臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Faculty and Student Attitudes toward Student Ratings of Instruction
書刊名：花蓮師院學報
作者：張德勝 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Te-sheng
出版日期：2000
卷期：11
頁次：頁37-54
主題關鍵詞：Student ratings；Faculty evaluation；College teaching；Teachers college；學生評鑑教師教學；大學教師評鑑；大學教學；師範學院
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
　　　　　本研究主要的目的是探討台灣地區九所師範學院教師與學生對「學生評鑑教師教學」的態度，並進而比較師生對此制度看法的差異性。本研究以八十七學年度第二學期專任教師及在籍的學生為研究對象，共得有效樣本教師部份是456位，學生部份則為954位。研究工具為研究者自編的「師範學院師生對『學生評鑑教師教學』態度調查問卷」。研究結果如下： 教師與學生都同意學校實施「學生評鑑教師教學」制度，但是學生的同意度顯著高於教師的同意度。 學生比教師更同意將評鑑結果用於教師的人事決策及學生選課方面。教師與學生都認為教師的幽默感、科目的難度以及學生對科目的興趣會影響評鑑的結果。 教師認為「學生評鑑教師教學」結果不應該公佈在學校的刊物上；學生則持中立意見。 學生認為教師的等級、學位、性別和擁有國外求學經驗，不會影響評鑑結果；教師則持中立意見。 有關評鑑的實施技術方面，教師和學生都認為所有任課教師都應該接受評鑑。評鑑者則由正在修課的學生擔任。教師評鑑委員會應該負起評鑑工具編製的責任，且評鑑工具應以各系所統一為原則。評鑑的實施則以期末在教室內由班級代表主持為宜。
　　　　　The purpose of this article was intended to offer a further analysis of the related concepts of parental involvement in their children's school education, including the rationales for and barriers to parental involvement. The author strongly claimed that parents have legal rights to be involved in school activities to protect their children's educational interest. Parental involvement was also considered as a useful way to connect schools with communities, promote school accountability, enhance children's learning, and provide schools with needed resources. The author also suggested that parental involvement area should be extended to all aspects of their children's school life; however, the level of parental involvement might be different, based on parents' background and school context. Several factors were considered as barriers to parental involvement, such as the difference in SES (socio-economic status) between parents and school educators, school educators' concerns about parents' interference with school operation, school's limited institutional autonomy, the bureaucratic nature of school organizations, and the poor function of parents' organization. Strategies for facilitating parental involvement were suggested in the later part of this article, including diversifying the ways of parental involvement, designing parental involvement as the content of teachers' training program, implementing site-based school management policy, establishing home-school partnership, and strengthening the cooperation between schools and parents' organizations. In the final part, the author emphasized the importance of home-school partnership which is characteristic of shared sense of ownership, mutual respect, and equal status on both parts. The author concluded that parental involvement in school education should be considered as an evolving process, rather than a static status.
期刊論文
1.Abbott, R. D.、Wulff, D. H.、Nyquist, J. D.、Ropp, V. A.、Hess, C. W.(1990)。Satisfaction with processes of collecting student opinions about instruction: The student perspective。Journal of Educational Psychology，82，201-206。  new window
2.Dent, P.、Nicholas, T.(1980)。A study of faculty and students: Opinions on teaching effectiveness ratings。Peabody Journal of Education，57，135-147。  new window
3.Baxter, E. P.(1991)。The TEVAL experience 1983-1988: The impact of a student evaluation of teaching scheme on university teachers。Studies in Higher Education，16，151-178。  new window
4.Marlin, J. W.(1987)。Student perception of end-of-course evaluations。Journal of Higher Education，58，704。  new window
5.Ory, J. C.、Braskamp, L. A.(1981)。Faculty perceptions of the quality and usefulness of three types of evaluative information。Research in Higher Education，5，271-282。  new window
6.Wulff, D. H.、Staton-Spicer, A. Q.、Hess, C. W.、Nyquist, J. D.(1985)。The student perspective on evaluation teaching effectiveness。ACA Bulletin，53，39-47。  new window
7.Rich, H. E.(1976)。Attitudes of college and university faculty toward the use of student evaluations。Educational Research Quarterly，1，17-27。  new window
8.Ryan, J. J.、Anderson, J. A.、Birchler, A. B.(1980)。Student evaluation: The faculty responds。Research in Higher Education，12，317-333。  new window
9.Wachtel, H. K.(1998)。Student evaluation of college effectiveness: A brief review。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education，23(2)，191-211。  new window
10.Brandenburg, D. C.、Braskamp, L. A.、Ory, J. C.(1979)。Considerations for an evaluation program of instructional quality。CEDR Quarterly，12，8-12。  new window
11.Cohen, P. A.(1980)。Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings。Research in Higher Education，13(4)，321-341。  new window
12.Avi-Itzahak, T.、Kremer, L.(1986)。An investigation into the relationship between university faculty attitudes toward student rating and organizational and background factors。Educational Research Quarterly，10(2)，31-38。  new window
13.Marsh, H. W.(1987)。Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research。International Journal of Educational Psychology，11(3)，253-388。  new window
14.Marsh, H. W.、Roche, L.(1993)。The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness。American Educational Research Journal，30(1)，217-251。  new window
會議論文
1.Franklin, J.、Theall, M.(1989)。Who reads ratings: Knowledge, attitude and practice of users of student ratings of instruction。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。San Francisco。  new window
研究報告
1.Spencer, P. A.、Flyr, M. L.(1992)。The formal evaluation as an impetus to classroom change: Myth or reality?。Riverside, CA：Riverside Community College。  new window
學位論文
1.Spencer, K. J.(1994)。Student perspectives on course and teacher evaluations(博士論文)。Hofstra University，Hempstead, NY。  new window
圖書
1.Arreola, R. A.(1995)。Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System。Bolton, MA：Anker Publishing Company, Inc.。  new window
2.Centra, John A.(1993)。Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching faculty and determining faculty effectiveness。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
3.Peterson, Kenneth D.(1995)。Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices。Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
單篇論文
1.Jacobs, L. C.(1987)。University faculty and students' opinions of student ratings，Bloomington, IN：Bureau of Evaluative Studies and Testing。(ED 291 291)。  new window
2.Stevens, G. E.(1978)。Teaching by whose objectives? The view of students and teachers(ED 193 580)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Marsh, H. W.、Dunkin, M. J.(1992)。Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective。Higher education: Handbook of theory and research。New York：Agathon Press。  new window
2.Cranton, P. A.、Knoop, R.(1991)。Incorporating job satisfaction into a model of instructional effectiveness。Effective practices for improving teaching: New directions for teaching and learning。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：695（臺灣：673，外國：22） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2298792 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68101162
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上