Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Kaynar, O., & Fine, A. (2007). The effects of need for cognition on Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 880-891.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Barry, B., & Fulmer, I. S. (2004). The medium and the message: The adaptive use of communication media in dyadic influence. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 272-292.
Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of statistical psychology, 3(2), 77-85.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.
Blasco-Arcas, L., Hernandez-Ortega, B. I., & Jimenez-Martinez, J. (2014). Collaborating online: the roles of interactivity and personalization. The Service Industries Journal, 34(8), 677-698.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Bradner, E., Kellogg, W. A., & Erickson, T. (1999). The adoption and use of ‘Babble’: A field study of chat in the workplace. Paper presented at the Sixth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Broadbent, D. E. (1971). Decision and stress. London: Academic Press.
Brown, S. A., Dennis, A. R., & Venkatesh, V. (2010). Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 9-54.
Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., & Bollen, K. A. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bucy, E. P., & Tao, C.-C. (2007). The mediated moderation model of interactivity. Media Psychology, 9(3), 647-672.
Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS quarterly, 11(3), 354-366.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855-870.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1997). Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 3(1).
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the association for information systems, 4(7), 1-78.
Gibson, J. J. (1987). The ecological approach to visual perception. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2009). Predicting tie strength with social media. Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, USA.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1(1), 201-233.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Han, S., Min, J., & Lee, H. (2015). Antecedents of social presence and gratification of social connection needs in SNS: A study of Twitter users and their mobile and non-mobile usage. International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 459-471.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society, 8(2), 125-147.
Hoang, D. T., Igel, B., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2006). The impact of total quality management on innovation: Findings from a developing country. International journal of quality & reliability management, 23(9), 1092-1117.
Hogan, B. J. (2009). Networking in everyday life. University of Toronto, Canada.
Huang, E. (2012). Online experiences and virtual goods purchase intention. Internet Research, 22(3), 252-274.
Jones, J. J., Settle, J. E., Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Marlow, C., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Inferring tie strength from online directed behavior. PloS one, 8(1), e52168.
Katz, E., Haas, H., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). On the use of the mass media for important things. American sociological review, 38(2), 164-181.
Kim, J., Spielmann, N., & McMillan, S. J. (2012). Experience effects on interactivity: Functions, processes, and perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1543-1550.
Kim, S. C., Yoon, D., & Han, E. K. (2014). Antecedents of mobile app usage among smartphone users. Journal of Marketing Communications(ahead-of-print), 1-18.
Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: a concept explication. New Media & Society, 4(3), 355-383.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 216-239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 8-22.
Kwon, O., & Wen, Y. (2010). An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 254-263.
Ledbetter, A. (2015). Media multiplexity theory: technology use and interpersonal tie strength. Engaging theories in interpersonal communication. Multiple perspectives. Second edition. London: SAGE.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2009). Avatar e-mail versus traditional e-mail: Perceptual difference and media selection difference. Decision Support Systems, 46(2), 451-467.
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152-1161.
Lin, N., & Dumin, M. (1986). Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8(4), 365-385.
Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of advertising, 31(4), 53-64.
Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. (2009). A dual-process model of interactivity effects. Journal of advertising, 38(2), 53-68.
Lu, H.-P., Lin, J. C.-C., Hsiao, K.-L., & Cheng, L.-T. (2010). Information sharing behaviour on blogs in Taiwan: Effects of interactivities and gender differences. Journal of Information Science, 36(3), 401-416.
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865-1883.
March, J. G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 587-608.
Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63(2), 482-501.
McMillan, S. J. (2000). Interactivity is in the eye of the beholder: Function, perception, involvement, and attitude toward the web site. Paper presented at the American Academy of Advertising, Pullman, WA.
McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of advertising, 31(3), 29-42.
Men, L. R., & Tsai, W.-H. S. (2012). How companies cultivate relationships with publics on social network sites: Evidence from China and the United States. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 723-730.
Mesch, G., & Talmud, I. (2006). The quality of online and offline relationships: The role of multiplexity and duration of social relationships. The Information Society, 22(3), 137-148.
MIC. (2014a). 網路社群使用現況分析(上). Retrieved December 16, 2015, from http://mic.iii.org.tw/intelligence
MIC. (2014b). 網路社群使用現況分析(下). Retrieved December 16, 2015, from http://mic.iii.org.tw/intelligence
MIC. (2014c). 網路社群於電腦與行動使用時間分析(上). Retrieved December 16, 2015, from http://mic.iii.org.tw/intelligence
Min, J., & Kim, B. (2015). How are people enticed to disclose personal information despite privacy concerns in social network sites? The calculus between benefit and cost. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), 839-857.
Mollen, A., & Wilson, H. (2010). Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63(9), 919-925.
Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., Kemery, E. R., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1998). Relationships between bases of power and work reactions: The mediational role of procedural justice. Journal of Management, 24(4), 533-552.
Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38-43.
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Duhachek, A. (2003). The influence of goal-directed and experiential activities on online flow experiences. Journal of consumer psychology, 13(1), 3-16.
Orchard, L. J., Fullwood, C., Galbraith, N., & Morris, N. (2014). Individual differences as predictors of social networking. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(3), 388-402.
Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413-428.
Pai, F.-Y., & Yeh, T.-M. (2014). The effects of information sharing and interactivity on the intention to use social networking websites. Quality & Quantity, 48(4), 2191-2207.
Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729-733.
Peng, T., Kao, Y., & Lin, C.-C. (2006). Common method variance in management research: Its nature, effects, detection, and remedies. Journal of Management, 23(1), 77-98.
Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American sociological review, 62(5), 673-693.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Potosky, D. (2008). A conceptual framework for the role of the administration medium in the personnel assessment process. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 629-648.
Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 169-174.
Rafaeli, S., & Ariel, Y. (2007). Assessing interactivity in computer-mediated. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. AMcKenna, T. Postmes, & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 71-88). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places: CSLI Publications and Cambridge university press.
Reinking, J. (2012). Contingency theory in information systems research. In Y. K. Dwivedi, M. R. Wade, & S. L. Schneberger (Eds.), Information systems theory: Explaining and predicting our digital society (pp. 247-263). New York: Springer.
Sheer, V. C. (2011). Teenagers'' use of MSN features, discussion topics, and online friendship development: The impact of media richness and communication control. Communication Quarterly, 59(1), 82-103.
Sohn, D., Ci, C., & Lee, B.-K. (2007). The moderating effects of expectation on the patterns of the interactivity-attitude relationship. Journal of advertising, 36(3), 109-119.
Song, J. H., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2008). Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. Journal of marketing, 72(2), 99-113.
Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. (2010). Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 298-322.
Suntornpithug, N., & Khamalah, J. (2010). Machine and person interactivity: The driving forces behind influences on consumers'' willingness to purchase online. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11(4), 299-325.
Torenvliet, G. (2003). We can''t afford it!: the devaluation of a usability term. Interactions, 10(4), 12-17.
Treisman, A. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological review, 76(3), 282.
Wang, H., Meng, Y., & Wang, W. (2013). The role of perceived interactivity in virtual communities: building trust and increasing stickiness. Connection Science, 25(1), 55-73.
Wei, H.-L., Lin, K.-Y., Lu, H.-P., & Chuang, I.-H. (2015). Understanding the intentions of users to ‘stick’to social networking sites: a case study in Taiwan. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(2), 151-162.
Wellman, B., & Tindall, D. (1993). Reach out and touch some bodies: How telephone networks connect social networks. Progress in Communication Science, 12, 63-94.
Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American journal of sociology, 96(3), 558-588.
Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362-369.
Wu, L.-L., Wang, Y.-T., & Hsu, A.-C. (2014). Ewom effects on Facebook. Paper presented at the 18th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Chengdu, China.
Wu, L. L., & Lin, J. Y. (2012). The match between information control and motivation in the online context. Psychology & Marketing, 29(11), 822-835.
Xu, Y., Kim, H.-W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2010). Task and social information seeking: whom do we prefer and whom do we approach? Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(3), 211-240.
Yeh, N.-C., Chuan-Chuan Lin, J., & Lu, H.-P. (2011). The moderating effect of social roles on user behaviour in virtual worlds. Online Information Review, 35(5), 747-769.
Yoo, W.-S., Lee, Y., & Park, J. (2010). The role of interactivity in e-tailing: Creating value and increasing satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(2), 89-96.
Zhang, H., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., & Zhao, L. (2014). What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences. Information & Management, 51(8), 1017-1030.
Zhang, P. (2008). Technical opinion Motivational affordances: reasons for ICT design and use. Communications of the ACM, 51(11), 145-147.