智慧資本對公司績效之影響：以台灣電子公司為例__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	智慧資本對公司績效之影響：以台灣電子公司為例
作者：	張紫誼
作者(外文)：	CHANG, TZU-YI
校院名稱：	中國文化大學
系所名稱：	國際企業管理學系
指導教授：	郭國誠
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2020
主題關鍵詞：	智慧資本；公司績效；資料包絡分析法；intellectual capital；firm performance；data envelopment analysis
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:4

本研究旨為探討智慧資本對公司績效之影響。首先，本研究透過Kruskal-Wallis檢定智慧資本之代理變數，檢定結果顯示不論是在不同的電子子產業間或在不同年度，智慧資本變數都存在顯著的差異，並進一步討論電子業智慧資本不同構面之表現。其次，以共同邊界麥氏生產力指數法探討電子產業及子產業經營績效，做為評估公司營運良窳之參考。再者，透過共線性診斷發現智慧資本代理變數間存在共線性，因此本研究進一步運用因素分析，將智慧資本三構面的代理變數萃取出主要因素。最後，採用縱橫迴歸模型評估智慧資本三構面與三個控制變數，對公司績效與其分解的三個構面之影響。本研究結果發現：(一)人力資本僅提升技術變動，對整體的生產力與技術差距變動無顯著的預測力，且對效率變動有負向顯著影響；(二)結構資本能預測整體生產力與技術差距變動的提升，但對效率變動與技術變動無顯著的預測力；(三)顧客資本能提升對電子公司之整體生產力、效率變動及技術變動但無法縮小技術上的差距。總結來說，本研究得出顧客資本為智慧資本最主要的影響構面。

以文找文

The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of intellectual capital on firm performance. First, the Kruskal-Wallis is applied to test the proxy variables of intellectual capital and further discuss the performance of different aspects of intellectual capital in the electronics industry. The test results show that between different electronic sub-industries and in different years, there are significant differences in intellectual capital proxy variables. Second, the metafrontier Malmquist productivity analysis (MMPI) is used to evaluate the operating performance of electronic industry and sub-industries to gauge if a firm is operating well. Third, through collinearity diagnostics, it was found that there is collinearity among the intellectual capital proxy variables. Therefore, this research further applied factor analysis to extract the main factors of the three-dimensional intellectual capital proxy variables. Finally, panel regression is used to evaluate the impact of the three dimensions of intellectual capital and three control variables on the firm’s performance and three decompositions. The results of this study found that: (1) human capital can only predict positive change in technology but has no significant predictive power for overall productivity and technology gap ratio change, and even has a negatively significant impact on efficiency change; (2) structural capital can predict the improvement of overall productivity and changes in technology gap, but there is no significant predictive power for changes in technical efficiency and changes in technology; (3) customer capital can improve the overall productivity, efficiency changes and technology changes of electronic companies, but it does not help narrow the technological gap with other benchmarks. In summary, this research found that customer capital was the most important dimension of intellectual capital.

以文找文

一、中文部分
王文英，李佳跨，邱紫芸(2012)，智慧資本與組織學習方式對學習能力與組織績效影響之實證研究，管理學報，29(1)，17-44。
李正文，黎子華(2009)，以智慧資本觀點評估台灣 IC 設計產業之財務經營績效，中原企管評論，7(2)，1-28。
洪友芳(2019, November 25)，台積電市值超越三星 tsmc果然比TSMC出頭天，自由時報 [線上資料]，來源：https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/2989416[2020, May 4]。
徐中琦，黃騰緯(2007)，智慧資本與企業經濟價值關聯性之實證研究，科技管理學刊，12(4)，35-65。
黃劭彥，林有志，林琦珍，施志成(2008)，智慧資本、智慧資本附加價值與企業績效之整合分析，台灣管理學刊，8(1)，27-46，DOI：10.6295/TAMJ.2008.0801.02。
黃家齊(2002)，人力資源管理系統與組織績效—智慧資本觀點，管理學報，19，415-450。
經濟部國貿局編制(2017)，2017上半年我國主要出口產品與主要市場增減原因分析報告[線上資料]，來源https://www.trade.gov.tw/App_Ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=../Files/Doc/8cede508-410c-465a-9cc5-efa4f611c9ba.pdf [2020, April 25]。
經濟部統計處編制(2016)，外銷訂單金額[線上資料]，來源https://dmz26.moea.gov.tw/GMWeb/advance/AdvanceQuery.aspx [2019, October 25]。
戴錦周，何玉蘭(2011)，智慧資本對企業財務績效影響之探討—以台灣上市 (櫃) 半導體產業為例，國立臺中技術學院學報(15)，55-72。
二、英文部分
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 41-60.
Bontis, N., & Fitz-Enz, J. (2002). Intellectual capital ROI: a causal map of human capital antecedents and consequents. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 223-247.
Bontis, N., Keow, W. C. C., & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 85-100.
Bontis, N., Wu, S., Wang, W. Y., & Chang, C. (2005). Intellectual capital and performance in causal models. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), 222-236.
Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual Capital: Core Assets for the Third Millennium Enterprise. London: Thomson Business Press.
Brymer, R. A., Molloy, J. C., & Gilbert, B. A. (2014). Human capital
pipelines: Competitive implications of repeated interorganizatio-nal hiring. Journal of Management, 40(2), 483-508.
Bukh, P. N., Larsen, H. T., & Mouritsen, J. (2001). Constructing intel-lectual capital statements. Scandinavian Journal of Management,17(1), 87-108.
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50(6), 1393-1414.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
Chen, I. J., & Popovich, K. (2003). Understanding customer relationship management (CRM). Business Process Management Journal, 9, 672-688.
Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. M., & Choe, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, 35(3), 291-311.
Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2011). Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443.
Dang, V. T., & Lin, C.S. (2017). Using hierarchical linear modeling to test the effect of overall strategic fit on firm performance in different industry. Chinese Management Studies, 11(4), 637-657.
Delgado‐Verde, M., Navas‐López, J. E., Cruz‐González, J., & Amores‐Salvadó, J. (2011). Radical innovation from relations‐based knowledge: empirical evidence in Spanish technology‐intensive firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(5), 722-737.
Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York: Harper Business.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84(1), 66-83.
Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega, 17(3), 237-250.
Grillo, C., Ferreira, F. A., Marques, C. S., & Ferreira, J. J. (2018). A knowledge-based innovation assessment system for small-and medium-sized enterprises: adding value with cognitive mapping and MCDA. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(3), 696-718.
Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. (2005). When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), 1-24.
Juma, N., & Payne, G. T. (2004). Intellectual capital and performance of new venture high-tech firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 297-318.
Kim, J. O., Ahtola, O., Spector, P. E., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it: Sage.
Kweh, Q. L., Lu, W. M., & Wang, W. K. (2014). Dynamic efficiency: intellectual capital in the Chinese non-life insurance firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 937-951.
Lattin, J. M., Carroll, J. D., & Green, P. E. (2003). Analyzing multivariate data. Thomson Brooks.
Leal-Millán, A., Roldán, J. L., Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., & Ortega-Gutiérrez, J. (2016). IT and relationship learning in networks as drivers of green innovation and customer capital: Evidence from the automobile sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(3), 444-464.
Lu, W. M., & Hung, S. W. (2011). Exploring the operating efficiency of Technology Development Programs by an intellectual capital perspective-A case study of Taiwan. Technovation, 31(8), 374-383.
Lu, W. M., Wang, W. K., & Kweh, Q. L. (2014). Intellectual capital and performance in the Chinese life insurance industry. Omega, 42(1), 65-74.
Lu, W. M., Wang, W. K., & Lee, H. L. (2013). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: evidence from the US semiconductor industry. International Journal of Production Research, 51(19), 5683-5695.
Lu, W. M., Wang, W. K., Tung, W. T., & Lin, F. (2010). Capability and efficiency of intellectual capital: The case of fabless companies in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 546-555.
Marr, B., Gray, D., & Neely, A. (2003). Why do firms measure their intellectual capital? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 441-464.
Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211-224.
Maskey, R., Fei, J., & Nguyen, H. O. (2018). Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 34(2), 91-111.
McDowell, W. C., Peake, W. O., Coder, L., & Harris, M. L. (2018). Building small firm performance through intellectual capital development: Exploring innovation as the “black box”. Journal of Business Research, 88, 321-327.
Mubarik, M. S., Chandran, V., & Devadason, E. S. (2018). Measuring Human Capital in Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises: What Matters? Social Indicators Research, 137(2), 605-623.
Nourani, M., Ting, I. W. K., Lu, W.M., & Kweh, Q. L. (2019). Capital Structure and Dynamic Performance: Evidence From Asean-5 Banks. The Singapore Economic Review, 64(3), 495-516
O’Donnell, C. J., Rao, D. P., & Battese, G. E. (2008). Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical Economics, 34(2), 231-255.
Oh, D. H., & Lee, J. D. (2010). A metafrontier approach for measuring Malmquist productivity index. Empirical Economics, 38(1), 47-64.
Pastor, J. T., & Lovell, C. K. (2005). A global Malmquist productivity index. Economics Letters, 88(2), 266-271.
Riahi‐Belkaoui, A. (2003). Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(2), 215-226.
Samoilenko, S., & Osei-Bryson, K. M. (2008). Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA in the presence of the sample heterogeneity with cluster analysis and decision trees. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(2), 1568-1581.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American economic review, 51(1), 1-17.
Shrader, R., & Siegel, D. S. (2007). Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: Evidence from technology-based new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 893-908.
Stewart, T. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organizations. Nicholas Brealey, London.
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463.
Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
TSMC (2020). Edited Transcript:Q4 2019 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd Earnings Call [Online], Available： https://www.tsmc.com/uploadfile/ir/quarterly/2019/4t4NT/C/TSMC%204Q19%20transcript.pdf [2020, May 4].
Van Buren, M. E. (1999). A yardstick for knowledge management. Training & Development, 53(5), 71-78.
Vergauwen, P., Bollen, L., & Oirbans, E. (2007). Intellectual capital disclosure and intangible value drivers: an empirical study. Management Decision, 45(7), 1163-1180.
Wang, Q., Zhao, Z., Zhou, P., & Zhou, D. (2013). Energy efficiency and production technology heterogeneity in China: a meta-frontier DEA approach. Economic Modelling, 35, 283-289.
Wang, W. K., Chan, Y. C., Lu, W. M., & Chang, H. (2015). The impacts of asset impairments on performance in the Taiwan listed electronics industry. International Journal of Production Research, 53(8), 2410-2426.
Wang, W. K., Lu, W. M., Kweh, Q. L., & Cheng, I. T. (2014). Does intellectual capital matter? Assessing the performance of CPA firms based on additive efficiency decomposition DEA. Knowledge-Based Systems, 65, 38-49.
Wang, W. K., Lu, W. M., Kweh, Q. L., & Liu, Y. L. (2017). Decentralized and concentrated investments in China and the performance of Taiwanese listed electronic companies. Applied Economics, 49(25), 2443-2455.
Wu, W. Y., Tsai, H. J., Cheng, K. Y., & Lai, M. K. (2006). Assessment of intellectual capital management in Taiwanese IC design companies: using DEA and the Malmquist productivity index. R&D Management, 36(5), 531-545.
Zeghal, D. & Maaloul, A. (2010). Analysing Value Added as an Indicator of Intellectual Capital and its Consequences on Company Performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931011013325

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	智慧資本對公司績效之影響：以臺灣電子公司為例
2.	金融科技Bank 3.0前後期金融業效率與生產力之實證
3.	智慧資本與公司績效關聯性之研究--以獨立董監事監督效果作為調節變數
4.	智慧資本與軍民通用科技發展專案績效關聯性之研究
5.	餐旅業之智慧資本對經營效率之影響
6.	以智慧資本觀點評估臺灣IC設計產業之財務經營績效
7.	層級分析法與資料包絡分析法在智慧資本效率衡量之比較--臺灣半導體與光電產業之實證

1.	以公司生命週期觀點探討智慧資本調整機制在股權結構與公司績效關聯性之角色
2.	組織學習能力、智慧資本對公司績效影響之研究－以台灣資訊電子業為例
3.	公司治理、智慧資本及績效：台灣銀行業之實證研究
4.	結合平衡計分卡與智慧資本建構定期航運業經營績效評估模式之研究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	全球化下臺灣產業的轉型--空洞化抑或升級？
2.	從後進到先進的路徑--臺灣半導體產業的啟示
3.	護國神山的由來：再談台積電與臺灣經濟發展模式
4.	邁向高薪新世界：臺積電為何加薪？
5.	美中貿易戰之趨勢及對臺灣投資與貿易結構之影響
6.	臺灣IC產業發展之關鍵成功因素
7.	Exploratory Study of Stage Dependent Critical Success Factors in the Taiwanese IC Industry
8.	知識經濟之藍海策略--以臺積電成功作法為例
9.	Facilitating New Product Development with Collaborative E-Commerce System: An Investigation in Semiconductor Industry
10.	以臺積電個案探索晶圓代工之製程策略
11.	企業興業與成長：比較個案研究
12.	策略夥伴選擇準則與聯盟不穩定性之研究--以臺灣半導體製造業為例
13.	臺灣半導體產業之發展現況與展望
14.	高市值電子公司股價報酬率與營收成長率之關聯性研究
15.	創新型企業文化關鍵因素之探索性研究 -以T公司為例

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫