|
Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096-1097. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153 Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171-185. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.4.171-185 Arnall, T. & Martinussen, E. S. (2010). Depth of field: Discursive design research through film. FORMkademisk, 3(1), 100-122. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.189 Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452-477. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4 Bar-Eli, S. (2013). Sketching profiles: Awareness to individual differences in sketching as a means of enhancing design solution development. Design Studies, 34(4), 472-493. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.007 Bates, M. J. (2007). What is browsing—really? A model drawing from behavioural science research. Information Research, 12(4), paper 330. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/paper330.htm Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: a longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773-785. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020084 Bergstrom, B. (2008). Essentials of Visual Communication. London: Laurence King Publishing. Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(2), 293-327. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1067860.1067867 Bilal, D. (2001). Children’s use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: II. Cognitive and physical behaviors on research tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 118-136. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999(::AID-ASI1038)3.0.CO;2-R Blankenship, T. L., Ayres, K. M., & Langone, J. (2005). Effects of computer-based cognitive mapping on reading comprehension for students with emotional behavior disorders. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(2), 15-23. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016264340502000202 Block, C. C., Parris, S. R., Reed, K. L., Whiteley, C. S., & Cleveland, M. D. (2009). Instructional approaches that significantly increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 262-281. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014319 Bowman, G., MacKay, R. B., Masrani, S., & McKiernan, P. (2013). Storytelling and the scenario process: Understanding success and failure. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80(4), 735-748. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.009 Booth, J. W., Taborda, E. A., Ramani, K., & Reid, T. (2016). Interventions for teaching sketching skills and reducing inhibition for novice engineering designers. Design Studies, 43, 1-23. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.11.002 Brinck, T., Gergle D., & Wood, S.D. (2001). Usability for the web: Designing web sites that work. San Francisco. CA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bryant, K., Campbell, J., & Kerr, D. (2003). Impact of web based flexible learning on academic performance in information systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 14(1), 1-15. Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan Kaufmann. Campbell, R. L. (1992). Will the real scenario please stand up? ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24(2), 6-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/142386.1054872 Chang, Y.-M., Wang, I.-C., & Ma, M.-Y. (2015). Study on Children’s Web Page Preferences through Participatory Design. Innovation in Design, Communication and Engineering, 132, 703-705. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b18737-147 Chang, Y.-M., Wang, I.-C., & Ma, M.-Y. (2016). Efficacy of Supplementary Image Schemes on Reading Motivation and Comprehension. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1153-1162. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1503a Canham, M., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 155-166. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.014 Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5-26. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013176309260 Carroll, J. M. (2000). Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with Computers, 13(1), 43-60. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00023-0 Cassady, J. C., & Smith, L. L. (2003). The impact of a reading-focused integrated learning system on phonological awareness in kindergarten. The Journal of Literacy Research, 35(4), 947-964. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3504_2 Chall, J. S. (1995). Literacy development. Journal of Education, 177(1), 63-83. Chang, Y.-M., & Wang, I.-C. (2008, May). A Study on the Interface Usability of children's websites. Proceedings of the 13th Chinese Institute of Design Conference. Taoyuan, Taiwan. Charlesworth, Z. M. (2008). Learning styles across cultures: Suggestions for educators. Education and Training, 50(2), 115-127. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400910810862100 Chen, C.-H., Wu, F.-G., Patrick Rau, P.-L., & Hung, Y.-H. (2004). Preferences of young children regarding interface layouts in child community web sites. Interacting with Computers, 16(2), 311-330. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2003.11.009 Chen, H.-L., & Williams, J. P. (2009). Use of multi-modal media and tools in an online information literacy course: College students’ attitudes and perceptions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(1), 14-24. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.10.021 Cheng, F.-F., Wu, C.-S., & Yen, D. C. (2009). The effect of online store atmosphere on consumer’s emotional responses – an experimental study of music and colour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 323-334. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290701770574 Cheong, H. & Shu, L. H. (2013). Using templates and mapping strategies to support analogical transfer in biomimetic design. Design Studies, 34(6), 706-728. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.02.002 Chi, P.-H. (2001). A study on the verbal skills of elementary school children with poor reading skills. Ulletin of Special Education, 20(4), 69-96. Cogmen, S., & Saracaloglu, A. S. (2009). Students’ usage of reading strategies in the faculty of education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 248-251. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.045 Danos, X. (2014). Graphicacy and culture: Refocusing on visual learning. Loughborough Design Press Ltd. de Koning, B. B. & van der Schoot, M. (2013). Becoming Part of the Story! Refueling the Interest in Visualization Strategies for Reading Comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 25(2), 261-287. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9222-6 de Vries, E., & Lowe, R. (2010, August). Graphicacy: What does the learner bring to a graphic? Paper presented at the EARLI SIG 2 Comprehension of Text and Graphics meetings, Tübingen, Germany. Deaver, S. P. (2009). A Normative Study of Children’s Drawings: Preliminary Research Findings. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 26(1), 4-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2009.10129309 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012801 Demirkan, H. (2016). An inquiry into the learning-style and knowledge-building preferences of interior architecture students. Design Studies, 44, 28-51. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.009 Demirkan, H. & Demirbas, O. O. (2010). The effects of learning styles and gender on the academic performance of interior architecture students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1390-1394. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.205 Druin, A. & Fast, C. (2002). The child as learner, critic, inventor, and technology design painter: An analysis of three years of Swedish Student Journals. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(3), 189-213. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020255806645 Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2013). How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction, 28, 48-63. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.002 Eris, O., Martelaro, N., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2014). A comparative analysis of multimodal communication during design sketching in co-located and distributed environments. Design Studies, 35(6), 559-592. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.04.002 Fehr, C. N., Davison, M. L., Graves, M. F., Sales, G. C., Seipel, B., & Sekhran-Sharma, S. (2012). The effects of individualized, online vocabulary instruction on picture vocabulary scores: an efficacy study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 87-102. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.586640 Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 210-225. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400030301 Galitz, W. O. (2002). The Essential guide to user interface design: An introduction to GUI design principle and techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Gijlers, H., Weinberger, A., van Dijk, A. M., Bollen, L., & van Joolingen, W. (2013). Collaborative drawing on a shared digital canvas in elementary science education: The effects of script and task awareness support. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(4), 427-453. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9180-5 Glenberg A. M., Goldberg A. B., & Zhu X. (2011). Improving early reading comprehension using embodied CAI. Instructional Science, 39(1), 27-39. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9096-7 Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Grimshaw, S., Dungworth, N., McKnight, C., & Morris, A. (2007). Electronic books: children’s reading and comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 583-599. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00640.x Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Davis, M. H. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403-423. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403 Hansen, D. L., & Morgan, R. L. (2008). Teaching grocery store purchasing skills to students with intellectual disabilities using a computer-based instruction program. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43(4), 431-442. Hassett, D. D. & Curwood, J. S. (2009). Theories and practices of multimodal education: The instructional dynamics of picture books and primary classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 63(4), 270-282. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.4.2 Hedin, L. R. & Conderman, G. (2010). Teaching students to comprehend informational text through rereading. The Reading Teacher, 63(7), 556-565. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.7.3 Hernandez, N. V., Schmidt, L. C., Kremer, G. O., & Lin, C.-Y. (2014, September). An empirical study of the effectiveness of selected cognitive aids on multiple design tasks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Design Computing and Cognition, 12, 227-246. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_13 Hope, G. (2008). Thinking and learning through drawing. London: SAGE. Jonas, W. (2001). A scenario for design. Design Issues, 17(2), 64-80. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/07479360152383796 Kelley, T. R. & Sung, E. (2016). Sketching by design: teaching sketching to young learners. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 1-24. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9354-3 Ketokivi, M. & Castañer, X. (2004). Strategic planning as an integrative device. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(3), 337-365. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4131439 Kirby, J. R., Ball, A., Geier, B. K., Parrila, R., & Wade-Wooley, L. (2010). The development of reading interest and its relation to reading ability. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(3), 263-280. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01439.x Lan, Y.-J., Sung, Y.-T., & Chabg, K.-E. (2009). Let us read together: Development and evaluation of a computer-assisted reciprocal early English reading system. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1188-1198. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.002 Law, Y.-K. (2006). The Effectiveness of Student-Centered Education in Second Graders’ Reading Instruction. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 38(1), 51-66. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20060622 Lawson, B. & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Oxford: Architectural Press/Elsevier. Le Fevre, D. M., Moore, D. W., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2003). Tape-assisted reciprocal teaching: Cognitive bootstrapping for poor decoders. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 37-58. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709903762869905 Lee, K. S., & Carrasquillo, A. (2006). Korean college students in United States: Perceptions of professors and students. College Student Journal, 40(2), 442-456. Lee, S., & Koubek, R. J. (2011). The Impact of Cognitive Style on User Preference Based on Usability and Aesthetics for Computer-Based Systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(11), 1083-1114. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555320 Lee, Y., & Vail, C. O. (2005). Computer-based reading instruction for young children with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(1), 5-18. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016264340502000101 Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2012). Science text comprehension: Drawing, main idea selection, and summarization as learning strategies. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 16-26. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.005 Leopold, C., Sumfleth, E., & Leutner, D. (2013). Learning with summaries: Effects of representation mode and type of learning activity on comprehension and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 27, 40-49. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.003 Lerner, J. W., & Johns, B. (2009). Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities: Characteristics, teaching strategies, and new directions (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Leutner, D., Leopold, C., & Sumfleth, E. (2009). Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 284-289. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.010 Liikkanen, L. A. & Perttula, M. (2010). Inspiring design idea generation: insights from a memory-search perspective. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(5), 545-560. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544820802353297 Lin, P.-K., & Chi, P.-H. (2000). Chinese Reading Comprehension Test. Ulletin of Special Education, 19(5), 79-104. Lu, L., & Ung, K.-C. (2007). An exploratory study on psychological traditionality, modernity, advisor-student fit, their influences on quality of the relationship and students’ well-being. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 27, 81-118. Luh, D.-B., & Chen, S.-N. (2011). A Novel CAI System for Space Conceptualization Training in Perspective Sketching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 137-150. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9171-7 Ma, G. L., Li, Y., Li., W. Q., & Pan, P. Y. (2011). A process model and method of idea generation for conceptual design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B – Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 225(4), 568-586. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041297510394103 Macaruso, P. & Walker, A. (2008). The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction for advancing literacy skills in kindergarten children. Reading Psychology, 29(3), 266-287. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702710801982019 Maderazo, C., Martens, P., Croce, K., Martens, R., Doyle, M., Aghalarov, S., & Noble, R. (2010). Beyond picture walks: Revaluing picturebooks as written and pictorial texts. Language Arts, 87(6), 437-446. Mahapatra, S., Das, J. P., Stack-Cutler, H., & Parrila, R. (2010). Remediating reading comprehension difficulties: A cognitive processing approach. Reading Psychology, 31(5), 428-453. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702710903054915 Mantzicopoulos, P. & Patrick, H. (2010). “The seesaw is a machine that goes up and down: Young children’s narrative responses to science-related informational text. Early Education and Development, 21(3), 412-444. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10409281003701994 Martin, P. & Velay, J.-L. (2012). Do computers improve the drawing of a geometrical figure for 10 year-old children? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(1), 13-23. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9140-6 Mason, L., Lowe, R., & Tornatora, M. C. (2013). Self-generated drawings for supporting comprehension of a complex animation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 211-224. doi:http://dx.doi.org/l0.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.04.001 Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60(1), 95-109. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011 McCabe, S., Sharples, M., & Foster, C. (2012). Stakeholder engagement in the design of scenarios of technology-enhanced tourism services. Tourism Management Perspectives, 4, 36-44. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2012.04.007 McGee, A. & Johnson, H. (2003). The effect of inference training on skilled and less skilled comprehenders. Education Psychology, 23(1), 49-59. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410303220 Mechling, L., & O’Brien, E. (2010). Computer-based video instruction to teach students with intellectual disabilities to use public bus. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(2), 230-241. Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87-99. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013184611077 Mullis, I.V.S., Kennedy, A.M., Martin, M.O., & Sainsbury, M. (2006). PIRLS 2006: Assessment Framework and Specifications (2nd ed.). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS and PIRLS, International Study Center, Lynch School of Education. Nardi, B. A. (1992). The use of scenarios in design. SIGCHI Bulletin, 24(4), 13-14. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/142167.142171 Nielsen, J. (n.d.). Kid's Corner: Website usability for Children. Retrieved September 9, 2014, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20020414.html Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books. Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443-468. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008 Oberg, A. & Daniels, P. (2013). Analysis of the effect a student-centred mobile learning instructional method has on language acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Leaning, 26(2), 177-196. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.649484 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2000). Literacy in the Information Age: Final Report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Statistics Canada. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/24/21/39437980.pdf doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264181762-en Otis, N., Grouzet, M. E., & Pelletier, L. G. (2005). Latent motivational change in an academic setting: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 170-183. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.170 Outhred, L. & Sardelich, S. (2005). A problem is something you don’t want to have: Problem solving by kindergarteners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 146-154. Pantaleo, S. (2010). Mutinous fiction: Narrative and illustrative metalepsis in three postmodern picturebooks. Children’s Literature in Education, 41(1), 12-27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10583-009-9096-x Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4 Park, J. (2011). Developing a knowledge management system for storing and using the design knowledge acquired in the process of a user-centered design of the next generation information appliances. Design Studies, 32(5), 482-513. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.05.001 Pei, E., Campbell, I., & Evans, M. (2011). A taxonomic classification of visual design representations used by industrial designers and engineering designers. The Design Journal, 14(1), 64-91. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175630610X12877385838803 Pfeil, U., Svangstu, K., Ang, C. S., & Zaphiris, P. (2011). Social Roles in an Online Support Community for Older People. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(4), 323-347. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.540490 Pike, M. M., Barnes, M. A., & Barron R. W. (2010). The role of illustrations in children’s inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(3), 243-255. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.006 Ranalli, J. (2013). Online strategy instruction for integrating dictionary skills and language awareness. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 75-99. Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 289-312. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530417 Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734-746. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734 Risko, V. J., Walker-Dalhouse, D., Bridges, E. S., & Wilson, A. (2011). Drawing on Text Features for Reading Comprehension and Composing. The Reading Teacher, 64(5), 376-378. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.5.12 Rowland, C. F., Pine, J. M., Lieven, E. V. M., & Theakston, A. L. (2003). Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 609-635. Schwamborn, A., Thillmann, H., Opfermann, M., & Leutner, D. (2011). Cognitive load and instructionally supported learning with provided and learner-generated visualizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 89-93. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.028 Shelly, G. B., Cashman, T. J., Gunter, R. E., & Gunter, G. A. (2008). Teachers discovering computers: Integrating technology and digital media in the classroom (5th ed. ). Boston, MA: Thomson Course Technology. Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x Snow, C.E. (2010). Reading comprehension: Reading for learning. International Encyclopedia of Education, 413-418. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00511-X Stalbovs, K., Eitel, A., & Scheiter, K. (2013, August). Which cognitive processes predict successful learning with multimedia? Paper presented at the 15th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Munich, Germany Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360-407. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1 Stull A. T. & Mayer R. E. (2007). Learning by Doing Versus Learning by Viewing: Three Experimental Comparisons of Learner-Generated Versus Author-Provided Graphic Organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 808-820. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.808 Sun, L., Xiang, W., Chai, C., Yang, Z., & Zhang, K. (2014). Designer’s perception during sketching: An examination of Creative Segment theory using eye movements. Design Studies, 35(6), 593-613. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.04.004 Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Huang, J.-S. (2008). Improving children’s reading comprehension and use of strategies through computer-based strategy training. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1552-1571. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.009 Suri, J. F. & Marsh, M. (2000). Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), 151-157. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00035-6 Tare, M., Chiong, C., Ganea, P., & DeLoache, J. (2010). Less is more: How manipulative features affect children’s learning from picture. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 395-400. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.06.005 Taura, T., Yamamoto, E., Fasiha, M. Y. N., Goka, M., Mukai, F., Nagai, Y., & Nakashima, H. (2012). Constructive simulation of creative concept generation process in design: a research method for difficult-to-observe design-thinking processes. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 297-321. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.637191 Therrien, W. J., Wickstrom, K., & Jones, K. (2006). Effect of a Combined Repeated Reading and Question Generation Intervention on Reading Achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21(2), 89-97. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00209.x Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127-145. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00031-X Trotman, D. (2006). Evaluating the imaginative: Situated practice and the conditions for professional judgment in imaginative education. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 7(3), 1-19. Türk, E. & Erçetin, G. (2014). Effects of interactive versus simultaneous display of multimedia glosses on L2 reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 1-25. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.692384 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Culture Organization. (2012). 2012 Report: Youth and skills: Putting education to work. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/leading-the-international-agenda/efareport/reports/2012-skills/ van Garderen, D. (2007). Teaching students with LD to use diagrams to solve mathematical word problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40 (6), 540-553. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400060501 van Meter, P., Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A., & Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 142-166. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.04.001 Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4 Wang, J. H., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162-186. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2 Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Tonks, S., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Children’s motivation for reading: domain specificity and instructional influences. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 299-309. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.6.299-310 Woolley, G. (2010). Developing reading comprehension: combining visual and verbal cognitive processes. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(2), 108-125. Yang, M. C. (2009). Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 20(1), 1-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0055-0 Yang, M. C. & Cham, J. G. (2007). An analysis of sketching skill and its role in early stage engineering design. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(5), 476-482. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2712214 Yang, Y.-F. (2012). Blended learning for college students with English reading difficulties. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 393-410. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.597767 Yu, X. (2012). Exploring visual perception and children's interpretations of picture books. Library & Information Science Research, 34(4), 292-299. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2012.06.004 Zhang, Z. H. & Linn, M. C. (2011). Can Generating Representations Enhance Learning with Dynamic Visualizations? Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 48(10), 1177-1198. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20443 Zhou, Y. R., Knoke, D., & Sakamoto, I. (2005). Rethinking silence in the classroom: Chinese students’ experiences of sharing indigenous knowledge. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 9(3), 287-311. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603110500075180
|