|
朱經明(2007)。教育統計學 。臺北市:五南。 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市: 高等教育。 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式 : LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北 市: 雙葉書廊。 陳順宇 (2007)。結構方程模式 : Amos操作。臺北市: 心理總經銷. 黃文璋 (2003)。數理統計。臺北市: 華泰. 黃芳銘 (2010)。結構方程模式理論與應用。臺北市: 五南. 蕭文龍 (2015)。統計分析入門與應用-SPSS中文版+PLS- SEM(SmartPLS)。臺北市:碁峰。 Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Bartholomew, D. J., & Knott, M. (1999). Latent variable models and factor analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley. Bollen, K. A., & Paxton, P. (1998). Two-stage least squares estimation of interaction effects. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Brandt, H., Kelava, A., & Klein, A. (2014). A simulation study comparing recent approaches for the estimation of nonlinear effects in sem under the condition of nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 181-195. Chen, C. (2016). The role of resilience and coping styles in subjective well-being among chinese university students. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(3), 377-387. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217. Cohen, J. (1978). Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components. Psychological Bulletin, 85(4), 858-866. Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum. Falenchuk, O. (2006). A study of unidimensional IRT models for items scored in multiple ordered response categories. (Doctoral dissertation Ph.D.), University of Toronto (Canada), Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304929555? accountid=10067 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I database. (304929555) Fox, J., Nie, Z., Byrnes, J., Culbertson, M., DebRoy, S., Friendly, M., . . . Monette, G. (2017). Package ‘sem’. Retrieved from https://cran.r- project.org/web/packages/lavaan/lavaan.pdf Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: regression and structural equation models. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Publishing Associates. Goodhue, D. L., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. (2012). Does pls have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data? Mis Quarterly, 36(3), 981-1001. Gordon, M. K. (2016). Achievement Scripts: Media Influences on Black Students' Academic Performance, Self-Perceptions, and Career Interests. Journal of Black Psychology, 42(3), 195-220. Harwell, M., Stone, C., Hsu, T. & Kirisci, L. (1996). Monte Carlo studies in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20,101-125. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equations modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS- SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. Henseler, J., & Chin, W. W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(1), 82-109. Henseler, J., & Fassott, G. (2010). Testing moderating effects in pls path models: an illustration of available procedures. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. New York : Springer . Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit inde xes in covariance structure analysis: criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. Hu, L. T., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure-analysis be trusted. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 351-362. Jöreskog, K. G., & Wallentin, F. Y. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 57-89). Mahwh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Jöreskog, K. G., Cudeck, R., Du Toit, S. H. C., & Sörbom, D. (2001). Structural equation modeling, present and future : A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling : Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.. ed.). Los Angeles: Los Angeles : SAGE. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent-variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 201-210. Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457-474. Kraemer, H. C., & Blasey, C. M. (2004). Centring in regression analyses: a strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13(3), 141-151. Leite, W. L., & Zuo, Y. Z. (2011). Modeling Latent Interactions at Level 2 in Multilevel Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Mean-Centered and Residual-Centered Unconstrained Approaches. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(3), 449-464. Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Widaman, K. F. (2006). On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product terms: Implications for modeling interactions among latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(4), 497-519. Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag. Marquardt, D. W. (1980). You should standardize the predictor variables in your regression model. Journal of the American Statistics Association, 75, 87-91. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z. L., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9(3), 275-300. Martínez-Ruiz, A., & Aluja-Banet, T. (2013). Two-step PLS path modeling mode B: Nonlinear and interaction effects between formative constructs. In H. A. W. W. Chin, V. E. Vinzi, G. Russolillo, & L. Trinchera (Eds.), New perspectives in partial least squares and related methods. Springer: New York. Monecke, A. (2013). Package ‘semPLS’. Retrieved from https://cran.r- project.org/web/packages/semPLS/index.html Moulder, B. C., & Algina, J. (2002). Comparison of methods for estimating and testing latent variable interactions. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 1-19. Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling : An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user's guide: Version 8. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen. Park, H. (2000). Comparison of IRT models for ordered polytomous response data(Order No. 9983591). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (304612642). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304612642? accountid=10067 Quintana, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1999). Implications of recent developments in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. Counseling Psychologist, 27(4), 485-527. Qureshi, I., & Compeau, D. (2009). Assessing between- group differences in information systems research: A comparison of covariance- and component-based sem. Mis Quarterly, 33(1), 197-214. Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance- based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332-344. Rossee, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. Rosseel, Y., Oberski, D., Byrnes, J., Vanbrabant, L., Savalei, V., Merkle, E., . . . Barendse, M. (2015). Package ‘lavaan’. Retrieved from https://cran.r- project.org/web/packages/lavaan/lavaan.pdf Schumacker, R. E. (2002). Latent variable interaction modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 40-54. Schumacker, R. E. (2016). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New York : Routledge. Sharma, P. N., & Kim, K. H. (2013). A comparison of PLS and ML bootstrapping techniques in SEM: A Monte Carlo Study. In H. Abdi, W. W. Chin, V. Esposito Vinzi, G. Russolillo, & L. Trinchera (Eds.), New perspectives in partial least squares and related methods (pp. 201- 208). New York, NY: Springer New York. Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2001). Generalized appended product indicator procedure for nonlinear structural equation analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26(1), 1-29. Wang, L. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2015). Moderated mediation analysis using Bayesian methods. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(2), 249-263. Wen, Z. L., Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2010). Structural equation models of latent interactions: An appropriate standardized solution and its scale-free properties. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(1), 1-22. Yang-Wallentin, F. (2001). Comparisons of the ML and TSLS estimators for the Kenny-Judd. In D. Sörbom, S. H. C. Du Toit, & R. Cudeck (Eds.), Structural equation modeling present and future : A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 425-442). Lincolnwood, IL Scientific Software International.
|