以文找文
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a preventive technology of risk management that is applied to analyze and to identify the potential failure modes in a system. The risk priorities of the failure modes are determined through the risk priority number (RPN), and appropriate improvement actions can be taken for decreasing the error. In other words, the failure modes are ranked by their RPN. Failure modes having higher RPN are assumed to be more important and assigned a higher priority than those with lower RPN. Traditionally, the RPN is the multiplication of three risk factors that are the severity, the occurrence, and the detection of a failure mode. It has the advantage of easy calculation and comparison, but the RPN has been criticized to have some drawbacks. In order to improve the disadvantages, this study considers the three risk factors as the attributes of a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem and the RPN is the criterion for comparing different failure modes. The characteristic of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is applied to determine the weights of the attributes. Based on the concepts of DEA and the distance of the failure modes to the ideal and the anti-ideal, a compromise programming model is proposed to determine the common weights of the three risk factors. The RPNs of all failure modes are calculated from the common weights. All failure modes could not only be compared on the same basis, but also have consistent rakings when they are ranked based on the distance to the ideal and the anti-ideal.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Battles, J. B.、Dixon, N. M.、Borotkanics, R. J.、Rabin-Fastmen, B.、Kaplan, H. S.(2006)。Sensemaking of patient safety and hazards。Health Services Research,41,1555-1575。
2.
Teng, S. G.、Ho, S. M.、Shumar, D.、Liu, P. C.(2006)。Implementing FMEA in a collaborative supply chain environment。The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,23(2),179-196。
3.
Welborn, C.(2007)。Using FMEA to assess outsourcing risk。Quality Progress,40,17-21。
4.
Pillay, A.、Wang, J.(2003)。Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning。Reliability Engineering and System Safety,79(1),69-85。
5.
Chang, K. H.、Cheng, C. H.(2011)。Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method。Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,22(2),113-129。
6.
Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.、Rhodes, E.(1978)。Measuring efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。
7.
Kao, C.(2010)。Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis。Applied Mathematical Modelling,34(7),1779-1787。
8.
Lotfi, F. Hosseinzadeh、Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M.、Aghayi, N.、Beigi, Z. G.、Gholami, K.(2013)。An improved method for ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis。Applied Mathematical Modelling,37(1/2),25-33。
9.
Sun, J.、Wu, J.、Guo, D.(2013)。Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights。Applied Mathematical Modelling,37(9),6301-6310。
10.
Tsou, C. M.、Huang, D. Y.(2010)。On some methods for performance ranking and correspondence analysis in the DEA context。European Journal of Operational Research,203(3),771-783。
11.
Alirezaee, M. R.、Afsharian, M.(2007)。A complete ranking of DMUs using restrictions in DEA models。Applied Mathematics and Computation,189,1550-1559。
12.
Bemroider, E.、Stix, V.(2007)。A method using weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis for ranking and validity issues in decision making。Computers and Operations Research,34,2637-2647。
13.
Jahanshahloo, G. R.、Lotfi, F. Hosseinzadeh、Khanmohammadi, M.、Kazemimanesh, M.、Rezaie, V.(2010)。Ranking of units by positive ideal DMU with common weights。Expert Systems with Applications,37,7483-7488。
14.
Kao, C. and Hung, H. T.(2005)。Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach。Journal of the Operational Research Society,56,1196-1203。
15.
Liu, H. C.、Liu, L.、Liu, N.、Mao, L. X.(2012)。Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fiizzy environment Expert Systems with。Applications,39,12926-12934。
16.
Liu, H.-C.、Liu, L.、Liu, N.(2013)。Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review。Expert Systems with Applications,40(2),828-838。
17.
Ramezani-Tarkhorani, S.、Khodabakhshi, M.、Mehrabian, S.、Nuri-Bahmani, F.(2014)。Ranking decision-making units using common weights in DEA。Applied Mathematical Modelling,38,3890-3896。
18.
Wang, Y. M.、Luo, Y.、Liang, L.(2009)。Ranking decision making units by imposing a minimum weight restriction in the data envelopment analysis。Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,223(1),469-484。
19.
Wang, Y.、Luo, Y.、Lan, Y.(2011)。Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis。Expert Systems with Applications,38,9122-9128。
20.
Adler, N.、Friedman, L.、Sinuany-Stern, Zilla(2002)。Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context。European Journal of Operational Research,140(2),249-265。
21.
Chin, K.-S.、Wang, Y.-M.、Poon, G. K. K.、Yang, J.-B.(2009)。Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach。Computers and Operations Research,36(6),1768-1779。
22.
Pollock, S.(200508)。Create a simple framework to validate FMEA performance。Six Sigma Forum Magazine August,4(4),27-34。
23.
Yu, P. L.(1973)。A class of solutions for group decision problems。Management Science,19(8),936-946。
圖書
1.
Chankong, V.、Haimes, Y. Y.(1983)。Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology。Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc.。
2.
Singor, M. C.(2000)。The Failure Analysis Matrix: A Usable Model for Ranking Solutions to Failures in Information Systems。School of Computer and Information Sciences, Nova Southeastern University。
3.
Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.、Lewin, A. Y.、Seiford, L. M.(1994)。Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications。Norwell:Boston, MA:London:Kluwer Academic Publishers。
4.
Zeleny, M.(1982)。Multiple Criteria Decision Making。New York:North-Holland。
5.
Yu, Po-Lung(1985)。Multiple-Criteria Decision Making, Concepts, Techniques, and Extensions。Plenum Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
CTP版材製程失效風險之分析與評估
2.
平衡計分卡各非財務構面效率評估之歸併模式
3.
塑膠模具失效模式之風險分級與排序
4.
珠寶飾品購買因素之評估
5.
國軍晉任遴選之人員績效評估
1.
警察機關政策績效評估與犯罪熱點預測之研究
2.
以決策實驗室法修正失效模式與效應分析
3.
引發糾紛之團體套裝旅遊服務失誤風險的研究
4.
應用資料包絡分析法於失效模式與效應分析以增強評估能力之研究
5.
妥協權重資料包絡分析模式之求解與應用
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
人情智能與部落格經營成敗之探討
2.
少數民族聚居村落的原生態體育文化流變考察
3.
人生儀禮、家庭義務與朝山進香--冀中南地區蒼巖山進香習俗研究
4.
大學道德資本、失德亂象及其生成邏輯
5.
大甲溪石岡壩下游河道沖淤特性探討
6.
eTrust網路銀行個資事件
7.
分割目的和股權分割公司之績效
8.
中國特別處理企業之會計穩健性與公司治理
9.
中國大陸國有土地上房屋徵收與補償法制之探討--兼論中國大陸不動產徵收法制的範疇
10.
中國大陸化粧品之零售價格趨勢研究
11.
公司本益比和產業平均本益比之間的偏離程度與橫斷面股票報酬:風險或行為?
12.
GSPT:使用前序表的高效關聯規則演算法
13.
中高齡以上者參與國樂團體的動機與自我評價之研究
14.
Mathematical Computation of Fuzzy Statistics for Sensory Evaluation
15.
Smartphone Market Analysis Using Dynamic Multi-Criteria Decision Methods
QR Code