:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:義務教育階段資優學生補救教育措施之研究
書刊名:特殊教育研究學刊
作者:陳美芳 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Mei-fang
出版日期:2000
卷期:19
頁次:頁309-325
主題關鍵詞:資優低成就補救教育Gifted underachieversRemedial educationAdaptive education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:63
     本研究的目的在了解國內義務教育階段對資優學生實施補救教育的現況,先透過座談及文獻資料分析編製調查問卷,再調查840位來自全國不同地區、任教不同學科的國小及國中教師,分析他們對資優低成就學生適應問題的看法及對各類補救教育措施的了解與成效評估。研究主要發現如下:(1)「聰明但成績低落」及「某些才能出眾但成績平平」兩類學生都有學習態度不佳與動機低落的問題,聰明但成績低落學生出現外顯行為問題的比例至少約占五成,某些才能出眾但成績平平學生則出現內向及外向行為問題的比例各佔兩成。(2)調查對象認為教育或學校行政層級規劃的補救教育措施中效果較好的是技藝班、體育或才藝班,效果較差的是假期輔導及課後輔導;他們認為自己採取的措施中效果較好的是提供個別教學或輔導、教材與作業內容或方式的調整等,效果較差的是教家長如何協助孩子。整體而言,教師對自己採取的補救措施效果的評估似乎優於行政層級規劃的措施。(3)七成以上教師認同為資優學生提供彈性而具挑戰性的學習環境,但可能比較接受以充實為主的資優教育措施。
     The study aims to investigate the remedial education programs for the gifted students graded from 1 through 9 in Taiwan. Based on the penal discussion and literature review, a survey was carried out to investigate the effectiveness and problems of the remedial education implemented in Taiwan. The subjects were 840 primary and junior schools teachers derived from different areas in Taiwan. The major findings were: 1)Both gifted underachievers and students with plain achievement but some outstanding talent had the problem of inappropriate learning attitude or motivation. The specific adjustment problems were analyzed for both group. 2)In general, the effect of current remedial programs was reported to be moderately helpful. The effects of different types of programs or strategies were compared. 3)More than 70% subjects supported individualized flexible and challenge programs planed for gifted students.
期刊論文
1.陳美芳(19960600)。資優學生身心特質與評量。教育資料集刊,21,13-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Blackburn, A. C.、Erickson, D. B.(1986)。Predictable crises of the gifted student。Journal of Counseling and Development,9,552-555。  new window
3.吳裕益(1983)。低成就資優學生的教育。資優教育,9,1-5。  延伸查詢new window
4.曾建章(1996)。低成就資優學生之學習輔導。特教園丁,11(4),16-21。  延伸查詢new window
5.曾淑容(1983)。低成就資優學生自我觀念的增進。資優教育,9,6-9。  延伸查詢new window
6.Rimm, S. B.、Lowe, B.(1988)。Family environment of underachievement。Gifted Child Quarterly,36,100-105。  new window
學位論文
1.張月良(1983)。國中低成就學生心理輔果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣教育學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙曉美(1989)。歸因再訓練策略與成敗比率對國小低成就動機兒童的成就動機、自我概念、堅持力及歸因方式的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾琬淑(1994)。三種不補救教學方式對國小數學科低成就學生實施成效之比較研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳吉昌(1995)。國中數學科個別化補救教學實驗研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rimm, S.(1995)。Why bright kids get poor grades and what you can do about it。New York:Crown Trade Paperbacks。  new window
2.Whitmore, J. R.(1980)。Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
3.Bloom, B. S.、Sosniak, L. A.(1985)。Developing talent in young people。New York:Ballantine Books。  new window
4.Ford, D. Y.(1996)。Reversing underachievement among gifted black students: Promising practices and programs。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
5.National Commission on Excellence in Education(1983)。A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform: A Report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education。A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform: A Report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education。Washington, DC。  new window
6.Rimm, S. B.(1986)。Underachievement syndrome: Causes and cures。Underachievement syndrome: Causes and cures。Watertown, WI。  new window
7.Rimm, S. B.(1991)。Underachievement and superachievement: Flip sides of the same psychological coin。Handbook of gifted education。Boston, MA。  new window
其他
1.Ford, D. Y.,Thomas, A.(1997)。Underachievement among gifted minority students: Problems and promises,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Silverman, L. K.(1993)。Techniques for Preventive Counseling。Counseling the gifted and talented。Denver, Colorado:Love Publishing Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top