:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中生在公民與社會科的目標導向、自我調整學習與學業成就關係之研究
作者:陳敏銓
作者(外文):Chen,Min-Chuan
校院名稱:國立臺南大學
系所名稱:教育學系課程與教學碩博士班
指導教授:徐綺穗
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2020
主題關鍵詞:公民與社會目標導向自我調整學習學業成就結構方程式civic and social educationgoal orientationself-regulated learningacademic achievementSEM
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
本研究旨在探討國中學生在公民與社會科的目標導向、自我調整學習和學業成就的關係。本研究採用問卷調查法進行,研究者參酌國內外關於目標導向及自我調整學習的相關論述與研究,形成研究架構後編擬「目標導向量表」及「自我調整學習量表」:預試階段以臺南市國中學生為研究對象,正式問卷則以我國全體國中生為研究對象,以多段式的抽樣方法進行,之後透過驗證性因素分析、描述統計、變異數分析等進行統計分析。研究發現結果摘要如下:
一、國中學生在公民與社會科的目標導向皆屬於中上程度,且具多重目標導向,其中以「自我逃避」最高,且個人內在的目標導向比人際間的目標導向重要。
二、國中學生在公民與社會科的自我調整學習屬於中上程度,其中以「動機/情感」層面最重要。
三、性別、年級、家庭類型、平均每天念書時間、每週複習公民與社會科時間等不同背景變項在公民與社會科的目標導向具有顯著差異。
四、性別、年級、家庭類型、平均每天念書時間、每週複習公民與社會科時間等不同背景變項在公民與社會科的自我調整學習具有顯著差異。
五、國中學生的目標導向對公民與社會科的學業成就上具顯著正向影響。
六、國中學生的目標導向對公民與社會科的自我調整學習上具顯著正向影響。
七、國中學生的自我調整學習對公民與社會科的學業成就具顯著正向影響。
八、自我調整學習在目標導向和學業成就之間具有中介效果。
九、目標導向對自我調整學習的影響中,「趨向」目標比「逃避」目標重要。
十、國中學生背景變項在目標導向對自我調整學習不具有調節效果。
十一、國中學生背景變項在目標導向對學業成就的正向調節效果為「年級」。
十二、在目標導向、自我調整學習和學業成就的整體結構模型,自我調整學習構面效果,依序為「動機/情感」、「行為」、「情境」、「認知」。
本研究最後依據研究發現結果提出國中學生在公民與社會科的學習建議,以及教師在進行公民與社會科的教學建議,最後則對後續研究提出建議,俾供國中學生、公民與社會科教師和相關領域的研究人員參考。
This study aims to explore the relationship between goal orientation, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement of junior high school students in civic and social education. This study adopted questionnaires. Referencing previous relevant discussions and theory on goal orientation and self-regulated learning, both within the country and abroad, the writer formed the research framework and formulated the “goal orientation scale” and “self-regulated learning scale”. In the pilot study, participants included junior high school students in Tainan City while the study participants in the actual study were all junior high school students in Taiwan. The research findings are summarized as follows:
1. Junior high school students scored above average in terms of goal orientation in civic and social education and showed multiple goals orientation, among which “self-avoidance goal” scored the highest. Intrapersonal goal orientation was deemed more important than interpersonal goal orientation.
2. Junior high school students scored above average in terms of self-regulated learning in civic and social education, among which the aspect of “motivation/affection” was considered the most important.
3. Different demographic variables, including gender, age, household type, average time spent studying daily, and the time spent on reviewing materials for civic and social education weekly resulted in a significant difference in goal orientation on civic and social education.
4. Different demographic variables, including gender, age, household type, average time spent studying daily, and the time spent on reviewing materials for civic and social education weekly resulted in a significant difference in self-regulated learning on civic and social education.
5. Junior high students’ goal orientation has a positive impact on academic achievement in civic and social education.
6. Junior high students’ goal orientation has a positive impact on self-regulated learning in civic and social education.
7. Junior high students’ self-regulated learning has a positive impact on academic achievement in civic and social education.
8. Self-regulated learning has a mediating effect between goal orientation and academic achievement.
9. “Approach goals” are more important than “avoidance goals” in goal orientation’s impact on self-regulated learning.
10. The background of junior high students does not have a mediating effect between goal orientation and self-regulated learning.
11. The variable of junior high students’ background which positively regulated goal orientation towards academic achievement is “age.”
12. In the overall structural equation of goal orientation, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement, self-regulated learning aspects, listed in order is “motivation/affection”, “behavior,” “situation,” and “cognition”.
Finally, based on the findings of this study, this paper posits study suggestions for junior high school students studying civic and social subjects and teaching suggestions for teachers teaching civic and social subjects. Lastly, it puts forward suggestions of follow-up research and serves as a reference for junior high school students, civic and social education teacher and researchers in relevant fields.
一、中文部分
毛國楠、程炳林(1993)。目標層次與目標導向對大學生自我調整學習歷程之影響。教育心理學報,26,85-106。DOI:10.6251/BEP.19930701.5
余民寧(2006)。影響學習成就因素的探討。教育資料與研究雙月刊,73,11-24。
吳中勤(2014a)。六向度數學成就目標之驗證。臺北市立大學學報,45(1),21-41。
DOI:10.6336/JUT.4501.002
吳中勤(2014b)。以多群組結構方程模式檢驗成就目標理論模式的測量恆等性。教育科學研究期刊,59(3),59-95。DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(3).03
吳中勤(2014c)。成就目標理論模式再概念化及其目標組型之探析。南大教育研究學報,48(2),27-48。DOI:10.3966/199044282014104802002
吳佳青、陳柏霖(2017)。新移民子女與本地子女數學知識信念、數學自我調整學習與數學成就之比較研究。國立屏東大學學報-教育類,1,49-81。
吳明隆(2007)。結構方程模式-AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
李仁豪、余民寧(2003)。2 × 2 成就目標理論架構之驗證。教育與心理研究,26,433-470。
李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體AMOS之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。臺北市:心理。
李茂能(2011)。圖解AMOS在學術研究之應用(第二版)。臺北市:五南。
沈孟樺、林淑玲(2013)。國中生家庭社會資本與自我調整學習關係之研究。家庭教育雙月刊,41,6-30。
林建平(2010)。低成就學童的家庭環境與自我調整學習之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,27(1),94-126。
林倚萱(2012)。中學實習教師自我調整學習歷程及其教師自我效能之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
林倚萱、羅家玲、林清文(2018)。教育實習教師應用自我調整學習策略之內涵分析研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,11(3),01-30。DOI: 10.3966/207136492018121103001
林宴瑛(2006)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之關係及潛在改變量分析(未出版碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
林宴瑛(2012)。從人境互動觀點探討目標結構、目標導向、情緒調整對考試情緒與應試策略之效果:條件化間接效果暨調節效果分析(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林宴瑛、彭淑玲(2015)。以多重目標觀點探討課室目標結構對國中生自我調整學習策略的影響:課室教學實驗研究。教育心理學報,47(2),159-178。
林宴瑛、程炳林(2007)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報, 39(2),173-194。DOI:10.6251/BEP.20070423
林宴瑛、程炳林(2014)。超越四向度:六向度目標導向模式之驗證與分析。教育心理學報,46(1),117-140。DOI:10.6251/BEP.20140120
林清山、程炳林(1995)。國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。教育心理學報,28,15-58。
林麗華、林清文(2003)。國中生數學科學習之目標導向、社會比較、自我效能與課業壓力關係研究。彰化師大輔導學報,25,87-132。
柯嘉甄(2003)。國小學生家長對多元評量的覺知與學生的目標導向、學習自我效能之相關研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東縣。
國際公民教育與素養調查研究:http://iccs.cere.ntnu.edu.tw/index.php/rlink
張春興(1989)。張氏心理辭典。臺北市:東華。
張春興(1994/2003)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐(重修二版)。臺北市:東華。
張偉豪、鄭時宜(2013)。與結構方程模型共舞。新北市:前程。
張景媛(1992)。自我調整、動機信念、選題策略與作業表現關係的研究暨自我調整訓練課程效果之評估。教育心理學報,25,201-243。
教育部(2008a)。九年一貫課程綱要總綱。
教育部(2008b)。九年一貫課程綱要-社會學習領域課程綱要
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。
梁雲霞(2006)。從自主學習理論到學校實務-概念架構與方案發展。當代教育研究,14(4),171-206。
許家驊(2008)。國小數學解題自我調節表現量表之編製發展與實測分析研究。教育與心理研究,31(4),115-146。
許雅惠(2012)。自我調整學習融入讀寫整合教學之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
陳志恆(2009)。國中學生自我調整學習策略量表之編製及效度研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
陳品華(1999)。二專生自我調整學習之理論建構與實證研究(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
陳品華(2004)。融入式介入方案對技職大學生自我調整學習之影響研究。教育與心理研究,27(1),159-180。
陳品華(2006)。技職大學生自我調整學習的動機困境與調整策略之研究。教育心理學報,38(1),37-50。
陳偉瑀(2007)。技職院校學生自我調整學習能力對體育課運動技能學習表現之相關研究。花蓮教育大學學報,24,123-138。
陳偉瑀(2010)。大學生自我調整學習教學策略對教師教學滿意度的預測。大專體育學刊,12(1),31-41。
陳偉瑀、王俊明(2008)。大學生自我調整學習對桌球學習效果之影響。大專體育學刊,10(2),93-106。
陳瑋婷(2011)。自我效能、學習策略與學業成就之關係研究:結合後設分析與結構方程模式。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,4(2),83-96。
陳寬裕、王正華(2018)。結構方程模型運用AMOS分析。臺北市:五南。
陳嘉成(1999)。成就目標、動機氣候、自我歷程與自我調整策略、持續學習動機和數學成就之關係(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
陳嘉成(2001)。中學生之成就目標導向、動機氣候知覺與學習行為組型之關係。教育與心理研究,24,167-190。
彭淑玲(2017)。未來取向之自我調整學習模式考驗暨檢驗課室目標結構的調節效果。教育心理學報,48(3),371-397。DOI:10.6251/BEP.20160304
程炳林(1995)。自我調整學習的模式驗證及其教學效果之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報:教育類,46(1),77-92。
程炳林(2002a)。大學生學習工作、動機問題與自我調整學習策略之關係。教育心理學報,33(2),79-102。
程炳林(2002b)。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報:教育類,47(1),39-58。
程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,48(1),15-40。
黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學結構方程模型。臺北市:五南。
黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式理論與應用(五版)。臺北市:五南。
黃博謙(2015)。國小六年級學生數位資本、資訊自我效能、成就目標與資訊學習成就關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
楊晶雲、劉秀嫚(2016)。臺灣八年級學生的公民參與意向:ICCS2009資料庫的應用。彰化師大教育學報,30,1-30。
臺灣學生成就長期追蹤評量計畫(TASAL):https://tasal.naer.edu.tw/tasal
臺灣學生學習成就評量資料庫:https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/11-1000-1253.php
趙珮晴、余民寧、張芳全(2011)。探討臺灣學生的自律學習:TEPS資料的縱貫性分析。教育科學研究期刊,56(3),151-179。
劉佩雲(1998)。兒童自我調整學習之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
劉佩雲(2000)。自我調整學習模式之驗證。教育與心理研究,23(1),173-205。
劉炳輝(2006)。國小原住民學童適應行為、文化認同、自我調整學習與其學業成就關係之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
潘靖瑛(2013)。大學生目標導向型態、自我調整學習策略與英文閱讀成就之關係研究。慈濟大學教育研究學刊,9,165-196。
蔡文榮、陳雅屏(2016)。互動式電子白板的使用差異對國小生英語學習動機與學習成就之影響。彰化師大教育學報,30,31-58。
鄧毓浩、黃美筠、董秀蘭、林佳範(2012)。ICCS2009認知測驗與我國相關中學學生公民教育學習成就評量之比較。中等教育,63(2),51~74。DOI:10.6249/SE.2012.63.2.03
鄭芬蘭、林清山(1997)。目標導向因果模式之驗證。教育心理學報,29,215-232。
DOI:10.6251/BEP.19970901.8


二、西文部分
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Change in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 269-298.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation for structural equation models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Barron, B. K., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 706-722.
Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2015). Integrating the regulation of affect, behavior, and cognition into self-regulated learning paradigms among secondary and post-secondary students. Metacognition Learning, 10, 15-42.
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-014-9129-8
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-457.
Bozpolat1, E. (2016). Investigation of the self-regulated learning strategiesof students from the faculty of education using ordinal logistic regression analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(1), 301-318. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2016.1.0281
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35.
Cetin, B. (2015). Academic motivation and self-regulated learning in predicting academic achievement in college. Journal of international education research ,11(2), 95-106.
Corno, L. (1993). The best-Iaid plans: Modern conceptions and educational research. Educational Research, 22(2), 14-22.
Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 191-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Corno, L., & Kanfer, R. (1993). The role of volition in learning and performance. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 21, pp. 301-341). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers.
Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-100.
Diaz, R. M., Neal. G. J., Amaya-Williams, M. (1990). The social origins of self-regulation. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 127-154). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Diener, C. L, & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451-462.
Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1980). An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 940-952.
Dweck, C. S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674-685.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivation processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
Dweck, C. S., & Elliott, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. H. Mussen (Gen. Ed.) & E. M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. IV. Social and personality development (pp. 643-691). New York: Wiley.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggeet, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Rewiew, 95, 256-272.
Dweck, C. S., & Reppucci, N. D. (1973). Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 109-116.
Effeney, G., Carroll, A., & Bahr, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Key strategies and their sources in a sample of adolescent males. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 13, 58-74.
Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “ classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. (Vol. 10, pp.143-179). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.
Elliot, A., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.
Elliot, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsicmotivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 968-980.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.80.3.501
Elliot, A. J., &Murayama, K.(2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613-628.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613
Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K.,& Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632-648.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new era of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
Garcia, T. (1995). The role of motivational strategies in self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 29-42.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Francisco: Freeman.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1984). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.
Ito, M., & Nakamura, K. (1998). Humans' choice in a self-control situation: Sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcer density. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 87-101.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33, 1-21.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illumination. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638-645.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105-122.
Heiman, T., & Precel, K. (2003). Students with learning disabilities in higher education: Academic strategies profile. Journal of Leaming Disabilities, 36, 248-258.
Hornstra, L., Majoor, M., & Peetsm, T. (2017). Achievement goal profiles and developments in effort and achievement in upper elementary school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 606–629. DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12167
Huang, C. J. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals inpredicting academic achievement: A metaanalysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 48-73.
Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental pesonality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99-171). New York: Academic Press.
Leung, J. J. (1993). Gender difference in academic motivational orientations: American and Chinese students (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Chapaign.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, Hazuki M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.
Mace, F. C., Belfiore, P. J., &Hutcinson, J. M. (2001). Operant theory and research on self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 39-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
MaCombs, B. L. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 67-124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Matuga, J. M. (2009). Self-regulation, goal orientation, and academic achievement of secondary students in online university courses. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 4-11.
McCardle, L.& Hadwin A. F. (2015). Using multiple, contextualized data sources to measurelearners’ perceptions of their self-regulated learning. Metacognition Learning, 10, 43-75. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-014-9132-0
Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
Midgley, C., Kaplan,A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M. L., Urdan, T., Anderman, L. H., …,& RoeserR. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113-131.
Miller, G. A. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328-346.
Oakland, T., & Joyce, D. (2004). Temperament-based learning styles and school-based applications. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 19(1~2), 59-73.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2) , 117-175.
Paris, S. G., & Byrnes, J. P. (2001). The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 170-200). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Paris, S. G., Byrnes, J. P., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Constructing theoris, identities, and actions of self-regulated learners. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 253-288). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Patrick, H., Ryan, A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males' and females' self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(2), 153-171.
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp.703-732). New York: Wiley.
Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 3-12. DOI: 10.1002/tl.37219956304
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31,459-470.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology ,25, 92-104. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1017
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goalorientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000c). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.451-502). SanDiego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, Michigian: National Center for Research to Improve Teaching and Learning, School of Education, The University Michigan.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validityof the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1989). A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, Michigian: National Center for Research to Improve Teaching and Learning, School of Education, The University Michigan.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariare Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227.
Powers, W. T. (1998). Making sense of behavior: The means of control. New York: Benchmark Press.
Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., & Tebb, S. S. (2001). Using structure equation modeling to test for multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(4), 613-626.
Şahin, E., Topkaya, N., & Kürkçü, R. (2016). Sex and age differences in achievement goal orientations in Turkish adolescents. Journal of Education and Practice, 27, 149-156.
Schunk, D. H. (1984). The self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 199-218.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Conclusions and future directions for academic interventions. In & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19). New York: Guilford Press.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445
Simons, P. R. J., & Vermunt, J. D. H. M. (1986). Self-regulation in knowledge acquisition: A selection of Dutch research. In G. Beukhof & P. R. J. Simons (Eds.), German and Dutch research on learning & institution: General topics and self-regulation in knowledge acquisition (pp. 101-135). The Hague: SVO.
Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relation with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perception, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 71-81.
Soltaninejad, M. (2015). Investigating predictive role of 2x2 achievement goal orientations on learning strategies with structural equation modeling. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(3), 21-30.
Spruce, R.,& Bol L. (2015). Teacher beliefs, knowledge, and practice of self-regulated learning. Metacognition Learning, 10, 245-277. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-014-9124-0
Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Allowing for thinking styles. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 36-37.
Thoresen, C. E., & Mahoney, M. J. (1974). Behavioral self-control. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.
Thorkildsen, T. A., & Nicholls, J. G. (1998). Fifth graders’ achievement orientations and beliefs: Individual and classroom differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 179-201.
Urdan, T. C. (1997). Achievement goal theory: Past results, future directions. In M. L.Machr and P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp.99-141). Greewich, CT: JAI Press.
VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995-1015.
VandeWalle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 629-640.
Villavicencio, F. T., & Bernard, A. B. I. (2013). Positive academic emotions moderate the relationship between self-regulation and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329-340.
Vogel, S., & Adelman, P. B. (1992). The success of college students with learning disabilities: Factors related to educational attainment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 430-441.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfman & G. Vakar, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watson, R. I. (1963). The great psychologists. New York: Lippincott.
Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed form models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Witkow, M. R., & Fuligni, A. J. (2007). Achievement goals and daily school experiences among adolescents with Asian, Latino, and European American backgrounds. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 584-596. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.584
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientation to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236-250.
Wolters, C. A., & Hussain M. (2015). Investigating grit and its relations with college students’ self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Metacognition Learning, 10, 293-311. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-014-9128-9
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. The Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Yough, M., Herron, M., Richards, K. A., & Ware, J. A. (2015). Working with what is brought: Promoting conceptual change in a course on learning. College Student Journal, 49(3), 355-368.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19). New York: Guilford Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1999). Commentary: Toward a cyclicaly interactive view of self-regulated learning. Internationa1 Journa1 of Educationa1 Research, 31, 545-551.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000a). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective.In M. Boekaerts & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000b). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 82-91.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001a). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-26). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001b). Theories of self -regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self -regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29-36.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Comparing students’ self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 145-155.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284-290. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE